


Ask the community...
Another thing to consider with your 529-to-Roth IRA rollover: make sure you're within the new $35,000 lifetime limit for these rollovers. The SECURE 2.0 Act created this option but with a cap. If you've done previous rollovers or plan to do more in the future for other kids, keep track of your total.
Thanks for mentioning the lifetime limit - I had completely forgotten about that! This is actually our first 529-to-Roth rollover, so we're well under the $35,000 cap. Do you know if I need to report somewhere that we've used up $6,700 of our lifetime limit? I'm not seeing any specific form or box to track this.
There's currently no specific tracking mechanism on tax forms for the $35,000 lifetime limit. It's one of those things you need to track yourself, similar to backdoor Roth contribution history. When you file your taxes, you'll just report the qualified distribution from the 529 and the contribution to the Roth IRA separately. The IRS doesn't have a centralized system monitoring your progress toward the $35,000 cap, so keeping your own records is essential. I recommend creating a simple spreadsheet with dates, amounts, and which 529/Roth accounts were involved for each rollover you do.
One important detail - if your son is over 30, you CANNOT do the 529-to-Roth rollover at all. This is a common mistake and could result in taxes and penalties. The SECURE 2.0 Act only allows these rollovers for beneficiaries under 30.
One option nobody mentioned is to use your prior year K-1 amounts as estimates if the investments haven't changed much. That's what my CPA has me do - we file the extension, pay based on last year's K-1 amounts adjusted a bit for market conditions, and then file the final return when all K-1s arrive. As long as you pay at least 100% of your prior year tax liability (110% if your AGI is over $150k), you'll qualify for the safe harbor provision and avoid underpayment penalties even if your actual liability is higher.
Thanks for mentioning the safe harbor thing! I didn't know about the 100%/110% rule. So if I paid $30k in taxes last year, and my AGI was over $150k, I could just pay $33k with my extension and be safe from penalties even if I end up owing more later?
Yes, exactly! If you paid $30k last year and your AGI was over $150k, then paying $33k (110% of last year's liability) with your extension would protect you from underpayment penalties through the safe harbor provision, even if your actual 2024 liability turns out to be higher when all your K-1s arrive. Just remember this only protects you from the underpayment penalty. You'll still owe interest on any additional tax due from April 15th until you pay it. But the interest rate is much lower than the penalty would be, so it's definitely the way to go if you're dealing with late K-1 forms.
Has anyone used the IRS Online Payment Agreement to handle the additional tax due after K-1s finally arrive? My CPA suggested this last year when my K-1s showed I owed about $8k more than I paid with my extension.
I used it two years ago and it was actually pretty straightforward. You can set up a payment plan right on the IRS website as long as you owe less than $50,000. The interest rate is reasonable compared to credit cards, and the process was surprisingly easy. Just make sure you don't miss any payments or they can revoke the agreement.
Just wanted to add a practical tip from my bookkeeping experience - make sure you're getting receipts that clearly show the base payment and tip separately. When I work with clients who use Fiverr and other platforms, we set up a separate expense category called "Contractor Tips" distinct from "Contractor Payments" in the accounting software. This makes it much easier to track the total percentage you're tipping throughout the year. If you ever get audited, having this clear separation shows you're being transparent and organized. Both are fully deductible, but the separate tracking helps you analyze your spending patterns too.
That's a really helpful suggestion! Do you recommend any specific accounting software that handles this separation well? I'm currently just using spreadsheets but thinking of upgrading to something more professional.
QuickBooks Online handles this really well - you can create custom expense categories and even set up automation rules to categorize expenses based on keywords in the descriptions. So if your Fiverr receipts always have "tip" in a certain field, it can auto-categorize for you. FreshBooks is another good option that's a bit simpler and less expensive if you don't need all the features of QuickBooks. Both allow you to attach digital copies of receipts directly to transactions, which is super helpful for keeping everything organized for tax time.
