IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Luca Ricci

•

This thread is incredibly thorough and helpful! As someone who works in cybersecurity, I wanted to add one more layer to the security discussion that hasn't been mentioned yet. When you're setting up both accounts, consider using a password manager (like Bitwarden, 1Password, or Dashlane) to generate and store unique, complex passwords for each service. Even though you'll primarily be using 2FA codes to log in, having strong unique passwords as your first line of defense is crucial for government accounts. Also, a quick heads up about the ID.me facial recognition process - if you wear glasses, have facial hair, or have changed your appearance significantly since your driver's license photo, be prepared for potential verification delays. I've seen people get stuck in manual review for several days because of appearance mismatches. One more security tip: after you set up both accounts, log out completely and then test logging back in to make sure everything works smoothly. There's nothing worse than discovering authentication issues when you're under deadline pressure during tax season! The "digital flag planting" strategy you mentioned is spot on - establishing your identity early creates a stronger paper trail and makes it much harder for bad actors to impersonate you later.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

This cybersecurity perspective is super valuable, thank you! The password manager recommendation is spot-on - I've been meaning to set one up for ages and this seems like the perfect opportunity to finally do it properly. The heads up about facial recognition issues is really helpful too. I actually do wear glasses and have grown a beard since my last license renewal, so I'll definitely be prepared for potential delays with the ID.me verification. Better to know that going in than be surprised by it! The tip about testing the login process after setup is brilliant - such a simple thing but I probably would have skipped that step and ended up discovering problems at the worst possible time. Really appreciate the practical cybersecurity advice alongside all the other great guidance in this thread!

0 coins

Really glad you asked this question! I went through the exact same confusion a few months ago and ended up doing a deep dive into both systems. Here's what I'd recommend based on my experience: **Definitely set up both accounts now.** The IRS is still using ID.me for 2025, but the Login.gov transition is inevitable - it's just a matter of when, not if. Having both ready eliminates any last-minute scrambling. **Timing considerations:** - ID.me verification took me about 3 days (longer during busy periods) - Login.gov was approved in under an hour - Both require different documentation, so plan accordingly **Your identity protection instinct is correct.** Creating your Login.gov account now does establish your identity in their system first, which adds a layer of protection against someone else trying to create an account with your information. **Practical benefits I've discovered:** - Login.gov works great for other federal services (I use it for Social Security and VA benefits) - Having both accounts made me more comfortable with the systems before I actually needed them for tax purposes - The peace of mind factor alone was worth the setup time Pro tip: Use the same recovery email for both accounts and enable 2FA immediately. Also, take screenshots of your successful verification pages - they've been lifesavers when I had minor login issues later. You're being smart by thinking ahead! Most people wait until February and then get frustrated with verification delays.

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive breakdown, thank you! The timing comparison between ID.me (3 days) vs Login.gov (under an hour) is really eye-opening. I had no idea there was such a big difference in processing times. Your point about getting comfortable with the systems before actually needing them is something I hadn't considered but makes total sense. There's already enough stress during tax season without having to figure out new verification processes on top of everything else. I'm definitely going to follow your advice about using the same recovery email and taking screenshots. That's the kind of practical detail that could save so much frustration later on. Really appreciate you sharing your real-world experience with both systems!

0 coins

I'm going through a similar situation right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! My divorce won't be final until May, but I've been separated since September and have my two kids living with me full-time. I was planning to file Married Filing Separately, but after reading about the Head of Household option, I'm wondering if I qualify too. One question I haven't seen addressed - if I do qualify for Head of Household, do I need any special documentation to prove the separation timeline or that I paid more than half the household expenses? I want to make sure I have everything properly documented in case the IRS has questions later. The last thing I need during this stressful time is an audit because I didn't have the right paperwork to back up my filing status. Also, for those who mentioned the tax calculation tools - do they factor in state taxes too? I'm in California and wondering if the filing status choice affects state taxes differently than federal.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

Great questions! For Head of Household documentation, keep records of when you moved out/separated (lease agreements, utility bills in your name starting from separation date), receipts for household expenses you paid (mortgage/rent, utilities, groceries, childcare), and documentation showing the kids lived with you more than half the year (school records, medical records, etc.). Regarding California state taxes - yes, your federal filing status generally carries over to your state return, but California does have some unique rules. The good news is that California recognizes Head of Household the same way as federal, so if you qualify federally, you should qualify for California too. The tax tools others mentioned like taxr.ai do factor in state-specific calculations, which is especially helpful in high-tax states like California where the filing status choice can make an even bigger difference in your overall tax bill. Keep all your separation and expense documentation organized - it'll give you peace of mind and protect you if there are ever questions about your filing status choice.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

