Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This is exactly why I always tell people to complete the verification even if the system seems to have moved forward without it. I went through something similar in 2023 - got my refund without verifying, thought I was golden, then boom - CP75C notice in my mailbox 6 weeks later. Had to scramble to get verified through ID.me before they clawed back my refund. The thing is, the IRS has multiple systems that don't always talk to each other perfectly. Your refund processing system might release the funds due to timing constraints, but the Taxpayer Protection Program database still has you flagged. It's like two different departments working off different spreadsheets. My advice? Don't spend that refund money yet. Set it aside in a separate account and proactively complete your ID verification through ID.me or by calling the verification hotline. Better to be safe than sorry, especially when you're relying on that money for expenses. The verification process itself isn't too bad once you get through - just have your documents ready.
Dana Doyle
ā¢This is such helpful advice! I'm curious - when you got the CP75C notice 6 weeks later, did they give you a specific deadline to complete the verification? And was there any indication of what would happen if you missed that deadline? I'm wondering how much time people typically have to respond to these notices before the IRS takes action.
Yara Khoury
This is such a tricky situation! I went through something similar in 2022 - got my refund without verifying, then about 8 weeks later received a CP75 notice requiring verification. The letter gave me 30 days to respond, but I called the TPP line within a week just to be safe. What saved me was keeping detailed records of everything. I took screenshots of my WMR status changes, saved all the emails, and documented the timeline. When I finally got through to an agent, having that documentation helped them understand my case quickly. One thing I learned: even if you get the refund, don't treat it as "cleared" until you've gone at least 6 months without any follow-up notices. The IRS post-processing reviews can take months to catch up, especially during heavy filing seasons. My suggestion would be to call the TPP verification line (833-558-5500) proactively and ask about your specific case. They can tell you definitively whether you still need to verify, even if your online status says "refund received." Better to spend 2 hours on hold now than deal with a surprise clawback later when you've already budgeted that money for expenses.
Liam McGuire
ā¢This is really good advice about keeping documentation! I'm actually in a similar boat right now - my status changed without me verifying anything. Quick question: when you called that TPP line, were you able to get through relatively quickly? I've been hesitant to call because I've heard horror stories about wait times, but it sounds like it might be worth the effort to get a definitive answer rather than just hoping everything works out.
Join the conversation
The whole PATH act is str8 š¤” stuff. Why they gotta hold our money hostage like this
Facts! They quick to take it but slow to give it back smh
Ethan Wilson
Pro tip: stop checking WMR its usually behind. Check your transcript instead its more accurate
@Chloe Martin honestly same! those codes and numbers make no sense to me. That taxr.ai thing @Sean O Donnell'mentioned might be worth checking out if it actually explains what all that transcript stuff means
Real talk the transcript codes are confusing af but once you learn the basic ones it's actually way better than WMR. Look for code 846 - that's your refund date. Code 570 means hold, 971 notice issued. Still a pain to decode but beats waiting for WMR to maybe update š¤·āāļø
Join the conversation
Another option worth exploring is equipment financing specifically - many lenders offer competitive rates for business equipment purchases, and you can often finance 80-100% of the equipment cost with the equipment itself as collateral. This keeps your retirement funds intact while still getting the equipment you need. I'd also suggest running the numbers on tax-adjusted returns. That 300% return over 8-10 years might look different when you factor in the immediate tax hit from the withdrawal (potentially 22-32% depending on your bracket) plus the 10% penalty if you're under 59Ā½. Don't forget to account for lost compound growth on those retirement funds over the same period. If you do decide to proceed with the withdrawal, consider timing it strategically - maybe split it across two tax years to avoid bumping into a higher bracket, or coordinate with other business expenses to maximize your deductions in the withdrawal year.
