Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Caden Turner
I feel your pain! Same thing happened to me - couldn't access my transcript online for ages due to some verification glitch. What finally worked for me was going to an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center in person with my ID and Social Security card. They were able to reset my online access on the spot. You can find your nearest office on the IRS website and make an appointment. It's a bit of a hassle but way faster than waiting weeks for mail delivery!
Join the conversation
Has anyone mentioned the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction implications? Section 199A treats rental real estate differently depending on whether it qualifies as a trade or business. In my experience, rental real estate usually gets better QBI treatment as a partnership than as an S corp because of the W-2 wage limitations. Since rental properties often don't have significant W-2 wages, S corps can actually limit your QBI deduction potential.
Charlie Yang
ā¢This is a really good point. Our CPA told us the same thing when we were considering converting our rental LLC. The QBI deduction can be up to 20% of qualified business income, but S Corps have that wage limitation that can really restrict it for real estate businesses without employees. Also, doesn't the QBI deduction phase out completely after 2025 anyway? I thought that was part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expiration.
Malik Thomas
You're absolutely right about the QBI implications - this is often overlooked but critical for real estate businesses. The W-2 wage limitation can severely restrict QBI deductions for S Corps in rental real estate, since most rental properties don't generate significant W-2 wages. And yes, the QBI deduction is set to expire after 2025 under current law, but given how popular it's been, there's a good chance Congress will extend it. Even if it does expire, the analysis between partnership vs S Corp treatment would still favor partnerships for most rental real estate scenarios. Between the built-in gains tax, basis step-up issues for succession planning, reasonable compensation requirements, and QBI limitations, it really seems like the partnership structure is superior for your father-son rental real estate business. The main benefits of S Corp election (avoiding self-employment tax on distributions) don't typically apply to passive rental income anyway. I'd strongly recommend getting a comprehensive analysis done before making any changes. The timing restrictions mean you can't easily reverse an S Corp election if you realize it was the wrong choice.
Join the conversation
QuantumQuest
Has anyone run into issues with their tax software not allowing you to leave the 199A fields blank? I'm using ProSystems and it keeps giving me a diagnostic error when I try to leave those fields empty, even though all my partners are C-Corps.
I use ProSystems too and had the same issue. What worked for me was putting zeros in all the 199A fields rather than leaving them blank. The software accepted that and didn't throw any errors. Just make sure you've properly identified each partner as a C-Corporation in the partner information screen.
QuantumQuest
ā¢Thanks, that worked perfectly! I tried putting in zeros instead of leaving them blank and the diagnostic errors went away. Seems like a software limitation rather than an actual requirement, but at least there's a workaround.
PaulineW
Great discussion everyone! As someone new to partnership taxation, I really appreciate seeing the consensus here. It's reassuring to know that leaving the 199A section blank (or entering zeros) for C-Corp partners is not only acceptable but actually the correct approach. I'm curious though - for those of you who have been doing this for years, have you ever had a client question why their K-1 doesn't have the 199A information? I imagine most C-Corp clients wouldn't even notice, but I'm wondering if anyone has had to explain this to a client who was expecting to see that section completed. Also, does anyone know if there are any proposed changes to the 199A reporting requirements that might affect this in future tax years?
Great questions! In my experience, C-Corp clients rarely ask about the missing 199A information because their tax preparers typically handle the K-1s and understand that C-Corps can't use the deduction anyway. The few times I've had to explain it, I just mention that the 199A deduction is only for individual taxpayers and pass-through entities, so C-Corporations don't need that information on their K-1s. Regarding future changes - I haven't seen any proposed regulations that would change the 199A reporting requirements for C-Corp partners. The fundamental issue is that C-Corporations are subject to their own tax rates and aren't eligible for the individual QBI deduction, so there's no logical reason they would need this information in future years either. The 199A deduction itself is currently set to expire after 2025 unless Congress extends it, but even if they do extend it, I can't imagine they would make it available to C-Corporations given how the corporate tax structure works.
Join the conversation
This whole situation is so messed up. We're in the middle of a pandemic, people are struggling, and the government can't even get their act together to help us. It's disgraceful š¤
Omar Zaki
I completely understand your frustration! I went through the exact same thing a few months ago. Here are a few additional tips that helped me: 1. Try calling different regional offices - sometimes one office is less busy than others 2. Keep a log of when you call and what happens - it helps track patterns 3. If you do get through, ask for a direct callback number for follow-ups 4. Document everything in writing (emails, letters) as backup Also, don't feel bad about exploring that paid service @Liam mentioned if you're really stuck. Sometimes $20 is worth your sanity and time. The system shouldn't be this broken, but we have to work with what we've got. Hang in there - you'll get through this! šŖ
Sofia Ramirez
lol this is literally why i stopped volunteering for dorm events. my hall director had me buy $200 of halloween decorations "to be reimbursed" and then made me fill out 5 different forms and wait 2 months to get my money back. and yeah they wanted a w9 too. the whole university system is broken
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
ā¢This is why u always get the money upfront if possible! I learned that lesson freshman year when I fronted $80 for a movie night and didn't get paid back for like 3 months. Now I just say "I can organize it but someone else needs to buy the stuff" or I get a university card from the RD to make the purchase directly.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
ā¢yeah exactly, lesson learned! now i just say no unless they give me the cash or a p-card first. not worth the paperwork headache and waiting forever to get my own money back.
0 coins
KhalilStar
Current university tax specialist here - you're absolutely right to ask about this! The W9 is completely standard procedure and doesn't change the tax treatment of your reimbursement. Since you have receipts showing you purchased supplies for an official university event, this should be processed as a non-taxable reimbursement. The university is just following their accounting protocols by collecting your tax ID information upfront - it's much easier for them to get a W9 from everyone than to determine case-by-case who might need one later. One tip: when you submit your reimbursement request, make sure to clearly label it as "Event Supply Reimbursement" and attach all your receipts. This helps their accounting team code it correctly in their system. Also keep copies of everything for your records - the receipts, the W9, and any emails about the reimbursement. The $145 amount is well below any threshold that would trigger additional scrutiny. You should receive your money back without any tax implications as long as everything is properly documented as a reimbursement rather than payment for services.
0 coins
Victoria Brown
ā¢This is super helpful, thank you! I was definitely overthinking the whole situation. One quick follow-up question - should I be concerned if the university takes a while to process the reimbursement? I know some people mentioned waiting months, and I'm wondering if there's a reasonable timeframe I should expect or if I need to follow up proactively. Also, when you say "clearly label it as Event Supply Reimbursement" - is that something I write on the W9 form itself, or just in the email/paperwork when I submit everything together?
0 coins