


Ask the community...
Something people forget is that LLC fees vary by state! In California, there's an $800 annual fee just to have an LLC, which would eat up a chunk of your $12,000 income. In Wyoming, it's only $50 annually. Definitely check your state's fees before deciding. Also, don't overlook that you can deduct legitimate business expenses as a sole proprietor without having an LLC. You just file Schedule C with your regular tax return.
Do all states have annual fees for LLCs? That might be a dealbreaker for me since my side gig only makes about 8k a year.
Not all states have the same fee structure. Some have low or no annual fees, while others like California are expensive. For example, Wyoming, New Mexico, and Arizona have very low annual fees under $100. If you're only making about $8k a year, you definitely need to calculate if the fees make sense for your situation. In many cases for smaller side hustles, operating as a sole proprietor and maximizing your eligible deductions on Schedule C is the most cost-effective approach. Just make sure you have good records of all business expenses and consider getting business insurance for liability protection instead of relying on an LLC structure.
Another angle: if you ever plan to get a mortgage while running your side hustle, lenders sometimes look at sole proprietor income differently than LLC income. My lender wanted 2 years of consistent LLC income before they'd count it toward my qualification. Something to think about if house buying is in your future!
One approach that helped me was timing recognition of income. Since India's tax year runs April-March and US is calendar year, you can sometimes recognize income strategically. For example, selling assets in India between January-March gives you time to plan how that income affects your US taxes. Also look into DTAA (Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement) provisions specifically for NRIs - there are exemptions for certain types of interest and capital gains.
Could you explain more about timing the income? I have some mutual funds in India I'm planning to sell. Would it be better to sell in January or March? And does it matter which bank account (NRE or NRO) I deposit the proceeds into?
Selling in January-March gives you more flexibility because you'll have that income in the current Indian tax year but can include it in next year's US taxes. This gives you almost a year to plan your overall tax strategy. For your mutual funds, it also depends on whether they're equity or debt funds, as they're taxed differently in India. As for accounts, it generally doesn't matter for US tax purposes whether you use NRE or NRO accounts - the US taxes worldwide income regardless. For Indian tax purposes, moving proceeds to an NRE account can sometimes offer advantages, but consult with an advisor about your specific situation.
Has anyone ever considered giving up their US green card to solve this problem? I'm thinking about moving back to India in a few years, and the double taxation is making me wonder if maintaining US person status is worth it.
Be careful with that approach. Giving up a green card after holding it for 8+ years can trigger the "exit tax" if you meet certain income/asset thresholds. The IRS treats it as if you sold all your worldwide assets on the day before expatriation. It's a pretty serious decision with long-term consequences.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - with income going from $27k to $54k, you probably jumped into a higher tax bracket. A lot of people don't realize that our tax system is progressive, meaning different portions of your income get taxed at different rates. Make sure you're taking all possible deductions too. At that income level with kids, make sure you're claiming: - Child Tax Credit - Child and Dependent Care Credit (if applicable) - Education credits if any of your kids are in college - Retirement contributions which can lower your taxable income
I thought tax brackets might be part of it. So even though I'm in a higher bracket, is it only the amount above the previous bracket that gets taxed at the higher rate? I always get confused about how that works. Also, do you know if there's any way to figure out what the "sweet spot" is where I'm making good money but still getting decent credits/refunds? Feels like I need a spreadsheet to figure all this out.
That's exactly right! Only the money that falls into each bracket gets taxed at that bracket's rate. For example, if the 12% bracket ends at $45,000 and the 22% bracket starts at $45,001, only the $9,000 of your income above $45K gets taxed at 22%. The first $45K is still taxed at the lower rates. There isn't really a "sweet spot" because making more money is always better overall. However, there are certain income thresholds where credits phase out quickly. For a family of four, the EITC phases out rapidly between $45K-$59K depending on filing status. The Child Tax Credit starts phasing out at much higher incomes ($200K for single, $400K for married filing jointly).
Has anybody else had issues with the irs e-file system this year? My return keeps getting rejected but doesn't explain why.
Just fyi, your college's athletic department or compliance office probably has resources to help student athletes with NIL tax issues. Many schools now offer tax workshops specifically for athletes with NIL deals. Might be worth checking with them before paying for outside help.
