


Ask the community...
One important thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - make sure you keep ALL documentation about the custody situation! If the ex tries to claim the child (which happens a lot in these situations), both returns will get flagged and you'll need to prove your case. Documents you should keep: - Copy of the court order showing custody - School records showing the child's address - Medical records you've paid for - Documentation of support you've provided (receipts for clothes, food, etc.) - The protection order documentation - Calendar or records showing the actual days the child was in each home The IRS will side with whoever files first initially, then you'll have to prove your case if there's a dispute. With a court order though, you're in a strong position.
Thanks for this detailed list! We actually have most of these documents already because of the custody situation. The court order is definitely the strongest piece, but I hadn't thought about keeping a calendar of the actual days. That's really smart, especially for the first half of the year when he was with us most nights but not all. Do you know if there's a specific form I need to fill out to claim him since he's not my biological child? Or do I just list him as a dependent when filing?
You'll list him as a dependent on your tax return just like you would any other dependent. There's no special form required specifically because he's not your biological child. The regular dependency forms (Form 1040 and the associated schedules) are all you need. When you're entering his information in your tax software or forms, you'll need to specify your relationship to him. Since he's not related to you by blood or marriage, you would typically select "Other" and might need to write in something like "girlfriend's child" or "member of household" depending on the tax software you're using.
Has anyone mentioned the Child Tax Credit yet? If you can claim the girlfriend's son as your dependent, you might qualify for the Child Tax Credit which is worth up to $2,000 per qualifying child! That's a significant tax benefit. Just make sure you have his Social Security Number. The IRS requires this for claiming the Child Tax Credit.
The $0 balance just means they haven't assessed any tax due yet, not that you don't need to file. Definitely file for both years! The IRS computer systems don't automatically calculate taxes for non-filers - they wait until they process information returns (like 1099-INT for interest) and then may send notices if they detect unfiled returns. As a non-resident alien with US source income, you're generally required to file Form 1040-NR. Interest from US banks is usually taxable, and any gains from selling stocks on Robinhood would definitely be reportable. Don't wait for them to contact you - penalties and interest keep accumulating!
Thanks for explaining! Do you know if there's a way to check if they've received any information returns for me? Like the 1099-INT forms from my bank etc?
Yes, you can request your Wage and Income Transcript from the IRS, which shows all information returns filed under your SSN or ITIN, including 1099-INT forms from banks. You can request this online through the IRS website if you have an account set up, or by mail using Form 4506-T. Keep in mind that information returns for 2023 might not all be processed yet, as companies have until late January to file them. But you should definitely be able to see 2022 forms by now if they were submitted.
I think everyone's making this too complicated. If you're not a US resident anymore, you only need to file if you have US source income above the filing threshold. Interest from US banks and trading on US exchanges is typically US source income, so yeah, you probably need to file. The $0 balance just means nothing's been assessed yet. Did your Robinhood account send you any tax forms? If they did, the IRS probably has that info too, and they'll eventually come looking for a return.
This isn't exactly right. Non-resident aliens have different filing requirements than US citizens/residents. Even if all US tax was properly withheld, you might still have a filing requirement to report the income. The rules around effectively connected income vs FDAP income are complex.
Another angle to consider - check if you received any cash in lieu of fractional shares during the conversion. Sometimes during these acquisitions, if the conversion ratio doesn't result in whole shares, you'll get cash for the fractional parts, and THAT portion IS taxable. For example, if the conversion was 1.25 ORCL shares for each CERN share, and you had 10 CERN shares, you'd get 12 ORCL shares plus cash for the 0.5 share. Check your Morgan Stanley statements carefully to see if this might be what the IRS is actually flagging.
Good point! I just double-checked my statements and there was actually a small cash payment of $37.42 for a fractional share. But the CP2000 is claiming I owe taxes on the entire value of all converted shares, not just this tiny cash amount. Could this small cash payout be why the entire transaction got flagged?
Yes, that's exactly what probably happened! The cash-in-lieu payment triggered a report to the IRS, but then the entire transaction got mischaracterized. This is super common. Your response to the CP2000 should acknowledge this small taxable amount (the $37.42) but explain that the remainder of the transaction was a tax-free reorganization. Include your Morgan Stanley statements showing both the share conversion and the small cash payment. The IRS should adjust their proposed assessment to only tax the cash portion, which would be a much smaller amount than what they're currently claiming.
Make sure you keep records of your original cost basis for those CERN shares! Even though the conversion itself isn't taxable, you'll need that information when you eventually sell the ORCL shares. Your basis carries over from the CERN shares. I made this mistake during a similar situation and had a nightmare trying to calculate my gains when I sold years later. Morgan Stanley should have this info, but in my experience, it sometimes gets lost in these conversions.
For your S-corp situation, don't forget you might still be able to set up and fund a SEP IRA for 2022 if you didn't already max out other retirement contributions. The deadline for SEP IRA creation and funding is your tax filing deadline including extensions, so you should still have time. You could contribute up to 25% of your net self-employment income (with some calculation adjustments) or $61,000 for 2022, whichever is less. Might be worth looking into if you have the cash flow and want to reduce your 2022 tax bill!
That's really helpful! Do you know if I can have both a Solo 401k and a SEP IRA for the same business? And does the contribution limit apply across both plans or separately?
You can have both types of plans, but the contribution limits overlap - they're not separate. The total combined employer contributions across all defined contribution plans (401k, SEP IRA, etc.) can't exceed the annual limit ($61,000 for 2022 or $67,500 if you're eligible for catch-up contributions). If you've already made employer contributions to your Solo 401k for 2022, you'd need to subtract those from the maximum SEP IRA contribution you could make. It gets complicated quickly, which is why having a tax pro run the numbers is usually worth it. The key advantage is that you can still set up and fund a SEP IRA now for 2022, whereas the Solo 401k needed to be established by Dec 31, 2022.
Has anyone switched from an S-corp to a C-corp for better retirement options? My accountant suggested I might be better off switching my entity type next year.
I did this last year. C-corps have some advantages for retirement planning (like the ability to create defined benefit plans with much higher contribution limits), but the tax situation gets WAY more complicated. You're looking at potential double taxation issues that can offset the retirement benefits.
Andre Dupont
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if your mother-in-law is from Canada, check if there's a tax treaty that might affect this situation. Some treaties have specific provisions about dependents and what counts as "residency" for tax purposes.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
ā¢Do you know where I can find info about tax treaties? My in-laws are from India and I've wondered about this too.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
ā¢You can find tax treaties on the IRS website - search for "United States Income Tax Treaties A to Z" and you'll find a list of all countries with treaties. For more detailed information, look for IRS Publication 901 (U.S. Tax Treaties). For India specifically, there is a tax treaty, but dependency rules are complex. The treaty mainly covers things like double taxation of income, but personal exemptions and dependent status are usually determined by the regular IRS rules I mentioned earlier.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
If the mother visits from Canada for 8 months, wouldn't she technically be considered a US resident under the substantial presence test? That might change things completely.
0 coins
Mei Lin
ā¢Good point! I think the substantial presence test is 183 days (about 6 months) in a calendar year, so at 8 months she'd likely meet that. Would that make her ineligible as a dependent?
0 coins