


Ask the community...
This thread has been incredibly helpful - thank you all for sharing your real experiences! I'm in a similar position with a property sale and have been getting pitched on DSTs left and right. What really stands out to me from reading through everyone's comments is that the legitimate DST arrangements seem to require giving up immediate access to most of your proceeds (like Maya's 30% upfront structure), while the sketchy ones promise you can have your cake and eat it too (90%+ upfront with full tax deferral). I think I'm going to follow Emma's advice and run a proper financial analysis including all fees before getting swept up in the tax deferral excitement. The 3.5% upfront fee that Ava mentioned would cost me over $50K on my transaction - that's a lot of capital gains tax I could pay instead! Has anyone here worked with a fee-only financial planner (not someone selling DSTs) to evaluate whether these arrangements actually make sense? I'm thinking an independent analysis might be worth the cost before I commit to anything.
Absolutely recommend getting an independent analysis! I used a fee-only CFP who specializes in tax planning (found through NAPFA) and it was worth every penny. They charged me $2,500 for a comprehensive analysis that included running scenarios with different tax rates, investment returns, and fee structures. What really opened my eyes was when they showed me the break-even analysis. For my DST to make financial sense, I would need to assume that capital gains rates increase significantly AND that I could earn better returns through the trust arrangement than in my own diversified portfolio. When we plugged in realistic assumptions, paying the tax upfront won by a wide margin. The planner also helped me understand the opportunity cost - that $50K in fees you mentioned could grow to over $130K in 10 years at a 10% return. Sometimes the "boring" solution of just paying taxes and investing is actually the smartest move!
This entire discussion has been eye-opening! As someone who works in tax preparation, I see clients getting pitched on DSTs constantly, and the sales tactics are often quite aggressive. What concerns me most is that many promoters are targeting people who aren't sophisticated enough to understand the risks. A few red flags I tell my clients to watch for: 1) Any promoter who guarantees the arrangement will never be challenged by the IRS, 2) Promises of getting 80%+ of proceeds upfront while deferring all taxes, 3) High-pressure tactics claiming "this opportunity won't last," and 4) Reluctance to provide detailed documentation for independent review. The legitimate DST arrangements I've seen typically involve substantial genuine deferrals of proceeds (not just token amounts), have real economic substance beyond tax avoidance, and are structured by attorneys who specialize specifically in this area - not general tax preparers or financial advisors trying to earn commissions. If you're considering this route, I'd strongly echo the advice about getting multiple independent opinions. The IRS has significantly increased enforcement in this area, and the penalties for getting it wrong can be severe. Sometimes the most expensive advice is the "free" consultation from someone trying to sell you something.
This is exactly the kind of professional perspective we need more of! As someone new to this community, I'm amazed at how helpful everyone has been in breaking down such a complex topic. Your red flags list is spot-on. I've been getting calls from DST promoters who hit every single one of those warning signs - especially the high-pressure tactics about "limited time offers" and reluctance to let me take documents to an independent attorney for review. One question for you as a tax professional: when clients do proceed with legitimate DST arrangements, what kind of documentation do you recommend they maintain to protect themselves in case of an audit? I'm thinking even the properly structured ones might draw IRS attention just because of all the enforcement activity in this area. Also, do you have any thoughts on the AI tax analysis tools that Andre and Emily mentioned? I'm curious whether those are actually reliable for something this specialized or if there's no substitute for human expertise in complex arrangements like this.
This is such a helpful thread! As someone just starting out with a BC-based online business, I'm saving all these resources. One question I haven't seen addressed yet - what happens if you accidentally charge the wrong tax rates to customers? I'm worried I might mess up the provincial rates since they seem to change and I have clients scattered across Canada. Is there a way to correct this after the fact, or do you just have to eat the difference? Also, if you overcharged a customer on taxes, do you refund them directly or does it go through some official process with CRA/BC? The taxr.ai tool mentioned earlier sounds promising for preventing these mistakes, but I'm curious about the cleanup process if you've already been doing it wrong for a few months.
