


Ask the community...
I got the same exact message on my 2024 transcript! The "Action Required" wording definitely caught me off guard too, but after reading through all these responses I'm feeling a lot more confident that it's just standard processing stuff. What's helping me stay calm is remembering that if they actually NEEDED something from me right now, they would have been way more specific about what to do. The fact that the message basically says "we'll contact you IF we need something" tells me they're still working through their review process. I filed about 10 days ago and have been obsessively checking my transcript daily (probably not helping my stress levels lol). But seeing that other people are in the same boat and that some folks from last year never even got a follow-up notice is reassuring. Going to try to stop checking every day and just focus on watching my mail for the next few weeks. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is such a lifesaver during tax season! š
Totally feel you on the obsessive transcript checking! š I've been doing the same thing since I got that message. It's like we all become amateur IRS code detectors overnight. Your point about them being more specific if they actually needed immediate action is spot on - that's what's been keeping me sane too. The whole "we'll mail you IF we need something" language really does suggest they're just doing their due diligence. Thanks for the reminder to chill out and stop refreshing that page 20 times a day!
I'm seeing this exact same message on my 2024 transcript too! Got it yesterday and honestly panicked for a hot minute when I saw that "Action Required" with the exclamation mark. But after reading everyone's responses here, I'm feeling way less stressed about it. What really helps is breaking down what the message actually says vs what that scary header makes you think. Like @Natalia pointed out, it's basically just "we're reviewing your return, we'll contact you IF we need anything, otherwise just wait." The key word being IF. I filed on Jan 24th and claimed the Child Tax Credit for my two kids, so I'm guessing that might be what triggered the review. From what I've read, they're being extra careful with family credits this year to prevent fraud. Definitely going to follow @Bruno's advice about checking mail religiously though. Last thing I want is to miss an actual notice and have this drag out for months. But for now, sounds like the best move is just to be patient and let them do their thing. Thanks everyone for sharing - makes me feel so much better knowing I'm not alone in this! š¤
Ugh, same exact situation here! Filed on Jan 26th and got that scary "Action Required" message yesterday. I also claimed the Child Tax Credit for my daughter so that definitely seems to be a common trigger. The way you broke it down really helps - focusing on what the message actually says instead of just that alarming header. I keep reminding myself that if they truly needed immediate action from me, they wouldn't be saying "we'll contact you IF we need something." Going to try my best to be patient and just check the mail daily like everyone suggests. This waiting game is brutal though! š©
Anyone know if TurboTax is good enough for content creator taxes? I'm making about $40k from YouTube and sponsorships and wondering if I need to spring for an accountant instead.
I used TurboTax Self-Employed last year for my content income (~$55k) and it worked fine. The interview process walks you through everything. Just make sure you keep good records of all your business expenses throughout the year!
TurboTax is ok for basics but misses creator-specific deductions. I switched to a creator-specialized accountant and she found like $3200 more in deductions TurboTax missed. Worth the $350 fee.
As someone who went through this exact situation last year, I totally understand the confusion! You're absolutely right to be concerned about setting aside money for taxes - that $37,500 total income puts you in a position where you'll owe both regular income tax and self-employment tax. A few key points from my experience: - Yes, report ALL income even without 1099s. Keep your own records of every payment. - Your equipment purchases are great deductions! That $3,750 in equipment can likely be fully deducted in the year of purchase using Section 179. - For quarterly payments, calculate 25-30% of your net profit and pay that quarterly to avoid penalties. - Self-employment tax is roughly 15.3% on your net earnings, covering Social Security and Medicare. The most important thing is to start keeping meticulous records NOW. Create a spreadsheet tracking all income sources, business expenses, and set aside that tax money in a separate account. Don't make my mistake of scrambling to reconstruct everything at tax time! Consider getting a business checking account to keep your creator income separate from personal expenses - it makes everything so much cleaner for tax purposes.
This is such solid advice! I'm just starting out as a content creator (about 6 months in) and already seeing I need to get more organized with tracking everything. Quick question - when you mention keeping "meticulous records," what specific things should I be documenting? Like do I need receipts for everything, or are bank statements enough? And for the business checking account, did you go with a traditional bank or one of those online business accounts?
Thanks everyone for all the helpful responses! I just tried entering my loss as "-24000" on the Free Fillable Forms and it worked perfectly. I must have been doing something wrong with the formatting before. To summarize what I learned from this thread: I definitely need to include both LLCs on Form 8995-A, with my profitable one showing $273k and the loss one as -$24k, giving me a net QBI of $249k for the deduction calculation. Since neither business is a specified service trade or business, I should be good to go. Really appreciate everyone taking the time to explain this - especially the clarification that losses from one qualified business must offset income from another. This makes total sense now, and I feel much more confident about getting this right on my return.
I'm glad you got it figured out! As someone who's still learning about all this tax stuff, it's really reassuring to see how this community comes together to help solve these complex issues. I have a small consulting business that I'm thinking of converting to an LLC, and reading through all these responses has given me a much better understanding of what I'll need to consider for QBI deductions. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and knowledge!
Just wanted to add another perspective as someone who went through this exact scenario last year. You're absolutely right to include both LLCs on Form 8995-A - I made the mistake of only reporting my profitable business initially and had to file an amended return. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track all my QBI calculations before entering them into any tax software. I listed each business, their net income/loss, and then calculated the combined QBI. This way I could double-check my work and make sure I wasn't missing anything. Also, since you mentioned concerns about triggering an audit - properly reporting both businesses (including the loss) actually reduces your audit risk compared to only reporting the profitable one. The IRS expects to see consistency between your business tax filings and your personal return, so including both LLCs shows you're being thorough and accurate. Good luck with your filing! It sounds like you've got all the information you need now to handle this correctly.