Am I the only one who thinks it's weird that Fiverr taxes tips differently? I use Upwork and they treat the whole payment the same way. Makes me wonder if there's something about how Fiverr classifies tips that could affect the tax treatment on our end too...
Fiverr treats tips differently because they don't take a commission on the tip portion - it goes 100% to the freelancer. But from a tax perspective for the buyer, it doesn't matter. The IRS sees both the base payment and tip as business expenses as long as they're reasonable and for legitimate business purposes.
That makes sense, thanks for explaining! So essentially Fiverr is just being nice to the freelancers by not taking a cut of the tips, but for my tax purposes as the buyer, I can deduct the whole thing regardless. Good to know the platform's internal policies don't affect my tax treatment.
One thing nobody's mentioned is that you need to consider the overall tax bracket you're in to fully understand the impact of these deductions. If you're in the 24% bracket, then a $16,800 property tax deduction saves you about $4,032 in federal taxes, while the $13,200 property tax saves you about $3,168. But that $3k difference in property taxes means you're still paying about $10k more out of pocket even after tax savings. So Property A would actually leave you with more money overall despite the smaller deduction. Also, don't forget to factor in state taxes! Some states have limits on property tax deductions even if the federal government doesn't.
But doesn't a higher property value also mean better appreciation potential over time? Shouldn't that be factored into the decision too?
Yes, property appreciation is absolutely an important factor in your overall investment return! However, appreciation is completely separate from the tax deduction benefits we're discussing. Higher-value properties (which often have higher property taxes) may appreciate more in absolute dollar terms, but not necessarily at a higher percentage rate. You could have a $300K property that appreciates 5% annually ($15K) while a $500K property might only appreciate 3% annually ($15K). The appreciation rate depends more on location, neighborhood development, and local market conditions than on the property tax amount.
Has anyone used TurboTax for reporting rental property income and expenses? I'm trying to figure out if it handles all these property tax deductions correctly or if I need something more specialized for rental properties.
I've used TurboTax for my 3 rental properties for years. It does a good job with the basic Schedule E stuff including property taxes, HOA fees, mortgage interest, etc. Just make sure you're using at least the Premier version which includes the rental property features. The basic versions don't have the rental property support.
Astrid BergstrΓΆm
The mortgage interest deduction is totally broken. It's supposed to help the middle class achieve homeownership but primarily benefits wealthy people with million-dollar mortgages. Regular people take the standard deduction anyway so they get zero benefit from this supposedly "middle class" tax break. Meanwhile the rich get to deduct interest on enormous loans for vacation homes. I'd cap it at $500k loans max and only for primary residences.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
β’I disagree completely. The mortgage interest deduction is one of the few tax breaks that helps the middle class. Not everyone who itemizes is "rich" - in high cost areas like California or New York, even modest homes can cost $750k+. Taking this away would crush homeowners in those regions.
0 coins
Astrid BergstrΓΆm
β’The data doesn't support that position. About 80% of taxpayers now take the standard deduction after the 2017 tax changes, meaning they get zero benefit from the mortgage interest deduction regardless of whether they're homeowners. The primary beneficiaries are households making over $200k. In high-cost areas, I'd support adjusting the cap based on local median home prices rather than having a flat national cap. But the current system primarily benefits the wealthy while doing very little to expand homeownership rates for middle-income families, which was supposedly its purpose.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Anyone want to talk about the "qualified business income" deduction? 20% tax break just for owning certain kinds of businesses while employees get nothing? My brother-in-law restructured his consulting work as an LLC and suddenly gets to deduct 20% of his income... meanwhile I do THE EXACT SAME JOB as an employee and get nothing. And don't get me started on the arbitrary rules about which businesses qualify!
0 coins
Chloe Martin
β’Yes! This is so messed up. My neighbor is a doctor who works at a hospital (doesn't qualify for the deduction) but her husband is a lawyer who set up his own practice and gets the full 20% QBI deduction. They make similar incomes but he pays way less in taxes. Makes no sense.
0 coins