


Ask the community...
Has anyone formed an LLC in New Mexico? I've heard good things about their privacy laws and low fees, which seem important for expats.
I formed my LLC in New Mexico while living in Thailand. The privacy is good (similar to Wyoming), and annual fees are low ($0 annual report fee). The problem came with banking - many banks weren't familiar with New Mexico LLCs and their privacy features, which made opening accounts harder. I eventually switched to Wyoming because it had better name recognition with financial institutions. If banking isn't a concern though, New Mexico is solid.
As someone who went through this exact process two years ago while living in Portugal, I'd strongly recommend Wyoming for your situation. The combination of strong privacy protections, low annual fees ($60), and no state income tax makes it ideal for expats running online businesses. A few practical tips from my experience: 1. Don't worry about matching your driver's license state - choose based on business benefits, not past connections 2. Use Northwest Registered Agent or similar for your registered agent service - they're reliable and expat-friendly 3. For banking, I had success with Relay Financial and Mercury - both are online-first and work well with foreign addresses 4. Keep detailed records of your foreign residency (lease agreements, utility bills, etc.) as this will be important for tax purposes One thing to consider: since you're serving US clients, make sure you understand the tax implications. Even with a Wyoming LLC, you'll still need to file US federal taxes as a citizen, and depending on your income level, you might benefit from the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. The key is getting everything set up properly from the start - it's much easier than trying to fix issues later when you're dealing with international time zones and communication barriers.
This is exactly the kind of detailed advice I was hoping for! Quick question about the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion - does that apply to LLC income or just W2/employment income? I'm planning to pay myself through the LLC but wasn't sure if consulting income through an LLC would qualify for the exclusion. Also, have you had any issues with Portuguese tax authorities regarding your US LLC income?
Great question about the FEIE! For single-member LLCs, the income is typically treated as self-employment income and reported on Schedule C, which can qualify for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion as long as you meet either the physical presence test (330 days outside the US in a 12-month period) or the bona fide residence test. However, there's an important caveat - if your LLC income is considered "passive" rather than "earned" income, it might not qualify. Since you're doing consulting work, that should definitely count as earned income from your personal services. Regarding Portugal - yes, I do have to report my US LLC income to Portuguese tax authorities since I'm a tax resident here. Portugal has a tax treaty with the US that helps prevent double taxation, but I still need to file in both countries. The good news is that Portugal has the NHR (Non-Habitual Resident) program which can provide significant tax benefits for certain types of foreign income during your first 10 years of residency. I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in US-Portugal tax issues - the interaction between LLC taxation, FEIE, and Portuguese tax law can get complex quickly. The investment in proper tax advice upfront will save you headaches later.
I'm thinking you might be running into the "testing period" requirement that goes along with the last month rule. Even though you were HSA-eligible all year, if you use the last month rule (basing contributions on your December status), you have to remain HSA-eligible through the end of the FOLLOWING year (12/31/2023 in your case). If you failed the testing period in 2023, you'd have to include the "excess" contributions in your income AND pay a 10% additional tax. Maybe your tax software is detecting that you didn't remain eligible through all of 2023?
That's an interesting point I hadn't considered! We did actually change insurance again in March 2023 when I got a new job with better coverage, but it's still an HDHP that's HSA-eligible. Would that still count as maintaining eligibility for the testing period, or does it have to be the exact same plan?
As long as your new coverage in 2023 still qualifies as an HDHP and you remained HSA-eligible, you should be fine for the testing period. It doesn't have to be the same exact plan - you just need to maintain HSA eligibility through December 31, 2023. If your new job's plan is HSA-eligible, you should be meeting the testing period requirements. Maybe double-check that the new plan truly meets all the HDHP requirements (minimum deductible, maximum out-of-pocket, etc.) to ensure it qualifies.
Just a practical tip that helped me with a similar issue - you might want to call your HSA providers directly. My husband and I ran into this exact problem, and our HSA bank had a dedicated tax specialist who explained that we needed to "recharacterize" some of the contributions between our accounts to avoid the penalty. They were able to do this even after the tax year had ended as long as it was before the tax filing deadline. They literally moved some money from my HSA to my husband's HSA and updated the contribution forms. Super easy fix that the tax software couldn't figure out!
Does this actually work? I thought once the money was in your HSA, you couldn't move it to someone else's account, even your spouse's. Wouldn't that count as a distribution and then a new contribution?
You're absolutely right to question this - you actually CAN'T directly transfer money between spouses' HSAs. What the HSA provider likely helped with was a "recharacterization" of excess contributions, which is different from a transfer. Here's how it works: If you over-contributed to your HSA, you can remove the excess contribution plus any earnings before the tax filing deadline and treat it as if it was never contributed. Then your spouse could make a new contribution to their HSA (assuming they haven't maxed out their limit). So it's not actually moving money between accounts - it's removing an excess contribution from one account and making a fresh contribution to the other. The net effect looks like a transfer, but technically it's two separate transactions that keep everything IRS-compliant.
One thing no one mentions about these energy tax credits - make sure you keep EVERY piece of documentation! I got audited last year specifically about an energy credit I claimed. Had to provide the manufacturer's certification statement, detailed receipt showing itemized costs (not just the total), and proof the installation met local building code requirements. The credit is great, but be prepared for the possibility that the IRS might want proof that your heat pump installation legitimately qualified. Take pictures during installation too if you can.
Did you use a tax pro to help with the audit or did you handle it yourself? I'm nervous about claiming these credits because I don't want to trigger extra IRS attention.
