IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As a newcomer to this community, I'm blown away by how comprehensive and helpful this discussion has been! I'm facing a very similar situation with about $2,000 worth of items I'm planning to donate to Goodwill before year-end, and this thread has completely transformed my understanding of how to handle donation deductions properly. The systematic approaches everyone has shared - taking photos before donation, using established valuation guides as baselines, maintaining detailed records with reasoning, and understanding the crucial distinction between fair market value and thrift store retail prices - have given me a clear roadmap for tackling this confidently. I'm particularly grateful for the insights about Form 8283 requirements (since I'll be over $500), the mileage deduction I had no idea existed, and the real-world experiences from those who've been through audits. Learning that the IRS is looking for reasonable good-faith effort rather than perfection is incredibly reassuring. One thing I'm planning to implement based on all the advice here: I'll use the hybrid photo approach (group shots by category for efficiency, individual photos for higher-value items), stick with the Salvation Army valuation guide as my conservative baseline, and adjust based on actual condition with detailed notes about my reasoning. Thank you to this amazing community for sharing such practical, real-world guidance. The peace of mind that comes from proper documentation is clearly worth the extra effort upfront!

0 coins

Fidel Carson

•

Welcome to the community, Brianna! This thread really has become an incredible resource - I'm so impressed by all the practical wisdom that's been shared here by experienced community members. Your systematic approach sounds absolutely perfect for handling your $2,000 in donations. The hybrid photo strategy combined with using the Salvation Army guide as your baseline is exactly what several successful members have recommended throughout this discussion. Having that detailed documentation trail will definitely give you the confidence you need when filing. One small addition to consider based on what others have shared: since you're planning multiple donation runs anyway for the mileage deduction, you might want to spread your documentation work across those trips rather than trying to catalog everything at once. It can make the process feel less overwhelming and helps ensure you don't rush through the valuation process. The peace of mind aspect really resonates with me too - it's clear from everyone's experiences that taking the time to do proper documentation upfront saves so much stress during tax season. Plus, having all that backup gives you complete confidence that you're claiming legitimate deductions properly. Thanks for adding your perspective as another newcomer who's benefited from this amazing community discussion. Good luck with your donations, and I hope you'll share how the process goes for you!

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful for this comprehensive thread! I've been putting off a major donation to Goodwill because I was intimidated by the documentation requirements, but reading through everyone's experiences has given me the confidence to move forward properly. I'm planning to donate about $2,800 worth of items before year-end - mostly clothing, household goods, and some furniture. The systematic approach everyone has outlined here is exactly what I needed: taking photos before donation, using the Salvation Army valuation guide as my baseline, maintaining detailed records with condition notes, and understanding that fair market value means "garage sale prices" rather than thrift store retail. The insights about Form 8283 requirements, the mileage deduction (14 cents per mile!), and the importance of being conservative but fair with valuations have been game-changing. I especially appreciated hearing from those who've been through audits - knowing that the IRS wants to see reasonable good-faith effort rather than perfection is incredibly reassuring. One question I have: for bulky items like furniture that are harder to photograph in detail, would you recommend taking multiple angles or focusing on any particular aspects to document condition? I have a dining table and some bookshelves that show normal wear but are still very functional. Thank you to this amazing community for turning what seemed like an overwhelming task into a manageable process with clear steps!

0 coins

IRS website says "2024 Tax Return Is Not Processed" after 4 weeks, but agent claims it's "in processing" - confused about $4,700 refund status!

I filed my tax return electronically about 4 weeks ago and have been checking the Where's My Refund tool regularly. Today I decided to check my account on the IRS website and it shows a message saying "Your 2024 Tax Return Is Not Processed" with additional text about processing usually taking 21 days for e-filing or 6 weeks for paper returns. When I log into my IRS account, I see a screen titled "Account Status" with a big alert that says "Your 2024 Tax Return Is Not Processed" in bold text. Below that, there's additional information explaining "If you've already filed, processing usually takes 21 days (electronic returns) or six weeks (paper returns)." The message also states "If you still need to file, submit your tax return along with any payment due by April 15, 2025 to avoid potential penalties." I can see this is from the official IRS website (sa.www4.irs.gov). I got worried so I called the IRS yesterday and spent over an hour on hold. When I finally reached someone, they told me my return was "in processing" and to just be patient. But the website still says it's not processed! I'm totally confused now. Is there a difference between "not processed" and "in processing"? Has anyone else experienced this? I was really counting on getting this refund soon since I'm supposed to be getting back around $4,700. The IRS representative didn't seem concerned at all, but the website message is making me nervous, especially since we're already into the fourth week since I filed. Does the IRS account status page update in real-time? Could it be that my return is actually being processed but the website hasn't updated yet? I'm checking my account several times a day and getting increasingly frustrated seeing that same "Not Processed" message staring back at me.

