


Ask the community...
Something nobody has mentioned yet - you should check if your partner's plan is better than what your new job offers! Often workplace insurance plans vary DRAMATICALLY in quality, coverage, and cost. My husband's plan has a $500 deductible while mine was $3,000. We saved over $2,000 last year by putting me on his plan even though we had to pay extra for it. Even if you're allowed to stay on your partner's plan, it might not be the best financial choice depending on the details of both plans. Also consider that your job is temporary - if you take their insurance, what happens after 5 months? Would there be a gap before you could get back on your partner's plan? These practical considerations are just as important as the tax implications.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered! The job is offering a high-deductible plan ($2,750) while my partner's plan has a $1,000 deductible. And you're right about the gap - I'm not sure if there would be a waiting period to get back on his insurance after my job ends. Do you know if special enrollment periods apply when you lose job-based coverage?
Yes, losing job-based coverage does qualify as a special enrollment event that would allow you to join your partner's plan outside the normal enrollment period. You typically have 30 days from the loss of coverage to request enrollment in the new plan. As for the deductible difference, that's definitely something to consider carefully. Also look at the premium costs - what would your employer charge versus what your partner's paycheck deduction would be for adding you? Sometimes the premium difference can outweigh the deductible savings. And don't forget to compare the networks - make sure your doctors are covered in both plans before making a decision.
One thing to consider - if your temporary job is W-2 employment, you'll have taxes withheld automatically. But if it's 1099 contract work (which many temporary positions are), you'll need to set aside money for taxes yourself. At your income level jumping up suddenly, you might be surprised by how much you'll owe next year. Also, the $5,050 dependent limit for 2024 is for gross income. If your job is 1099, you can deduct legitimate business expenses which might keep your net income under the limit.
Just a quick tip - make sure you keep track of ALL your 1099 income and set aside money for taxes! I made the mistake of not saving enough for taxes my first year as a contractor and got hit with a huge bill plus underpayment penalties. The IRS wants quarterly estimated tax payments if you expect to owe more than $1000 in taxes. Wish someone had told me this when I started!
Thanks for mentioning this! Do I need to make those quarterly payments even if I still have my W2 job where taxes are being withheld? And roughly what percentage should I be setting aside?
Even with a W2 job, you might still need to make quarterly payments on your contractor income. It depends on how much you're making and if your W2 withholding covers your total tax liability. A safe approach is to set aside about 30-35% of your contractor income for taxes (federal, state, plus self-employment tax which is 15.3%). You can use the IRS withholding calculator to get a more precise estimate based on your total income from both sources. Some people also increase their W2 withholding instead of making separate quarterly payments - that's another option if your employer allows it.
Don't forget that as a contractor you'll be getting a 1099-NEC form (not 1099-MISC like in the old days) from whoever is paying you. This is what they'll send to the IRS to report how much they paid you. The W9 you're filling out now just gives them the info they need to create that 1099-NEC correctly.
Another option you might want to consider is a Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT). You contribute the appreciated asset to the trust, get an immediate partial tax deduction, and the trust sells the asset tax-free. The trust then pays you an income stream for life or a set period, and the remainder goes to charity when the trust ends. The math can work out quite well if you're planning to hold the asset long-term anyway. I did this with some tech stocks that had appreciated 1000% and it saved me a ton in capital gains while providing steady income.
Would this work for crypto? I've got some ETH that's gone up like crazy and I'm trying to figure out how to cash some out without giving half to Uncle Sam.
Yes, it can work for cryptocurrency. The key is that the trust sells it after you've donated it, so the trust itself doesn't pay capital gains tax on the appreciation. You'll need to find a trustee comfortable with handling crypto assets though, as some traditional trustees aren't familiar with the process. Keep in mind that you're ultimately giving a portion to charity - this isn't a strategy to avoid taxes completely while keeping all the money. But the tax benefits plus the income stream can make the math very favorable compared to just selling and paying capital gains tax directly.
Has anyone actually tried the S-Corp to Wyoming LLC to trust strategy the OP mentioned? I've heard claims that Wyoming entities provide strong asset protection, but I'm skeptical about the tax benefits. Seems like the IRS would see through this pretty quickly.
I looked into something similar for my business. The Wyoming LLC part can work for privacy and some liability protection, but it doesn't magically change your tax situation. The IRS follows the money regardless of how many entities you put in between. And trying to loan yourself money through your own entities gets really tricky really fast.
Don't forget to calculate if you're actually eligible for the full EIP amounts. If your income was over certain thresholds, the payment started phasing out. For single filers: - First payment: Phased out starting at $75,000 AGI - Second payment: Same threshold - Third payment: Had a faster phase-out rate If you had kids or dependents, that would have increased your payment amounts too. Make sure you're claiming the right amount when you file amended returns.
Thanks for mentioning this! My AGI was definitely under the threshold (around $27,500 that year), so I should have gotten the full amount. I don't have any dependents though. When filing the amended return, do I need to provide any proof that I didn't receive the payments?
You usually don't need to provide direct proof that you didn't receive the payments. The IRS can check their records to see if payments were issued to you. However, it helps to include a brief statement explaining that you never received the payments and are now claiming the Recovery Rebate Credit you were eligible for. If the IRS believes they already sent you the payments, they might reject your amended return. In that case, you would need to request a payment trace to determine what happened to those payments. But start with the amended return first since their records will likely show no payments were made.
I actually had issues with my EIP going to a closed bank account. If that happened to you, the bank would have rejected it and the IRS should have mailed you a paper check instead. Did you move during the pandemic? That could explain why you never got it.
This happened to me too! The IRS tried to deposit to my old bank account, it bounced, then they mailed a check to my old address. By the time I figured it all out, it was too late to request a trace. I had to claim it on my taxes.
I did move in late 2020, but I thought I updated my address with the IRS when I filed my 2020 taxes. Maybe the second or third payment got sent to my old place? The mail forwarding probably would have expired by then too. I'm definitely going to check out both the tax amendment option and trying to call the IRS directly to see what happened. This whole process is so frustrating!
Malik Johnson
Just wanted to mention that if you're really in a time crunch, you might consider using a Certified Acceptance Agent (CAA) for your ITIN application. They're authorized by the IRS to verify your identity documents, which means you don't have to mail your original documents or certified copies to the IRS. Many CAAs can process ITIN applications much faster than going directly through the IRS, and some even offer same-day service for the document verification part. They charge a fee, but in your situation, the time saved might be worth it.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
β’Do you know approximately how much CAAs typically charge? And do they actually speed up the IRS processing time or just the document verification part? I'm trying to decide if it's worth the extra cost.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
β’CAAs typically charge between $50-$300 depending on your location and the complexity of your situation. They don't actually speed up the IRS processing time for issuing the ITIN itself, but they eliminate a huge bottleneck in the process - the document verification stage. When you apply on your own, the IRS has to verify all your identity documents before even starting to process the ITIN application, which can add weeks. CAAs are pre-authorized to do this verification, so your application enters the IRS system at a more advanced stage. Another benefit is that you keep your original documents, which reduces risk and stress.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Has anyone tried filing with "ITIN Applied For" and then amending the return later when the ITIN comes through? My accountant suggested this as an option but I'm worried it will trigger an audit or other issues.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
β’I did exactly this last year. You can write "ITIN Applied For" on your tax forms and file them with your W-7 application. Once the IRS processes your ITIN application, they'll associate the number with your already-filed return. Just make sure to keep copies of EVERYTHING.
0 coins