


Ask the community...
This might be a stupid question but... if I'm filing an extension, do I still need to contribute to my IRA by April 15th to count it for last year? Or does the extension give me until October for that too?
Not a stupid question at all! Unfortunately, the extension doesn't give you extra time for IRA contributions. The deadline for making IRA contributions for the previous tax year is still the original filing deadline (April 15th for most people), regardless of whether you file an extension. So if you want to make a contribution to count for 2023, you need to do it by April 15, 2024, even if you're filing an extension for your tax return.
Just wanted to add something that might help with your Form 4868 extension - since you mentioned getting a refund last year and having a similar financial situation, you're likely safe putting zero for the estimated tax liability. But if you want to be extra cautious, you could put a small amount like $100 just to avoid any potential issues. For the 8949 checkbox confusion, I had the same problem last year! The key thing to remember is that you MUST check one of the boxes - leaving it blank will cause processing delays. Most individual crypto traders end up using Box C (short-term, not reported on 1099-B) and Box F (long-term, not reported on 1099-B) since most exchanges don't provide proper 1099-B forms with cost basis information. One tip that saved me a lot of headaches: keep detailed records of all your transactions with dates, amounts, and what you paid for each crypto. Even if you use software to help calculate everything, having your own backup records is invaluable if the IRS ever has questions. Good luck with your extension!
You need to use the EITC Assistant on the IRS website. With your income level and three qualifying children, you're looking at a significant Earned Income Credit. You should also claim the Child and Dependent Care Credit if you paid for childcare. Your refund will likely be substantial, but you need to file correctly. The self-employment tax will reduce it somewhat, but the credits should more than offset this. Consider making estimated tax payments next year to avoid any penalties.
Would this income level also qualify for the Additional Child Tax Credit if the regular Child Tax Credit exceeds their tax liability? I'm trying to understand if there's a phase-out that would apply here or if they'd get the full refundable portion.
Based on your income levels, you're definitely in a good position for a substantial refund! With $19,000 total income and 3 qualifying children, here's what I'd expect: **Child Tax Credit**: $6,000 (3 kids ร $2,000 each) **EITC**: Around $6,500+ with 3 kids at your income level **Self-Employment Tax**: ~$706 (as others mentioned) The key factors that will determine your exact refund: - How much was withheld from your W-2 (this is crucial!) - Your filing status (Head of Household vs. Married Filing Jointly makes a huge difference) - Whether you qualify for Additional Child Tax Credit if your credits exceed your tax liability Your income is low enough that you'll likely get most/all of these credits as refunds rather than just reducing tax owed. I'd estimate you're looking at $8,000-$10,000+ refund range, but definitely use the IRS EITC Assistant tool that Sara mentioned - it's the most accurate way to calculate the Earned Income Credit portion. Don't forget to keep receipts for those medical expenses too - they might be deductible if they exceed 7.5% of your AGI!
Quick question for anyone who knows - I'm in a similar situation but with a much smaller inherited IRA (about $43k). Is there a minimum amount where the IRS doesn't care about missed RMDs? Like if the penalty would be really small, do they sometimes just ignore it? Just wondering if there's a threshold where it's not worth their time to pursue.
There's no minimum threshold where the IRS "doesn't care" about missed RMDs. The 50% penalty applies regardless of the account size. However, smaller accounts do mean smaller penalties, obviously. But you should still follow the correction procedure - calculate what you should have taken, withdraw it now, file Form 5329 with a reasonable cause statement for each year. The IRS typically waives penalties for first-time mistakes regardless of account size if you correct them proactively.
I went through this exact situation with my father's inherited IRA back in 2021. Missed three years of RMDs and was absolutely terrified about the penalties. Here's what worked for me: First, don't panic - the IRS really is reasonable about penalty waivers when you're proactively fixing the mistake. I calculated all my missed RMDs using the Single Life Expectancy Table (you can find it in IRS Publication 590-B), took all the distributions immediately, then filed separate Form 5329s for each missed year. The key is the reasonable cause letter. I explained that I wasn't aware of the RMD requirement due to inexperience with inherited accounts, that I discovered the error through my own research, and that I had now taken all required distributions and would comply going forward. I attached documentation showing I had taken the catch-up distributions. The IRS waived all penalties - saved me about $4,200. The whole process took about 6 months from filing to receiving the waiver approval. The hardest part was actually getting all the year-end account statements I needed for the calculations, so make sure you contact your IRA custodian for those historical balances. One tip: when you take the catch-up distributions, ask your custodian to code them properly for each tax year they relate to, not just dump them all as 2025 income. This can help with the tax impact.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you for sharing your experience! I'm curious about the part where you mentioned asking the custodian to code the distributions for each tax year - can you explain more about how that works? Does the custodian actually have the ability to designate which year each distribution relates to, or is it more of a documentation thing for your own records? I'm worried about taking a large lump sum distribution and having it all hit my 2025 taxes when ideally it should be spread across the years I missed.
Based on the current tax season patterns, it seems like most post-verification refunds are probably arriving within about 7-14 days, though some might take a bit longer depending on various factors. The IRS systems appear to be processing somewhat faster than last year, at least for relatively straightforward returns. You might want to check your transcript daily if possible, as that's usually where you'll likely see updates before they show in WMR.
I went through identity verification last year and wanted to share my timeline to help set expectations. I verified on a Tuesday evening, and my transcript updated the following Friday with processing codes. My direct deposit hit exactly 12 days after verification. A few things that helped me stay sane during the wait: First, check your transcript weekly rather than daily - it typically only updates overnight on Thursdays/Fridays. Second, don't panic if WMR shows "still processing" for a while after verification - that's normal. Third, the 846 code with a DDD (direct deposit date) is what you're looking for on your transcript. Since you verified on Sunday and it's already been processed according to the IRS rep, I'd expect to see movement in your transcript by this Friday, with your refund likely arriving within the next 1-2 weeks. The fact that your verification notification disappeared immediately is actually a good sign - it means the system accepted it right away.
This is super helpful, thank you! I'm new to checking transcripts - is there a specific time on Thursdays/Fridays when they typically update? I've been checking randomly throughout the day and haven't seen any changes yet. Also, when you say "processing codes," are there specific ones I should be looking for before the 846 code appears?
NeonNomad
Has anyone noticed if TurboTax is better or worse than other tax software for handling these 1099-B discrepancies? I'm having the same issue and wondering if switching to something else would help.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
โขI switched from TurboTax to H&R Block's software last year specifically for investment reporting and found it to be WAY more intuitive for handling complex 1099-B situations. Their interface for entering individual transactions made it much clearer when there were wash sales or other special situations.
0 coins
Chloe Green
I had this exact same issue with my 1099-B forms last year! The key thing that helped me was realizing that you need to look at the "Basis reported to IRS" checkbox on each form. If it's marked "No" (Box 3), then the broker didn't report your cost basis to the IRS, which means the simple math of proceeds minus cost basis won't match the net gain/loss they calculated. Also check if you have any transactions with adjustment codes in Box 1f - these can include things like return of capital distributions or stock splits that affect the basis calculation in ways that aren't immediately obvious from the main numbers. One more thing - if you're using the "summary" method in TurboTax where you just enter the totals, try switching to entering each transaction individually. It takes longer but gives the software all the detail it needs to properly handle the complexities. Good luck!
0 coins