This is really solid advice about equipment financing - I hadn't fully considered how the compound growth loss on retirement funds factors into the equation. When you mention splitting the withdrawal across two tax years, do you know if there are any restrictions on doing that? Like, would I need to purchase the equipment in phases to justify the split withdrawal, or can I take partial distributions in December and January for a single equipment purchase? I want to make sure I'm not creating any red flags with the IRS if I go this route.
Miguel Ortiz
ā¢Great question about splitting withdrawals across tax years! There's no requirement to purchase equipment in phases to justify split withdrawals - you can take distributions in different tax years for a single purchase as long as you can document the business purpose. However, timing is crucial for tax planning. If you withdraw in December 2024 and January 2025, both amounts would need to be reported as income in their respective tax years. The equipment purchase and resulting Section 179 deduction would typically go on the tax return for the year you actually bought and placed the equipment in service. So if you buy in January 2025, that deduction would offset your 2025 income, not the 2024 withdrawal. To maximize the strategy, you might consider: 1) Taking the first withdrawal late in 2024 and making a partial equipment purchase then, 2) Taking the second withdrawal and completing the purchase early in 2025. This way each withdrawal has corresponding business deductions in the same tax year. Just make sure to keep detailed records showing the business necessity and timing of both withdrawals and purchases. The IRS doesn't typically flag this approach as long as there's legitimate business documentation.
Lucas Turner
I'm dealing with a similar situation right now, though mine involves about $15k for manufacturing equipment. One thing I learned from talking to my accountant is that you might want to look into the timing of when you "place the equipment in service" versus when you make the withdrawal. If you withdraw the funds in December 2024 but don't purchase and start using the equipment until January 2025, you'll pay taxes on the withdrawal income in 2024 but can't claim the Section 179 deduction until 2025. This could put you in a higher tax bracket for 2024 with no offsetting deduction. Also, don't forget about state taxes if you're in a state with income tax - that adds another layer to the withdrawal cost that equipment depreciation might not fully offset. Have you calculated what the actual after-tax cost of the withdrawal would be versus a business loan? When I ran my numbers, even at 8% interest for equipment financing, I came out ahead compared to the combined federal tax, state tax, and 10% penalty hit from early retirement withdrawal. The math gets even more favorable for financing when you consider that loan interest is deductible as a business expense, so you're effectively getting a discount on the interest rate equal to your marginal tax rate.
This is really helpful - the timing aspect between withdrawal and equipment placement is something I definitely need to consider more carefully. I hadn't thought about how splitting those across tax years could actually hurt rather than help. Your point about running the actual numbers is spot on. I've been so focused on the projected equipment returns that I haven't done a detailed comparison of the true cost of early withdrawal (taxes + penalties + lost compound growth) versus equipment financing costs after factoring in the interest deduction. Do you mind sharing what interest rate you were quoted for equipment financing? I'm curious if rates vary significantly by industry or equipment type. For my situation, even if I could get financing at 9-10%, it might still be better than the retirement withdrawal route when I factor in all the tax implications you mentioned. Also, did your accountant give you any guidance on documentation requirements if you do go the withdrawal route? I want to make sure I'm not creating audit risks by mixing retirement and business funds.
Ethan Wilson
ā¢I got quoted rates between 7.5% and 9.8% for equipment financing, with the variation mainly based on the equipment type, my business credit score, and length of the loan term. Manufacturing equipment generally gets better rates than some other categories since it holds value well as collateral. My accountant emphasized keeping very detailed records if going the withdrawal route - separate business bank account for the withdrawn funds, clear paper trail from retirement account ā business account ā equipment purchase, and documentation showing the equipment was purchased solely for business use (invoices, delivery receipts, etc.). She also recommended getting a formal business valuation or equipment appraisal to support the "investment" rationale if questioned. One thing that surprised me was learning about the "exclusive business use" requirement for Section 179. If there's any personal use of the equipment, even minimal, you can't take the full deduction. This becomes especially important when mixing personal retirement funds with business purchases - the IRS scrutinizes these transactions more closely. After running all the numbers including lost opportunity cost on retirement funds, I ended up going with equipment financing at 8.2%. The peace of mind of keeping my retirement intact was worth the interest cost, especially since the interest is tax-deductible.