As someone who works in tax preparation, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been fully addressed - the timing of when you actually separated matters a lot for Head of Household eligibility. The IRS requires that you lived apart from your spouse for the LAST SIX MONTHS of the tax year, not just any six months during the year. So if you separated in August like one commenter mentioned, you'd meet this requirement since August through December is more than six months. But if someone separated in July, they'd need to count July through December to make sure it's at least six months. Also, regarding documentation - the IRS doesn't require you to file proof with your return, but you should definitely keep records. I recommend creating a simple timeline document showing: separation date, when kids started living with you primarily, major household expenses you paid each month, and any relevant court documents or separation agreements. One more tip: if you're unsure about your filing status, you can always file an amended return if you discover you qualified for a more beneficial status after filing. It's better to be conservative and potentially amend later than to file incorrectly and face penalties. The Head of Household status can save significant money compared to Married Filing Separately, so it's definitely worth exploring if you think you might qualify!

0 coins

I see a lot of advice here but I'm confused about one thing... if I have $5000 in winnings (including a $3000 jackpot) but $7000 in losses for the year, do I still have to report the $5000 as income and then separately deduct $5000 in losses? Or can I just report the net loss of $2000? Does turbo tax handle this correctly?

0 coins

You MUST report the full $5000 as income on Schedule 1, then deduct up to $5000 as an itemized deduction on Schedule A. You can never deduct more than your winnings, and you can't just report the net amount. This is why gambling taxes can be unfair - you have to report all winnings but can only deduct losses if you itemize. TurboTax does handle this correctly if you follow the prompts carefully. It will ask about your W-2G, then separately ask about gambling losses on the itemized deductions section. Just make sure you're tracking both numbers separately.

0 coins

Something to keep in mind - even if you get your withholding back, you'll need to be prepared for potential scrutiny from the IRS if your gambling losses are substantial compared to your income. They sometimes flag returns where gambling losses seem unusually high relative to someone's financial situation. The key is having rock-solid documentation. Beyond what others have mentioned, I'd also recommend keeping photos of your losing tickets if possible, and if you play table games, try to get pit boss signatures on your session records when you have big losses. Some casinos will do this if you ask. One more tip: if you're planning to claim gambling losses this year, consider opening a separate bank account just for gambling funds next year. It makes tracking much cleaner and provides a clear paper trail of your gambling activity that's separate from your regular expenses.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about documentation! I'm curious about the separate bank account idea - do you just deposit your gambling budget into that account and then only use those funds at casinos? And when you withdraw cash at casino ATMs, does that automatically create the paper trail you're talking about, or do you need to do something additional to track it properly? Also, regarding the pit boss signatures - is that something most casinos are willing to do, or do you have to ask at specific times? I've never thought to ask for that kind of documentation while playing.

0 coins

I've been reading through this entire discussion and it's clear that legal malpractice settlements involving estate matters are incredibly complex from a tax perspective. What strikes me most is how many different factors can influence the tax treatment - from the "origin of the claim" doctrine to stepped-up basis issues to potential windfall considerations. For anyone else facing similar situations, this thread really highlights the importance of getting proper documentation from your settlement attorney about what exactly the payment represents. It sounds like having a clear breakdown of damages (lost inheritance vs. interest vs. punitive elements vs. reimbursement of costs) could make a huge difference in how the IRS treats the settlement. The suggestion about potentially filing an extension to get professional guidance rather than rushing to meet the deadline also seems very wise, especially with larger settlements that could draw IRS scrutiny. Better to invest in proper tax advice upfront than deal with audits, amendments, and penalties later. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and knowledge - this has been really educational about an area of tax law that doesn't get discussed very often but can have major financial implications for families dealing with estate disputes.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

This has been such a valuable discussion to follow! As someone new to this community, I'm impressed by how thorough and helpful everyone has been in breaking down such a complex tax situation. What really stands out to me is how this case demonstrates that settlement taxation isn't just a simple "taxable or not taxable" question - there are so many nuanced factors that can affect different portions of the same settlement. The interplay between estate tax rules, malpractice recovery principles, and income tax reporting requirements is definitely not something most people would think through on their own. I also appreciate how several members shared their experiences with various services and resources for getting professional guidance. It's clear that for situations this complex, trying to DIY the tax treatment could lead to serious problems down the road. For the original poster - it sounds like you have a solid plan now with getting professional help and potentially filing an extension. This thread has probably saved you from making some costly mistakes!

