


Ask the community...
Another option would be to make your "regular" commute officially part of your podcast business. Like, you could rebrand your show to specifically review your commute route businesses and traffic patterns daily. Then your commute becomes the actual content creation time and location for your business. My brother-in-law did something similar with his photography business where he specifically focused on documenting his daily train commute and now sells prints. The IRS has never questioned his deductions since the commute literally IS his business.
Is this actually legit though? Seems like you're just trying to find a loophole that would get flagged in an audit. Can you really just "decide" your commute is now your business?
It's not about "deciding" your commute is your business - it's about actually establishing a legitimate business purpose that happens to use your commute route. My brother-in-law's commute photography project generates actual income through print sales, and he has documentation showing the business purpose of each trip. You'd need to be able to show that your podcast is truly focused on your commute route specifically, with actual content about locations along that route, and that you're consistently creating content during those drives. You also need real income from it. The IRS looks at whether there's a profit motive and if the activity is carried out in a businesslike manner. It's not a loophole if it's actually a legitimate business activity.
Don't forget that if you use the standard mileage rate (which most people should), you can't also deduct individual car expenses like gas, insurance, maintenance, etc. The standard rate (62.5 cents per mile for 2025) is supposed to cover all those costs. But if your car is expensive to operate, you might want to calculate actual expenses instead. Just keep ALL receipts and determine the percentage of business use vs personal use. And whichever method you choose in the first year you use the car for business, you're pretty much locked into for the life of that vehicle!
One other thing to consider is that you'll need to fill out a Schedule C for your podcast income, which means you'll pay self-employment tax on that income (about 15.3%). So make sure your deductions are actually saving you more than you're paying in SE tax if this is a small side hustle.
Don't make the mistake I made! I paid our nanny as an independent contractor for almost 2 years because she asked for it that way. Got audited last year and ended up owing over $3,400 in back taxes, penalties, and interest. The IRS agent specifically said nannies who work in your home and follow your schedule almost never qualify as independent contractors. If your nanny is pushing for contractor status, it's usually because they want to avoid paying their portion of FICA taxes. But you as the employer will be the one who gets hammered if you misclassify them.
That sounds really scary! But what if both people agree to the arrangement? Like if we both sign a contract saying she's an independent contractor, wouldn't that protect me?
Unfortunately no, a contract doesn't override IRS classification rules. I actually had a written agreement with my nanny stating she was an independent contractor, and the IRS basically said that document wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. The classification is determined by the actual working relationship, not what you call it in a contract. Since I controlled when and how she worked, provided all the equipment/supplies, and she only worked for our family, the IRS said she was clearly an employee regardless of what we agreed to between ourselves.
Has anyone used a nanny payroll service? I'm thinking of signing up for one to handle all this tax stuff. Seems like it might be worth the money for peace of mind.
Another thing your husband should consider is liability insurance. As a 1099 contractor, he likely needs his own liability coverage for any damages or injuries he might cause. As a W-2 employee, he'd typically be covered under the company's insurance. Also, if he's been paying quarterly estimated taxes as a 1099, he wouldn't need to do that as a W-2 since taxes would be withheld from each paycheck. Might seem minor but it does simplify things.
This is a really important point about liability that people often overlook. My brother-in-law is a contractor and was sued when a cabinet he installed fell and injured someone. His own insurance had to cover it, but if he'd been an employee, the company's insurance would have handled everything.
You're absolutely right about the liability risks. I've seen contractors face devastating financial consequences when something goes wrong on a job and they discover their insurance coverage had gaps. Company insurance policies typically have much higher coverage limits than individual policies. The other consideration is workplace injuries. As a W-2 employee, workers' comp would cover medical expenses and lost wages if your husband gets injured on the job. As a 1099, he'd need his own disability insurance policy, which can be expensive for high-risk trades like carpentry.
Has anyone mentioned the new tax rules for 1099 reporting? Starting with the 2025 filing season, the threshold for requiring 1099-NEC forms dropped significantly. So even small payments to contractors require reporting now. I'm wondering if that's part of the company's motivation - they're trying to simplify their reporting requirements by making more people W-2 employees.
