IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Amara Adebayo

β€’

Here's a super simple way I calculated mine: Marginal rate: Look at the tax bracket where your last dollar of income falls. For married filing jointly in 2023, if your taxable income was between $89,451 and $190,750, your marginal rate is 22%. Effective rate: Line 24 (total tax) Γ· Line 9 (total income) Γ— 100 = your percentage

0 coins

That's not quite right for someone with self-employment income. You need to include the self-employment tax too (Schedule 2, line 4), otherwise you're undercounting your total tax burden.

0 coins

Great question! As someone who also has both W-2 income and self-employment income, I can relate to the confusion around calculating these rates properly. Here's what I've learned from my own experience: **For Marginal Rate:** Find your taxable income on line 15 of your 1040, then look up which tax bracket that puts you in for married filing jointly. That bracket percentage is your marginal rate for federal income tax. But remember, any additional self-employment income will also be subject to the 15.3% self-employment tax (though you get to deduct half of it). **For Effective Rate:** This is where it gets tricky with self-employment income. You want to divide your total tax burden by your total income. So add up: - Line 24 (total tax from 1040) - Line 4 from Schedule 2 (self-employment tax) Then divide that sum by your total income (W-2 wages + net profit from Schedule C). One thing that really helped me understand this better was realizing that my effective rate tells me what I actually paid on average, while my marginal rate tells me what I'd pay on the next dollar I earn. This distinction is super important for planning whether to take on more consulting work! The self-employment tax piece definitely makes it more complex than just having W-2 income, but once you understand the components, it becomes much clearer.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

β€’

This is really helpful! I've been struggling with this exact same situation. One follow-up question - when you mention deducting half of the self-employment tax, where does that show up on the forms? I see the SE tax calculation on Schedule SE but I'm not sure where the deduction part gets applied on my 1040. Also, do you happen to know if there's a simple way to project what my rates would be if I increased my consulting income by a certain amount? I'm trying to decide whether it's worth taking on a bigger project next year.

0 coins

@Isabel Vega Great questions! The deduction for half of your self-employment tax shows up on line 15 of Schedule 1 Additional (Income and Adjustments to Income ,)which then flows to line 10a on your main 1040 form. This reduces your adjusted gross income, so you re'not paying income tax on the portion of SE tax that represents the employer "half." For projecting future rates with increased consulting income, here s'what I do: Take your current taxable income and add the projected additional net profit from consulting. See which tax bracket that new amount falls into - that gives you the marginal rate for the extra income. Then add 15.3% for SE tax minus (the income tax savings from deducting half of that SE tax, which varies by your bracket .)A rough rule of thumb I use: if I m'in the 22% bracket, each additional dollar of consulting income costs me about 33-34% in total taxes 22% (income tax + 15.3% SE tax - roughly 3% savings from the SE tax deduction .)It s'not perfect but gets me in the ballpark for quick decisions!

0 coins

I've been following this discussion as someone who works with low-income families navigating healthcare coverage, and I wanted to add some additional reassurance about your specific situation. At $15,500 actual income versus your $22,000 estimate, you're describing exactly the scenario that the ACA's safety net provisions were designed to protect. The fact that your income dropped due to health reasons - which forced you to cut back hours - is a classic example of circumstances beyond your control that these protections address. What's particularly important in your case is that $15,500 puts you right at the Federal Poverty Level threshold (around $15,060 for 2024). This means you're likely protected by multiple safeguards: the coverage gap provision if you're in a non-expansion state, or at minimum the repayment caps if you're in an expansion state. The key thing to remember is that the system recognizes the difference between someone who deliberately underreports income to get bigger subsidies versus someone who makes a good-faith estimate that gets derailed by life circumstances. Your health-related work reduction falls squarely into the latter category. Don't let the fear of potential repayment prevent you from filing Form 8962. As everyone else has shared, the protections are built into the form calculations and apply automatically when you enter your actual income. You're very likely going to owe much less than you fear, or possibly nothing at all.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

β€’

