


Ask the community...
To all those having trouble reaching a human at IRS. I just ran across this video that gave me a shortcut to reach a human. Hope it helps! https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c
If your call gets after paying for the service, you should definitely contact Claimyr's customer support immediately. Most legitimate callback services have policies in place for technical issues like this. Document the time of disconnection and your payment confirmation. You can also try calling the directly using their main line (1-800-829-1040) - while wait times are long, it's free. For future reference, consider calling early morning or late in the week when call volumes might be lower.
Thanks for this helpful advice! I'm actually dealing with this exact situation right now. My call got cut off yesterday after waiting 2 hours through Claimyr and I haven't heard back yet. I'll definitely reach out to their customer support like you suggested. The early morning tip is gold - I never thought about timing my calls strategically. Has anyone else had success getting through to the directly in the early hours?
@Oscar Murphy Yes! I ve'had great success calling the directly around 7:00-7:30 AM EST. The wait time was only about 45 minutes compared to the usual 2+ hours later in the day. Tuesday and Wednesday mornings seem to be the sweet spot. Also, if you re'still waiting on Claimyr, definitely keep following up with them - I ve'heard they re'usually pretty good about honoring their callback guarantee when there are technical issues. Good luck!
I think people are overthinking this. No income = nothing to report. The IRS only cares about money you actually received. I worked 3 different jobs last year but only got paid from 2 of them, so I only put 2 W-2s on my return. Nobody's coming after you for not reporting a job that paid you nothing lol.
But what if the employer filed something on their end showing you as an employee? Couldn't that create a mismatch with your return?
Companies only file W-2s for employees who received wages. If you earned zero dollars, there's no W-2 generated, so there's nothing that would create a mismatch with the IRS. The employer might have you in their system as an employee for their own records, but they don't report anything to the IRS until they actually pay you. So there's no risk of a mismatch or triggering a flag in the system.
I'm actually a tax preparer and see this scenario often. Just to be super clear: if you received NO compensation whatsoever (no wages, no benefits, nothing of monetary value) from the second job during 2024, then there's nothing to report on your 2024 return. The employer won't issue a W-2 for zero dollars. Just keep those employment documents for your 2025 taxes when you actually start earning from that position.
What about if you got like a signing bonus in December but don't actually start working until January? Would that count for this year's taxes?
Yes, a signing bonus received in December 2024 would need to be reported on your 2024 tax return, even if you don't start working until 2025. The IRS operates on a cash basis for most taxpayers, meaning you report income in the year you actually received it, not when you earned it through work. So if the money hit your account in 2024, it goes on your 2024 return. The employer should issue you a W-2 or 1099 for that payment.
Doesn't this whole situation expose a huge loophole in the system? If casinos only report jackpots over $1,200 but someone's putting millions through machines, couldn't they just play in a way that avoids big jackpots? I'm thinking about games like basic video poker where you could avoid going for royal flushes (the big jackpot hands) and still win consistently with smaller hands. Basically "staying under the radar" by avoiding reportable wins while still potentially laundering money.
This actually isn't as effective as you might think. Modern casinos employ sophisticated player tracking and anti-money laundering systems that look for exactly this type of behavior pattern. If someone is cycling large amounts of money through machines while intentionally avoiding jackpots (by playing suboptimal strategy, for instance), this would trigger internal alerts. Additionally, casinos are required to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) for unusual gambling patterns, regardless of whether reportable jackpots are hit. These reports go to FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) and can trigger investigations. Casino compliance departments specifically look for players who appear to be deliberately structuring their play to avoid reporting thresholds - it's one of the red flags they're trained to identify. For exactly this reason, money launderers have found casinos to be increasingly difficult venues for cleaning significant amounts of money. The combination of cameras, player tracking, transaction monitoring, and trained staff makes sustained laundering activity quite risky.
This is a really fascinating case study that highlights how complex gambling taxation can be. I've been following similar situations in my work, and there are a few additional considerations worth mentioning: The $61.2 million "coin in" vs $6.3 million reported winnings discrepancy is actually quite normal for high-volume video poker players. What many people don't realize is that video poker has a very high "churn rate" - you're constantly winning and losing smaller amounts, but only the bigger jackpots (typically $1,200+) generate W-2Gs. Regarding your money laundering question - while theoretically possible, it's become much harder in practice. Beyond the AML controls others mentioned, there's also the issue of source of funds. If someone suddenly starts gambling with millions in cash without a clear legitimate income source, that itself triggers scrutiny from multiple agencies, not just the IRS. One thing I'd add is that the IRS has been increasingly sophisticated about cross-referencing gambling activity with other income sources. They can spot patterns where reported gambling winnings don't align with someone's overall financial profile. So even if the casino reporting has gaps, other data sources can fill in the picture. The key takeaway is that while the reporting system isn't perfect, the overall surveillance and compliance framework makes sustained large-scale laundering through gambling quite risky and difficult to execute successfully.
Another trucker here - just to add a real example: I bought my Peterbilt for $175,000 last year. My CPA took Section 179 deduction for the full amount on last year's taxes. This year I'm only deducting the INTEREST portion of my loan payments which is about $12,000 for the year. If I deducted the full loan payments (around $36,000/year including principal), that would definitely be double dipping since I already deducted the truck's value through depreciation.
