Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I'm going through this exact same Form 5695 rejection issue! My partner and I jointly own our townhouse and we installed a new heat pump and energy-efficient windows last year. Got the identical "Joint Occupancy on Form 5695" error message through TaxSlayer saying it'll be fixed March 17th. This thread has been incredibly helpful - I was absolutely convinced I had messed up the energy credit calculations or misunderstood something about the joint ownership requirements. I spent hours re-checking the Form 5695 instructions and second-guessing whether I needed to allocate the credit differently even though my partner isn't claiming any portion on their return. It's such a relief to see this is a widespread IRS system bug affecting joint property owners across all the major tax software platforms. Reading everyone's experiences confirms our returns are likely correct and we just need to wait for the IRS to fix their processing error. I'm definitely going to wait for the March 17th electronic fix rather than dealing with the hassle and delays of paper filing. Thanks to everyone for sharing - this community has been way more helpful than trying to decode confusing IRS error messages!
I'm experiencing the exact same issue! My spouse and I co-own our home and installed a new heat pump system last year. Got hit with the identical Form 5695 joint occupancy rejection through FreeTaxUSA. Like everyone else here, I was completely panicking thinking I had miscalculated the energy credit or done something wrong with the joint ownership documentation. I must have re-read the Form 5695 instructions a dozen times trying to figure out what I missed. It's such a huge relief to find this thread and realize this is a widespread IRS system bug affecting all of us with joint property ownership, regardless of which tax software we're using. Based on everyone's experiences, I'm definitely waiting for the March 17th electronic fix rather than paper filing. It sounds like our returns are all correct and we just need the IRS to get their processing system sorted out. This community has been incredibly helpful - way better than the vague error messages or trying to get through to the IRS phone lines! Thanks everyone for sharing your situations.
I'm dealing with this exact same Form 5695 rejection issue! My husband and I co-own our home and installed a new heat pump and solar panels last year. Got the identical "Joint Occupancy on Form 5695" error through H&R Block Online saying the processing error will be corrected March 17th. This thread has been such a relief to find - I was absolutely convinced I had made some calculation error with the energy credits or misunderstood the joint ownership requirements. Spent countless hours re-checking the Form 5695 instructions and second-guessing whether I needed to split the credit differently even though my husband isn't claiming any portion on his return. It's incredibly reassuring to see this is a widespread IRS system bug affecting joint property owners across all major tax software platforms. Reading through everyone's experiences confirms that our returns are likely correct and we just need to wait for the IRS to resolve their processing error. I'm definitely going to wait for the March 17th electronic fix rather than dealing with paper filing delays. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences - this community has been way more helpful than any official IRS guidance I could find!
I'm so glad I found this thread! I was going through the exact same panic cycle - my fiancé and I co-own our condo and installed a new heat pump last fall. Got the same Form 5695 joint occupancy rejection through TurboTax and I was convinced I had somehow messed up the credit calculation or ownership allocation. Reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly reassuring. It's amazing how many of us are dealing with this identical IRS system bug across different tax software platforms. I was especially worried because we claimed the full credit amount since my fiancé doesn't have filing requirements this year, but it sounds like even straightforward situations like ours are getting caught up in their processing error. Definitely waiting for the March 17th fix based on all the advice here. It's such a relief to know our returns are probably correct and we just need the IRS to get their system working properly. Thanks everyone for sharing - this community support has saved me so much stress and confusion!
Join the conversation
Quick question - I paid for my spring 2025 semester tuition in December 2024. Do I claim that on my 2024 taxes (filing now in 2025) or on next year's taxes? My 1098-T is confusing me because the amounts don't match what I actually paid during the calendar year.
It depends on which method you're using. You can claim expenses in the year you pay them (cash method) OR in the year they're due (accrual method). Most individuals use the cash method, so if you paid in Dec 2024, you'd claim on your 2024 taxes you're filing now in 2025. just make sure you're consistent with whichever method you choose year to year.
Thanks for explaining! I'll go with the cash method then and claim my December 2024 payment on the tax return I'm filing now. Makes sense to claim it in the year I actually paid it. I didn't realize I had a choice between methods, so that's helpful to know I need to be consistent going forward.
One thing that helped me a lot when dealing with my 1098-T was understanding that you don't have to use the amounts exactly as shown on the form. The IRS allows you to use either the amounts on the 1098-T OR your actual payment records, whichever is more accurate for your situation. In my case, my school's 1098-T showed different amounts than what I actually paid because of timing differences with financial aid disbursements. I kept all my tuition payment receipts and was able to use those actual amounts instead. This is especially important if you made payments across different tax years or if your school's accounting doesn't match your payment schedule. Also, don't forget that you can claim required course materials even if you bought them from Amazon or other retailers - just make sure you can prove they were required for your courses. I saved all my course syllabi that listed required textbooks and supplies, which helped justify those expenses.