This has been such an incredibly helpful thread! As someone completely new to navigating ACA subsidies, I can't express how grateful I am for all the real-world experiences and detailed explanations everyone has shared. Reading Connor's professional perspective really drives home how these protections are specifically designed for situations like the original poster's - and like many of ours. The distinction between deliberate underreporting versus good-faith estimates derailed by life circumstances is so important and gives me confidence that the system will treat these situations fairly. What strikes me most about this entire discussion is how many people were living in unnecessary fear about their ACA subsidy situations, myself included. The collective wisdom here has shown that while the system is complex, it actually has multiple layers of protection for people dealing with unexpected income changes due to health issues, job changes, or other circumstances beyond their control. For anyone else who might find this thread while dealing with similar worries - please don't let fear paralyze you from filing Form 8962. The experiences shared here demonstrate that the protections are real and they work. Whether it's the coverage gap provision, repayment caps, or hardship exemptions, there are safeguards specifically designed to help people in these situations. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share their knowledge and experiences. This community support has been invaluable!

0 coins

I completely understand your panic about this situation - I was in almost exactly the same boat last year! I estimated around $21,000 but ended up making only $14,800 due to a medical issue that forced me to reduce my work hours significantly. Here's what I learned: the ACA actually has strong protections for people whose income drops unexpectedly due to circumstances beyond their control. Since you mentioned your income dropped to $15,500 due to health reasons, you're likely protected by what's called the "coverage gap" provision if you're in a state that didn't expand Medicaid. The key thing is that you made your original $22,000 estimate in good faith, and the reduction was due to health issues - not something you could have predicted. At $15,500, you're right around 100% of the Federal Poverty Level, which triggers automatic protections against subsidy repayment in most cases. Don't let fear prevent you from filing Form 8962 when tax time comes. The protections are built into the form calculations and apply automatically when you enter your actual income. I was terrified I'd owe back over $3,000, but thanks to these safeguards, I ended up owing nothing. Keep documentation of your health issues and work hour reductions - having that paper trail shows your income estimate was reasonable and the change was due to legitimate circumstances. You're going to be okay!

0 coins

Lena Kowalski

β€’

Thank you so much for sharing your experience, Jeremiah! As someone who's completely new to this community and facing a very similar situation, reading your story has been incredibly reassuring. Your situation sounds almost identical to mine - I also had to reduce my work hours due to health issues and I've been absolutely terrified about what this means for my ACA subsidies. The fact that you went from fearing a $3,000 repayment to owing nothing thanks to these protections gives me so much hope. I had no idea about the coverage gap provision or how the Federal Poverty Level threshold works in these situations. Like so many others in this thread, I was convinced the system was designed to punish people for any income changes, but learning about all these safeguards has completely changed my understanding. Your advice about keeping documentation of health issues and work hour reductions is really helpful - I've been saving all my medical records and employer communications about my reduced schedule, so it sounds like I'm on the right track there. This entire thread has been like finding a treasure trove of practical information that I couldn't get anywhere else. Thank you for adding your voice and helping ease the fears of those of us dealing with these stressful situations!

