


Ask the community...
its probably nothing major tbh. mine was just them verifying my w2 info. cleared up in like 3 weeks
Code 570 can definitely be stressful when you're waiting for your refund! I went through the same thing last year. The key is to keep monitoring your transcript weekly for any updates or new transaction codes. Sometimes it resolves faster than expected, other times it can drag on. Since you filed in January, you're still within the normal processing timeframe even with the hold. Try not to stress too much - most 570 codes do get resolved eventually, it's just the waiting game that's brutal.
Anyone know if there's a way to opt out of the IP PIN program once you've opted in? I initially signed up after some concerns about identity theft, but now it feels like an extra hassle every year.
You can't opt out once you're in the program. I tried last year because I kept misplacing my PIN, but the IRS agent told me it's a permanent security feature for your account. It's actually for your protection since identity theft with taxes is such a huge issue.
Just to add some clarity on the timing - I've been in the IP PIN program for 3 years now and the pattern is pretty consistent. New IP PINs are typically available online through your IRS account starting around December 28th-January 2nd. The physical CP01A notices usually arrive in the mail between January 10th-20th, depending on your location. I'd definitely recommend setting up your IRS online account if you haven't already - it's much more reliable than waiting for mail, especially if you're planning to file early. You can access it through the "Get an IP PIN" tool on IRS.gov once the new year hits. Just make sure you have all your previous year tax info handy for identity verification when you log in. Pro tip: Set a calendar reminder for early January to check your online account. That way you can get your PIN and file as soon as W-2s and other documents are ready!
Are you sure you're even required to mail anything? I e-filed through TurboTax last year and had capital losses from stock trades, but I never had to mail in form 8453 or anything else. TurboTax attached my electronic 8949 to my return and that was it.
That's a good point - the TurboTax instructions weren't super clear about whether mailing Form 8453 is mandatory or not. It just popped up after I submitted saying I "need to" mail it in. But the wording on the actual 8453 form seems to suggest it's only if I'm choosing not to report the transactions electronically? Maybe I don't need to mail anything if TurboTax already included the electronic 8949? Does anyone know for sure?
It really depends on whether TurboTax transmitted the detailed transaction information electronically with your return. Log back into your TurboTax account and look at your actual filed return (you can view the PDF). If you see Form 8949 with your transactions listed or Form 6781 for futures contracts, then that information was already transmitted electronically and you likely don't need to mail anything. TurboTax sometimes prompts you to mail in Form 8453 when you have attachments that can't be transmitted electronically. If the capital losses were entered as summary information without the detailed transactions being included electronically, then you would need to mail the supporting documentation.
Just to add to the futures contract discussion - different brokers report futures trading differently on 1099s. Some issue a 1099-B and some issue a 1099-MISC for futures trading profits/losses. If you received a 1099-B for futures, double-check the box that indicates what type of transactions they are. I had this exact issue last year and spent hours on the phone with my broker. Turns out they had incorrectly issued a 1099-B for Section 1256 contracts when they should have used a different form. I had to request a corrected form and amend my return.
This is helpful. How can you tell from looking at the 1099-B if they're Section 1256 contracts? Is there a specific box or code to look for?
Look for Box 1(b) on your 1099-B - it should indicate whether the proceeds are from Section 1256 contracts. Also check if there's a code in the "Applicable checkbox" section or any notation about "60/40" treatment. Section 1256 contracts typically include most regulated futures contracts, broad-based index options, and dealer equity options. If your 1099-B shows futures contracts but doesn't clearly indicate Section 1256 treatment, you should contact your broker to clarify. They're required to properly identify these transactions since the tax treatment is so different from regular capital assets.
Had this last month. Same amount. $1,400 taken. Freaked out. Called IRS. Waited two hours. Agent explained. I claimed RRC. Already got stimulus. System caught it. Adjusted automatically. Got CP12 notice later. Explains everything. Can't dispute it if records correct. Check line 30 on your 1040. Probably shows $1,400 there. Common mistake.
Just to clarify - the $1,400 adjustment would specifically be for the third Economic Impact Payment that was authorized in March 2021. The first two payments were $1,200 and $600 respectively, for a total of $1,800. If your adjustment is exactly $1,400, that's almost certainly the third payment.
I'm sorry to hear about your situation with the medical bills coming up! This sounds like a classic Recovery Rebate Credit issue. The IRS has gotten really good at catching when people accidentally claim stimulus payments they already received. Since you mentioned the exact amount of $1,400, that's almost certainly the third Economic Impact Payment from 2021. Check your tax return copy - if there's an amount on line 30 of your Form 1040, that's where the mistake happened. You should receive a CP12 notice in the mail within a couple weeks explaining the adjustment. If you're absolutely certain you never received that third payment, you can dispute it, but you'll need solid documentation. For your immediate medical bill situation, I'd recommend calling your healthcare provider to see if they offer payment plans while you sort this out.
Edwards Hugo
Has anyone considered the relationship implications here? I mean, yes you can probably file HOH, but the bigger issue seems to be that your girlfriend is claiming the tax benefits while you pay 95% of expenses. Might be worth having a conversation about finances in general, not just taxes.
0 coins
Gianna Scott
ā¢This is actually really good advice. My ex and I had similar tax disagreements and it was a symptom of bigger financial incompatibility. We ended up working with a financial counselor who helped us create a fair system for expenses AND tax benefits. Might be worth looking into.
0 coins
A Man D Mortal
ā¢You make a good point. We've definitely been having some disagreements about money lately. She feels entitled to claim our daughter because she makes less money and gets a bigger refund that way, but I'm the one covering almost all our expenses year-round. Maybe this is about more than just taxes.
0 coins
Avery Saint
I completely understand your frustration with this situation. Based on what you've described, you should be able to file as Head of Household even though your girlfriend claimed your daughter as a dependent. The key is that you're paying more than half the household expenses and your child lives with you - those are the main qualifications for HOH status. However, I'd strongly recommend getting professional guidance to make sure you're doing everything correctly. The IRS can be very particular about documentation, especially in situations like yours where there might be questions about who's entitled to what benefits. Keep detailed records of all your expenses - mortgage payments, utilities, groceries, childcare costs, etc. This will be crucial if you ever need to prove that you're covering the majority of household costs. The worst thing that could happen is getting audited without proper documentation. Also, consider having a serious conversation with your girlfriend about how you both handle finances and tax benefits going forward. This kind of disagreement about money can create bigger relationship issues if it's not addressed properly.
0 coins