This is exactly why I always insist on reviewing every single document before signing, even if it takes an extra 30 minutes. Tax preparers who use electronic signature systems often rush clients through multiple forms hoping they won't read the fine print. For your situation, I'd suggest taking screenshots of those text conversations where the $285 fee was agreed upon - that's your smoking gun evidence. The fact that he's gone radio silent after you questioned the discrepancy is a huge red flag and shows he knows he messed up. One thing that might help speed up resolution: many tax prep offices are franchises or work under larger companies. If this is the case, try contacting the corporate office or regional manager directly. They often have more authority to issue refunds quickly to avoid bigger problems, and they definitely don't want complaints going to the IRS or state agencies. Keep us posted on how this turns out - stories like yours help other people recognize these tactics before they get burned.
This is such great advice about reviewing everything carefully! I learned this lesson the hard way when I was younger and just signed whatever the preparer put in front of me. Now I take photos of every document with my phone before signing, especially if they're using electronic signatures. @Zara Khan - definitely take screenshots of those text messages like Amara suggested! That written agreement for $285 is solid proof. I ve'seen cases where preparers try to claim verbal agreements never happened, but text messages are hard to dispute. The fact that yours went silent after you showed the math is basically an admission of guilt in my book.
This situation is infuriating but unfortunately common. The good news is you have solid documentation with those text messages showing the agreed $285 fee - that's your strongest piece of evidence. From what you've described, it sounds like your preparer used what's called a "refund transfer" service where fees are deducted directly from your refund. This often includes hidden bank processing fees that many preparers don't properly disclose upfront. The fact that he's ignoring your messages now is a major red flag. Here's what I'd recommend: First, get a copy of your complete tax return if you don't have one already - look for any forms showing refund allocation or bank product authorizations. Then file a complaint with the IRS using Form 14157 (Complaint: Tax Return Preparer). You can also report this to your state's consumer protection agency since this falls under deceptive business practices. The IRS takes undisclosed fees very seriously, especially when there's clear documentation like your text conversations. Don't let this slide - preparers who pull these tricks are counting on people just accepting the loss and moving on.
Jacob Smithson
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of understanding how Section 1033 interacts with bonus depreciation if you're planning to claim it on your replacement truck. Since you purchased a $47,000 replacement vehicle, you might be eligible for 100% bonus depreciation (depending on when you placed it in service). However, remember that your depreciable basis will be reduced by the deferred gain as Omar mentioned earlier - so while you paid $47,000, your actual basis for depreciation purposes would be $31,500 ($47,000 - $15,500 deferred gain). This affects how much bonus depreciation you can actually claim. Also, make sure your replacement truck qualifies as "similar or related in service or use" to your original truck. For business vehicles, this is usually straightforward, but the IRS can be picky if there are significant differences in vehicle class or business use. Since you mentioned both were for construction work, you should be fine, but document the business purpose of both vehicles just in case. The combination of involuntary conversion deferral and bonus depreciation can create some complex interactions, so definitely discuss this strategy with your CPA when they return from vacation!
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
ā¢This is really valuable information about bonus depreciation interactions! I hadn't considered how the reduced basis would affect my depreciation calculations. So if I understand correctly, even though I can potentially claim 100% bonus depreciation, I can only apply it to the $31,500 adjusted basis rather than the full $47,000 purchase price? This seems like it could get pretty complex when you factor in the depreciation recapture from the original vehicle too. I'm definitely going to need to discuss this with my CPA - sounds like there are some strategic decisions to make about whether to take bonus depreciation or spread it out over time, especially given how it interacts with the deferred gain. Thanks for bringing this up - it's exactly the kind of detail that could easily be overlooked but makes a big difference in the overall tax impact!
0 coins
Vince Eh
ā¢Exactly right! The bonus depreciation would only apply to your adjusted basis of $31,500, not the full purchase price. This is one of those areas where the tax code interactions can really catch people off guard if they're not careful. Another consideration is that if you take the full bonus depreciation on the reduced basis, you'll have very little remaining basis to depreciate in future years. Some taxpayers prefer to elect out of bonus depreciation in these situations to spread the deduction over the vehicle's useful life, especially if they expect to be in higher tax brackets in future years. The depreciation recapture from your original truck gets "carried forward" into the new asset's basis calculation, so when you eventually dispose of the replacement truck, you'll potentially face recapture on both the original deferred amount plus any new depreciation taken. It's definitely worth modeling different scenarios with your CPA to see which approach gives you the best overall tax outcome given your specific situation and income projections.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my delivery truck was damaged in a storm, and I was completely overwhelmed by all the forms and requirements for deferring the gain. One thing I want to add that might help others - make sure to get a written confirmation from your insurance company that explicitly states they're declaring the vehicle a "total loss" due to the casualty. The IRS wants clear documentation that this was truly involuntary and not just you deciding to get rid of an old vehicle. Also, if you're using the same insurance company for your replacement vehicle, sometimes they can provide helpful documentation showing the business use continuity between the old and new trucks, which supports the "similar or related in service or use" requirement. The timing information everyone shared about the 2-year replacement period is spot on - I almost made the mistake of thinking it started from the date of the storm rather than when I received the settlement check. That could have caused serious problems down the road! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with the various tools and services mentioned. It's reassuring to know there are resources available when you can't reach your CPA or need to get through to the IRS directly.
0 coins