Ryan Vasquez

•

This is such a common and frustrating experience! I went through the exact same thing earlier this year and it was maddening. The disconnect between "not processed" on the website and "in processing" from the agent happens because these are completely different systems that don't communicate well. The website literally only updates to "processed" when your return is 100% complete and your refund is approved - it doesn't show any of the intermediate steps where they're actually working on your return. Since you found a 570 code on your transcript, that's exactly why you're seeing "not processed" on the website. The 570 is a temporary hold code that's extremely common with Child Tax Credit returns (which you have). The IRS does additional verification on returns with CTC, and this hold prevents the website status from updating until that verification is complete. Here's what to expect: • 570 holds with CTC typically resolve in 4-6 weeks total • You're at week 4, so you should see movement soon • Stop checking the main account page (it's basically useless during holds) • Check your transcript weekly for the 570 to disappear or an 846 code (refund issued) Your $4,700 is completely safe - it's just stuck in their standard verification process. The agent was correct that it's "in processing." The website will catch up once the hold clears. Hang in there!

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

I've been through this exact frustrating experience! The "not processed" vs "in processing" confusion is one of the most maddening things about dealing with the IRS. What's happening is that the IRS website and their internal agent systems are completely separate and don't sync properly. The website only shows "processed" when your return is 100% complete and approved - it doesn't reflect any of the work happening behind the scenes. So even while they're actively reviewing your return (which is what the agent meant by "in processing"), that website status stubbornly stays on "not processed" until everything is totally finished. The 570 code on your transcript is the key here - that's a temporary hold that's super common with Child Tax Credit returns. Since you mentioned having CTC for your kids, your return is going through their standard verification process, which typically takes 4-6 weeks total. You're at week 4, so you should see movement soon! My advice: stop checking that useless main account page (I know it's addictive but it'll just stress you out) and focus on your transcript instead. Look for either the 570 to disappear or an 846 code to appear - that means your refund has been issued. Your $4,700 is completely safe, just temporarily stuck in verification. The waiting is brutal but this is totally normal! Hang in there! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

This whole thread has been so enlightening! I'm a new parent dealing with my first year of DCFSA contributions and employer childcare benefits, and I was completely panicking when I saw that extra income appear in my tax software. What really helped me understand was everyone's explanation that Box 10 is essentially a "total benefits received" number that includes EVERYTHING - your DCFSA contributions, employer contributions, backup childcare, subsidies, everything. I had no idea these all got lumped together for that $5,000 combined limit. The retroactive payment explanation was especially helpful since my employer also made some kind of adjustment payment this year that I couldn't figure out. Now I understand it shows up on 2024's W2 regardless of what year the services were actually for. I'm definitely going to request a detailed breakdown from HR like some of you suggested. I think seeing exactly what's included in that Box 10 number will help me feel more confident that everything is correct. And thanks for all the mentions of the Child and Dependent Care Credit - with daycare costs over $15,000 last year, I should definitely qualify for some relief on the expenses beyond that $5,000 tax-free limit. Every little bit helps when you're dealing with these crazy childcare costs! It's so reassuring to know this situation is normal and that even with some benefits becoming taxable, we're still coming out ahead compared to paying everything with after-tax dollars.

0 coins

Welcome to the dependent care benefits confusion club! It's honestly such a relief to see so many people going through the same thing - I was starting to think I was the only one who found this stuff completely baffling. Your situation sounds almost identical to mine from last year. That moment when you see the extra taxable income pop up in your tax software is genuinely scary if you don't understand what's happening. I remember thinking "Did I mess up my DCFSA somehow? Is this going to cost me thousands in extra taxes?" The breakdown everyone's provided here is spot-on. What helped me the most was realizing that even though it feels like you're getting "penalized" for having good benefits, you're actually still saving money compared to paying all childcare costs with after-tax income. The math works out in your favor even with the $5,000 combined limit. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given: when you do get that detailed breakdown from HR, don't be surprised if there are small benefits you completely forgot about. In my case, there was a dependent care wellness reimbursement and some kind of childcare resource service that I had used but never connected to my W2. It all adds up! The Child and Dependent Care Credit was definitely worth pursuing in my situation too. With your $15,000+ in childcare costs, you should have plenty of qualifying expenses beyond that tax-free $5,000 to make the credit worthwhile.

0 coins

Ella Lewis

•

This is exactly the kind of situation that makes tax season so stressful! I went through something very similar last year and the confusion is totally understandable. Your Box 10 amount of $11,983.68 likely includes your DCFSA contribution ($5,869.81), your employer's contributions (~$4,100 including that retroactive payment), and probably other dependent care benefits you might not have considered - like backup childcare services, dependent care subsidies, or other employer-provided childcare assistance. The reason TurboTax is adding $5,000+ to your taxable income is because of the combined $5,000 annual limit on tax-free dependent care benefits. Everything above that limit becomes taxable income, which is why you're seeing that additional amount. Here's what I'd recommend: 1. Get a detailed breakdown from HR of everything included in your Box 10 amount 2. Review your paystubs throughout the year to track all dependent care benefits 3. Make sure you're claiming the Child and Dependent Care Credit on qualifying expenses beyond the $5,000 tax-free limit The good news is this situation is completely normal for families with generous employer benefits and DCFSA contributions. Even with some benefits becoming taxable, you're still better off than paying all childcare costs with after-tax dollars. The partial tax benefit is still a win!

