IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Dana Doyle

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - my vehicle was damaged in an accident and the insurance payout is higher than what I would have gotten in a trade. Does anyone know if insurance payouts for Section 179 vehicles are treated the same way as trade-ins for recapture purposes? I took the full deduction on a $60k truck in 2022, and now insurance is paying out $38k after it was totaled. I'm assuming I'll need to report that $38k as ordinary income, but I'm not sure if there are any special rules for involuntary conversions versus voluntary trades. Also planning to use the insurance money plus additional funds to buy a replacement truck - can I still take Section 179 on the new one even though this wasn't technically a trade-in situation?

0 coins

Insurance payouts for totaled vehicles are generally treated similarly to trade-ins for Section 179 recapture purposes, but there are some important differences since this is an involuntary conversion. You'll likely need to report the $38k insurance payout as ordinary income since your truck's adjusted basis was reduced to zero (or near zero) when you took the full Section 179 deduction. However, involuntary conversions have special rules under Section 1033 that might give you some options. If you replace the vehicle with similar business property within a certain timeframe (usually 2-3 years), you may be able to defer some of the gain recognition. This gets complex though, especially when combined with Section 179 recapture. And yes, you can absolutely take Section 179 on your replacement truck - the insurance payout and new purchase are separate transactions for tax purposes. Just make sure the new vehicle meets all the Section 179 requirements. Given the complexity of involuntary conversion rules combined with Section 179 recapture, I'd strongly recommend getting professional advice on your specific situation. The timing and amount of income recognition could vary significantly depending on how you structure the replacement purchase.

0 coins

I've been following this thread because I'm in a nearly identical situation with my work truck. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the importance of documenting your business use percentage if your vehicle wasn't used 100% for business. The IRS requires you to recapture based on the actual business use portion. So if you used your truck 80% for business and took a partial Section 179 deduction based on that percentage, your recapture calculation should also reflect that same 80% business use ratio. Also, keep in mind that if you're financing the new vehicle, the Section 179 deduction applies to the full purchase price, not just your down payment or trade equity. This is different from some other business deductions where financed amounts might be treated differently. Make sure you have good records showing the business use of both the old and new vehicles - mileage logs, business trip documentation, etc. The IRS can be pretty strict about this during audits, especially when large Section 179 deductions are involved.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

This is really helpful information about business use percentage - I hadn't thought about how that affects the recapture calculation. I've been using my truck about 75% for business, so I'm assuming I'll only need to recapture 75% of the trade-in value? Also, your point about financing is interesting. So if I'm buying a $50k truck but only putting $15k down (using my trade-in value), I can still deduct the full $50k under Section 179 as long as the truck qualifies? That seems almost too good to be true given all the recapture headaches I'm dealing with on the old vehicle. Do you happen to know if there are any restrictions on taking Section 179 again if you've just had to recapture a previous deduction in the same tax year?

0 coins

Kylo Ren

•

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but make sure you're documenting the HECK out of the business use of that ATV. I got audited last year for exactly this - had a Polaris Ranger for my rural properties and the IRS wanted proof it was used for business. Take dated photos of you using it for property maintenance, keep a mileage log, and save receipts for any attachments you buy for property work (like a small trailer, sprayer, etc). The auditor told me they specifically flag off-road vehicle purchases in businesses that aren't directly related to agriculture or landscaping.

0 coins

That's really good to know. Do you think having before/after photos of work done using the ATV would help? And did they accept your mileage log or did they want more specific documentation?

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the importance of establishing a clear business purpose BEFORE you buy the ATV. The IRS will scrutinize whether the vehicle was truly necessary for your business operations or if it was primarily for personal enjoyment. For your vacant land LLC, document specific business activities that require the ATV - like property inspections for insurance purposes, boundary maintenance, clearing brush for fire prevention, checking on utilities or access roads, etc. Create a written business plan that outlines how the ATV is essential for these activities. Also consider the timing - if you buy an expensive ATV right before year-end just to create a tax loss, that's going to raise red flags. The IRS prefers to see legitimate business purchases made when actually needed for operations. And don't forget about the luxury automobile limitations under IRC 280F. Even though ATVs aren't technically "automobiles," the IRS sometimes applies similar scrutiny to recreational-type vehicles used in business. Keep your purchase reasonable relative to what's actually needed for the job.

0 coins

Why do these tax preparers think they can hold our docs hostage like this? 🤮 the whole system is broken frfr

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

ong they be acting like they own our tax info 🤔

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

Ugh this is so frustrating! I went through something similar last year. The 810 freeze usually means they're questioning withholdings or credits on your return. Your preparer is required by law to give you a complete copy of your filed return - they can't just hold it hostage like that! I'd definitely file a complaint with the IRS about them. Also try getting your wage and income transcript directly from the IRS website so you can see what was actually filed. The good news is the 810 freeze shouldn't mess up next year's filing as long as you get it sorted out. Hang in there! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Lucas Turner

•

This has been such a helpful discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation for my consulting business where I have branded button-down shirts and blazers with my company logo that I wear to client meetings and conferences. One thing I've learned from my CPA is that keeping a simple log can really strengthen your case. I track when and where I wear each branded item - like "March 15: Client presentation at ABC Corp" or "March 20: Industry conference networking event." It takes maybe 30 seconds per entry but creates a clear paper trail showing business use. For those asking about audit documentation, my CPA said the IRS typically wants to see that you can demonstrate the items were purchased specifically for business use and that you actually use them that way. Photos are great, but a usage log plus receipts showing you bought multiple identical items (rather than just one shirt you might wear personally) can be even more convincing. @Zainab Ibrahim - your music school situation sounds like a textbook case for deductible clothing. The fact that you're wearing logo shirts specifically to identify yourself to parents and venue staff during recitals shows clear business necessity beyond just general marketing.

