


Ask the community...
I'm dealing with a similar situation right now as a new partnership member who might need to sell my interest soon due to a job relocation. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful, but I'm curious about timing - when exactly should I request the section 751 information from the partnership? Should I wait until after the sale is complete, or is it better to get this information beforehand so my buyer and I can factor it into the sale price negotiations? I'm worried that if there's significant ordinary income from hot assets, it could affect what someone would be willing to pay for my partnership interest. Also, does anyone know if there are standard industry practices for how partnerships should calculate and provide this information, or is it really just a free-for-all depending on how organized the partnership's accounting team is?
Great question about timing! You should definitely request the section 751 information BEFORE finalizing the sale, not after. This information is crucial for determining the true tax impact on both you and the buyer, which absolutely should factor into price negotiations. When I was in a similar situation, I found that sophisticated buyers actually expect this information upfront - it shows you're serious and transparent about the tax implications. The ordinary income portion from hot assets can significantly impact the after-tax proceeds, so both parties need to understand this before agreeing on a price. As for industry standards, unfortunately it really is inconsistent. Some partnerships have well-established procedures and provide detailed section 751 analyses automatically, while others act like you're asking for their deepest secrets. Professional service partnerships (law, accounting, medical) tend to be better organized about this, while smaller trade partnerships can be all over the map. I'd recommend reaching out to the partnership's accountant directly rather than going through general management - they're more likely to understand exactly what you need and why it's important for the transaction.
Based on my experience as a tax professional who's handled numerous partnership interest sales, I can confirm that your K-1 will NOT automatically report the section 751 gain from selling your partnership interest. The K-1 reports your distributive share of partnership income/loss through the sale date, but the gain calculation from transferring your actual ownership interest is separate. Your accountant will need to perform a detailed analysis comparing your adjusted basis in the partnership interest against the sale proceeds, then allocate portions between ordinary income (section 751 hot assets) and capital gain. This requires information about unrealized receivables, substantially appreciated inventory, and any special basis adjustments - data that should come from the partnership but often requires specific requests. Given your 35% interest, this could be a substantial calculation. I'd recommend requesting the section 751 information from your partnership immediately, as some partnerships are slow to respond or may need time to compile the necessary valuations. Don't wait until you get your K-1 - start this process now so your accountant has everything needed to properly complete Forms 4797 and Schedule D when tax time comes.
This is really helpful advice from a professional perspective. I'm curious though - in your experience, what happens if the partnership refuses to provide the section 751 information or takes an unreasonably long time to respond? Are there any legal remedies available to selling partners, or do we just have to make our best estimate for tax purposes? I'm asking because I've seen several comments in this thread about partnerships being uncooperative, and I want to know what my options are if I run into resistance when I request this information for my upcoming sale.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a solo practitioner who's been hesitant to make the switch from paper filing superseded returns, but reading everyone's experiences has convinced me it's time to modernize my process. One question I haven't seen addressed - for clients who are particularly anxious about their tax situation, how do you explain the difference between superseding and amending in a way that reassures them? I have several clients who get very nervous about any changes to their returns, and I want to make sure I'm communicating the benefits clearly. Also, I'm using TaxSlayer Pro and I'm not sure if they've implemented the superseded return e-filing capability yet. Has anyone had experience with TaxSlayer Pro for this, or should I consider switching software if I want to take advantage of e-filed superseded returns? The time savings everyone is reporting (30-40 hours per season) would be huge for my practice. Right now I probably spend 2-3 hours per superseded return between printing, mailing, tracking, and following up. If I could cut that down to 30 minutes of electronic processing, it would free up significant time for client advisory work. Thanks to everyone who's shared their practical experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that makes all the difference!
For anxious clients, I find it helps to explain superseding as "replacing" rather than "changing" - it makes it sound less scary. I tell them: "Think of it like sending a corrected email before anyone reads the first one. The IRS will only look at the new, correct version and completely ignore the original." I also emphasize that superseding is actually BETTER than amending because it's faster and there's no lengthy review process. Regarding TaxSlayer Pro, I believe they added e-filing capability for superseded returns in their latest update, but you'd need to check with their support to confirm. Most major professional software platforms have implemented this by now given the IRS changes. The time savings are absolutely real - you're looking at the right numbers. What really sold me on making the switch was calculating that even if I only do 10 superseded returns per season, I'm saving 15-20 hours of administrative work. That's time I can spend on higher-value client services or just having better work-life balance during tax season. For a solo practitioner, that efficiency gain can be transformative for your practice!
