IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Quick tip from someone who's filed 1120-F for 5+ years: Don't forget to include Form 8833 for any treaty-based return positions you're taking. I see so many foreign corps miss this and it immediately flags your return. Also, if you have any US real property interests, make sure you're properly handling Form 8288 withholding requirements. These are audit magnets if handled incorrectly.

0 coins

Speaking of Form 8833, how specific do you need to be in describing the treaty provisions you're relying on? Do you cite specific articles and paragraphs, or just generally reference the treaty? Our tax software gives very limited space for these explanations.

0 coins

Always cite the specific treaty article, paragraph, and subparagraph when completing Form 8833. For instance, don't just say "US-Japan Treaty" - say "Article 7(1) of the US-Japan Income Tax Treaty" and briefly explain how it applies to your situation. If space is limited in your software, attach a supplemental statement. Being precise about which provisions you're relying on demonstrates to the IRS that you've done your homework and have a solid basis for your position. In my experience, vague treaty claims get questioned much more often than specific, well-documented ones.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Maya, I've been through this exact situation with our UK subsidiary filing 1120-F. A few additional points that might help: For your R&D allocation question, consider maintaining a detailed allocation study that documents not just the methodology but also the business rationale. We had success using a combination approach - gross receipts for general R&D, but direct attribution for specific projects where we could clearly identify US vs. global benefits. Regarding your software licensing revenue question, be very careful here. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing income attribution between related entities. If your US operations are involved in customer relationships, technical support, or customization for those licenses, you may have ECI even if the contracts are signed in Japan. Document all US activities related to that revenue stream. One thing I didn't see mentioned - make sure you're considering the branch profits tax implications. With $2.4M in receipts, you're likely subject to it, and proper planning around deemed repatriation can save significant tax. Also, file Form 5472 for related party transactions if you haven't already. Missing this can trigger automatic penalties even if your 1120-F is perfect.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, Miguel! I hadn't even considered the branch profits tax implications - that's definitely something I need to discuss with our CPA immediately. Regarding Form 5472, we do have significant intercompany transactions (management fees, technology licensing, shared services) that I'm now worried we haven't been reporting properly. Is there a specific threshold for related party transactions that triggers the Form 5472 requirement, or is it any transaction at all? Also, your point about documenting US activities for the software licensing revenue is spot on. Our US team does handle customer implementation calls and provides ongoing technical support, even though the licenses are sold through Japan. It sounds like we definitely need to treat at least a portion of that as ECI. Do you have any guidance on reasonable allocation methods for splitting that revenue between US and Japanese activities?

0 coins

Will My Refund Unfreeze After Oct 21? Transcript Shows 2 Amended Returns, Multiple 570/977 Codes & Penalty Removal

I need help understanding what's happening with my amended return situation. My transcript is showing multiple amendments and I'm really confused about whether money is coming or not. Looking at my transcript, I see: TRANSACTIONS CODE EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION CYCLE DATE AMOUNT 150 Tax return filed 20242405 07-01-2024 $4,875.00 14221-478-43991-4 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding 04-15-2024 -$3,456.00 810 Refund freeze 03-29-2024 $0.00 276 Penalty for late payment of tax 20242405 07-01-2024 $347.00 196 Interest charged for late payment 20242405 07-01-2024 $211.00 971 Notice issued 07-01-2024 $0.00 570 Additional account action pending 08-05-2024 $0.00 971 Amended tax return or claim 07-02-2024 $0.00 forwarded for processing 977 Amended return filed 07-02-2024 $0.00 33277-601-02162-4 971 Amended tax return or claim 08-17-2024 $0.00 forwarded for processing 977 Amended return filed 08-17-2024 $0.00 33277-634-01925-4 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding 04-15-2024 -$1,850.00 290 Additional tax assessed 20244005 10-21-2024 $762.00 19254-675-06360-4 570 Additional account action pending 10-21-2024 $0.00 277 Reduced or removed penalty for 10-21-2024 -$347.00 late payment of tax 197 Reduced or removed interest 10-21-2024 -$211.00 charged for late payment This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data Two separate 977 codes for amended returns - one filed on 07-02-2024 (reference 33277-601-02162-4) and another on 08-17-2024 (reference 33277-634-01925-4). I don't understand why there are two different amendments when I only filed one. Did the IRS file one on my behalf? There are also multiple 570 codes showing "Additional account action pending" - one for 08-05-2024 and another for 10-21-2024. Does this mean they're still processing something? The timeline shows my original return was filed (code 150) on 07-01-2024 with cycle date 20242405, but then there's a refund freeze (code 810) from 03-29-2024 which seems odd since it's before I filed my return. I got hit with some penalties (code 276) and interest (code 196) on 07-01-2024, but then later on 10-21-2024 they reduced or removed both the penalty (code 277) and interest (code 197). I see there's an additional tax assessed (code 290) from 10-21-2024 with reference 19254-675-06360-4 and cycle 20244005, but I'm not sure what this is for? I also see multiple 971 notices issued on different dates (07-01-2024, 07-02-2024, and 08-17-2024) but I don't think I've received all of these notices. I notice there are two separate 806 codes for W-2 or 1099 withholding on 04-15-2024. Why would this appear twice? With all these codes and dates, especially the two different amendments and pending actions, I really can't tell what's happening with my refund. Can someone help me make sense of this? Will I be getting a refund or do I owe more money? The penalties were removed but there's that additional tax assessment that has me worried.