This is terrible advice. My school's "tax workshop" was just a generic presentation that basically said "NIL is taxable, consult a tax professional." They wouldn't answer specific questions because they were afraid of giving "tax advice." Complete waste of time.
I actually did try talking to our compliance office first, but they just gave me a generic handout about "tax implications" without any specific guidance. They said they aren't allowed to give tax advice and told me to talk to an accountant. Didn't even mention quarterly estimated payments at all, which seems like a pretty important detail!
Something important that nobody has mentioned - if your NIL payment came directly from your university rather than an outside company, make sure they classified it correctly! My school initially misclassified my NIL as a scholarship on my 1098-T form, which would have made it tax-free if used for educational expenses. I had to get them to correct it and issue a 1099 instead. Definitely double-check whatever tax documents you receive from the school in January before filing. A friend of mine ended up getting audited because the university reported the income in two different ways.
Oh that's super helpful. My school's athletic department handles NIL deals through their foundation, and I've been wondering how that would show up on tax forms. Did you have to request the 1099 or did they eventually send the correct form automatically?
I had to specifically request the 1099 after I noticed the error. They initially included the NIL payment on my 1098-T, which is only supposed to show tuition and qualified scholarships. When I questioned it, they admitted it was an error because their system wasn't set up properly for NIL payments yet. I'd recommend calling your school's foundation office directly in January if you don't receive a 1099-NEC or 1099-MISC by the end of the month. Don't just assume they'll handle it correctly, especially since NIL is still relatively new for most university accounting systems. It's better to address any issues before you file your taxes than have to amend returns later.
Andre Dupont
Something similar happened to my brother. Turns out the brokerage reported the distribution on a 1099-R form instead of properly coding it as an inheritance distribution. The IRS computers automatically categorized it as a retirement distribution and applied ordinary income tax rates. You need to get a copy of whatever 1099 forms were filed. Look at Box 7 on any 1099-R forms - there should be a distribution code. If it's coded incorrectly, that's your problem right there. Also, don't wait to respond to the IRS notice. The interest and penalties will keep accumulating while you figure this out. At minimum, send a letter stating you dispute the assessment and are gathering documentation to prove it was inheritance, not income.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
ā¢This is super helpful, thank you! I just called the estate attorney and she's going to send me copies of all the paperwork including the 1099 forms. She seemed to think it was probably a coding error too. Do you know if I need to file an amended return or is a dispute letter enough?
0 coins
Andre Dupont
ā¢If you never reported this money as income on your original tax return (which you shouldn't have if it was inheritance), then you don't need to file an amended return. You just need to respond to the IRS notice with a clear explanation and documentation. Your response should include: 1) Death certificate copy, 2) Documentation showing you were a beneficiary, 3) Any incorrect 1099 forms with an explanation of why they're wrong, and 4) Documentation of the step-up basis if there were securities involved. If all this seems overwhelming, it might be worth paying a tax professional who specializes in estates for a one-time consultation.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Has anyone considered that maybe there WERE taxable elements to this inheritance? If the dad had traditional IRAs or 401ks, those distributions to heirs ARE taxable as income (unlike regular investment accounts). Same with any savings bonds that had deferred interest. Getting all the documentation is definitely step one, but don't automatically assume it's all a mistake. The tax rules around inherited retirement accounts changed significantly in 2020 with the SECURE Act.
0 coins
ThunderBolt7
ā¢This is a really important point. My family went through this with my grandmother's IRA. We all got distributions and ALL of it was taxable because it was a pre-tax retirement account. The step-up basis rules don't apply to IRAs and 401ks the same way they do to regular investment accounts. OP specifically mentioned it was "not an IRA" but sometimes people don't realize what type of accounts they're inheriting. If it was any type of retirement account (traditional IRA, 401k, 403b, etc.), those distributions are definitely taxable.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
ā¢Thank you for bringing this up! I'm 100% sure it was a regular brokerage account and not a retirement account. I just got off the phone with the estate attorney who confirmed it was a non-retirement investment account, so it should have gotten the step-up basis treatment. She's going to send me all the documentation tomorrow, but she believes Fidelity incorrectly coded the distribution which is why the IRS thinks I owe taxes. I'll update once I know more!
0 coins