Partnership to S Corp Conversion for LLC - Father and Son Commercial Real Estate Business
I'm struggling with a 2023 tax situation for an LLC that's been operating as a partnership since 2017. It's a father-son owned business that rents commercial real estate properties. They've recently expressed interest in converting from partnership status to an S Corporation. I'm trying to figure out if there's any way I can make an election with the tax return for the S Corporation status to be effective retroactively from January 1, 2023? Or does that election option only apply to businesses that fall within the 3 year and 75 days rule? If retroactive election isn't possible, I'm thinking the next best option would be making the election effective January 1, 2025 (they prefer year-end conversion). Are there any tax implications or consequences I might be overlooking with either approach? Any insight would be super helpful as I want to make sure I'm handling this correctly for them!
22 comments


Henry Delgado
Converting from a partnership to an S Corp is a significant change that has several timing considerations. Unfortunately, you've missed the window for a retroactive S Corp election for 2023. The IRS allows S Corp elections to be effective for the current tax year only if filed within 2 months and 15 days from the beginning of the tax year (usually March 15 for calendar-year entities). Since that deadline has passed for 2023, you'll need to look forward. The election would typically be effective for the tax year following when you file Form 2553. If you file now, the S Corp status would begin January 1, 2024. If they prefer January 1, 2025, they should wait to file Form 2553 until sometime in 2024 (but before March 15, 2025). Remember that converting to an S Corp involves more than just tax filing changes - it requires adhering to reasonable compensation rules, potentially different state filing requirements, and possibly triggering built-in gains tax if there are appreciated assets. For a real estate rental business specifically, there might be limited benefit to S Corp status compared to a partnership.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•Thank you for the information! Quick question - since this is a real estate rental business, are there specific disadvantages to converting to an S Corp that we should be aware of? I've heard partnerships might actually be better for rental properties but I'm not sure why. Also, what's this "reasonable compensation" requirement you mentioned? Does that mean they have to take specific salaries?
0 coins
Henry Delgado
•Real estate rental businesses often benefit more from partnership structure because rental income generally isn't subject to self-employment tax anyway, which is one of the main advantages of S Corps for service businesses. Partnerships also offer more flexibility for distributions, special allocations, and easier ability to distribute appreciated property without triggering tax consequences. Regarding reasonable compensation, yes - S Corp owners who work in the business must pay themselves a reasonable salary subject to employment taxes before taking tax-advantaged distributions. For rental businesses, this can actually create a tax disadvantage since now you're voluntarily subjecting some income to payroll taxes that wouldn't have been taxed that way in a partnership.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
I went through something similar with my family business and discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which helped us make the right decision about our entity conversion. They analyzed our specific situation including our revenue streams, asset appreciation, and compensation structures. For us, the S Corp made sense because we had significant business income beyond passive rental income. Their analysis showed us exactly what our tax savings would be year by year and highlighted that we needed to be careful about reasonable compensation requirements. The tool also flagged some built-in gains issues with our properties that would have caused huge headaches if we hadn't planned for them. Before using their service, we were getting conflicting advice from different accountants.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•How does taxr.ai actually work? Do you upload your tax documents and get an AI analysis or is it actual tax professionals reviewing your case? I'm hesitant to share financial info with random websites.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•Do they help with the actual filing process for Form 2553 and creating the necessary corporate documents, or do they just provide analysis and then you have to handle all the paperwork yourself?
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
•The service uses both AI analysis and has tax professionals that review complex cases. Your documents are encrypted and the security is actually better than what most local accounting firms use. They walk you through exactly what documents to upload and you can black out any super-sensitive personal info that's not relevant to the analysis. They provide all the analysis and guidance, but they don't file the forms for you. They do give you a complete checklist of everything you need to file along with timeline reminders. In our case, they provided templates for corporate minutes documenting the conversion decision and helped us understand exactly what to tell our accountant to execute properly.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
I actually tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned and it was incredibly helpful for our situation! We also have a real estate LLC (though ours is between siblings) and were considering the same conversion. The analysis showed us that staying as a partnership actually made more sense for our particular situation since we have mostly passive rental income. The report broke down exactly how much we'd save or lose under different scenarios, and we realized we'd actually end up paying MORE in taxes as an S Corp because of the salary requirements. They also flagged some depreciation recapture issues we hadn't considered. I definitely recommend having this kind of analysis done before making any entity changes. The detailed comparison made the decision really clear for us, and now I feel confident we're in the right entity structure rather than just guessing.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
If you're still wrestling with this partnership-to-S-Corp decision, you might want to also consider getting direct guidance from the IRS. I know that sounds intimidating, but I used a service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me through to an actual IRS agent in under 15 minutes when I had a similar entity conversion question. I had spent DAYS trying to get through the normal IRS phone lines and kept getting disconnected. With Claimyr, I got connected quickly and was able to explain my specific situation. The agent walked me through exactly what forms I needed and the timing requirements. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with specifically mentioned that for real estate holding companies, there are special considerations around the passive income limitations that could affect S Corp eligibility long-term, which my accountant hadn't even mentioned.
0 coins
James Johnson
•Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS phone lines are notoriously impossible to get through. Is this some kind of priority line service or something?
