


Ask the community...
@Crystal Singletary A future date on code 150 usually means your return is still being processed and hasn t'been fully accepted yet. The IRS sometimes assigns future processing dates when there are delays or additional reviews needed. Since you have the 810 freeze from months ago, that s'likely what s'holding everything up. Have you done the identity verification yet? Once that freeze gets lifted, your code 150 should update to show the actual processing date and things should move forward. The waiting is brutal but hang in there! š¤
Hey Greg! I went through something super similar last year. The 810 freeze is definitely frustrating but you're on the right track having done the in-person verification. Those codes 766 and 768 are actually good signs - they show your credits are being processed and applied to your account. The 4/15/24 date you're seeing is just the tax filing deadline, not your refund date unfortunately. After identity verification, the IRS usually takes 6-9 weeks to lift the freeze and process your refund. Keep checking your transcript for when that 810 code disappears - once it's gone and you see an 846 code, that's when you'll have your actual refund date! The waiting is the worst part but you're definitely moving in the right direction š
Thanks for breaking this down Adrian! I'm in a similar situation and the waiting is killing me š© How long did it actually take for your 810 to disappear after verification? And did you get any kind of notification when it was lifted or did you just have to keep checking your transcript?
This is a really important distinction that trips up a lot of people! The $600 reporting rule only applies to third-party payment networks like PayPal, Venmo, and Cash App - your regular bank won't report that $750 cash deposit to the IRS. Banks have completely different reporting thresholds - they only file Currency Transaction Reports for cash deposits over $10,000, and that's for anti-money laundering purposes, not tax reporting. Your brother's loan repayment is just that - a repayment of money you originally lent out, so it's not taxable income anyway. I'd recommend keeping some record of the original loan (text messages, notes, etc.) just in case, but for a personal transaction like this, it's very unlikely the IRS would ever question it. The key thing to remember is that traditional banking and payment app transactions operate under totally different regulatory frameworks - don't let the payment app controversy make you worry about normal bank deposits!
This whole thread has been so helpful! I'm new to this community and was actually dealing with a very similar situation. My cousin paid me back $650 for her share of our vacation rental through a cash deposit last week, and I was panicking thinking I'd have to report it as income. Reading everyone's explanations about the difference between traditional banks and payment platforms really cleared things up for me. It's reassuring to know that regular bank deposits from personal transactions like loan repayments don't fall under the $600 reporting threshold that applies to PayPal, Venmo, etc. I also kept our text messages about the original loan arrangement, so I feel much better about having that documentation if needed. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion - it's exactly the kind of clear, practical advice that newcomers like me really need!
Welcome to the community, Drew! It's great to see newcomers getting involved in these discussions. Your vacation rental situation is a perfect example of why so many people are confused about these reporting rules. You're absolutely right to feel relieved - personal loan repayments between family and friends are definitely not subject to the $600 reporting threshold. That rule is specifically designed to capture business-like transactions happening through payment platforms, not personal financial arrangements between relatives. The fact that you kept those text messages is smart documentation practice. While it's unlikely you'd ever need to explain a $650 deposit from a family member, having that paper trail showing it was a shared expense reimbursement gives you complete peace of mind. One thing I'd add for you and other newcomers - this distinction between traditional banks and payment apps is really the key to understanding most of these reporting questions. Banks move money around but don't categorize it as "income" vs "non-income" for reporting purposes. Payment apps, on the other hand, are specifically regulated as payment settlement entities and have to track and report transaction volumes over $600. Hope you find this community as helpful as I have for navigating these confusing tax situations!
Thanks for the warm welcome, Benjamin! This community has already been incredibly helpful for someone like me who's still learning about all these tax regulations. Your explanation about banks versus payment apps really drives home the key distinction that I think a lot of people miss. I'm curious though - since I'm relatively new to managing these kinds of financial situations - are there any other common scenarios where people get confused about reporting requirements? I want to make sure I'm prepared for future situations beyond just loan repayments. For example, if family members reimburse me for group purchases or shared expenses throughout the year, are there any thresholds I should be aware of? It seems like having good documentation habits from the start is really the best approach, regardless of the specific reporting rules. Better to have records you don't need than to need records you don't have!
