IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Zane Gray

•

been waiting since February... welcome to the party 😭

0 coins

I feel your pain! Been there myself and the waiting is brutal. Just to confirm what others said - you definitely won't get your refund before the 846 code shows up. That code literally means "refund issued" so it has to appear first. 3 weeks isn't too bad yet though - the IRS says to allow 21 days for e-filed returns. If you hit the 21 day mark and still nothing, then you can start digging deeper into what might be causing the delay. Hang in there!

0 coins

Thanks for the encouragement! I'm definitely learning that patience is key with the IRS. It's reassuring to know that 3 weeks isn't unusual yet. I'll try to chill out and wait for that 21 day mark before I start really panicking. This whole process is so nerve-wracking when you're counting on that money!

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

I ran into this exact same issue with my Schwab 1099-B supplemental form showing Section 1256 contracts! What worked for me was switching to TaxAct which has better support for Form 6781 than HRBlock's online version. Even though your values are all zeros, you definitely need to report this since the IRS received a copy of your 1099-B. I learned this the hard way when I initially skipped it and got a notice asking about the missing form. In TaxAct, look for "Investment Income and Expenses" then select "Other Investment Income" and you'll find the Section 1256 option. It walks you through entering the values from boxes 8-11 of your supplemental 1099-B. Since everything is zero for you, it should be straightforward once you find the right form. If you want to stick with HRBlock, you'll likely need their desktop software or to work with a tax professional since their online version doesn't handle specialized investment forms very well.

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

Thank you for sharing your experience with TaxAct! I'm actually leaning towards switching software at this point since HRBlock online seems to be missing this functionality entirely. Can you clarify what you mean by getting a notice for initially skipping the form? Was it an actual IRS correspondence or just a software warning? I'm trying to understand how seriously the IRS takes these zero-value Section 1256 reports since multiple people have mentioned they should still be filed even with no tax impact. Also, did TaxAct automatically detect that you needed Form 6781 when you uploaded your 1099-B, or did you have to manually search for the Section 1256 option?

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

It was an actual IRS notice (CP2000) about 6 months after filing. The notice basically said they had received a 1099-B showing Section 1256 activity but couldn't find the corresponding Form 6781 on my return. Even though there was no tax due, they wanted documentation showing I had properly reported the activity. TaxAct didn't automatically detect it when I uploaded the 1099-B - I had to manually find the Section 1256 option under the investment income section. The software isn't smart enough to read the supplemental forms and auto-populate the specialized forms. Once I found the right section though, it was pretty straightforward to enter the values from boxes 8-11. The IRS notice was resolved quickly once I filed an amended return with Form 6781 included, but it was definitely a hassle I could have avoided by doing it right the first time. That's why I always recommend including these forms even when the values are zero - the IRS matching system will catch it eventually.

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact issue for the past two years with futures trading through TD Ameritrade. Here's what I learned that might help you and others: Even with zero values, you absolutely need to report Section 1256 contracts because the IRS has a copy of your supplemental 1099-B. I made the mistake of skipping it my first year since everything was zero, and got a CP2000 notice months later asking where Form 6781 was. For HRBlock online users specifically: Their basic online version doesn't support Form 6781 at all. You have three realistic options: 1. Upgrade to HRBlock Premium (desktop version) - this definitely includes Form 6781 2. Switch to tax software that handles it better (TurboTax Premier, TaxAct, or FreeTaxUSA all support Section 1256) 3. Work with an HRBlock tax professional I ended up switching to TurboTax Premier after my notice experience. The key is finding "Section 1256 Contracts and Straddles" in the investment income section. You'll manually enter the values from boxes 8-11 of your supplemental 1099-B even though they're all zeros. The IRS matching system will eventually catch missing forms, so it's worth doing it right the first time even when there's no tax impact. Save yourself the headache of dealing with notices later!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your real experience with the CP2000 notice! I was actually wondering if the IRS would really care about zero-value Section 1256 contracts, but your story confirms what others have mentioned about their matching system catching these discrepancies. I'm definitely going to switch to TurboTax Premier rather than risk dealing with notices later. It sounds like the extra cost upfront is worth avoiding the headache of amended returns and IRS correspondence. One quick question - when you got the CP2000 notice, how long did it take to resolve once you filed the amended return with Form 6781? I'm trying to understand the timeline in case I end up in a similar situation in the future.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

Does she provide more than half of her own support? Thats another thing to consider besides just age

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

nope i pay for everything still

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Just to add some clarity - the key tests for a qualifying child are: age (under 19 or under 24 if full-time student), relationship (your child), residency (lived with you more than half the year), and support (didn't provide more than half their own support). Sounds like your daughter meets all of these! The December birthday actually works in your favor since she was still 18 on Dec 31st.

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

This is super helpful! I'm new to all this tax stuff and wasn't sure about all the different requirements. So basically as long as she meets those 4 tests you mentioned, she can still be claimed even though she's 18 now? That's a relief to know for when my kids get older too.

