One thing nobody mentioned is that if you claim your baby, you might qualify for Head of Household filing status which has better tax rates than filing Single. You need to provide more than half the cost of keeping up the home where your child lives. In my situation, I was the lower earner but by claiming our baby and filing HOH, I saved way more than my higher-earning partner would have saved by claiming her. Just another factor to consider when you're figuring this out - don't just look at the child tax credit alone!

This is such a common situation for unmarried couples! I went through something similar last year. A few key things to consider beyond what others mentioned: Since your boyfriend is self-employed, he can also potentially benefit from the Additional Child Tax Credit if his tax liability gets reduced to zero - this credit is refundable unlike the regular Child Tax Credit. With his business expenses and the child-related credits, he might end up with a nice refund. Also, don't overlook childcare expenses if either of you paid for daycare or a babysitter so you could work. The Child and Dependent Care Credit can be worth up to $1,050 for one child, and whoever claims the child gets this benefit too. One strategy some couples use: run a quick calculation using tax software both ways before filing. Most programs let you play with different scenarios. Enter all your info twice - once with you claiming her, once with him claiming her - and see which gives your household the better overall result. And definitely look into that Head of Household status! The tax savings from HOH filing status alone might outweigh the benefit of your boyfriend claiming the higher credits, especially since you're already paying most of the housing costs.

I totally understand the temptation to try filing again, but as others have mentioned, you really can't file a second return for the same tax year. The IRS system will reject it outright since your SSN has already been used. However, your coworker's situation might be totally different from yours - she could have different deductions, credits, or filing status that you don't qualify for. The difference in her refund might not apply to your situation at all. If you're really concerned you missed something, I'd suggest doing a quick review of common deductions people forget: student loan interest, charitable donations (even small ones), work-from-home expenses if you were remote, educator expenses if you're a teacher, or state and local tax deductions. You can also check if you qualified for any credits like the Child and Dependent Care Credit or Education Credits. If you find something significant you missed, then file Form 1040-X to amend your return. But honestly, if TurboTax walked you through everything and you answered the questions accurately, you probably didn't miss much. The peace of mind might not be worth the hassle unless you discover something really substantial.

I've been in a similar situation where I filed early and then started wondering if I missed something after hearing about others getting larger refunds. One thing that helped me was using the IRS's Interactive Tax Assistant tool on their website - it's free and walks you through questions to see if you might qualify for credits or deductions you didn't claim. The tool helped me realize I had actually claimed everything I was eligible for, which gave me peace of mind. It covers things like education credits, dependent care credits, and various deductions that are commonly overlooked. If you do find something substantial through the tool or by reviewing your return, then definitely go the amended return route with Form 1040-X rather than trying to file again. But honestly, if TurboTax guided you through their interview process and you answered everything accurately, you probably got most of what you were entitled to. Different tax situations can lead to very different outcomes, so your coworker's experience might not be relevant to your specific circumstances.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned - If your wife already owned her house before marriage and you owned your condo before marriage, be careful about how you're filing. In some states, property owned before marriage remains separate property, which can affect how the rental income and expenses should be reported. If the condo is still in your name only, and not jointly with your wife, you might need to file Schedule E under just your name, not jointly. The LLC complicates things further. You should really consult with a CPA who specializes in real estate, not just a general tax preparer.

Your tax preparer is being overly cautious. You absolutely can and should claim legitimate rental property expenses on Schedule E even without rental income yet. The IRS allows deductions for properties that are "placed in service" - meaning ready and available for rent - regardless of whether you've found tenants. The fact that you're actively showing the property and being selective about tenants actually strengthens your position. This demonstrates genuine business intent, not a hobby activity. Keep detailed records of your marketing efforts, showings, and communications with potential renters. A few key points for your situation: - Document everything: receipts, photos of work done, rental listings, showing appointments - The LLC formation date doesn't determine "placed in service" - it's when you first made the property available for rent - Start keeping a mileage log NOW for any rental-related trips with the truck - Consider finding a tax professional who specializes in rental properties if your current preparer won't file Schedule E The IRS has consistently ruled in favor of taxpayers who can demonstrate legitimate business purpose and proper documentation. Your expenses are real business costs that should be deductible. Don't let fear of an audit prevent you from claiming legitimate deductions you're entitled to take.

Wait, I'm confused about something. If the OP reported MORE income than was on the 1099 ($3000+ vs $600), wouldn't that mean they OVERPAID their taxes? Why would the IRS come after them for an audit when they paid more tax than required?

I went through something very similar last year with multiple gig platforms. The key thing to understand is that you likely DID report the correct income - you just need to make sure the sources are properly documented. From what you've described, it sounds like you found your tax summary showing the full $4000+, which is exactly what you should be reporting. The $600 1099-NEC is just one piece of the puzzle (likely bonuses/incentives as others mentioned). Here's what I'd recommend: First, gather ALL your tax documents from Uber - the 1099-NEC, the annual tax summary, and any 1099-K if you received one. Then compare what you actually filed versus what these documents show. You may find that you're closer to being correct than you think. If there are discrepancies, file Form 1040-X to amend, but don't panic about audits. The IRS is much more concerned with people underreporting income than overreporting it. Since you were trying to be accurate and used the information available to you at the time, this is clearly an honest mistake that's easily correctable. The important thing is to get it sorted out properly rather than leaving mismatched information on file, even if it resulted in you paying more tax than necessary.

Same here! Filed 2/4 and got the exact same codes on my transcript yesterday. The waiting is killing me but sounds like we're in good shape based on what everyone's saying. Fingers crossed we see that 846 code soon 🤞

I'm in the exact same situation! Filed 2/3 and just saw my transcript update with codes 150, 806, 766, and 768. It's so nerve-wracking not knowing what's happening but this thread has been super informative. Thanks everyone for breaking down what these codes mean - sounds like we're on the right track and just need to be patient for that 846 code to show up. The IRS really needs to make this process more transparent for taxpayers!