0 coins

Liv Park

•

As a tax professional who has handled several similar cases, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been fully addressed yet - the importance of timing your consultation strategically. Since you're dealing with a 2024 settlement that needs to be reported on your 2024 return, you'll want to get professional guidance soon even if you file an extension. One key issue I've seen in estate malpractice cases is when the settlement compensates for assets that would have received a stepped-up basis at death but didn't due to the attorney's errors. If your parents' estate included appreciating assets that should have passed to you with a stepped-up basis but didn't due to the malpractice, the settlement might need to be analyzed under different rules than a simple inheritance recovery. Also, make sure your tax professional coordinates with your malpractice attorney before finalizing any position. I've seen cases where well-meaning attorneys structured settlements in ways that created unnecessary tax complications because they didn't consider the tax implications upfront. Getting both professionals working together now could potentially save you thousands in taxes if any adjustments to the settlement characterization are still possible. Document everything thoroughly - the IRS tends to scrutinize large settlements, especially those involving estate matters where the tax treatment isn't immediately clear from standard forms.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of expert insight I was hoping to see in this discussion! The point about stepped-up basis complications for appreciating assets is particularly important - I hadn't fully considered how the malpractice might have affected the basis treatment of different types of assets in the estate. Your suggestion about coordinating between the tax professional and malpractice attorney is really valuable too. It sounds like there might still be opportunities to clarify or even adjust how the settlement is characterized if we act quickly enough. Given that we're still relatively early in the tax year, there might be some flexibility to optimize the tax treatment before everything is finalized. The documentation point is well-taken - with a settlement this size involving estate matters, we definitely want to be prepared for potential IRS scrutiny. Having clear professional guidance and documentation from the start will be much better than trying to reconstruct the reasoning later if questions arise. I'm definitely convinced about getting both professionals involved sooner rather than later. Thanks for the practical advice from someone who has actually handled these types of cases before!

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

I've had this exact same problem! The IRS phone system is notorious for audio issues. Here are a few things that have worked for me: First, try calling from a landline if possible - cell phone connections can be spotty with their old system. Second, make sure you're in a quiet room and speak directly into the microphone (not on speaker). If they still can't hear you, don't waste time trying to make it work - immediately ask to be transferred to a different agent or line. I've also had success calling the early taxpayer assistance line at 1-800-829-1040 and pressing 2 for personal income tax questions - sometimes that routing has better audio quality. The key is being proactive about the audio check right when they pick up instead of trying to struggle through a bad connection. Good luck!

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

This is super helpful advice! I never knew about the early taxpayer assistance line routing - that's a great tip. The landline suggestion makes a lot of sense too since these older government systems probably weren't designed with modern cell networks in mind. I really appreciate the emphasis on being proactive about the audio check right when they answer instead of wasting time trying to make a bad connection work. That alone could save so much frustration. Thanks for sharing the specific number and extension, I'm definitely going to try that route next time! šŸ“ž

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

I work for a tax preparation service and deal with IRS calls regularly - this audio issue is SO common! Here's what I've found works best: Before you even start talking about your tax issue, immediately do an audio test with the agent. Say "Can you hear me clearly?" and wait for confirmation. If there's any static, cutting out, or they ask you to repeat yourself, don't waste time - ask to be transferred right away. Also, I've noticed their system works much better with corded phones vs wireless/Bluetooth. If you're using a cell phone, try switching to WiFi calling if your carrier supports it. One more trick: if you have to call back, mention to the new agent that your previous call had technical difficulties - they'll often prioritize getting you to someone with better equipment. The IRS knows their phone system is problematic and the agents are usually very understanding about these issues!

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear from someone who deals with this professionally! The audio test tip is so smart - I was trying to jump straight into explaining my tax issue instead of making sure they could actually hear me first. I had no idea about WiFi calling potentially helping either, that's definitely worth trying. It's reassuring to know that even tax professionals deal with these same frustrating audio problems regularly. Makes me feel less like it's something I'm doing wrong. Thanks for the insider tips and for confirming that the agents are understanding about these technical issues! šŸ™

0 coins

Prev1...236237238239240...5643Next