


Ask the community...
Something people haven't mentioned yet - make sure you're using the correct business code on your Schedule C! Since this is just a bonus payment, you should probably use code 711510 (Independent artists, writers, and performers) or something similar. Also, make sure you're tracking your estimated tax payments for next year. When you get 1099 income without tax withholding, you might need to make quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid penalties. For a one-time bonus it might not matter, but it's good to know!
Estimated tax payments? Ugh, this is getting more complicated by the minute! My bonus was about $8,500 - do I really need to worry about estimated payments for next year? I thought that was only for people who are actually self-employed year-round.
For a one-time payment of $8,500, you probably don't need to worry about estimated payments for next year. The requirement typically kicks in if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in taxes when you file. Since this was just a one-time thing and not ongoing self-employment income, you should be fine without making estimated payments. Just be prepared that you'll owe both income tax and self-employment tax (about 15.3%) on that bonus amount when you file. If possible, set aside roughly 25-30% of the bonus amount for taxes so you're not caught off guard when you file.
Has anyone else had their employer incorrectly issue a 1099-NEC for what clearly should have been W-2 income? I'm pretty sure sign-on bonuses should typically be on your W-2, not a 1099. Might be worth asking your employer about this because it could be a mistake?
This happens more often than you'd think. Companies sometimes try to save on their portion of employment taxes by incorrectly classifying employees as contractors. A sign-on bonus for a regular employment position should usually be on a W-2. If it's a substantial amount, it might be worth asking your HR or payroll department to correct it. But keep in mind that if you push back, they might get defensive since fixing it would cost them money.
One thing to consider with these lead fee arrangements is whether the fee is truly for lead generation or if it's a revenue split. The distinction matters for tax reporting. True lead generation fees (where you pay for being connected to a client) are service payments requiring a 1099. But if you're operating under a revenue-sharing agreement where they're essentially a partner in the business relationship, the reporting requirements might differ. I learned this the hard way when the IRS questioned our reporting of fees that were actually structured as commission splits. Worth looking at the exact language in your agreement.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Looking back at our contract, it specifically describes the fee as "payment for client acquisition services" rather than a revenue share. Would that language definitely make it a service requiring a 1099?
Based on that contract language, yes, it would most likely be considered a payment for services that requires a 1099. When the contract specifically calls it "payment for client acquisition services," the IRS would typically view that as you purchasing a service from them. If it were structured as a revenue split or commission arrangement, the contract would usually contain language about "shared revenue" or "commission splits" and might include different terms about the business relationship. The specific language in contracts really matters when determining tax reporting requirements, so you're on the right track focusing on those exact terms.
Am I the only one who's CPA handles all this? š I just forward these types of questions to my accountant and they figure it out. Last year we had like 17 different lead generators and marketing partners with various fee structures and my CPA sorted it all out.
Not everyone can afford a CPA, especially small businesses just starting out. I do my own taxes to save money and questions like this are really important for DIY tax filers.
That's a fair point. I didn't mean to sound dismissive. I started doing my own taxes too but switched to a CPA once these business relationships got complicated. For DIY filers, I think the main thing is documenting everything clearly - get those W-9s from anyone you pay, track all payments meticulously, and maybe consider investing in good accounting software that flags when you need to issue 1099s. The peace of mind is worth it, even if you're handling tax filing yourself.
One thing nobody mentioned - if you're doing renovations before renting, keep EXTREMELY detailed records of everything. Take before and after photos of all work done. I got audited last year specifically on my rental property improvements and had to prove which were repairs vs capital improvements. The difference in tax treatment is huge.
What counts as "detailed records"? I've been keeping receipts but not much else. Should I be doing more?
Receipts are a good start, but you should also note exactly what each expense was for. Create a spreadsheet that categorizes everything as either a repair or improvement. Take dated photos before, during, and after major work. Keep copies of contracts with any contractors. For example, don't just have a receipt that says "bathroom work - $3,500." Have documentation showing it was a complete bathroom remodel with new fixtures, tile, etc. This makes it clear it's a capital improvement rather than a repair. The IRS can get very picky about what qualifies as an immediate deduction versus what must be depreciated.