Yes! This has been causing chaos in my industry (graphic design). All of my small clients are suddenly panicking about paperwork. Some have even told me they're only working with LLCs now because they don't want to deal with 1099s for individuals anymore.
One thing to watch out for with excess HSA contributions - you need to remove not just the excess amount but also any earnings specifically attributable to that excess portion. When I had a similar situation, my HSA provider calculated this as: (Excess amount) ร (Total earnings รท Total account value) ร (Time excess was in account รท 365) It wasn't a huge amount in my case (about $38 on a $1200 excess), but if you don't remove the earnings along with the excess, the IRS considers it an incomplete correction.
That formula is super helpful, thank you! Does the HSA provider typically issue any special tax form for the earnings on the excess that I need to watch for next year? I want to make sure I report everything correctly.
Yes, you'll receive a 1099-SA from your HSA provider that shows the distribution, and there should be a code indicating it was an excess contribution removal. The earnings portion will need to be reported as "Other income" on your tax return for the year you take the distribution (so likely 2025 tax return if you're handling this now). Also, your HSA provider should send you a Form 5498-SA showing your total contributions for the year, but this typically doesn't reflect the removal of excess contributions in a way that's immediately clear. You'll need to keep good records of the excess removal to reconcile everything when you file.
Has anyone dealt with this situation where you have to remove excess HSA contributions but you've already spent some of the money on qualified medical expenses? I'm in a similar situation to OP but I've used about half of my HSA funds already this year.
This gets tricky. When you remove excess contributions, you're technically removing the most recent contributions first. If you've spent HSA funds on qualified medical expenses, those distributions are considered to have come from your valid contributions first, not the excess. So even if you've spent money from your HSA, you still need to remove the full excess amount (plus earnings). You'll need available funds to do this. If your current HSA balance is less than the excess amount you need to remove, you may need to add funds back temporarily just to facilitate the removal.
Chloe Anderson
Your sister should definitely file as Head of Household and claim the CTC/ACTC herself. What matters for the qualifying child test is that the child doesn't provide more than half of their own support (which obviously a 4-year-old doesn't). It doesn't matter who between your sister and your parents provides more support. The key thing is that your sister maintains the home where she and her child live. Even if your parents help financially, if the payments are going to her (not directly to landlords), then she's still "maintaining the home" for HOH purposes. Your parents can't claim your niece as a qualifying child because she doesn't live with them. I went through this exact situation with my daughter when my parents were helping me through nursing school. The IRS confirmed I was the proper person to claim the credits.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
โขThanks so much for sharing your similar experience! So just to be crystal clear - even though my parents are paying for a lot of my sister's expenses directly (they write checks to her landlord and utility companies), she can still claim her daughter for the CTC/ACTC as long as her daughter lives with her? But for HOH status, it matters whether my parents give the money to my sister first or pay the bills directly?
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
โขYes, your sister can claim her daughter for CTC/ACTC regardless of who pays the bills, as long as her daughter lives with her for more than half the year and meets the other qualifying child tests. For Head of Household, it does matter who physically pays the household expenses. If your parents pay bills directly, those amounts don't count toward your sister "maintaining the home." She would need to pay more than half the total costs of keeping up the home using her own money (which could include money your parents give directly to her). If your parents are paying most bills directly, she might not qualify for HOH status, but she could still file as Single and claim her daughter for the child tax credits.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
This might be a dumb question, but what's the actual difference in dollars between your sister filing as Single with a dependent vs. Head of Household with a dependent? The CTC/ACTC would be the same either way if she can claim her child, right? The only difference would be the tax brackets and standard deduction?
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
โขNot a dumb question at all! For 2023 taxes, the standard deduction for Single is $13,850 while Head of Household is $20,800 - that's almost $7,000 difference! Plus HOH has more favorable tax brackets. With your sister's income at $18,500, this could mean several hundred dollars more in her refund. The CTC/ACTC amounts are the same either way, but the HOH filing status itself is valuable.
0 coins