


Ask the community...
Don't forget about self-employment taxes! If your single-member LLC is a disregarded entity, you'll pay self-employment taxes on that income. If you're already taking guaranteed payments from the multi-member LLC, this arrangement essentially means you're paying SE tax on two streams of income.
This is a great question and one that comes up frequently with multi-entity business structures! Based on what you've described, this arrangement is definitely doable, but there are several key considerations to get right: **Documentation is crucial** - You'll want formal service agreements between the LLCs outlining the scope of work, payment terms, and rates. Simple invoicing might not be sufficient if you get audited. **Fair market value** - The rates your single-member LLC charges should be comparable to what an unrelated third party would charge for similar services. This protects against IRS challenges about inflated expenses. **Operating agreement compliance** - Make sure your Trio Consulting LLC's operating agreement doesn't restrict this type of arrangement, and get explicit approval from your partners. **Tax implications** - Your single-member LLC income will flow through to your personal return, and you'll owe self-employment taxes on it. Meanwhile, Trio Consulting can deduct these payments as legitimate business expenses. One thing to consider: since you're essentially wearing two hats (partner in Trio AND service provider through Solo Marketing), maintain clear boundaries about which work belongs to which entity to avoid conflicts with your partners. Have you discussed this arrangement with your partners yet? Their buy-in will be essential for making this work smoothly.
I had the exact same issue last year! I used H&R Block, uploaded Form 8332 for my daughter, and was told they'd mail the 8453. Six months later, my ex got a letter from the IRS saying the dependency exemption was denied because they never received the form. When I went back to H&R Block, they admitted they "couldn't find any record" of mailing it. I ended up having to file an amended return and mail everything myself with certified mail. H&R Block did cover the fees for the amendment since it was their mistake, but it was a huge hassle. Definitely don't just trust that they're handling it!
This is such a frustrating situation that unfortunately happens more often than it should. I work as a tax compliance specialist and see this exact issue regularly. Here's what you need to know: 1. **Immediate action needed**: Don't wait any longer. Contact H&R Block's office manager (not just any employee) and demand written confirmation that your Form 8453 with attached Form 8332 was mailed, including the date and IRS processing center address. 2. **If they can't provide proof**: Mail the forms yourself immediately with certified mail. You can still submit Form 8332 even after the original return was filed - just include a cover letter explaining the situation. 3. **Timeline matters**: The IRS typically processes these within 6-8 weeks once received. If your ex filed claiming the dependency exemption without the supporting form, his return might be in "pending" status or he could receive a notice requesting the documentation. 4. **Protect yourself**: Going forward, always request a copy of Form 8453 and tracking confirmation for any mailed documents. Many preparers are supposed to provide this automatically but don't always follow through. The good news is this can still be fixed, but time is critical. Don't let H&R Block's confusion delay your action any further.
Some tax offices offer a "self-preparer" package where you can use their professional software but do the work yourself. I did this last year for my extended family - paid $150 for access to professional software that let me prepare unlimited returns. Each return still had e-filing fees ($25 each in my case), but it was WAY cheaper than hiring a pro for each return. Check with local tax offices in your area - many offer this in the off-season (summer/fall) at discounted rates. They technically review the returns before filing, but it's minimal if you know what you're doing.
Did they require you to have any credentials for this arrangement? And did they limit what forms you could file using their software?
No credentials required! The tax office registered the returns under their EFIN, but I did all the work. They just did a quick review before submission. As for limitations, I had access to all federal and state forms - the only restriction was I couldn't file business returns (1120, 1120S, 1065) but could do Schedule C for sole proprietorships. It was perfect for family returns which were mostly W-2s, some 1099s, and basic investment income.
Have you considered setting up a shared Dropbox or Google Drive folder where everyone uploads their documents? That's what I did for my family - created a secure folder structure for each person, had them upload docs throughout the year, then I blocked off a weekend to do all the returns using FreeTaxUSA. Way more efficient than doing them one by one with each person present.
I tried the shared folder method but had issues with older family members not scanning things properly or uploading the wrong docs. How did you handle the technologically challenged relatives?
@Pedro Sawyer I ran into the same issue initially! What worked for me was creating a simple one-page instruction sheet with screenshots showing exactly how to scan and upload documents. I also set up a practice "folder where" they could test uploading a random document first. For the really tech-challenged relatives, I found it easier to either visit them once to collect all their documents in person, or have them mail me physical copies that I could scan myself. The time saved from not having to sit through each return individually still made it worthwhile, even with some extra document collection effort upfront. The key was being flexible - some family members used the digital method, others I just collected docs from the old-fashioned way. As long as I had all the paperwork centralized, I could still knock out all the returns efficiently in one session.