Has anyone used TurboTax for reporting rental property? I've used it for years for my personal taxes but never for a rental. Not sure if it can handle all the depreciation and improvement tracking properly.
Just a simple example that helped me understand depreciation recapture: Say you buy a rental for $200k (with land worth $40k). You can depreciate $160k (building only) over 27.5 years = about $5,818/year. You own it for 5 years, claiming $29,090 total in depreciation. You sell for $220k. Most people think: I bought at $200k, sold at $220k, so my profit is $20k. IRS thinks: Your adjusted basis is $200k - $29,090 = $170,910. Your total gain is $220k - $170,910 = $49,090. Of that gain, $29,090 is depreciation recapture (taxed up to 25%) and $20k is capital gain (taxed at lower capital gains rates). This is why you pay tax on more than just the $20k difference between buying and selling prices.
Thanks for this breakdown - super helpful! Quick question: If I sell a rental after owning for the full 27.5 years, would I still have depreciation recapture? Or would it be fully depreciated at that point?
If you sell after the full 27.5 years, you would still have depreciation recapture, but it would be on the entire depreciable amount of the building. After 27.5 years, your basis in the building portion would be $0 (assuming no improvements were made along the way). So if you sold, all of the building portion of your sale price would be subject to depreciation recapture at the 25% rate. The land portion would be calculated separately as a capital gain. Many investors avoid this recapture tax by doing 1031 exchanges into new properties, which allows you to defer both the capital gains tax and the depreciation recapture tax. However, this is just deferring the tax - not eliminating it completely.
Does anyone know if you can avoid depreciation recapture if you convert your rental back to a primary residence before selling? I've heard conflicting things about this.
Unfortunately, converting to a primary residence doesn't help with depreciation recapture. You'll still have to pay recapture tax on ALL depreciation taken while it was a rental. The primary residence conversion can help with capital gains (you might qualify for the $250k/$500k exclusion), but the IRS specifically requires recapture of depreciation regardless of the property's status when you sell. The only way to avoid recapture is with a 1031 exchange into another investment property, but that just defers it - you'll face recapture eventually when you finally sell without exchanging.
Anastasia Romanov
Just a heads up - I tried doing MFS in California (community property state) using Free Fillable Forms last year and ended up filing on paper because I couldn't get past the verification errors. This year I did successfully e-file, but I had to do something a bit different. Instead of entering the W-2s exactly as shown on the forms, I entered them with already-calculated 50% amounts. So if my spouse's W-2 showed $80,000 in wages and $15,000 in withholding, I entered a W-2 for them showing $40,000 and $7,500 on my return. It felt wrong doing it this way since it doesn't match the actual W-2, but Form 8958 properly showed the allocation, and the verification passed with this method. Just another option if you're struggling with the override approach.
0 coins
StellarSurfer
ā¢Isn't that technically incorrect though? I thought you're supposed to report the full W-2 amounts exactly as they appear on the forms, then use Form 8958 to show the allocation. Wouldn't entering modified amounts on the W-2 entries potentially cause issues?
0 coins
Anastasia Romanov
ā¢You're absolutely right that it's not the technically correct way to do it. The proper way is to enter the W-2s as they appear and then use Form 8958 to allocate. However, Free Fillable Forms has this verification issue that prevents many people from e-filing when done the correct way. It's one of those situations where the system limitation forces a workaround. The important thing is that the final tax calculation is correct and Form 8958 properly shows the community property allocation. I spoke with a tax professional before doing it this way, and they said that as long as Form 8958 is included and properly shows how you derived your numbers, it should be fine. The IRS is ultimately looking at your taxable income, withholding, and whether you've properly split community property income.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
Has anyone tried paper filing instead? After struggling with FFF for weeks last year (California MFS), I just printed everything out and mailed it. Took forever to get my refund but at least I didn't have to deal with the verification errors.
0 coins
Zara Malik
ā¢Paper filing works but it's sooo slow right now. I paper filed my MFS return from Washington state last year and it took almost 7 months to get my refund. The IRS is still catching up on their backlog.
0 coins