So wait, if you use Section 179 to deduct the whole purchase price in year 1, do you get any deduction for the truck in year 2 besides the interest? Like does depreciation still continue or is it all used up?
Once you've used Section 179 to deduct the full purchase price, there's nothing left to depreciate in future years. The only deduction related to the truck financing you can take in following years is the interest portion of your loan payments. You'll still have other truck-related deductions though - maintenance, repairs, fuel, insurance, etc. These are separate operating expenses that you can deduct each year regardless of depreciation.
I'm an owner-operator and just wanted to add that this confusion is super common. Like half the guys at my terminal are doing their taxes wrong. Remember: - The TRUCK (asset) = depreciable - The INTEREST on loan = deductible expense - The PRINCIPAL on loan = NOT deductible (that's what depreciation covers) - REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE = always deductible The IRS isn't dumb - they know what a loan payment includes and they'll catch double-dipping eventually!
What tax software do you use that correctly separates these things? I'm using TurboTax Self-Employed and it doesn't seem very clear about how to handle my truck loan vs depreciation.
I've been using FreeTaxUSA for my owner-operator business and it handles truck depreciation pretty well. When you enter your truck purchase, it walks you through Section 179 vs regular depreciation options. For the loan, you have to manually separate the interest from principal using your loan statements, but it's not too complicated once you understand what you're doing. The key is keeping good records of your loan statements so you can pull out just the interest portion each month. Most loan servicers will send you a year-end statement that breaks down total interest paid vs principal, which makes tax time much easier.
Emma Davis
Question about timing - I'm planning to buy a used cargo van for my business around Dec 20th this year. Will I still be able to take the full bonus depreciation for this tax year even if I only use it for business for like 10 days in December?
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
β’Yes, you can take the full bonus depreciation for the current tax year as long as the vehicle is placed in service before December 31st. The IRS doesn't prorate bonus depreciation based on how many days you used it during the year - it's based on when you start using it for business purposes. Just make sure you actually start using it for business before year-end (even just a couple business trips will establish that it's "in service"), and keep documentation of that business use. Also keep in mind that your business use percentage for next year will be what matters for any regular depreciation going forward.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
Just wanted to add something important that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you understand the luxury vehicle limitations! Even with bonus depreciation, there are annual caps on how much you can deduct for vehicles over a certain weight. For 2024, if your vehicle weighs less than 6,000 pounds (most cars and light trucks), you're subject to luxury vehicle limits. The first-year depreciation cap is around $12,200 for vehicles placed in service in 2024, which could affect your $12.5k vehicle purchase. However, if you buy a vehicle over 6,000 pounds GVWR (like many SUVs and trucks), you can generally take the full bonus depreciation without these limits. This is why you see so many business owners buying larger vehicles - the tax benefits are significantly better. Also, consider whether you want to elect out of bonus depreciation and use Section 179 instead. Sometimes Section 179 can be more beneficial depending on your income situation and other business equipment purchases for the year. I'd definitely recommend running the numbers both ways before making your final decision!
0 coins
Freya Andersen
β’You can find GVWR specifications on the vehicle's door jamb sticker (driver's side door frame) or in the owner's manual. For shopping purposes, manufacturer websites and sites like Edmunds.com also list GVWR in their detailed specs sections. Regarding Section 179 vs bonus depreciation - most tax software like TurboTax Business or TaxAct can help compare the two, but they're not always great at showing the multi-year impact. The taxr.ai tool that @Keisha Robinson mentioned earlier actually does a pretty good job of this comparison from what I ve'seen others mention. The key difference is that Section 179 has income limitations you (need sufficient business income to take the full deduction ,)while bonus depreciation doesn t'have the same income requirements. Also, Section 179 has a total annual limit across all equipment purchases, whereas bonus depreciation is calculated per asset. Given your situation, if you re'looking at vehicles in that price range, you might want to consider something like a Honda Ridgeline or Ford Transit Connect - they often have GVWR over 6,000 lbs but are still practical for general business use.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
β’You can find the GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) on the vehicle's door jamb sticker or in the owner's manual - it's a federal requirement for all vehicles. For used cars, you can also look it up online using the VIN or model specifications on sites like Edmunds or the manufacturer's website. Most tax software (TurboTax Business, FreeTaxUSA, etc.) will help you compare Section 179 vs bonus depreciation, but they sometimes oversimplify the calculation. The key difference is that Section 179 has income limitations (your deduction can't exceed your business income for the year), while bonus depreciation doesn't. If you have a profitable year, bonus depreciation might be better. If you're just starting out with lower income, Section 179 could work better. One thing to consider - if you're set on the $12.5k range, look at older pickup trucks or SUVs from around 2015-2018. Many of those will be over the 6,000 lb threshold and still in your price range. A Ford F-150 SuperCrew or Chevy Tahoe from that era would likely qualify for full bonus depreciation without the luxury vehicle limits. Just remember you still need to maintain that 80% business use regardless of which vehicle you choose!
0 coins