


Ask the community...
Something no one has mentioned yet - your employer's HR/benefits system might already have this calculator built in. I discovered that our Workday system has a "paycheck simulator" that lets you adjust contributions and see the impact on take-home pay. It's super accurate because it already has all your specific benefit options programmed in. Worth checking your company's HR portal before looking elsewhere. The benefit is that it will be pre-loaded with your company's specific benefit options and contribution limits.
That's a great suggestion I hadn't thought of! Do you know if these built-in calculators typically handle all the different pre-tax options and show the tax implications clearly? Our HR system is ADP but I haven't fully explored all its features.
Most employer HR systems with these calculators do handle all the pre-tax options specific to your company's benefits package. They're usually more accurate than generic calculators because they're configured with your exact benefit structure. ADP definitely has this feature! Look for something called "Paycheck Modeling" or "Net Pay Calculator" in your ADP portal. It should let you adjust all available pre-tax deductions and show exactly how they affect your take-home pay. If you can't find it, ask your HR department - sometimes these features aren't enabled by default.
Has anyone tried TurboTax's W-4 withholding calculator? It's not exactly what you're looking for, but I found it helpful for optimizing overall tax withholding while balancing pre-tax deductions. It helped me avoid owing at tax time while maximizing my monthly take-home pay.
I use the TurboTax tool every year after doing my taxes. It's decent but doesn't really show the impact of changing pre-tax deductions in real-time. It's more focused on getting your W-4 withholding right than optimizing across different pre-tax options. I ended up using a combination of that plus a separate calculator for my 401k/HSA decisions.
Thanks for the feedback! You're right that it's more withholding-focused. I just found it useful as one piece of the optimization puzzle. I've been looking for something more comprehensive that shows the trade-offs between different pre-tax options in real-time.
One thing to consider - if you're operating as a partnership, make sure to keep VERY detailed records of how much money comes in and how it's split between you two. My friend and I did YouTube stuff together and it became a huge mess at tax time because we didn't document everything properly. Also, don't forget about self-employment taxes! Each of you will need to pay these on your portion of the partnership income (currently 15.3% on net earnings). You might want to make quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid a big bill and potential penalties at tax time.
How do we handle the expenses for equipment and software? We've been sharing the costs pretty informally. Do we need to track every single purchase?
You absolutely need to track every single purchase related to your YouTube work. Keep all receipts (digital or physical) and note which partner paid for what. The partnership should track all these expenses, even if they came from personal funds. For equipment and software, these are legitimate business expenses that can offset your income. Just make sure you're only deducting the business portion (if you also use things personally). You'll need to decide if certain equipment should be depreciated over time rather than expensed immediately - this depends on cost and expected useful life.
Has anyone mentioned the option of just filing separately? Like couldn't the roommate just report all the income on their Schedule C and then just give the other person "gifts" that wouldn't be taxable? Seems easier than all this partnership stuff.
That's actually tax fraud and could get both of them in serious trouble. The IRS isn't stupid - they know people try these "creative" approaches. What you're describing is trying to avoid paying self-employment taxes and income taxes by mischaracterizing business income as gifts. The company clearly views them as a single business entity, which is why they're asking for one W-9. The proper way to handle this is exactly what the top comments suggest - file as a partnership, get an EIN, and each partner reports their share of income on their personal returns.
One option nobody's mentioned is just switching tax software. I left TurboTax last year because of similar issues and started using FreeTaxUSA. It's much more straightforward about business forms and doesn't try to upsell you on everything. Just an idea if you're getting frustrated!
Does FreeTaxUSA handle business losses correctly though? I've heard mixed things about their self-employment features compared to TurboTax.
FreeTaxUSA has worked perfectly for my small business for the past two tax seasons. Their interface for business income and expenses is actually cleaner and more straightforward than TurboTax in my opinion. Their system for tracking loss carryforwards works well too - it automatically pulls the information from your previous year's return if you used them before, or you can enter it manually if you're switching from another service. The best part is they don't lock features behind paywalls or make you wait for "form availability" like TurboTax does.
Have u already entered the business as inactive or closed in TurboTax? Sometimes thats all u need to do and it will stop asking for forms. I had this issue last yr with schedule C stuff from my etsy shop that i closed in 2021.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - with a SaaS business at your profit level, you should also consider the QBI (Qualified Business Income) deduction implications between LLC and S-corp. At $700k profit, you're well above the phase-out thresholds for service businesses (which starts around $170k for single filers), but SaaS businesses can sometimes qualify as non-service businesses depending on how they're structured and operated. If your business qualifies as non-service, the S-corp could be even more beneficial because you might get a partial QBI deduction on the distribution portion. But if it's considered a service business, the QBI might be completely phased out at your income level regardless of entity structure. Have you had anyone analyze whether your specific SaaS might qualify for QBI as a non-service business? That could add tens of thousands more in tax savings.
I haven't had anyone look at the QBI angle for my business specifically. Could you explain a bit more about what makes a SaaS qualify as non-service vs service? My platform is completely automated with very little direct customer support or customization.
For SaaS businesses, the distinction between service and non-service for QBI purposes comes down to whether your business relies on the reputation or skill of its owners/employees. Fully automated platforms with minimal human intervention tend to have a stronger case for non-service classification. Key factors that help qualify as non-service: if your software operates with minimal customization, if customers use it without your direct involvement, if it's standardized rather than tailored to specific clients, and if the value comes from the technology itself rather than your expertise. Your description of an automated platform with little customer support actually sounds promising for non-service classification. I'd recommend getting a tax professional to document these aspects of your business carefully, as qualifying for QBI at your income level could mean an additional $140k deduction (20% of your profit), which is substantial.
What tax software have people found most helpful for handling S-corp returns for solo businesses? I'm planning to make the switch but wondering if I can still do it myself or if I absolutely need to hire someone.
Jabari-Jo
Going back to your original question about Thomson OneSource - one thing to consider is the size of your tax team. We found it was overkill for our needs when we only had two people handling tax matters. The system seems designed for larger departments with specialized roles. The reporting capabilities are excellent though, especially for executive presentations and audit preparation. If your company has complex holdings or multi-entity structures, OneSource handles the consolidations very well.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
β’That's really helpful. We have 3 people on our tax team right now, but we're planning to grow. Would you recommend starting with something simpler and migrating later, or just jumping into OneSource to avoid multiple transitions?
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
β’With a team of 3, I'd probably recommend starting with something simpler unless your corporate structure is already quite complex. The licensing and implementation costs for OneSource are substantial, and you won't utilize many of the advanced features right away. If you're definitely planning to grow significantly in the next 1-2 years, it might make sense to start with OneSource to avoid multiple transitions. But if growth will be more gradual, you could save considerably by using a mid-tier solution for now and migrating when you have 5+ tax specialists.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
Has anyone used both Thomson OneSource and CCH Axcess? We're trying to decide between the two and I'd love to hear a comparison.
0 coins
Micah Trail
β’I've used both extensively. Thomson OneSource is stronger for corporate tax work, especially complex multi-entity structures. CCH Axcess has better workflow management and is more intuitive for new users. If you're primarily focused on corporate income tax with multi-state filings, Thomson has the edge. For a balanced practice with both individual and corporate clients, CCH might be better. Thomson's document management isn't as seamless as CCH's, but their calculation engine is more robust for complex scenarios.
0 coins