IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emily Sanjay

•

Don't forget about self-employment taxes! Even if your YouTube business has losses that offset your other 1099 income for income tax purposes, you'll still pay SE tax on the net profit from your existing 1099 work. The SE tax is calculated separately for each Schedule C business - losses from one don't offset SE tax on another. Also, have you looked into an S-Corp election for your profitable 1099 business? At your income level, you might save significantly on SE taxes by taking a reasonable salary plus distributions.

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

That's a really good point about the self-employment taxes that I hadn't considered. So even if the YouTube losses offset my income tax, I'd still be paying the full SE tax on my current 1099 income? Regarding the S-Corp suggestion - I've been considering that actually. What would you consider a "reasonable salary" for my current 1099 work given the income range I mentioned?

0 coins

Emily Sanjay

•

Yes, you would still pay the full SE tax on your current 1099 business. Self-employment tax is calculated on each Schedule C separately - losses from one business don't reduce SE tax liability for another profitable business. For an S-Corp reasonable salary, there's no exact formula, but it should be comparable to what you would pay someone else to do the same work. For a high-earning consultant making $135-270k, a reasonable salary might be around 50-60% of your total profits. The remaining amount could be taken as distributions not subject to SE tax, potentially saving you thousands. However, S-Corps come with additional compliance requirements and costs (payroll processing, separate tax return, etc.). At your income level though, the savings would likely outweigh these costs. I'd recommend running the numbers with a tax professional familiar with your specific situation.

0 coins

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of timing your equipment purchases strategically. Since you're expecting significant expenses in the early years of your YouTube business, consider using Section 179 expensing or bonus depreciation to deduct the full cost of equipment purchases in the year you buy them, rather than depreciating them over several years. This is especially valuable when you have high income from your other sources that the YouTube losses can offset. For example, if you buy $13.5k worth of camera equipment in year one when your YouTube channel has minimal income, you can potentially deduct the full amount against your W-2 and 1099 income that same year. Also, keep in mind that the IRS looks at the totality of circumstances when determining business vs. hobby status. Even if you show losses in the first few years, factors like time and effort devoted to the activity, expertise you bring, success in similar activities, and expectation of asset appreciation all work in your favor. Since you already have successful business experience with your 1099 work, that demonstrates you understand how to run a profitable business. Just make sure you're treating the YouTube venture like a real business from day one - separate accounts, business plan, marketing efforts, etc. The documentation you create now will be crucial if the IRS ever questions your deductions later.

0 coins

DO NOT IGNORE THIS! Document everything NOW. My ex did this to me and because I didn't respond quickly enough with the right documentation, it created a 2-year nightmare with the IRS. Print out all text messages where you told him not to claim them. Make copies of your court order. Get documentation from the school showing your address as their residence. The most important thing is filing Form 8332 showing you DID NOT release your claim to the children. Even though your return was accepted, his paper-filed return could still cause problems.

0 coins

This is overkill. The IRS systems catch this automatically these days. I went through this in 2023 and didn't have to do anything but wait. My ex's return was rejected, mine processed fine.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

I went through this exact scenario two years ago. Your court order is your strongest protection here - the IRS follows legal custody arrangements, not just who pays support. Since you filed first and were accepted, you're in good position. A few practical tips from my experience: - Keep screenshots of those text messages where you explicitly told him not to claim them - If he does try to file, his e-file will likely be rejected immediately due to duplicate SSNs - If he paper files to try to bypass the system, it'll get caught during processing but may take longer to resolve The "tax preparers" he consulted either don't understand custody law or he's misrepresenting what they told him. Paying child support doesn't override a court order that specifically grants you the right to claim the children. Stay calm and document everything, but don't let him pressure you into "releasing" your claim. You have every legal right to claim your kids based on both custody time (more than half the year) and your court order.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

Great breakdown on the technical side! As someone who's been through multiple filing seasons, I can confirm the WMR interface really doesn't correlate with actual processing speed. I've noticed that people with similar situations (same credits, filing status, etc.) can have completely different WMR experiences even when filed on the same day. The backend processing seems to depend more on which batch your return gets assigned to rather than anything you can control. It's frustrating that the IRS doesn't provide more granular status information, but understanding that it's essentially a "black box" until completion helps manage expectations. Thanks for bringing some actual analysis to this topic instead of the usual speculation!