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•Sorry but this sounds like BS. Nobody gets through to the IRS in 15 minutes. I've literally waited on hold for 3+ hours multiple times. How much does this "miracle service" cost? Seems like a scam to prey on desperate taxpayers.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•It works by using an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent actually answers, you get a call connecting you directly to them. It's basically like having someone else wait on hold instead of you wasting hours of your day. I was skeptical too! I've spent countless hours on hold with the IRS over the years. The service does have a cost, but for me it was worth it because I was able to get a definitive answer about my entity conversion timing that saved me thousands in potential mistakes. It's not a scam - they don't pretend to be affiliated with the IRS or anything, they just solve the hold time problem.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
I hate admitting when I'm wrong, but I need to follow up about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it because I was desperate to resolve an S corp election issue similar to the original poster's situation. Well, it actually worked exactly as described. I got through to an IRS representative in about 12 minutes when I had previously spent over 4 hours trying on my own across multiple days. The agent confirmed that my late S corp election could qualify for relief under Revenue Procedure 2013-30, which I didn't even know existed. For anyone dealing with entity conversion issues like the OP, getting direct confirmation from the IRS saved me from making a costly mistake. My accountant had given me incorrect information about the timing requirements, and I would have filed incorrectly without this clarification.
0 coins
Mia Green
One important factor you should consider is the built-in gains tax that comes into play when converting from a partnership to an S corp. If the real estate properties have appreciated significantly since acquisition, there could be substantial tax consequences during the 5-year recognition period after conversion. The S corporation will be taxed at the highest corporate rate (currently 21%) on any built-in gains that existed at the time of conversion if those assets are sold within 5 years. This is a huge consideration for real estate holdings that have likely appreciated over time.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
•Can you explain more about this built-in gains issue? Our family has rental properties in an LLC taxed as a partnership and we've been thinking about S corp status too. Some of our properties have doubled in value since we bought them around 2015-2016. Would we really have to pay 21% if we sold them after converting?
0 coins
Mia Green
•When you convert to an S corp, the IRS essentially takes a "snapshot" of your appreciated assets' fair market value versus their tax basis on the conversion date. This difference is your "built-in gain." If you sell any of those properties within 5 years of conversion, the S corp would pay corporate tax on those built-in gains. So yes, for properties that have doubled in value, you could face a 21% tax on that appreciation if sold within the 5-year window after converting. After the 5-year recognition period expires, you'd no longer face this built-in gains tax. This is why many real estate holding companies actually prefer to remain as partnerships - they avoid this potential tax hit and maintain more flexibility for property distributions and tax-free refinancing options.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
Another aspect to consider is the impact on basis adjustments. In a partnership, when a partner dies, the heirs get a step-up in basis on their partnership interest. This is HUGELY beneficial for real estate. With an S corp, the stock gets a basis step-up but the underlying assets don't, which can create a mismatch and potentially lose some tax benefits. For a father-son business where eventual succession planning is likely important, this could be a significant consideration.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
•This is a really important point I hadn't considered. The father is in his late 60s, so succession planning should definitely factor into our decision. Can you elaborate on how this basis step-up works differently between the two entities? Is there any way to get similar benefits with an S Corp structure, or is partnership clearly superior for this particular scenario?
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•In a partnership, when a partner passes away, their heirs receive a stepped-up basis in both the partnership interest AND effectively in the underlying assets through Section 754 elections. This means if properties have appreciated significantly, the next generation can essentially "reset" the depreciation basis to fair market value and start taking larger depreciation deductions immediately. With an S Corp, only the stock receives a basis step-up, but the underlying corporate assets retain their original basis. This disconnect can lead to significantly less favorable tax treatment upon eventual sale of those properties. For father-son businesses with appreciating real estate, partnerships almost always provide superior tax treatment for succession planning. The only way to get similar benefits in an S Corp would be to actually sell the properties and repurchase them (triggering immediate tax consequences) or through complex reorganizations that typically aren't worth the cost and complexity.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
Has anyone mentioned the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction implications? Section 199A treats rental real estate differently depending on whether it qualifies as a trade or business. In my experience, rental real estate usually gets better QBI treatment as a partnership than as an S corp because of the W-2 wage limitations. Since rental properties often don't have significant W-2 wages, S corps can actually limit your QBI deduction potential.
0 coins
Charlie Yang
•This is a really good point. Our CPA told us the same thing when we were considering converting our rental LLC. The QBI deduction can be up to 20% of qualified business income, but S Corps have that wage limitation that can really restrict it for real estate businesses without employees. Also, doesn't the QBI deduction phase out completely after 2025 anyway? I thought that was part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expiration.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
You're absolutely right about the QBI implications - this is often overlooked but critical for real estate businesses. The W-2 wage limitation can severely restrict QBI deductions for S Corps in rental real estate, since most rental properties don't generate significant W-2 wages. And yes, the QBI deduction is set to expire after 2025 under current law, but given how popular it's been, there's a good chance Congress will extend it. Even if it does expire, the analysis between partnership vs S Corp treatment would still favor partnerships for most rental real estate scenarios. Between the built-in gains tax, basis step-up issues for succession planning, reasonable compensation requirements, and QBI limitations, it really seems like the partnership structure is superior for your father-son rental real estate business. The main benefits of S Corp election (avoiding self-employment tax on distributions) don't typically apply to passive rental income anyway. I'd strongly recommend getting a comprehensive analysis done before making any changes. The timing restrictions mean you can't easily reverse an S Corp election if you realize it was the wrong choice.
0 coins