Great question about tax corrections! If you've been charging incorrect rates, you can definitely fix this. For overcharges, you typically refund the customer directly and then adjust your next GST/HST filing to reflect the correct amount owing. For undercharges, you can either absorb the difference as a cost of doing business or invoice the customer for the shortage (though that's awkward). The key is to correct your filings with CRA and BC as soon as you realize the mistake. Both agencies have voluntary disclosure programs that can reduce penalties if you come forward proactively. I'd recommend keeping detailed records of any corrections and maybe consulting with an accountant for the first correction to make sure you do the paperwork right. Using a tool like taxr.ai from the start would definitely save you this headache! I wish I had known about these resources when I started - would have prevented a lot of late nights trying to figure out which province charges what rate.
This thread has been incredibly informative! I'm a freelance graphic designer in BC and was completely lost on the tax requirements. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like I need to: 1. Register for GST/HST if my total revenue (including US clients) exceeds $30k 2. Register for BC PST regardless of revenue since design services are taxable in BC 3. Not charge any taxes to my US clients (zero-rated exports) 4. Charge appropriate GST/HST rates for Canadian clients based on their province 5. Only charge BC PST to BC clients The mention of taxr.ai and Claimyr is really helpful - I've been dreading calling CRA but knowing there are tools to help navigate this makes it feel less overwhelming. I think I'll start with the tax calculation tool to make sure I understand what I should be charging, then use the CRA callback service to confirm my specific situation. One follow-up question: for creative services like graphic design, are there any special considerations for determining where the "place of supply" is? Some of my clients are corporations with offices in multiple provinces, and I'm not sure which address to use for tax purposes.
I completely understand your stress about this - FBAR errors can feel overwhelming, especially on your first filing! The good news is that selecting the wrong "Type of Filer" box is definitely something you should and can easily fix with an amended filing. Since all your actual account information and financial data are correct, this falls into the category of a non-material error that you're voluntarily correcting. The IRS and FinCEN much prefer when taxpayers proactively fix mistakes rather than hoping they won't be noticed. Here's what I'd recommend: log back into the BSA E-Filing System and prepare an amended FBAR. When you get to the filing type section, select "Amended" and briefly explain in the text field something like "Correcting Type of Filer selection in Box 2." Make sure to reference your original BSA ID number so they can link the filings. The sooner you file the amendment, the better - there's no benefit to waiting. This type of voluntary correction of a form error (as opposed to hiding unreported accounts) is exactly the kind of compliance behavior they want to see. You're doing the right thing by fixing it!
This is exactly the reassurance I needed to hear! I've been losing sleep over this mistake for the past week. Your step-by-step guidance makes the amendment process sound much more manageable than I was imagining. I really appreciate you mentioning that voluntary corrections are viewed favorably - that takes a huge weight off my shoulders. I'm going to log into the BSA system this weekend and get the amendment filed. Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed and encouraging advice!
I can relate to the anxiety you're feeling about this FBAR mistake - it's completely normal to be nervous about getting everything right, especially on your first filing! The consensus from everyone here is spot on: filing an amended FBAR is definitely the right approach for correcting the "Type of Filer" error. What might help ease your mind is knowing that the BSA E-Filing System is designed to handle these exact situations. When you log in to file the amendment, the system will guide you through indicating it's a correction to your previous filing. The fact that all your account information and financial data are accurate is the most important part - that shows you're making a good faith effort to comply properly. One small addition to the great advice already given: when you do file the amendment, you might want to save a copy of the confirmation screen or any reference numbers for your records. Having documentation that you proactively corrected the error can be helpful if any questions ever arise down the road. You're handling this exactly the right way by addressing it promptly rather than ignoring it. Take a deep breath - this is a very fixable situation!