0 coins

I completely understand your shock and frustration with that $12K tax bill! As someone who went through a very similar situation ($10,500 surprise bill) two years ago, I can tell you that you're definitely not alone and the advice you received is absolutely correct. The "married but withhold at higher single rate" option is 100% legitimate and specifically designed for dual-income married couples like yourselves. You're not lying on any tax forms - this option exists because the IRS recognizes that standard "married" withholding assumes only one spouse works, which leads to chronic underwithholding for two-income households. However, I'd recommend being strategic about implementation. When my spouse and I both switched to single rates initially, we ended up with a $3,400 refund the following year - essentially gave the government an interest-free loan. What worked much better for us was a mixed approach: - I switched to "married but withhold at higher single rate" (as the higher earner) - My spouse kept "married" but added $275 extra per paycheck in Step 4(c) - We used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator to calculate these exact amounts Since you're making changes in April, definitely make estimated quarterly payments for Q1 and Q2. With your $12K shortfall pattern, I'd plan for around $2,800-3,000 per quarter to avoid penalties. The good news? Once you get this dialed in, you'll have complete peace of mind. We've been within $300 of breaking even for two years running. Set a calendar reminder to review your withholding each January - it's become routine and the stress relief is incredible. You've absolutely got this!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience and the detailed breakdown of what worked for you! As someone who's new to this community and dealing with a similar tax withholding nightmare, it's incredibly reassuring to hear from people who have actually solved this problem successfully. Your mixed approach sounds really smart - having the higher earner switch to "married but withhold at higher single rate" while the other spouse adds targeted extra withholding seems like it would give much better precision than just having both spouses make the same change. The fact that you've been within $300 of breaking even for two years is exactly the kind of predictable outcome I'd love to achieve. I hadn't initially considered the timing issue with quarterly payments, but since we're already several months into the year, those Q1 and Q2 payments are clearly essential. Your $2,800-3,000 per quarter estimate gives me a solid target to work with. The calendar reminder for annual withholding reviews is such a great idea - I can see how making this a routine part of tax planning would prevent these kinds of surprises from happening again. After reading through all these responses, I'm feeling much more confident that there's actually a path forward to solve this permanently rather than just stumbling through it year after year. Thanks for the encouragement!

0 coins

Dominic Green

β€’

I went through this exact same situation last year - $11,800 surprise tax bill despite both my wife and I having "married" selected on our W-4s. The shock and panic was absolutely overwhelming, so I completely understand what you're going through right now. After extensive research and working with a tax professional, I can confirm that the H&R Block advisor gave you excellent guidance. "Married, but withhold at higher Single rate" is 100% legitimate and specifically designed for dual-income married couples. You're absolutely not lying or doing anything wrong - this option exists because the IRS knows that regular "married" withholding assumes only one spouse works. However, I'd strongly recommend using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator first before both of you switch to single rates. When we initially both made that change, we ended up with a $3,200 refund the next year - basically gave the government an interest-free loan. What actually worked for us was a strategic mixed approach: - My wife switched to "married but withhold at higher single rate" (she's the higher earner) - I kept "married" but added $285 extra per paycheck in Step 4(c) - We used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator to calculate these precise amounts Since you're making changes in April, definitely make estimated quarterly payments for Q1 and Q2. With your $12K shortfall pattern, I'd estimate around $2,800-3,000 per quarter to avoid penalties. The silver lining? Once you get this dialed in correctly, you'll never deal with surprise tax bills again. We've been within $250 of breaking even for the past year using this approach. Set a calendar reminder to review your withholding every January - the peace of mind is absolutely worth it!

0 coins

Oliver Weber

β€’

This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm a CPA who specializes in individual tax returns, and I see this HCSM confusion come up frequently with my clients. Everything discussed here aligns perfectly with current IRS guidance. Just to reinforce the key points for anyone still reading: 1) HCSM reimbursements are NOT taxable income - don't report them on your return 2) You can ONLY deduct medical expenses you actually paid out of pocket (not reimbursed amounts) 3) Monthly HCSM shares are generally NOT deductible as medical expenses 4) Keep meticulous records showing original expenses, reimbursements received, and net out-of-pocket costs One additional piece of advice: if you're ever unsure about your specific situation, consider getting a consultation with a tax professional who has experience with HCSMs. The documentation and calculation requirements can get complex, especially when you have partial reimbursements or expenses that span multiple tax years. Also worth noting that HCSM rules and IRS interpretations can evolve, so what's accurate today might change in future tax years. Always verify current guidance when preparing your returns. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences - practical examples like these are often more helpful than wading through dense IRS publications!

0 coins

Malik Johnson

β€’

Thank you so much for weighing in as a CPA! It's really reassuring to hear from a professional that everything discussed here aligns with current IRS guidance. As someone who's completely new to both HCSMs and the tax implications, I was worried that some of the advice might be outdated or incorrect. Your point about consulting with a tax professional who has HCSM experience is really valuable. I can already see how complex this could get, especially as my medical expenses and HCSM interactions become more complicated over time. The idea that rules and interpretations can evolve is also something I hadn't considered - I was thinking this would be "set it and forget it" once I understood the basics. One quick question: when you mention getting a consultation for complex situations, what would be some red flags that indicate someone should seek professional help rather than trying to figure it out themselves? I want to make sure I know when I'm getting in over my head rather than making costly mistakes. This whole discussion has been incredibly educational. It's amazing how something that seems like it should be straightforward (medical expenses and reimbursements) can actually have so many nuances when HCSMs are involved. Really appreciate everyone sharing their knowledge and experiences!