0 coins

This logging idea is brilliant! I wish I had thought of that from the beginning. I'm just starting my freelance graphic design business and bought some branded hoodies and polo shirts for client meetings and networking events. I've been keeping receipts but not tracking actual usage - definitely going to start that log system now. Your point about buying multiple identical items is really smart too. I bought 3 of the same polo shirt specifically so I'd always have a clean one for client meetings, which probably helps show business intent rather than personal use. @Zainab Ibrahim - after reading all these responses, your music school polo shirts sound like they d'easily qualify. The combination of professional identification during lessons AND marketing during public recitals gives you a really strong business case. Plus at $300-400 annually, it s'not a huge red flag amount. Thanks everyone for sharing your real-world experiences - this is way more helpful than trying to decode IRS publications on my own!

0 coins

This entire thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who just started my own tutoring business, I've been hesitant to invest in branded clothing because I wasn't sure about the tax implications. Reading through everyone's experiences, it seems like the key is establishing a clear business purpose and maintaining good documentation. I love the idea of keeping a usage log - that seems like such a simple way to demonstrate legitimate business use if questions ever arise. @Zainab Ibrahim - your situation with the music school polo shirts really does seem like a perfect example of deductible business clothing. You have two clear business purposes (instructor identification and marketing), you're wearing them in professional settings (lessons and recitals), and the cost is reasonable. I'd say you have a very strong case. One question for the group - does anyone know if there are any specific requirements about how the logo/business name needs to be displayed? Like does it need to include the full business name, or is just a recognizable logo sufficient? I'm designing some shirts for my tutoring business and want to make sure I get this right from the start. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences and practical tips. This is exactly the kind of information you can't find in generic tax guides!

0 coins

Just to add some clarity for everyone asking about documentation - the IRS Publication 529 specifically outlines what records you need to keep for gambling losses. For online platforms like Robinhood, your account statements are usually sufficient IF they clearly show the dates, amounts, and nature of each transaction. However, if you were using prediction markets or betting platforms that don't provide detailed tax reporting, you should definitely create a gambling log. Include the date, type of wager, amount bet, amount won/lost, and the platform used. Keep screenshots of your betting history if possible. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - if your total gambling losses exceed $5,000 in a year, you'll need to file Form 4797 in addition to reporting on Schedule A. This is often overlooked but can cause issues during an audit. Also remember that even if you can't deduct all your gambling losses this year (because they exceed your winnings), you can't carry them forward to future years like you can with capital losses. Gambling losses are use-it-or-lose-it each tax year.

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

This is really helpful clarification, thank you! I had no idea about Form 4797 for losses over $5k. That could definitely apply to my situation. The fact that gambling losses can't be carried forward like capital losses makes this even more frustrating - seems like the tax code really penalizes people who got caught up in election betting. Do you know if there's any difference in how the IRS treats political prediction markets versus traditional sports betting? I'm wondering if they view election betting as having some kind of informational or civic value that might affect the tax treatment.

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Great question about political prediction markets vs sports betting! Unfortunately, the IRS doesn't make that distinction - all forms of wagering are treated the same for tax purposes, regardless of whether you're betting on elections, sports, or even academic outcomes. The tax code focuses on the economic substance of the transaction rather than any perceived civic or informational value. What matters more is the platform and structure of your bets. If you're trading on a regulated exchange where you're buying/selling contracts (like some prediction markets), those might be treated as securities transactions. But if you're placing traditional wagers on election outcomes, it's gambling regardless of the subject matter. The IRS has been pretty consistent on this - they've even ruled that betting on the outcome of TV game shows is gambling, so there's no special carve-out for "educational" or politically-relevant betting. The form and function of the transaction is what determines the tax treatment, not the underlying subject matter.

0 coins

One thing I'd add that might be relevant for your Robinhood situation - be very careful about wash sale rules if any of your election bets involved buying and selling the same or substantially identical securities within 30 days. This can actually disallow some of your capital losses temporarily. I made this mistake last year when I panic-sold some defense stocks right before the election, then bought them back a week later thinking I was being smart. The IRS wash sale rule kicked in and I couldn't deduct those losses on my 2024 return - they got added to my cost basis instead. It's a common trap that a lot of people fall into during volatile periods like elections. If you were doing rapid trading on similar securities or ETFs based on election predictions, definitely review your transactions for potential wash sales. Robinhood should flag these on your 1099-B, but it's worth double-checking since it can significantly impact your deductible losses.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

This is such an important point about wash sales! I had no idea this could apply to election-related trading. I definitely did some panic buying and selling of similar ETFs during the election period - bought some defense ETFs, sold them when polls looked bad, then bought similar ones a few days later. Do you know if the wash sale rule applies across different but similar ETFs? Like if I sold a broad defense ETF and then bought a more specific aerospace ETF within 30 days, would that trigger the rule? And does Robinhood's 1099-B actually catch all of these situations, or do I need to track them manually? Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here - this is way more complicated than I expected when I first placed those bets!

0 coins

Prev1...21482149215021512152...5643Next