I've been following this discussion with great interest as someone who's been preparing returns for about 8 years. Like many of you, I was slow to adopt e-filing for superseded returns, but this thread has really opened my eyes to what I've been missing. One thing I want to add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure to update your engagement letters and fee schedules to reflect the new superseded return capabilities. I've found that clients are willing to pay a premium for the faster processing times compared to amendments, especially when they need their corrected returns quickly for mortgage applications or other time-sensitive situations. I'm using Drake Tax and can confirm their superseded return functionality works great. The key thing in Drake is to make sure you check the "Superseding Return" box in the Electronic Filing menu AND attach your explanatory statement in the Client Documents section. I learned this the hard way when my first attempt was rejected for missing documentation. For those still on the fence about making the switch - start with one or two straightforward cases to get comfortable with the process. Once you see how much smoother it is compared to paper filing, you'll wonder why you waited so long. The client satisfaction alone is worth the learning curve!
Great point about updating engagement letters! I hadn't thought about that aspect but you're absolutely right - being able to offer faster processing is definitely a value-add that clients will pay for. I'm curious about how you structure the pricing difference between superseded returns and regular amendments? Also, thanks for the specific Drake instructions. I've been hesitant to try it in Drake because I wasn't sure about the exact steps, but your explanation makes it seem much more straightforward than I expected. The Client Documents section for the explanatory statement makes sense - I was wondering where that would go in their system. I think you're right about starting with simple cases first. I have a couple of straightforward income corrections coming up that would be perfect for testing this process before trying it on more complex situations.
Has anyone used the "alternative calculation for year of marriage" option on Form 8962? I got married in October and was on my parents' plan until September, and now I'm trying to figure out if that applies to my situation or if I should just do the regular allocation method.
The alternative calculation for year of marriage wouldn't apply to your situation since that's specifically for cases where you got married during the year AND one or both spouses were enrolled in marketplace coverage. It helps married couples avoid having to repay excess APTC due to their combined income being higher than their individual incomes. For your case, you'd just use the regular allocation method for the months you were on your parents' plan, and then if you and your spouse had marketplace coverage after marriage, you'd handle that separately.
This is a really common situation that trips up a lot of first-time filers! The key thing to understand is that you need to coordinate with your parents before finalizing anything. Since you didn't contribute to the premiums, the typical approach would be for your parents to allocate 100% of the premium tax credit to themselves (on their Form 8962) and for you to allocate 0% to yourself. This means you wouldn't claim any of the advance premium tax credits, so you shouldn't owe any repayment. However, you absolutely need to confirm with your parents what they're planning to report before you submit your return. If they haven't filed yet, you can decide together. If they've already filed and claimed 100%, then you should definitely use 0% allocation. For the monthly amounts, you're correct to put $0 for September through December since you weren't covered. Make sure you're only reporting the 8 months you were actually on the plan. The reason TurboTax is showing you owe money is probably because it's calculating as if you received advance premium tax credits for the full year or a higher allocation percentage. Once you get the allocation sorted out with your parents, this should resolve itself.
This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I was looking for! I was getting so confused by all the different percentages and calculations, but it makes sense now that it's really about coordinating with my parents first. I'm going to call them tonight to see what they're planning to do on their return. Since I didn't pay anything toward the premiums, it sounds like the simplest approach would be for them to take 100% and me to take 0%, which should eliminate the repayment issue I'm seeing in TurboTax. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly - I feel much more confident about handling this now!
Just want to add another important tip - if you're using a credit card to pay your CP14 balance, check if your card offers any cash back or rewards for tax payments. Some cards categorize these payments as "government services" which might earn you points. Also, make sure you're not close to your credit limit before making the payment. I've seen people have their payments declined because they didn't account for the processing fee on top of the balance owed. The last thing you want is a failed payment when you're trying to stop penalties from accumulating! And definitely double-check that you're using one of the IRS-approved processors (PayUSAtax, Pay1040, or ACI Payments). There are some sketchy websites out there that look official but aren't actually authorized by the IRS.
Great point about checking credit limits! I learned this the hard way when my payment got declined because I forgot about the processing fee. Had to scramble to make a bank transfer instead, which delayed everything by a few days. For anyone reading this - the processing fees are usually around 1.87% to 1.99% of your payment amount, so for a $750 balance you're looking at roughly $14-15 in fees on top of the amount owed. Factor that into your available credit before hitting submit! Also seconding the advice about only using IRS-approved processors. I almost fell for a fake site that looked identical to the real ones but had slightly different URLs. When in doubt, go directly to IRS.gov and click their links to the authorized payment processors.