This is actually a pretty straightforward situation from a tax perspective! The money your roommates pay you for utilities is definitely not taxable income - you're just collecting reimbursements for shared expenses, not running a business or making a profit. However, I'd strongly recommend keeping good documentation anyway. Save copies of all the utility bills and track when each roommate pays their portion (screenshots of Venmo transactions work great for this). While you don't need to provide "official receipts," sharing copies of the actual utility bills creates transparency and gives everyone the documentation they might need. Your roommates are probably asking for receipts either because they don't trust the amounts (which is fair - bills can vary month to month) or because one of them is considering claiming a home office deduction if they work from home. For that deduction, they'd need documentation of their portion of utilities, so providing bill copies actually helps everyone. As for benefits to having utilities in your name - you're building payment history with those companies, which can help when you move and need to establish service elsewhere. Just make sure your roommates pay reliably so you don't get stuck with late fees or service interruptions on your record!
This is really helpful! I'm actually new to having roommates and wasn't sure about any of this stuff. One thing I'm wondering - what if the utility bills vary a lot month to month? Like our electric bill was $80 in October but $180 in January because of heating. Should we be splitting based on the actual monthly amount, or averaging it out over the year so everyone pays the same each month? And does it matter tax-wise which approach we use?
Great question about seasonal variation! From a tax perspective, it doesn't matter whether you split bills monthly or average them out - either way, you're still just collecting reimbursements for actual expenses, so there's no taxable income involved. However, I'd recommend splitting based on actual monthly amounts rather than averaging. Here's why: it's more transparent (everyone can see exactly what the bill was that month), and it's simpler for record-keeping since your documentation matches the actual bills. Plus, if someone moves out mid-lease, you don't have to deal with complicated adjustments to an averaged system. The seasonal variation is totally normal - most households see big swings between summer/winter months. You might want to give your roommates a heads up when you know a high-usage month is coming (like "hey, last January our electric was $180, so expect your share to be around $60 instead of the usual $25"). This prevents sticker shock and maintains trust in the arrangement!
Just to add another perspective - I've been the "utility bill person" in multiple roommate situations over the years, and it's actually pretty common for roommates to ask for documentation around tax time. Don't take it personally! One thing that's worked really well for me is creating a simple monthly email that goes out to all roommates with a photo of each bill and a breakdown of everyone's share. Something like "January utilities: Electric $142 (your share: $47.33), Internet $65 (your share: $21.67), Water $38 (your share: $12.67)." This way everyone has the documentation they need right when the bills come in, and there's never any confusion or requests for "receipts" later. This approach has actually prevented several potential roommate conflicts over the years. When everyone can see the actual bills and math upfront, there's complete transparency. Plus if anyone does need documentation for tax purposes (home office deductions, etc.), they already have everything organized in their email folder. The tax implications are exactly what others have said - no income to report since you're just collecting reimbursements. But having that paper trail makes everything smoother for everyone involved!
This monthly email approach is genius! I wish I'd thought of this when I started living with roommates. I've been doing the whole "send bills when people ask" thing and it's definitely created some awkward moments. One question though - do you send the email before collecting payments or after? I'm wondering if it's better to give people the breakdown first so they can budget, or collect payments first and then send documentation. Also, have you ever had roommates who still questioned the amounts even with full transparency? Thanks for sharing this system - definitely going to try it starting next month!
One strategy I don't see mentioned is differentiating between the PSL and the actual tickets. My CPA structured my ticket business so that I personally own the PSLs as an investment asset (since they can appreciate over time), while my LLC "rents" the right to purchase the annual tickets from me. This way, the LLC can deduct the full cost of the annual tickets plus a reasonable "rental fee" for using my PSLs, and I report that rental income personally. This creates some nice tax flexibility depending on my overall situation each year. When/if I eventually sell the PSLs, I'll be taxed at capital gains rates rather than ordinary income. My CPA said this approach works best when the PSLs have significant value like yours do at $80k.
