IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Anyone using specific software to track PUC? Our firm has been using an ancient Excel template that's prone to errors, especially with complex corporate groups. We lost a client last year because of a major PUC calculation error that resulted in unexpected tax on what they thought was a return of capital.

0 coins

Lucy Lam

•

We use CaseWare's corporate tax module. It's not perfect but it does a decent job tracking PUC across multiple transactions. The key is diligent data entry - garbage in, garbage out. We still have our senior tax people review the calculations manually.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

The key breakthrough for me was understanding that tax PUC is essentially a "tax cost" concept while corporate PUC is a "legal capital" concept. They serve completely different purposes. Think of it this way: corporate PUC protects creditors by ensuring shareholders can't withdraw their capital contribution without proper procedures. Tax PUC prevents taxpayers from extracting corporate surplus tax-free by disguising it as a return of capital. The Income Tax Act deliberately reduces tax PUC in many situations (like non-arm's length transfers under s. 84.1) because otherwise taxpayers could artificially inflate their tax PUC and then extract corporate earnings without paying tax on deemed dividends. For your exam, focus on the policy reasons behind the adjustments - once you understand WHY the tax rules reduce PUC in certain situations, the mechanical calculations make much more sense. The textbook contradictions you're seeing are probably different fact patterns where different anti-avoidance rules apply. Good luck with your CPA exam! The PUC concepts are definitely challenging but they're fundamental to understanding Canadian corporate tax.

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

This is such a helpful way to think about it! I've been getting caught up in the mechanical calculations without understanding the underlying policy rationale. Your point about tax PUC being a "tax cost" versus corporate PUC being "legal capital" really clarifies why they diverge in so many situations. The anti-avoidance aspect makes total sense now - if taxpayers could just create artificial PUC through related party transactions, they could essentially convert taxable dividends into tax-free capital returns. No wonder the Income Tax Act has all these grinding rules! Do you have any specific suggestions for which anti-avoidance provisions to focus on for the exam? I'm assuming 84.1 is crucial, but are there other key sections that commonly reduce tax PUC below corporate PUC?

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

Has anyone used TurboTax for reporting foreign property sales? Is it capable of handling these complex situations or should I just hire a CPA? Worried about missing something important.

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

I tried using TurboTax for a similar situation (sold property in Canada) and found it really lacking for international tax situations. It didn't properly guide me through Form 8938 requirements or foreign tax credit calculations. Ended up hiring a CPA with international tax experience who found several deductions TurboTax missed. For something this complex with potentially big tax implications, I'd recommend a specialist.

0 coins

I went through a very similar situation when my family sold property in the Philippines last year. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier is to get all your property documents organized and translated (if needed) well before you start the tax filing process. The biggest surprise was learning about the FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report) requirements. Since the sale proceeds sat in a foreign account temporarily while we arranged the transfer, we had to file FinCEN Form 114 because the account balance exceeded $10,000 at any point during the year. This is completely separate from your tax return and has its own filing deadline. Also, make sure to keep detailed records of all transaction costs, legal fees, and transfer fees - these can often be added to your basis or deducted as selling expenses, which reduces your taxable gain. With a $200-250k sale, even small percentage savings can add up to significant dollar amounts. One last tip: if your parents are planning to become US tax residents soon, consider consulting with an Enrolled Agent who specializes in international taxation. The timing of the sale relative to their residency status could have major tax implications, and it's worth getting professional advice upfront rather than trying to fix issues later.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! The FBAR requirement is something I definitely wouldn't have thought of. Quick question about the document translation - did you need certified translations or were regular translations acceptable? My parents have all their Vietnamese property documents but obviously they're not in English. Also, when you mention "transaction costs" that can be added to basis, does that include things like real estate agent commissions and currency exchange fees from the original purchase years ago?

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with an added complication - the deceased relative lived in one state, worked in another state, and I live in a third state. The plan administrator is withholding taxes for the state where the company is headquartered (a fourth state!). From what I'm reading here, it sounds like I'll need to file a nonresident return in the withholding state and then claim credits on my home state return. But I'm wondering if I also need to consider the deceased's state of residence or the state where they worked? Also, has anyone dealt with the timing issue? They're distributing this in late 2025, so I'm worried about having enough time to sort out all the state tax filings before the April deadline. Should I be making estimated payments to my home state even though they're already withholding for another state?

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

Welcome to the multi-state inheritance tax maze! I went through something similar last year with my grandmother's plan. The good news is that for inheritance purposes, you generally only need to worry about the withholding state and your home state - the deceased's residence and work location typically don't create additional filing obligations for you as the beneficiary. You're right that you'll need to file a nonresident return in the withholding state and claim credits on your home state return. Given the late 2025 timing, I'd definitely recommend making an estimated payment to your home state for Q4 2025, especially since you won't know the exact credit amount until you file the nonresident return. Pro tip: request all tax documents from the plan administrator as early as possible in January. Multi-state situations can take longer to sort out, and you'll want plenty of time before the April deadline. Also ask them specifically about the withholding calculation - sometimes they use the wrong state rates when there have been corporate changes.