I went through this exact same situation last month with a CP14 notice. Here's what worked for me: 1. Use the IRS.gov website to access the approved payment processors - don't Google them separately as there are fake lookalike sites. 2. For the payment category, select "Form 1040 payment" or "Individual tax payment" - there's no specific CP14 option. 3. Make sure to enter the correct tax year from your notice (probably 2024), not the current year you're making the payment. 4. Have your SSN, notice number, and exact balance amount ready before starting. I used Pay1040 and it worked perfectly. The fee was about $15 on a $800 payment. The key thing is making sure all your identifying information matches exactly what's on the CP14 notice so the payment gets applied correctly. One more tip - set up an online IRS account if you don't have one already. Even though their payment system was down when you tried, you can usually track when your payment gets processed and see your balance update in real time once it goes through.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm new to dealing with IRS notices and was really stressed about messing something up. Your step-by-step breakdown makes it seem much more manageable. Quick question - when you say "set up an online IRS account," is that different from the regular IRS.gov login? I tried creating an account before but got confused by all the different portals they have. Which specific one should I be looking for to track my CP14 payment? Also, did your balance update immediately after payment or did it take the full processing time to show the change? I'm worried I'll keep getting follow-up notices even after I pay if their system is slow to update.
Benjamin Carter
Great thread! I've been struggling with the same issues and this discussion has been incredibly helpful. One thing I wanted to add based on my experience last year - make sure you're also considering the timing of when you moved funds between exchanges. I had a situation where I transferred a large amount from Binance to KuCoin in the middle of the year, and for a brief period, the same funds were technically "in transit" but still showing on both platforms. I almost double-counted that amount when calculating my maximum balance. The key is to track the actual settled balances, not pending transfers. Also, if you're using any foreign lending platforms (like BlockFi when it was operational, or current platforms like Nexo), those definitely count as foreign financial accounts for FBAR purposes if they're not US-based. I learned this the hard way when my tax preparer caught it during review. The monthly screenshot approach mentioned earlier is genius - I wish I had thought of that instead of trying to reconstruct everything from transaction histories at year-end!
0 coins
GamerGirl99
ā¢This is such a great point about funds in transit! I had a similar issue where I was moving Bitcoin from one exchange to another and the blockchain confirmation took longer than expected. Both exchanges were showing the balance temporarily, which would have definitely led to double-counting if I hadn't been careful. Your mention of lending platforms is really important too - I think a lot of people don't realize that platforms like Nexo or even some of the newer DeFi lending protocols based outside the US could trigger FBAR requirements. It's not just traditional "exchanges" but any foreign platform where you're holding crypto assets. The complexity of this stuff is exactly why I've been considering getting professional help for next tax season. Between tracking maximum balances, avoiding double-counting during transfers, and making sure I'm not missing any foreign platforms that count as "financial accounts," it feels like there are so many ways to accidentally mess up the reporting. Has anyone here worked with a tax professional who specializes in crypto? I'm wondering if it's worth the extra cost to avoid potential compliance issues.
0 coins
Liam O'Connor
As someone who went through this exact nightmare last year, I can't stress enough how important it is to get professional help if you're dealing with multiple foreign exchanges. I tried to handle everything myself initially and made several mistakes that could have resulted in penalties. The key things I learned: First, the $10k threshold is indeed based on aggregate maximum values across ALL foreign accounts, not simultaneous balances. Second, you need to be really careful about what constitutes a "foreign financial account" - it's not just exchanges, but also lending platforms, staking services, and even some DeFi protocols depending on where they're incorporated. One thing that saved me was discovering that some exchanges provide annual statements specifically designed for tax reporting. Binance, for example, has a tax reporting section where you can generate statements that show your maximum balance for the year. Not all exchanges offer this, but it's worth checking before you spend hours reconstructing your records. Also, don't forget that beyond FBAR, if your foreign crypto assets exceed certain thresholds ($50k for single filers), you may also need to file Form 8938 (FATCA reporting) with your regular tax return. The thresholds and requirements are different from FBAR, so you could end up needing both forms. The good news is that once you set up a proper tracking system, it becomes much more manageable in subsequent years. But for your first year dealing with foreign exchanges, seriously consider getting help from a tax professional who understands crypto - it's worth the peace of mind.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
ā¢This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! I'm definitely in that "first year dealing with foreign exchanges" category and feeling overwhelmed by all the requirements. The point about Binance having tax reporting statements is huge - I had no idea that was available and have been trying to manually track everything through their regular transaction history. Quick question about the Form 8938 threshold you mentioned - when you say $50k for single filers, is that based on the same "maximum aggregate balance" calculation as FBAR, or is it calculated differently? I want to make sure I understand if I might need both forms. Also, do you have any recommendations for finding tax professionals who actually understand crypto? I've called a few local CPAs and most of them seemed uncomfortable with crypto questions, let alone foreign exchange reporting requirements.
0 coins