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! My client also put the same amount in both Box 1 and Box 7 on my 1099-NEC, and like you, I received the full amount shown in Box 1 with no deductions whatsoever. After reading through all these responses, I'm convinced this is just a common mistake that happens when business owners aren't familiar with the new 1099-NEC form layout. The fact that multiple tax professionals here are saying they see this 5-10 times per season really puts my mind at ease. What I found most helpful from this thread is understanding that Box 7 is specifically for state income allocation when you work across multiple states - not for any kind of withholding. Since all my work for this client was done remotely from my home state, Box 7 should definitely be blank. I'm going to follow the advice here and contact my client today to request a corrected form before filing. Better to be proactive about this than deal with IRS matching issues later. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these confusing tax situations!

0 coins

I'm so glad I found this thread! I'm in almost the exact same boat - received a 1099-NEC with identical amounts in Box 1 and Box 7, and my tax software is showing a suspiciously large federal refund increase. Reading all these expert explanations has been a huge relief. What really clicked for me was understanding that Box 7 is only for multi-state income allocation, not withholding. Since I work remotely from home for all my clients, that box should definitely be empty. It's reassuring to know this is such a common mistake that tax professionals see it regularly. I was hesitant to contact my client about it because I didn't want to seem like I was questioning their competence, but framing it as helping them avoid potential IRS issues makes it feel much more collaborative. Planning to reach out today and request the correction before filing. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise here - this community is invaluable for those of us still learning the ropes!

0 coins

I've been following this thread as someone who processes dozens of 1099-NECs for my consulting business, and I wanted to add a few practical tips for getting this resolved quickly with your client. When you reach out to them, I'd suggest being very specific about what needs to change. Instead of just saying "Box 7 is wrong," try something like: "Hi [Client], I received my 1099-NEC and noticed Box 7 has an amount in it. This box is only used when contractors work across multiple states for income allocation. Since all my work was done [remotely from my home state/entirely in [state]], this box should be blank. Could you please issue a corrected 1099-NEC with Box 7 empty? This will help us both avoid any IRS matching issues." Most payroll services (like ADP, Paychex, etc.) can generate corrected forms pretty easily - it's usually just a matter of logging in and reissuing. If your client did the forms manually, they might need to order new blank forms, but the IRS allows handwritten corrections in some cases. Also, keep documentation of your request for the correction. If for some reason they can't or won't fix it before the filing deadline, you'll want to show the IRS that you tried to resolve the discrepancy proactively. Don't stress too much about this - it really is one of the most common 1099-NEC errors out there!

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

This is exactly the kind of practical guidance I was looking for! Your suggested email template is perfect - it explains the issue clearly without making the client feel bad about the mistake. I really appreciate the specific language about Box 7 being for multi-state income allocation, as that gives them a clear understanding of what the box is actually meant for. The tip about keeping documentation of my correction request is particularly valuable. I hadn't thought about that aspect, but you're absolutely right that having a paper trail could be important if there are any IRS questions later. I'm feeling much more confident about reaching out to my client now. It's reassuring to know that most payroll services can handle corrections easily - hopefully this will be a quick fix. Thanks for taking the time to share such detailed and actionable advice!

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

I'm an expat married to a non-US citizen without an SSN, and I've been through this exact process. One thing nobody mentioned is that you can actually go to an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center in person and they can verify your spouse's documents on the spot! This saved us from having to mail in original documents or find a Certifying Acceptance Agent. You need to call to make an appointment first (this is where Claimyr could help), but it's free and much faster than mailing everything in. Just bring your spouse, their passport, your marriage certificate, and the completed W-7 form.

0 coins

Do you know if you can submit the completed tax return at the same time when you go to the Taxpayer Assistance Center? Or do they just verify the documents for the ITIN?

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

I'm going through something similar right now! One additional option that might help is to check if your spouse qualifies for an exemption from getting an ITIN. If your spouse is a nonresident alien who doesn't have U.S. source income and won't be claimed as a dependent, you might be able to file as "Married Filing Separately" and treat your spouse as a nonresident alien. This could actually be beneficial tax-wise in some cases, especially if your spouse has no U.S. income. You'd file Form 1040 or 1040-SR and just put "NRA" (Nonresident Alien) in the spouse information section instead of an SSN or ITIN. However, you'll want to double-check this with a tax professional since the rules around resident vs. nonresident status can be pretty complex, especially if your spouse spent any time in the U.S. during the tax year. The substantial presence test and other factors come into play.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

This is really helpful information about the NRA option! I hadn't considered that my spouse might qualify as a nonresident alien. He's only been in the U.S. for about 3 months this tax year and doesn't have any U.S. income. The substantial presence test sounds complicated though - is there a simple way to calculate if he meets the requirements, or should I definitely consult with a tax professional before going this route? I'm worried about making the wrong choice and causing problems down the line.

0 coins

Prev1...214215216217218...5644Next