I handled it myself since I had all the documentation ready. The key was having the manufacturer's certification statement showing the heat pump met the efficiency requirements and the itemized receipt from my contractor. If you're worried, I'd recommend creating a folder (physical or digital) specifically for your energy credit documentation. Include the product details with efficiency ratings, contractor certification, receipt, and maybe even photos of the installed unit with its model number visible. With everything properly documented, it was actually a straightforward process to respond to the audit request.
Another thing to watch out for is the annual limits on these credits. For the home energy improvements (like heat pumps), you're looking at a $2,000 annual limit for the heat pump itself. If you're doing other energy improvements in the same year (like insulation, windows, etc), those have separate limits. You might want to consider splitting installations across tax years if you're doing multiple improvements to maximize your credits. I did my heat pump last year and I'm doing my windows this year to get the most out of it.
Are you sure about splitting across years being better? I thought there was a lifetime limit to these credits, not just annual.
The Inflation Reduction Act actually removed the lifetime limits that existed under the old energy credit system! Under the current rules, the $2,000 annual limit for heat pumps resets each year, so you could theoretically claim it multiple times if you install qualifying equipment in different years. However, you're right to think about timing strategically. If you're doing multiple improvements, you want to make sure you can use all the credits. Since these are non-refundable credits, you need enough tax liability each year to absorb them. Vincent's approach of spreading installations across years makes sense if your annual tax liability is limited. For most people though, if you have sufficient tax liability, there's no advantage to waiting - you might as well get the improvements done and claim the credits as soon as possible.
Another option I don't see mentioned - check if your potential new employer offers an HDHP option you could enroll in immediately upon starting. Many employers have waived waiting periods for benefits during the pandemic and some have kept those policies. If your current coverage ends October 15th and new employer coverage can start October 16th, that would satisfy the continuous coverage requirement. Just make sure the new plan qualifies as an HDHP for HSA purposes - not all high-deductible plans do!
That's an excellent point! I actually haven't finalized the new job offer yet, so I could potentially negotiate immediate HDHP coverage as part of my package. Do you know if there are specific questions I should ask their HR department to confirm their plan would qualify?
Ask their HR department these specific questions: First, ask if their plan is officially "HSA-qualified" - this is a specific designation, not just any high-deductible plan. Request the Summary of Benefits and Coverage document to verify the deductible meets 2024 minimums ($1,600 for individual coverage) and that the plan doesn't offer non-preventive coverage before the deductible is met. Second, confirm their policy on benefit start dates for new employees. Some companies have first-day coverage, others have waiting periods of 30-90 days. If there's a waiting period, ask if exceptions can be made, especially if you explain your HSA testing period situation.
I want to add one more consideration that might be helpful - if you're planning to leave around October 15th specifically, you might want to think about pushing it to November 1st instead. Since HSA eligibility is determined by having HDHP coverage on the first day of the month, leaving mid-month in October could make you ineligible for the entire month of October. If you leave on October 15th and there's any delay getting new coverage started, you'd lose October eligibility even if you only had a few days gap. But if you can wait until November 1st, you'd maintain full October eligibility and then just need to ensure your new HDHP coverage starts November 1st with no gap. I know job timing isn't always flexible, but even a couple weeks could make a significant difference for your HSA testing period compliance. The penalties for breaking the testing period can be substantial, so it might be worth exploring if your departure date has any flexibility.
This is such a smart point about the timing! I hadn't really thought about how leaving mid-month could affect the entire month's eligibility. Since I do have some flexibility with my departure date, pushing it to November 1st sounds like it could save me a lot of headache. Quick question though - if I leave November 1st and my new employer coverage also starts November 1st, would that satisfy the "no gap" requirement? Or do I need my old coverage to end October 31st and new coverage to start November 1st to avoid any technical gap? Also, does anyone know if there's a specific time of day that matters? Like if my employer coverage ends at 11:59 PM on October 31st and new coverage starts at 12:01 AM November 1st, is that considered continuous?
Jessica Suarez
Just want to add that timing matters here too. If you were married on ANY day in 2024, the IRS considers you married for the ENTIRE tax year when filing your 2024 taxes in 2025. So your marital status on December 31st determines your filing status for the whole year.
0 coins
Marcus Williams
ā¢That's not entirely accurate. While that's the general rule for US citizens, there's a special "last day of the year" rule that applies when one spouse is a nonresident alien. The couple can choose to treat the nonresident spouse as a resident for tax purposes, but it's an election they make, not automatic.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
I went through this exact same situation two years ago when I married my wife from the Philippines! Here's what I learned after making some mistakes the first time around: You definitely CAN file Married Filing Jointly even without your wife having an SSN - you'll need to get her an ITIN first. But here's the key thing that tripped me up initially: make sure you understand the "nonresident alien spouse election" that Marcus mentioned. You can elect to treat your nonresident spouse as a US resident for tax purposes, which opens up joint filing. One tip that saved me a lot of headaches: before applying for the ITIN, call the IRS (or use one of those callback services others mentioned) to confirm which specific documents they'll accept from your wife's country. Different countries have different acceptable documents, and the IRS agents can tell you exactly what works best. Also, don't stress too much about the foreign income reporting if you do file jointly - most countries have tax treaties with the US that prevent double taxation. My wife's income from the Philippines was covered by the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, so it didn't actually increase our US tax burden. The whole process took about 3 months from start to finish, but it was definitely worth it for the tax savings compared to filing single. Good luck!
0 coins