Logan Scott

•

I'm dealing with something similar - multiple amended returns showing up when I only filed one. From what I've learned, the IRS sometimes creates internal amendments (that second 977 code) when they find discrepancies during processing. The good news is that October 21st date shows recent activity. When they remove penalties AND interest like yours shows (codes 277/197), it usually means they're taking responsibility for processing delays. That additional tax assessment (code 290) for $762 will either reduce your refund or create a balance due. Check if your withholding (those 806 codes totaling $5,306) covers your total tax liability plus that new $762 assessment. If it does, you should still get something back once they finish processing. The 570 codes mean they're still working on it, but October activity is promising! Keep checking your transcript weekly for either an 846 refund code or movement on that balance. Based on the timeline, I'd expect resolution in the next 2-4 weeks.

0 coins

Thanks for breaking this down! That makes me feel a bit better knowing the October activity is a good sign. So if my withholding was $5,306 total and I have that $762 additional assessment, plus my original tax was $4,875, I should still get something back right? Math was never my strong suit but it seems like I'd still have a small refund coming? šŸ¤ž

0 coins

LunarEclipse

•

Looking at your transcript breakdown, you should definitely still get a refund! Here's the math: Your total withholding was $5,306 ($3,456 + $1,850 from the two 806 codes). Your original tax liability was $4,875, plus that additional $762 assessment = $5,637 total. So $5,306 - $5,637 = you'd still be due a small refund of around $331, assuming no other adjustments. The fact they waived your penalties and interest (saving you $558 total) shows they're being fair about their processing delays. That October 21st activity is definitely movement in the right direction - when the IRS removes penalties like that, it usually means they're wrapping up the case. Keep monitoring for an 846 code in the next few weeks. With amended returns, they often batch process the final calculations, so you might see everything resolve at once. The multiple 570 codes just mean they're being thorough with the review process.

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

Wait, I'm getting confused by all these numbers šŸ˜… Can someone double check the math here? I see the withholding amounts but I'm not sure if I'm reading the transcript correctly. Is the $4,875 from code 150 what I actually owe in taxes, or is that something else? And does that additional $762 assessment mean I definitely owe more money on top of everything? Sorry for all the questions but this is my first time dealing with amended returns and I just want to make sure I understand what's happening!

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Hey Emily! No worries, this stuff is confusing. Let me break it down simply: The $4,875 from code 150 is your total tax liability for the year (what you actually owe). The $762 from code 290 is additional tax they assessed after reviewing your amended return, so your total tax owed is now $4,875 + $762 = $5,637. Your withholding (payments made through payroll) was $5,306 total. So you'd still get a small refund of about $331 ($5,306 - $5,637 = -$331, but since it's negative that means you overpaid). The penalties and interest were waived so you don't owe those anymore. Hope that helps! 😊

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

From my experience as a small business owner, there are situations where you might get an unusually large refund. Last year, I estimated my quarterly tax payments based on the previous year's income, but then had a significant business loss in Q4. I had already paid in about $22k in estimated taxes throughout the year but ended up owing much less due to the business loss, resulting in a large refund. Another possibility: if your cousin bought a house last year, there are substantial first-time homebuyer credits in some states that can be combined with federal credits, especially for energy-efficient improvements. These can add up quickly.

0 coins

What tax software would you recommend for someone with a small business and rental properties? I've been using TurboTax but feel like I'm missing a lot of potential deductions, especially for my rentals.