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Exactly! I'm new here but went through this exact frustration last year. Filed early February and watched my status bounce between one bar and "still processing" for over a month while my neighbor who filed weeks after me got her refund in 10 days. It's so reassuring to hear from people who actually understand the system instead of just guessing based on their own single experience. The batch assignment explanation makes so much sense - it's like being randomly assigned to different checkout lines at the store, some just move faster regardless of what you're buying.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

This is incredibly helpful! I'm a newcomer here and filed my return 3 weeks ago with Schedule C income (freelance graphic design work). My WMR has been stuck on one bar the entire time and I was starting to panic reading all the conflicting advice online. Your explanation about the RTF updating independently from WMR makes perfect sense - it's like the difference between what's actually happening in the kitchen versus what the order tracking app shows you. Really appreciate you sharing actual technical knowledge instead of just anecdotal experiences. Do you know if there's any pattern to how gig worker returns get batched? I'm wondering if the additional verification you mentioned for Schedule C filers happens at a specific stage in the process.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Welcome to the community! As another newcomer who just went through this exact scenario, I can totally relate to the panic. I'm also a freelancer (web development) and filed with Schedule C about a month ago. Mine was stuck on one bar for weeks before switching to "still processing" last week. What helped me was realizing that the additional verification for gig workers seems to be more thorough - they're probably cross-referencing our reported income with 1099s and making sure everything adds up. From what I've gathered reading through this community, Schedule C returns often get flagged for manual review regardless of accuracy, which explains the longer timelines. The batch assignment seems somewhat random, but the verification stage appears to be pretty standard for us freelancers. Hang in there!

0 coins

Just to clarify something I'm seeing in some of the responses - the key date is December 31st of the tax year. If your son turned 18 in December 2023, that means he was 17 at the beginning of 2023 and turned 18 during the year. For Child Tax Credit purposes, he needed to be under 17 at the end of the year (December 31, 2023) to qualify. I had a similar situation when my daughter turned 17 in November a couple years back. I remember being disappointed to lose that credit, but was still able to claim her as a dependent for other purposes. Double-check your son's birthdate against these requirements just to be certain.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

I went through this exact situation two years ago when my son turned 18 in November. The age cutoff rules can be really frustrating, especially when you're used to getting certain credits year after year. Just want to add one thing that helped me - make sure you keep detailed records of his college expenses if he's starting school. Even though you lose the Child Tax Credit, education credits like the American Opportunity Tax Credit can actually be more valuable (up to $2,500 vs the $2,000 CTC). You'll want to save all tuition statements, book receipts, and required fee documentation. Also, if your son has any part-time job income, make sure he understands whether he needs to file his own return. The IRS gets copies of his W-2s regardless, so coordination between your returns is important to avoid any complications with dependent claims. The silver lining is that this is typically a one-time adjustment year. Once you navigate it this time, you'll know exactly what to expect going forward!

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Something important that hasn't been mentioned yet - check your sale agreement carefully. Often there are tax provisions specifically addressing this situation. In my case, we had a "tax true-up" clause that required the company to make a distribution to departing shareholders specifically to cover tax liabilities attributable to undistributed profits. If your agreement has language about tax distributions, tax true-ups, or tax withholding related to shareholder exits, you may have contractual recourse against your former partners.

0 coins

I just reviewed my sale agreement and found a section titled "Tax Distributions for Departing Shareholders" that I completely missed before! It says the company must make distributions to cover tax liabilities on allocated profits for the year of departure. Should I get a lawyer involved or just approach my ex-partners directly?

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

I'd suggest approaching your former partners directly first with a clear reference to the specific clause in your agreement. Send them a professional email quoting the exact language and calculating what you believe you're owed based on the K1 allocations. If they're reasonable business people, they may acknowledge the oversight and work to make it right. Only escalate to legal involvement if they refuse to honor the agreement or dispute your interpretation. Many times, this is just an oversight rather than intentional, especially if the transaction was complex.

0 coins

The timing of your sale creates a unique issue. If you sold mid-year 2024 but the transaction completed in 2025, there's a possibility that your income allocation on the K1 isn't properly pro-rated for the period you actually owned shares. S Corps are required to allocate income based on per-share, per-day calculations when ownership changes mid-year. Did your K1 reflect owning shares for the entire year or just the portion you were an actual owner?

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

This is super important. I had a similar situation and discovered my K1 showed income for the full year even though I sold my shares in July. Required an amended K1 and saved me about $30k in taxes.

0 coins

@Anastasia Smirnova You should definitely verify this! Look at your K1 Schedule K-1 box 1 ordinary (business income -) it should show income only for the days you actually owned shares in 2024, not the full year. If you sold in the middle of 2024, your allocation should be significantly less than a full year s'worth. Since you mentioned the sale was agreed to in 2024 but completed in early 2025, the key question is when you legally ceased to be a shareholder for tax purposes. This could make a huge difference in your tax liability - potentially tens of thousands of dollars. You might want to request the company s'books showing exactly how they calculated the per-share, per-day allocation for your K1. If they got this wrong, you ll'need an amended K1.

0 coins

Prev1...21442145214621472148...5643Next