This is really helpful advice! I had no idea you could use your actual payment records instead of what's on the 1098-T. My school's form shows payments from when financial aid was disbursed, but I actually paid some tuition out of pocket at different times. So I can use my bank statements and payment receipts instead of the 1098-T amounts? That would actually give me a more accurate picture of what I personally paid for qualified expenses. Do you know if there's any specific documentation the IRS requires, or are regular payment receipts and bank records sufficient?
Join the conversation
I'm experiencing this exact same frustrating situation right now! Verified my identity online about 16 days ago and my portal is still stuck on "Action Required." It's such a relief to read all these similar experiences - I was starting to worry I had missed something critical. The explanation about the system lag between verification processing and portal display updates makes total sense. It's frustrating that the IRS hasn't fixed this known issue, but at least now I understand it's a technical problem, not something I need to act on. I'm definitely going to start checking my transcript weekly instead of obsessing over the portal status daily. That seems like a much better way to track actual progress. Thanks to everyone who shared their timelines - knowing that most people see resolution within 4-6 weeks rather than the full 9 weeks is really reassuring. This community has been incredibly helpful for navigating this confusing process!
I'm so relieved to find this thread! I verified my identity about 3 weeks ago and have been checking that portal constantly, getting more stressed each time I see "Action Required." I was convinced I had somehow messed up the verification process or missed a step. Reading everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring - it's clear this is just a widespread system issue where the portal display doesn't keep up with their actual processing. The technical explanation about the different databases and update delays finally makes sense of why this happens. I had no idea about checking transcripts for more current information! That's such a valuable tip. I'm definitely switching from daily portal anxiety-checking to weekly transcript reviews. It's frustrating that the IRS hasn't prioritized fixing this confusing display issue, but at least now I know I'm not alone in this waiting game and that most people see updates well before that scary 9-week maximum timeline.
I'm going through this exact same nightmare right now! Verified my identity 11 days ago and that "Action Required" message is still haunting my portal every time I check. I was starting to think I had somehow botched the verification process, but reading everyone's experiences here has been such a lifesaver. It's honestly ridiculous that the IRS knows this display lag is confusing taxpayers but hasn't bothered to fix it or at least add some kind of explanation. The technical breakdown about different databases updating at different speeds finally makes this mess make sense though. I had absolutely no clue about checking transcripts for more accurate information - that's such a game-changing tip! I've been torturing myself with daily portal checks, but I'm switching to weekly transcript reviews starting now. Knowing that most people see their accounts update within 4-6 weeks instead of that terrifying 9-week maximum really helps manage the anxiety. Thanks to everyone for sharing their timelines and reassuring those of us stuck in this waiting limbo - this community is honestly better at explaining IRS processes than the IRS itself!
I'm in the exact same boat! Verified my identity about 9 days ago and have been obsessively checking that portal every single day, getting more worried each time I see "Action Required." I was genuinely starting to panic that I had somehow messed up the verification or that there was another step I was missing. This thread has been absolutely invaluable - it's such a relief to know this is a widespread system issue and not a personal failure on my part. The explanation about the backend processing being ahead of the portal display finally makes this whole confusing situation make sense. I feel so silly for not knowing about transcript checking! I've been putting myself through unnecessary stress with daily portal anxiety when I could have been getting more accurate information all along. Definitely switching to weekly transcript reviews immediately. It's really frustrating that the IRS hasn't prioritized fixing this known display issue when they clearly know it's causing confusion and stress for taxpayers. But at least this community provides the clear explanations that the IRS website doesn't! Thank you everyone for sharing your experiences - it's made this waiting period so much more bearable knowing we're all in this together.
Join the conversation
Has anyone else noticed that syndication sponsors are being super aggressive with cost segregation studies lately? I just got one that claimed 85% bonus depreciation in year 1 on a property that's clearly not that front-loaded with short-life components. Makes me nervous about audit risk.
Yeah, I've seen that too. My CPA actually recommended we be more conservative and only take 65% of what the cost seg study claimed because he said the IRS is starting to look at "engineered" tax losses more carefully. Better safe than sorry with these things.
This is a great question that many syndication investors struggle with! The short answer is yes - you can generally use your $135k in depreciation losses from the new syndication to offset your $135k in Section 1231 gains from the sales, assuming both are passive activities for you as an LP. Here's what's happening: Your new syndication's cost segregation study creates passive activity losses, while your sale gains are likely passive income since you weren't materially participating in those properties either. The passive activity loss rules allow these to offset each other within the same tax year. A few important considerations: 1. Make sure both activities qualify as passive (sounds like they do as an LP) 2. Be aware that some of your gain might be depreciation recapture taxed at 25% rather than capital gains rates 3. Any excess losses get suspended and carried forward to future years Regarding the "benefit" of upfront depreciation - it's not just about offsetting rental income. It creates valuable tax deferral, and if you have suspended losses when you eventually sell a property, those losses can offset ANY type of income (not just passive). This is why cost segregation studies are so powerful for wealth building through real estate. I'd definitely recommend working with a CPA who specializes in real estate syndications to make sure you're maximizing these opportunities properly!