Join the conversation
Dyllan Nantx
Has anyone tried using TaxSlayer? Their website says they offer "Ask a Tax Pro" service that sounds similar to what TaxAct used to have. Thinking about switching for next year.
I used TaxSlayer last year and their Ask a Tax Pro service was ok but limited. You can ask questions but they don't do a comprehensive review. They give you like 3 questions with their mid-tier plan, and unlimited with their premium. Responses usually came within a day but sometimes felt generic.
Dyllan Nantx
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience! That's disappointing to hear it's limited to a certain number of questions with their mid-tier plan. I definitely need more hand-holding than that. I might just bite the bullet and pay for a local CPA to review everything after I prepare it myself. Seems like all these online services are moving away from comprehensive reviews to save money on staffing costs.
I'm in the exact same boat as you! Been using TaxAct since 2020 and loved having that scheduled appointment where someone would walk through my entire return with me before filing. It was such a relief as someone who's not super confident with taxes. I noticed the change last year too and was really frustrated. What helped me was combining a few approaches: I used the new question system to ask about specific sections I was unsure about, but I also found a local Enrolled Agent who offers "review only" services for about $75. They'll go through your completed return and flag any issues before you file. It's annoying that we have to cobble together solutions now when TaxAct used to offer everything in one package, but at least there are still ways to get that expert review we need. The peace of mind is worth the extra step and cost for me.
Amara Eze
ā¢That's a great approach combining the TaxAct questions with a local review! I hadn't thought about finding an Enrolled Agent specifically for review services. How did you find yours - just through Google or is there a directory somewhere? And did they catch anything significant that you missed, or was it more for peace of mind? I'm definitely willing to pay the extra $75 if it means getting that comprehensive review I used to rely on. The uncertainty of not having someone double-check everything before filing makes me so anxious every tax season.
Christian Burns
Does anyone know if doing this recharacterization messes up your ability to do backdoor Roth conversions in the future? I'm in a similar situation and worried this will create some kind of red flag in the system.
0 coins
Sasha Reese
ā¢It doesn't mess up future backdoor Roth conversions. I've done recharacterizations before and still do backdoor Roth conversions every year. The only thing that can complicate backdoor Roths is having existing pre-tax money in Traditional IRAs (the pro-rata rule).
0 coins
Zainab Khalil
I went through almost the exact same situation last year! The key thing to understand is that when you recharacterize contributions, you're essentially treating them as if they were made to a Traditional IRA from the beginning. For your Code R form (2022 contributions), you technically should amend your 2022 return to remove the Roth IRA contribution and add it as a Traditional IRA contribution instead. I know it seems weird since you just got the form, but the recharacterization itself happened in 2023, and the IRS wants your 2022 return to reflect the "corrected" contribution type. The good news is that if you didn't take a deduction for the original Roth contribution (which you couldn't have), the amendment is mainly just changing the type of contribution reported. It shouldn't result in any additional taxes owed. For your backdoor Roth strategy going forward, this actually sets you up perfectly! The recharacterized money is now in a Traditional IRA, and if your income is still above the Roth limits, you can convert that Traditional IRA money to Roth as part of your backdoor strategy. Just make sure to account for the pro-rata rule if you have other Traditional IRA balances.
0 coins
Sophie Hernandez
ā¢This is really helpful, thanks! I'm new to all this IRA stuff and feeling pretty overwhelmed. When you say "amendment is mainly just changing the type of contribution reported" - does that mean I need to file a whole new 1040X form? And how do I make sure I don't mess up the pro-rata rule calculation when I do my backdoor Roth conversion? I have about $15k in an old 401k rollover sitting in a Traditional IRA that I'm worried might complicate things.
0 coins