0 coins

For small business and rental properties, I'd recommend FreeTaxUSA or TaxAct over TurboTax - they're much better at handling Schedule E rental income/losses and business deductions without forcing you into expensive upgrade tiers. Make sure you're tracking ALL rental expenses: repairs, maintenance, property management fees, insurance, property taxes, depreciation, travel to the property, and even office supplies for rental management. The depreciation deduction alone can be substantial - you can depreciate the structure (not land) over 27.5 years. For business deductions, don't forget home office expenses if you work from home, vehicle mileage, business meals (50% deductible), professional development, and equipment purchases. The Section 179 deduction lets you write off up to $1.16M in equipment purchases in the year you buy them instead of depreciating over time.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

There's another scenario that could explain your cousin's $25k refund - if she's been involved in any kind of tax-related legal settlement or IRS error correction. I had a neighbor who received a massive refund because the IRS had incorrectly processed her returns for several years, and when they finally caught and corrected their mistake, she got a lump sum payment that included not just the refund amounts but also interest. Also, some healthcare workers (like nurses) were eligible for special pandemic-related relief programs and credits that might still be processing. There were student loan forgiveness programs, emergency worker benefits, and various state-specific credits for essential workers that could contribute to an unusually large refund. The timing might also be important - if she filed late or had to wait for certain tax documents (like K-1s from investments or partnerships), her refund might include interest payments from the IRS for the delay, which can add up significantly over time.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is really insightful! I hadn't thought about IRS error corrections or pandemic-related credits for healthcare workers. Given that your cousin is a nurse, she might have qualified for some of those essential worker programs that had delayed processing. The interest payment aspect is particularly interesting - if the IRS held up her refund for any reason and then had to pay interest on top of the original refund amount, that could definitely explain how a normal refund turned into something much larger. Do you know what the current interest rate is that the IRS pays on delayed refunds? And how long does a refund typically have to be delayed before they start adding interest?

0 coins

This is exactly why I always tell people to be extremely cautious with new tax preparers, especially when they promise unusually large refunds. What you're describing sounds like classic "ghost preparation" tactics where preparers manufacture deductions and credits to inflate refunds. The -$35,000 "additional income" combined with $30,000 in credits is a huge red flag. These numbers suggest your preparer may be claiming fake business losses or inappropriate refundable credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit that you don't actually qualify for. My advice: DO NOT file this return. Get copies of everything your preparer did and take it to a reputable CPA or enrolled agent for a second opinion. Ask them to explain every single line item that's different from your previous returns. Also document everything about your interactions with this preparer - you may need it if you decide to report them to the IRS. The fact that she's giving you conflicting refund amounts ($25k vs $35k) is another major warning sign. Better to get a legitimate smaller refund than deal with years of IRS problems, penalties, and having to pay back fraudulent refunds with interest.

0 coins

This is such solid advice. I'm actually dealing with something similar right now - my preparer is claiming I qualify for credits I've never heard of before. The whole "trust me" response when you ask for documentation is the biggest red flag possible. One thing I'd add is to make sure you get copies of ALL the forms before you leave the preparer's office. Don't just take their word for what's on the return. I learned this the hard way when my preparer claimed certain deductions were "standard" but couldn't show me where they came from when I asked later. @f014fc63b237 You're smart to question this now rather than after filing. The peace of mind from getting a second opinion is worth way more than any potential refund.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

I'm a tax professional and I need to emphasize how serious this situation is. The combination of negative income adjustments and large refundable credits you've never qualified for before is textbook preparer fraud. Here's what likely happened: Your preparer probably created a fake Schedule C (business) showing losses to generate that -$35,000, then claimed refundable credits like EITC or Additional Child Tax Credit based on manufactured income scenarios. This is called "refund fraud" and it's one of the most common schemes the IRS investigates. The fact that she gave you two different refund amounts and can't provide documentation is all you need to know. A legitimate preparer would have clear explanations and supporting documents for every entry. My recommendation: 1) Do NOT file this return under any circumstances 2) Get your documents back and find a reputable CPA or EA 3) Report this preparer to the IRS using Form 14157 4) Consider reporting to your state's licensing board if applicable The IRS has sophisticated computer systems that flag these patterns immediately. You would almost certainly be audited within months of filing, and you'd be liable for the full amount plus penalties regardless of your preparer's actions. Trust your instincts - they're telling you something is very wrong here.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

bruh why even offer this if they deny everyone lmaooo been seeing so many ppl get denied this year

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

fr fr they just playing with our emotions at this point šŸ’€

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

Sorry you got denied! That's so frustrating when you really need the money. Just wanted to mention that even though the refund advance didn't work out, you can still track your actual tax refund once the IRS starts processing returns. The IRS Where's My Refund tool usually updates within 24 hours after they receive your return. Hang in there - at least you'll get your regular refund once processing begins! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

Thanks for the encouragement! Yeah it definitely stings getting denied when you're counting on that money. Good point about the regular refund though - at least that's something to look forward to. Do you know when the IRS usually starts accepting returns? I feel like it's usually late January but not sure of the exact date this year.

0 coins

Prev1...27202721272227232724...5644Next