This is exactly the kind of situation where proper planning upfront can save you thousands in taxes and headaches later. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given is to consider the timing of when you set up your LLC and start treating this as a business. If you retroactively try to claim business deductions for years when you were just casually selling tickets, that could raise red flags. But going forward, if you formalize the structure and start operating in a businesslike manner, you'll be in much better shape. Also, don't overlook the potential for other revenue streams once you have the LLC set up. Some of my clients have expanded into buying/selling other events' tickets, partnering with other season ticket holders, or even offering ticket management services. The infrastructure you set up for your football tickets can often support additional activities. Just make sure whatever you do, you're genuinely operating with profit motive and keeping detailed records. The IRS hobby loss rules are no joke, especially with high-dollar activities like this.
This is really helpful advice about the timing aspect! I'm wondering - since I've already been selling tickets for about 3 years, would it be problematic to form an LLC now and start treating it as a business going forward? Or should I be concerned about the IRS questioning why I'm suddenly calling it a business when I wasn't before? Also, you mentioned other revenue streams - I've actually been thinking about helping some friends who have season tickets but don't want to deal with the hassle of selling them. Would that kind of ticket management service fit well within the same LLC structure, or would that create complications?
Malik Thompson
17 Has anyone dealt with state taxes for NRAs? I understand the federal rules a bit better now, but I worked in California and they're notorious for aggressive tax collection. Do the same NRA exemptions apply at the state level?
0 coins
Malik Thompson
ā¢5 Great question about state taxes. The NRA rules we've been discussing are federal tax rules, and states have their own tax systems that don't always align with federal treatment. California in particular is known for having one of the more aggressive state tax authorities (FTB). Generally, if income is sourced to California (like from working physically in CA), the state will want to tax it regardless of your federal NRA status. For capital gains specifically, California typically follows the "source" of the income. If your employer shares were granted while working in California, the state might consider the gains to be California-source income even after you've left.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who just moved from the US back to my home country and is facing similar capital gains questions, I wanted to add a few points that might be useful: 1. **Documentation is key** - Keep detailed records of when you received company shares, your employment dates, and when you left the US. The IRS may need this to determine if gains are ECI. 2. **Vesting vs. Sale timing matters** - Even if shares vested while you were in the US, selling them after becoming an NRA can change the tax treatment. The "source" of the income becomes important. 3. **Watch out for Form 8833** - If you're claiming treaty benefits to reduce or eliminate US tax on capital gains, you might need to file this form along with your 1040-NR. 4. **FIRPTA considerations** - While most stock sales aren't affected, if you have any US real estate investments, there are different rules under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act. The tax treaty angle mentioned earlier is really important. Many countries have specific provisions for capital gains that can override the general ECI rules. Definitely worth looking into your specific country's treaty with the US. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this kind of real-world insight is so much more valuable than trying to parse through IRS publications alone!
0 coins
Haley Bennett
ā¢Thank you so much for adding these practical points! The documentation aspect is something I hadn't fully considered. I've been keeping some records but probably not comprehensive enough. Your point about Form 8833 is especially helpful - I had no idea there was a separate form required for claiming treaty benefits. Would you happen to know if there's a threshold for when this form is required, or is it needed whenever you claim any treaty benefit? Also, regarding the vesting vs. sale timing - in my case the RSUs vested over 4 years while I was working in the US, but I'm planning to sell them now that I'm back home. It sounds like this could work in my favor for tax purposes, but I want to make sure I understand the implications correctly. The FIRPTA mention is interesting too. I don't have real estate investments now, but it's good to know about for the future. This whole thread has been incredibly educational - thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences!
0 coins