IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sayid Hassan

•

anyone else notice the processing is slower this year or is it just me?

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

def slower. blame the budget cuts 🤔

0 coins

Filed my NYS return on 2/3, accepted same day. Still showing "processing" status as of today. This is my first time filing in NY so wasn't sure what to expect for timing. Seeing some of you got yours in 10 days while others are waiting weeks - seems pretty inconsistent! Will keep checking and update when I get movement.

0 coins

Rental income: do I qualify for "active participation" if I'm a landlord with minimal work due to low-maintenance tenant?

I need some advice on my tax situation. I own a piece of rural property that I rent out to a tenant who uses it for their livestock. The rental arrangement is pretty straightforward - I use Schedule E for reporting since it's just a basic cash rent deal. Technically, I'm responsible for typical landlord duties like finding tenants and handling repairs or improvements. But in reality, I've had the same tenant for years now, and there's rarely anything that needs fixing. Most years, my landlord "work" consists of just signing the annual lease and depositing rent checks. I'm confused about whether I should be checking the "active participation" box on my Schedule E. Does active participation mean being responsible for landlord activities (which I am), or does it require actually performing a significant amount of those activities (which I don't really do)? I've made some improvements in the past (built a fence and installed a water well), but that's not a regular thing. The property came to me through an inheritance that was divided among several family members. One relative advised me that it's "simpler" if we all claim to be active participants, but I'm not sure that's right. I suspect they might be suggesting this to maximize deductions, but we don't typically have losses on this land anyway. We do take depreciation on some improvements, but I don't think active participation affects that. I'm concerned I might have been filing incorrectly, and I want to understand the implications if I stop checking the "active participation" box now. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Edwards Hugo

•

Nobody's mentioned record keeping yet! If you're claiming active participation, it's smart to keep some basic documentation of your management activities. Even just a simple log noting when you communicate with your tenant, when you inspect the property, when you make decisions about repairs/improvements, etc. Doesn't need to be elaborate, but having something to show your involvement can be really helpful if you're ever questioned about it.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

So how much documentation is enough? I have a similar situation with a low-maintenance rental and I literally only interact with my tenant when they send the rent check each month. Should I be keeping more records than just the rent payments?

0 coins

You don't need extensive documentation, but it's helpful to track more than just rent payments. Consider keeping records of: annual lease renewals/negotiations, any property inspections you do (even if infrequent), decisions about maintenance or improvements (even if you decide NOT to do something), and any communication with the tenant about property matters. Even documenting that you reviewed the property condition annually or made decisions about insurance coverage shows active involvement. A simple calendar note or email to yourself when these activities happen is usually sufficient. The goal is just to show you're making management decisions, not that you're working full-time as a landlord.

0 coins

Great discussion here! As someone who's dealt with similar rental property questions, I wanted to add that the "active participation" standard is really about your authority and responsibility rather than the actual time spent. The IRS generally looks at whether you have the right to make management decisions, not how often you exercise that right. In your case with the rural property and livestock tenant, you're clearly the decision-maker even if those decisions are infrequent. You choose whether to renew leases, set rental terms, and decide on property improvements. The fact that your tenant is low-maintenance actually speaks well of your property management - it doesn't disqualify you from active participation. One thing I'd suggest is keeping a simple annual summary of your landlord activities, even if minimal. Things like "reviewed and renewed lease agreement," "decided against fence repairs this year," or "evaluated property insurance coverage" all demonstrate active management decision-making. This documentation could be valuable if you ever need to justify your participation level. Since you mentioned your income situation puts you in range to potentially benefit from the $25,000 loss allowance, maintaining active participation status gives you valuable flexibility for years when you might have significant expenses or vacancy periods.

0 coins

Has anyone talked to their CPA about qualified charitable distributions from IRAs? My mother is over 70 and uses this to reduce her taxable income while satisfying her required minimum distributions. Not sure if it would work for capital gains specifically tho.

0 coins

QCDs only work for IRA distributions and only if you're over 70½. They wouldn't help with capital gains from property sales. They're great for reducing income tax on required minimum distributions but wouldn't affect capital gains tax at all.