This exact same thing just happened to me! Filed in March with direct deposit info I've used successfully for the past 3 years, and suddenly they switched to mailing a paper check. The "Where's My Refund" tool gives absolutely zero explanation - just says "your refund check is being mailed" with no reason why they made the switch. I'm on day 3 since the status changed and already getting anxious about when it will actually arrive. Based on all the experiences shared here, sounds like I should expect 2-3 weeks minimum. Really frustrating when you budget around having that money available immediately with direct deposit! Going to sign up for USPS Informed Delivery right now after seeing so many people recommend it. At least that way I'll get a heads up when it's finally coming. The lack of transparency from the IRS about why these switches happen is honestly the most annoying part - they just make these decisions and leave us completely in the dark. Thanks to everyone for sharing their timelines and experiences - makes me feel way less alone in dealing with this!
I totally feel your frustration! The same thing happened to me two years ago and I was so confused since nothing had changed on my end either. The waiting is definitely the worst part, especially when you're counting on that money. From what I've seen, most people get their checks within that 2-3 week window once the status changes, so hopefully yours will be on the shorter end. The USPS Informed Delivery really does help with the anxiety - at least you'll know it's coming the day before it hits your mailbox. Hang in there, the check will come eventually even though the IRS gives us zero helpful information about why this stuff happens!
I had this exact same issue happen to me last year! The IRS randomly switched my refund from direct deposit to a paper check even though I'd been using the same bank account for 4 years straight. Turns out there was some kind of "verification flag" on my account that I never knew about. My check took exactly 18 days to arrive after the status changed to "mailed" - so you're probably looking at 2.5-3 weeks realistically. The waiting is absolutely brutal when you're expecting the money right away! One thing that really helped me was setting up USPS Informed Delivery (if you haven't already). You'll get an email every morning showing what mail is coming that day, so at least you'll know when the check is actually arriving instead of obsessively checking your mailbox every day like I did. The most frustrating part is that the IRS gives zero explanation for why they make these switches. I spent hours trying to figure out what triggered it and never got a real answer. Just one of those things we have to deal with unfortunately. Your check will definitely come though - just gotta be patient!
18 days is really helpful to know, thanks for sharing! I'm just at the beginning of this waiting game so it's good to have realistic expectations. Already signed up for USPS Informed Delivery after seeing it mentioned so many times in this thread - hopefully that will save me from constantly checking the mailbox like a crazy person! It's so frustrating that they can just randomly flag accounts with no explanation. At least I know I'm not alone in dealing with this IRS weirdness.
Olivia Kay
Has anyone successfully gotten their overwithholding refunded without getting corrected W-2s? My employer admitted they messed up but said they "can't" issue new W-2s because they already filed with the IRS. They offered to just cut me a check directly.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
ā¢Be careful with this approach. While getting your money back is good, not having corrected W-2s could cause problems later. Your reported wages to the IRS would show you paid more in Social Security than you actually did (after the refund), which could potentially trigger a discrepancy flag. If they insist they can't issue corrected W-2s (which isn't true - they absolutely can file W-2c forms to correct previously filed W-2s), make sure you get documentation from them acknowledging the overwithholding and the direct refund. Save this for your records in case the IRS ever questions the discrepancy.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
I'm dealing with this exact same issue right now! My employer also overwitheld Social Security tax because I hit the wage cap partway through the year, but they kept deducting from my paychecks anyway. One thing that helped me was calculating the exact amount they owe me and putting it in writing. For 2024, the Social Security wage base is $168,600, so any SS tax withheld on wages above that amount should be refunded. I made a simple spreadsheet showing my cumulative wages by pay period and highlighted exactly when I hit the cap and how much was incorrectly withheld after that point. I also found it helpful to reference IRS Publication 15 (Employer's Tax Guide) when talking to HR. Section 5 specifically covers the Social Security wage base and employer responsibilities. Having that official IRS publication number to cite made them take me more seriously. Don't let them drag this out - you're absolutely right that it's their legal responsibility to fix this, not yours. Keep escalating until you get to someone with actual authority to process the correction. Good luck!
0 coins