0 coins

Diego Vargas

β€’

@Malik Johnson Great question! Here are some red flags that suggest you should consult a tax professional: 1 You) have medical expenses spanning multiple tax years with reimbursements that don t'align with when you paid the bills 2 Your) HCSM has complex sharing rules with different reimbursement percentages for different types of expenses 3 You) re'self-employed and trying to figure out business vs. personal deduction treatment 4 You) have large medical expenses over ($25,000 where) small mistakes could lead to significant tax implications 5 You) ve'received conflicting guidance from your HCSM about tax treatment of their reimbursements 6 You) re'dealing with HSA or FSA funds in addition to HCSM reimbursements Basically, if you re'spending more than a few hours trying to sort through the documentation and calculations, or if you re'not confident in your conclusions, it s'probably worth the consultation fee. The cost of getting it wrong penalties, (interest, audit complications often) exceeds the cost of professional help. Also, if your AGI is high enough that you re'subject to additional Medicare taxes or other high-income provisions, the interaction between medical deductions and those rules can get quite complex. The good news is that most HCSM situations are straightforward once you understand the basic principles discussed in this thread. It s'really the edge cases and complex scenarios where professional help becomes valuable.

0 coins

This entire discussion has been so helpful! I'm dealing with my first year of HCSM membership (Samaritan Ministries) and was completely lost on how to handle the tax implications. Reading through everyone's experiences, I now understand that I need to: - NOT report my HCSM reimbursements as income - Only deduct medical expenses that weren't reimbursed - Keep detailed records of original bills vs. what was actually covered One question I have that I don't think was fully addressed: What about expenses that were submitted to my HCSM but are still pending approval? I have about $3,000 in medical bills from late 2024 that I submitted in December, but I won't know if they'll be approved for sharing until sometime in 2025. Should I assume they won't be covered and deduct them on my 2024 return, or wait to see what happens? I'm leaning toward being conservative and not deducting them until I know for sure they won't be reimbursed, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach. Any thoughts from those who've dealt with this timing issue before?

0 coins

Something important that nobody has mentioned yet - if you're sending money to family overseas, there are FBAR reporting requirements if the total amounts get large enough. My uncle got hit with a huge penalty for helping cousins in another country because he didn't know he had to file an FBAR form when the total exceeded $10,000 in a year. Different rules apply to international transfers versus domestic ones. Just something to keep in mind if any of your friends/family are outside the US!

0 coins

That's really helpful - thankfully all my transfers have been domestic. Is there anywhere specific I should look to understand these FBAR requirements better? I might start helping my aunt who lives in Canada next year.

0 coins

You should check out the official FinCEN website for FBAR requirements. Look specifically for Form 114, which is what you file to report foreign accounts. The reporting threshold is when the total value of all your foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. For helping family in Canada, be aware that the FBAR requirement applies if you have signature authority over accounts, not just ownership. So if you were to deposit money directly into a Canadian account where you're a signatory, that could trigger reporting requirements. Simple wire transfers or using services like Wise to send money wouldn't trigger FBAR requirements for you personally.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

β€’

Just want to throw this out there - I've sent thousands to my parents and siblings over the years through Zelle and Venmo and never had an issue. It's never been questioned in an audit (yes, I was audited once but for completely unrelated reasons). The IRS cares about taxable income, not personal transfers. As long as you're not trying to hide income by making it look like personal transfers, you're good. They're looking for the big tax evaders, not people helping their families.

0 coins

But what about the new reporting requirements? I heard all cash app transfers are being reported now?? I'm confused about what's changed with the new $600 rule.

0 coins

Prev1...280281282283284...5645Next