This is really helpful! I'm in a similar situation with syndication investments. One thing I'm curious about - when you mention that suspended losses can offset "ANY type of income" when you sell the property, does that include income from things like business sales or consulting work? I have a pretty variable income year to year, so timing property sales around high-income years could be a huge tax strategy if that's really the case.
Kiara Greene
As a newcomer to this community, I'm absolutely fascinated by the depth of expertise shared in this thread! Reading through all these responses has been like getting a crash course in Roth 401k withdrawal strategies that I never knew I needed. @Giovanni Mancini - your situation really highlights how much more complex these withdrawals are compared to what most people expect. The pro-rata rule seems particularly harsh since you've already paid taxes on those contributions, yet you can't access them without also triggering taxes on the earnings portion. What strikes me most is how plan-specific many of these strategies are. The rollover approach that @Connor O'Neill successfully used could be a game-changer, but it completely depends on your employer's plan provisions. Similarly, the loan limits, hardship exceptions, and timing requirements all vary by plan. Given that you need $120K - a substantial amount - the staged approach combining a loan with a strategic rollover seems most promising if your plan allows it. This would let you access some funds immediately through the loan while properly structuring the remainder to minimize tax consequences. The consensus here about getting professional guidance makes total sense. With amounts this large, even small optimizations in your withdrawal strategy could save thousands in taxes and penalties. The consultation fees would likely pay for themselves many times over. Have you been able to reach your plan administrator yet to start exploring what options are actually available under your specific plan? That seems like the critical first step before you can evaluate which of these strategies might work best for your situation.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Welcome to the community, @Kiara Greene! As someone also new here, I'm equally amazed by the expertise everyone has shared. This thread has been incredibly educational about Roth 401k withdrawal complexities I never knew existed. @Giovanni Mancini - after reading through all this excellent advice, I m'wondering about one practical aspect that hasn t'been fully addressed: the timeline coordination between different strategies. If you do pursue the staged approach loan (+ rollover ,)how would you sequence these to ensure you get access to funds when needed while maximizing tax benefits? For instance, if your plan allows a $50K loan but the rollover process takes several weeks or months to complete, would you need to bridge that gap somehow? Or could the loan proceed immediately while you work through the rollover paperwork for the remaining $70K you need? Also, I m'curious about the documentation requirements. Several people mentioned thoroughly documenting your unexpected "circumstances for" potential hardship exceptions. Would this documentation need to be submitted upfront, or could it be gathered while other strategies are being explored? The complexity really does seem to justify professional guidance, especially with so many moving parts that need to be coordinated properly. Looking forward to hearing what you learn from your plan administrator about what s'actually possible under your specific plan!
0 coins
Jenna Sloan
As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly impressed by the comprehensive advice shared in this thread! Reading through everyone's insights has been like getting an advanced education in Roth 401k withdrawal strategies. @Giovanni Mancini - your situation perfectly demonstrates why these retirement account rules are so much more complex than most people realize. The pro-rata rule is definitely a harsh reality that catches many off guard, especially when you've been diligently contributing after-tax dollars for years. What I find most valuable from this discussion is how everyone has emphasized the importance of your specific plan's provisions. The rollover strategy that @Connor O'Neill successfully executed could potentially save you thousands, but it all hinges on whether your employer allows in-service distributions. Similarly, the loan provisions, hardship exceptions, and timing requirements vary significantly between plans. Given the substantial amount you need ($120K), the staged approach that multiple experts have recommended - starting with a plan loan for immediate access, then exploring a rollover for the remainder - seems like your best bet for minimizing tax consequences. This would give you breathing room to properly structure the tax-advantaged portion without rushing into the pro-rata trap. The unanimous advice about seeking professional guidance really resonates. With amounts this large, even a small optimization in your withdrawal strategy could easily justify consultation fees many times over. A tax professional familiar with retirement distributions could help you model different scenarios and coordinate the timing of various strategies. Your first step should definitely be that comprehensive call to your plan administrator. Based on everything discussed here, I'd recommend asking specifically about loan availability, in-service rollover options, hardship provisions, and getting the exact breakdown of contributions vs. earnings in your account. Looking forward to hearing what you discover about your plan's specific options - this thread should be required reading for anyone considering early Roth 401k withdrawals!
0 coins