Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.
$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just got mine today! Filed Jan 29, got regular refund Feb 12, CTC hit my acct this AM. Was getting worried tbh. Checked the IRS2Go app every day lol. No status updates until it suddenly appeared. Hang in there!
Same situation here! Filed Feb 8th, got my regular refund on Feb 28th, but still waiting on CTC. After reading through all these responses, I'm feeling a bit more reassured that it's normal to be in different batches. Going to check my account transcript tomorrow for any TC 766 codes like @Melissa Lin mentioned. It's frustrating not knowing which wave you're in, but sounds like most people are getting theirs within the expected timeframes. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread has been super helpful!
Join the conversation
Success story here! My return was in the errors department for EXACTLY the same reason. • Filed on February 2nd with unemployment income reported • Return went to errors department around February 15th • No communication from IRS during this time • Transcript updated on March 9th showing processing complete • Refund deposited on March 14th The key is patience. They're just verifying the information against state records. Unless they contact you specifically asking for something, there's nothing you need to do except wait.
Thanks for sharing your experience! I'm dealing with the same situation right now - my return has been in the errors department for about 10 days due to unemployment compensation reporting. It's reassuring to hear from so many people who've been through this process. The IRS agent I spoke with mentioned it could take 2-4 weeks, which aligns with what others are saying here. I'm trying to stay patient and avoid the temptation to call every day for updates. Has anyone found that checking the transcript daily actually shows meaningful progress, or does it just update all at once when the review is complete?
Join the conversation
Make sure to keep copies of EVERYTHING. Print your original return, the new 1040-X, and especially receipts showing the vehicle sales tax you paid. I did a similar amendment last year and the IRS sent me a letter asking for proof of the sales tax.
How long did your amendment take to process? I filed one in March and still haven't heard anything.
Hey Zoe! I went through this exact same situation a few months ago. The good news is that filing an amendment isn't as scary as it seems, and it definitely won't trigger an audit just because you're adding a legitimate deduction you forgot. A few things to keep in mind beyond what others have mentioned: 1. Make sure you have your vehicle purchase documentation handy - the sales contract, registration, and any receipts showing the exact sales tax amount. The IRS may ask for proof. 2. Double-check whether claiming the sales tax deduction is actually better than your state income tax deduction. You can only pick one, so run the numbers both ways. 3. When you fill out the 1040-X, be very clear in the explanation section about what you're changing and why. Something like "Adding previously omitted vehicle sales tax of $2,700 to Schedule A itemized deductions." The whole process took about 12 weeks for me to get my additional refund, so don't panic if it takes a while. Just make sure to keep copies of everything you submit!
Join the conversation
Another option: call the investment company and ask for a draft or preliminary K-1. Many partnerships have rough numbers before the final K-1s are issued. They might not offer this unless you specifically ask, but I've gotten drafts before when I pushed them. Just explain your filing deadline dilemma.
I actually tried that already! Called them twice and they claimed they don't have even preliminary numbers yet because they're "waiting on information from upstream investments" or something like that. Seemed like an excuse to me, but they wouldn't budge.
That's frustrating! In that case, I agree with the other suggestions about estimating based on last year. One thing to add - make sure you document your attempts to get the information. Save emails, note dates of phone calls, etc. This creates a paper trail showing you made good-faith efforts to report accurately. If your investment is with a larger company, try escalating to a manager or investor relations. Sometimes the frontline support people just give standard answers, but someone higher up might be more helpful.
Important detail - make sure to attach a statement to your return explaining the missing K-1 situation if you decide to file with estimates! This has saved me before. Write something like "The K-1 from XYZ Partnership (EIN XX-XXXXXXX) was not provided by the extended filing deadline despite multiple requests. Income reported is estimated based on prior year amounts and will be amended when the K-1 is received." This documentation helps establish good faith compliance.
Does this statement need specific formatting or can you just type it up and include it with your return? If filing electronically, where do you attach this explanation?
For electronic filing, you can usually attach the statement as a PDF in the "Additional Forms" or "Supporting Documents" section of your tax software. If your software doesn't have that option, you can include the explanation in the "Other Information" field on Form 1040 or add it as a rider statement. For paper filing, just staple it to your return. Keep it simple - one page explaining the situation, the partnership's name and EIN, and that you're using good faith estimates. The IRS just wants to see you made a reasonable effort to comply despite the third party delay.
Malik Jenkins
One creative approach I haven't seen mentioned: have you considered a Deferred Compensation Plan for the partnership? Instead of receiving equity upfront, you could structure it so the S-Corp promises to transfer shares over time based on performance metrics. This spreads out the taxable events and potentially reduces overall tax burden if your tax bracket varies year to year. For your loss from the business sale, look into Form 1244 stock treatment if applicable. If you originally qualified, you might be able to treat a portion of your losses as ordinary rather than capital, which would help offset your income.
0 coins
Yara Assad
•The deferred compensation idea is interesting. Would that still give me voting rights and other partnership benefits from day one? Or would those phase in as the shares transfer? I'm concerned about having a say in business decisions if I'm taking on partnership responsibilities.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
•You can structure the agreement to give you voting rights and management authority separate from the economic interest. Many partnerships have provisions where newer partners get full voting rights immediately but the economic interest transfers over time. The operating agreement can be drafted to give you authority in business decisions from day one while still deferring the actual ownership transfer for tax purposes. This separates the control aspects from the economic aspects, which is relatively common in professional service firms.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
Important question: Is the existing S-corp providing you these shares as compensation for services or are you buying in with your own money? The tax treatment is completely different. If they're compensating you with shares, that's ordinary income. If you're investing capital, you're creating basis in the shares without immediate tax consequences. From what you described, it sounds like they're gifting you equity as compensation, which creates the big tax hit. Consider restructuring as a capital contribution where you invest in the company (possibly with a loan to finance the purchase).
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Not OP but quick follow-up - if you're buying in with your own money, what's the point? Aren't you just trading cash for equity of equivalent value? Seems like a wash.
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
•@Eduardo Silva The point isn t'that you re'getting something for nothing - you re'right that it s'essentially a wash in terms of net worth. The benefit is avoiding the immediate tax hit on $2.6M of ordinary income. When you buy in with your own money, you re'creating basis in the shares without triggering a taxable event. The $2.6M becomes your cost basis, so you only pay taxes later when you sell or receive distributions above that basis. Compare that to receiving the shares as compensation, where you d'owe roughly $900K in taxes immediately as (OP mentioned but) have no cash to pay it. You d'be forced to take distributions from the company just to cover the tax bill, which creates a messy situation for everyone involved. @Freya Andersen is spot on - the structure matters way more than the economics here.
0 coins