I'm in exactly the same situation (F-1 beyond 5 years) and my accountant told me something completely different. He said the closer connection exception ONLY applies if you've already met the substantial presence test. But as an F-1 student in years 1-5, you're EXEMPT from the substantial presence test in the first place, so the closer connection exception doesn't even come into play until year 6. So in year 6, you would first apply the substantial presence test (which you'll probably meet), and THEN you can apply the closer connection exception by filing Form 8840. Am I misunderstanding this completely? The IRS publication language is so confusing!
You've got it right. During years 1-5 of F-1 status, you're automatically exempt from the substantial presence test (file Form 8843 only). Starting year 6, you're subject to the substantial presence test - which you'll likely meet if you've been in the US continuously. At that point, the closer connection exception becomes relevant - and that's when you need Form 8840 along with 8843. Your accountant is correct about the sequence of application, but wrong if they're saying you can't use the closer connection exception. You absolutely can if you genuinely maintain stronger ties to your home country.
This clarification is super helpful! So if I understand correctly: Years 1-5: File just 8843, automatically non-resident. Year 6+: File both 8843 and 8840 to claim closer connection exception. I wish the IRS website explained it this clearly! Thanks so much.
Since everyone seems confused about the substantial presence test for F-1 students, here's what I learned after calling the IRS twice and talking to a school tax advisor: Years 1-5 on F-1: You are an "exempt individual" (not exempt from tax, but exempt from counting days for substantial presence test). File Form 8843 only. Year 6+ on F-1: You are no longer automatically exempt, so the substantial presence test applies. If you meet it (which you likely will after 183 days), you have two options: 1. File as a resident alien (subject to FICA and eligible for standard deduction) 2. Try to claim closer connection exception by filing both Forms 8843 AND 8840 The closer connection test looks at where your life is centered - bank accounts, property, family, future plans, etc. If they accept it, you continue filing as nonresident alien (no FICA tax, but also no standard deduction). The most common mistake I see is people only filing 8843 after year 5 without the 8840 form. That's not enough to claim the exception!
Which tax software actually handles this correctly? I tried TurboTax and it doesn't even have options for nonresident aliens! I tried Sprintax like OP mentioned but it sounds like it doesn't handle the closer connection exception correctly either.
From my experience, most mainstream tax software (TurboTax, H&R Block, etc.) doesn't handle nonresident alien situations well at all. They're designed primarily for U.S. residents and citizens. For F-1 students, your main options are: 1. Sprintax - handles basic nonresident cases but as mentioned, doesn't properly evaluate closer connection exceptions 2. Glacier Tax Prep - specifically designed for nonresident aliens, but can be pricey 3. Manual preparation using IRS forms directly (Forms 1040NR, 8843, 8840) 4. Tax professionals who specialize in international student taxation The closer connection exception is pretty nuanced, so even specialized software might not get it right without human review. I ended up doing mine manually after Sprintax incorrectly classified me as a resident in year 6.
Ryder Greene
Everyone's focusing on federal taxes, but don't forget to check local options! My city has a "renter's relief" program that gives a modest rebate to renters below certain income thresholds. It's only about $750 a year, but that's better than nothing. Google "[your city/county name] + renter relief" or "renter tax credit" to see if anything exists in your area. Also, if you're in a high tax state, the SALT cap of $10K means many homeowners aren't getting the full benefit of their property tax deductions anyway. It's not completely equitable, but the gap isn't as huge as it might seem in some areas.
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
ā¢Thanks for mentioning this! I just checked and my county actually does have a program I never knew about. It's not much ($500 credit) but definitely helps.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
ā¢What's the SALT cap? I keep hearing about it but don't really understand what it means or how it affects homeowners vs renters.
0 coins
Adriana Cohn
I'm actually a tax preparer and want to add some context. The mortgage interest deduction was never really designed to be "unfair" to renters - it's a legacy policy from when almost all interest was deductible (including credit cards, car loans, etc). Those other deductions were eliminated but mortgage interest stayed because of heavy lobbying from the real estate industry. With the increased standard deduction ($13,850 single/$27,700 married in 2025), about 85% of taxpayers don't itemize anymore anyway. So many homeowners aren't even getting that benefit unless they have very large mortgages.
0 coins
Melody Miles
ā¢But what about property tax deductions? Those still benefit homeowners and not renters, right? Even though technically renters are paying property taxes through their rent.
0 coins
CyberNinja
ā¢You're absolutely right about property taxes. Renters do indirectly pay property taxes through their rent, but they can't deduct any portion of it. The property tax deduction (up to $10K under the SALT cap) only benefits the property owner - in this case, the landlord. This is one of the clearest examples of the tax code's bias toward ownership. A renter and a homeowner could be paying the exact same amount monthly for housing, but only the homeowner gets to deduct the property tax portion. The renter is essentially subsidizing their landlord's tax deduction while getting no benefit themselves. Some states try to address this inequity with renter's rebate programs that are specifically designed to give renters back a portion of the property taxes they're indirectly paying, but it's definitely not universal or consistent across the country.
0 coins