0 coins

As someone who went through a similar situation when I moved to the US for work, I can share what I learned the hard way. The key insight that saved me was understanding that tax residency and citizenship are completely separate concepts in US tax law. When I first arrived on my L-1 visa, I made the mistake of thinking I only needed to report US income. After consulting with a tax attorney who specializes in expat situations, I discovered that once you meet the substantial presence test (which happens quickly when you're here on a work visa), you're taxed as a US resident on worldwide income. Here's what I'd strongly recommend: 1. Get professional tax advice from a CPA who specializes in international tax and crypto - this isn't a DIY situation 2. Use proper crypto tax software to handle your transaction volume (the recommendations above for taxr.ai seem solid) 3. Consider whether restructuring your trading as a US business entity might provide better compliance and potential deductions 4. Look into tax treaties between the US and Canada that might help avoid double taxation The offshore corporation route you're considering is extremely risky. Even if structured "correctly," the compliance burden (FBAR, Form 8938, potentially Form 5471) is massive, and the penalties for getting it wrong are severe. The IRS has gotten very sophisticated at tracking crypto transactions across international boundaries. Your trading volume actually makes compliance easier in some ways - with proper software, bulk processing is more efficient than trying to handle smaller volumes manually. Focus on legitimate tax efficiency strategies rather than avoidance schemes that could jeopardize your visa status and future immigration prospects.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice OP needs to hear. I'm also on a work visa and made similar assumptions about only reporting US income until I got educated about the substantial presence test. One thing I'd add - when you mention tax treaties between US and Canada, it's worth noting that these primarily help with avoiding double taxation rather than reducing your US tax obligations. The treaty won't help you avoid reporting the crypto trading income to the IRS, but it may provide credits for any Canadian taxes paid on the same income. Also, regarding the visa status implications you mentioned - this is huge. Getting flagged for tax evasion or failing to comply with reporting requirements can seriously impact future visa renewals or green card applications. Immigration authorities do look at tax compliance history, so the offshore structure could create problems beyond just IRS penalties. The business entity route you mentioned is interesting though. Has anyone here actually set up a US trading entity for crypto? I'm curious about the practical benefits vs. additional compliance burden.

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•

I work in tax compliance for a major accounting firm and handle several high-volume crypto traders in similar situations. The offshore Cayman structure you're considering is essentially a red flag for the IRS - they have specific anti-avoidance rules targeting exactly this type of arrangement. Here's the reality: as a US tax resident (which you likely are under the substantial presence test), you're required to report worldwide income regardless of where the trading occurs or what entity owns the accounts. The IRS has substantially increased enforcement around crypto in recent years, and they're particularly focused on international arrangements. What you should focus on instead: 1. **Proper software is non-negotiable** - With your volume, manual tracking is impossible. The recommendations above for taxr.ai are spot-on for high-frequency trading. 2. **Consider trader tax status** - If you qualify as a "trader in securities" (which crypto may qualify for), you can deduct trading expenses and potentially use mark-to-market accounting, which simplifies year-end reporting. 3. **Professional guidance is essential** - Your situation involves international tax, high-volume trading, and visa status implications. A specialized CPA will save you money long-term. 4. **The compliance burden of offshore structures is massive** - Even if legally structured, you'd need to file Forms 3520, 5471, FBAR, 8938, and potentially others. The penalties for errors often exceed any potential tax savings. The good news is that legitimate tax optimization strategies exist for high-volume traders that don't involve the risks of offshore arrangements. Focus on compliant solutions rather than schemes that could jeopardize both your tax status and visa situation.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

Don't forget about state taxes! If you worked in two different states like you mentioned, you'll probably need to file part-year resident returns for both states. This gets complicated fast when you have different income types.

0 coins

This is such an important point! I worked in Illinois and then California and had to file partial year returns in both. California especially got confusing because they wanted to tax my worldwide income for the part of the year I lived there.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year! A few additional tips that helped me: 1. **Calculate your safe harbor amount** - If your prior year tax liability was under $1,000, you may not owe any estimated tax penalties at all. If it was higher, paying 100% of last year's tax liability (or 110% if your AGI was over $150k) through withholding + estimated payments will generally protect you from penalties. 2. **Consider Form 2210** - Even if you missed some quarterly payments, you might be able to avoid penalties by filing Form 2210 with your return and showing that your income was uneven throughout the year (which it sounds like it was, since you started the fellowship in June). 3. **Double-check your 1042-S reporting** - Fellowship income from a 1042-S typically goes on Schedule 1 as "other income" rather than being treated like regular wages. Make sure whatever tax software you use handles this correctly. 4. **Keep documentation** - Save all your fellowship award letters and any communication from your university about the tax treatment. Sometimes there are special provisions for certain types of research fellowships. The January 15th estimated payment is definitely worth making to avoid additional penalties, but don't stress too much about the earlier quarters - the penalties are usually manageable and there are often ways to reduce them when you file your actual return.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

This is incredibly helpful! I had no idea about Form 2210 potentially helping with uneven income situations. Since my fellowship didn't start until June, that definitely applies to me. Quick question about the safe harbor calculation - when you say "prior year tax liability," does that include both federal and state taxes, or just federal? My 2023 return was pretty simple since I was just a student with minimal income, so I'm hoping I might qualify for that under $1,000 threshold. Also, do you happen to know if there's a difference in how fellowship income is treated if you're still technically a student (ABD status) versus being classified as a postdoc employee? My university seems unclear about this distinction on my paperwork.

0 coins

Prev1...21462147214821492150...5643Next