0 coins

Great advice throughout this thread! I want to add one more consideration that caught me off guard when I inherited my dad's non-qualified plan last year - make sure to ask about any outstanding loans against the account. If the deceased had taken a loan from their retirement plan that wasn't fully repaid at death, the remaining loan balance gets treated as a taxable distribution to you as the beneficiary. This won't show up in your initial paperwork but will appear on the 1099-R, and it can significantly increase the taxable amount beyond what you're expecting. In my case, there was an outstanding $12,000 loan that I had no idea about, which bumped up my taxable distribution and threw off all my estimated tax calculations. The plan administrator should be able to tell you if there are any outstanding loans, but you have to specifically ask - they don't always volunteer this information upfront. Also, if you're concerned about the tax impact of receiving a large lump sum in one year, check if the plan offers any installment payment options. Some non-qualified plans allow beneficiaries to spread distributions over multiple years, which can help with tax bracket management.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

This is incredibly valuable information about outstanding loans - thank you for sharing! I never would have thought to ask about that. It's scary how these hidden details can completely change your tax situation. Your point about installment payments is interesting too. For someone like me who's already worried about being pushed into a higher tax bracket with an $80K lump sum, spreading it over multiple years could be a game changer. Do you know if there are any downsides to choosing installments over a lump sum? I'm wondering about things like investment opportunity cost or whether the plan could change their policies between payments. Also, when you say the loan balance shows up on the 1099-R, does it get coded differently than the regular distribution, or does it all just show up as one taxable amount?

0 coins

I went through the verification gauntlet just last week! It's like a tax return escape room, except the prize is your own money. šŸ˜‚ I received the 5071C letter, tried the online route first, but the system couldn't verify me (probably because I recently changed my phone number). Had to call in and speak with an agent. The agent asked me questions about: - Previous addresses - Employers from 2+ years ago - Car loan information - Credit card accounts The whole call took 22 minutes once I got through to someone. My transcript updated 3 days later, and my refund was deposited 5 days after that. Not as painful as I expected... once I finally reached a human!

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

I'm currently going through this same process and wanted to share what I've learned so far. Since you mentioned caring for your elderly mother, I'd definitely recommend trying the online verification first through ID.me if/when you get the 5071C letter. It's much more convenient than sitting on hold for hours with a phone call. One thing that helped me prepare was gathering all my documents ahead of time: driver's license, Social Security card, and my 2022 tax return (you'll need the prior year AGI). Also, make sure you have access to the phone number and email address that the IRS has on file for you - they use these for verification codes. The timing seems pretty consistent based on what others have shared - most people get their verification letter around 3-4 weeks after filing. Since you filed 27 days ago, you might receive yours soon. Keep checking your mailbox daily, and don't forget to check with your post office if you've had any mail delivery issues recently. Once you complete verification, the refund processing usually takes 1-2 weeks. Given your caregiving responsibilities, having a clear timeline should help you plan around this. Good luck!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation with my father's estate return two years ago. The IRS kept requesting Form 1310 even though I had already submitted it electronically. After three rounds of back-and-forth, I learned that the issue was actually with how the electronic filing system handles certified documents. Here's what worked for me: I called the IRS number on the letter and asked them to specify exactly what format they needed the court certificate in. Turns out they needed the actual raised seal to be visible, which obviously doesn't transmit well electronically. I ended up having to get a new certified copy from the probate court with clearer certification language and sent it via certified mail with a cover letter referencing the notice number. The whole process took about 10 weeks from start to finish, but once I sent the properly certified documents, they processed the refund without any further issues. Don't give up - it's just a matter of getting them the documentation in the exact format their system requires.

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

This is really helpful - I never would have thought about the raised seal issue! That makes total sense why electronic filing wouldn't work for these certified documents. Did you have to pay extra to get a new certified copy from the probate court, or were they able to provide it at no charge since it was for the same case?

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now with my late grandmother's return. The IRS sent me the same letter requesting Form 1310 and supporting documents that I know I included with the e-file. Reading through these responses has been incredibly helpful - I had no idea about the raised seal issue with certified documents. That explains why my electronically submitted court certificate might not have been accepted even though it looked fine to me. I think I'm going to follow the advice here and call the IRS number on my notice to ask specifically what format they need the documentation in before I resubmit anything. It sounds like getting clarity upfront about their exact requirements could save weeks of back-and-forth. Has anyone had success getting through to the IRS phone lines recently? I've been dreading making that call because of all the horror stories about wait times, but it seems like that might be the most direct path to resolution.

0 coins

Prev1...33533354335533563357...5644Next