0 coins

One strategy that hasn't been mentioned yet is donating appreciated property directly to charity instead of cash. If you have other appreciated assets (stocks, bonds, real estate), you can donate those directly and avoid paying capital gains tax on them while still getting the full fair market value deduction. For example, if you have $200,000 worth of stock that you originally bought for $50,000, donating the stock directly saves you capital gains tax on the $150,000 appreciation AND gives you a $200,000 charitable deduction. Then you could use the cash you would have donated to reinvest in similar securities. This doesn't help with your current property sale, but it's a more tax-efficient way to make large charitable donations if you have other appreciated assets in your portfolio. You essentially get to "stack" the tax benefits - avoiding capital gains AND getting the income tax deduction. Just make sure the charity can accept the type of asset you want to donate, and that you've held it for more than one year to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

This is really helpful advice! I hadn't thought about donating appreciated assets instead of cash. One question though - if I donate appreciated stock worth $200k that I bought for $50k, and then use that cash to buy similar stock, wouldn't I essentially be in the same position but with a higher cost basis on the new stock? It seems like I'm trading the same economic exposure but getting better tax treatment. Is there any wash sale rule or similar restriction that would prevent this strategy?

0 coins

I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm dealing with a nearly identical situation. My syndication sold in late 2022, distributed proceeds in early 2023, but I'm still waiting for final dissolution paperwork as we head into 2025. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the potential impact on your state tax returns. While we've covered the federal reporting requirements thoroughly, some states have their own partnership dissolution requirements that can affect your state tax reporting. In my case, the partnership was formed in Delaware but owned property in Texas, and both states had different requirements for the dissolution process. I'd recommend checking with your state tax authority (or a local tax professional familiar with your state's rules) to make sure you're handling the state reporting correctly while waiting for the federal dissolution paperwork. Some states require you to continue filing partnership returns until formal dissolution is complete, regardless of activity level. Also, for those dealing with unresponsive sponsors - I found that mentioning potential regulatory complaints (like with state securities regulators) in written communications often gets faster responses. Most sponsors want to avoid any regulatory scrutiny, so the mere mention of escalating to authorities can motivate better communication. The waiting is frustrating, but as others have noted, it's better to be conservative and wait for proper documentation than to risk having to file amended returns later.

0 coins

This is such an important point about state tax implications that I hadn't considered! I'm dealing with a similar multi-state situation where our syndication was Delaware-formed but held properties in Florida. I just assumed the state reporting would follow the federal timeline, but you're absolutely right that different states can have their own dissolution requirements. Your point about mentioning regulatory complaints is also really insightful. I've been trying to be polite and patient with our sponsor, but after 18+ months of "administrative delays," maybe it's time to be more direct about expectations and potential escalation paths. The threat of regulatory scrutiny could definitely motivate them to prioritize wrapping things up. Do you have any specific recommendations for which state regulators are most effective to mention? I'm thinking securities regulators since these are typically securities offerings, but I'm not sure if there are other regulatory bodies that might have jurisdiction over syndication sponsors who are dragging their feet on dissolution paperwork. Thanks for bringing up these additional considerations - it's helpful to think beyond just the federal tax implications when dealing with these prolonged dissolution situations.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

I've been dealing with this exact scenario for the past 18 months, and it's been incredibly frustrating. What helped me finally get clarity was being very persistent with specific documentation requests from the sponsor. I started sending monthly written requests asking for: 1) A detailed breakdown of remaining administrative tasks, 2) Expected completion dates for each task, 3) Confirmation of what reserves (if any) are being held and why, and 4) The specific steps remaining for state dissolution filing. After months of vague responses, this approach finally got them to provide a concrete timeline. Turns out they were waiting for a final tax adjustment from the buyer that was taking forever due to some depreciation recapture calculations, plus they needed to maintain a small reserve for 18 months post-sale due to environmental warranty provisions in the purchase agreement. The key was making it clear I needed specific information for my own tax planning and wouldn't accept "administrative matters" as an adequate explanation. Once they realized I wasn't going away and needed real answers, the communication improved dramatically. For your 2024 taxes, definitely don't mark it as dissolved without that final K-1. But do push your sponsor for a realistic timeline - you deserve to know when this will actually be resolved.

0 coins

processed = they looked at it. processing = they looking at it. paid = we still waiting 😤

0 coins

why is this so accurate tho šŸ’€

0 coins

As someone who's been through this process multiple times, I can confirm what Lauren said is spot on! The key thing to remember is that "processed" doesn't automatically mean approved - it just means they're done reviewing your return. I've had returns go to processed status and then get additional review codes added later. The real indicator is looking for specific codes like 846 (refund issued) or 971 (notice issued) on your transcript. Also check your "as of" date - if it's current, that's usually a good sign. Don't stress too much about the daily checking though, once it's processed the refund typically comes within 1-3 weeks if everything is approved!

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

Thanks for breaking this down! @d1ebf4b48088 and @591fc2fae192 both explained it really well. I'm new to checking transcripts and was getting confused by all the different statuses. So basically I should be looking for code 846 specifically rather than just the processing/processed status change? Also what does the "as of" date actually mean - is that when they finished reviewing or when the refund gets sent out?

0 coins

Prev1...25822583258425852586...5645Next