IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This might be an ongoing benefits payment from the union. My brother gets something similar - it's part of his pension arrangement but gets reported on 1099-NEC for some reason. It's definitely not earned income and shouldn't be subject to SE tax. The tax chain was 100% taking advantage of your client. They were artificially boosting the refund with improper EITC to make their fee seem worth it. That's really predatory especially for someone on limited income.

0 coins

That's why I stopped going to those tax prep chains. They charged my mom $350 to file a return that literally only had Social Security income on it. Total scam.

0 coins

This is a great example of why getting proper documentation is so crucial. I'd strongly recommend having your client contact the union directly to get a written explanation of what these payments represent. Ask specifically for: 1. The original agreement or settlement terms that created these payments 2. Whether this is strike benefits, back pay, settlement money, or ongoing pension/benefit payments 3. Any documentation showing the time period these payments relate to The fact that she hasn't worked in 6 years makes it almost certain this isn't compensation for current services, which means no SE tax and no EITC eligibility. The chain preparer was likely inflating her refund inappropriately. For future reference, union payments can fall into several categories: - Strike benefits (earned income only if received during active strike) - Settlement payments (usually not earned income) - Pension/benefit distributions (not earned income) - Back pay for past services (depends on timing and circumstances) Without proper documentation, I'd err on the side of treating it as other income rather than risking an audit for improper EITC claims.

0 coins

I just went through this exact scenario last week! My deposit date was April 10th, and like you, I've always received my refunds 1-2 days early in previous years. This year it showed up at 3:45pm on the exact deposit date. Did you by chance file using a different software this year? Or claim any different credits? I'm curious if there's a pattern to who's experiencing these timing changes.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

I'm going through this exact same situation right now! My DDD is today (April 17th) and I've been checking my account obsessively since midnight. This is really helpful to read that so many others are experiencing the same timing changes this year. I filed with the same software I always use (TurboTax) and claimed the same credits as last year, so it doesn't seem to be related to filing method or credits claimed. My transcript shows TC846 with today's date and my account number is correct. Based on what everyone is sharing here, it sounds like I should expect it to hit sometime this afternoon rather than panicking that something went wrong. The IRS really should have communicated these processing changes better - a lot of people rely on those early deposits for bill planning! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences. It's reassuring to know this is a widespread change and not an issue with my specific return.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Has anyone here used their IRA money for closing costs instead of the down payment? My lender said that could be a smarter way to use the funds since my down payment affects my loan terms but closing costs are just out of pocket.

0 coins

Yes! That's exactly what I did last year. Used my regular savings for the down payment to get the best loan terms, then used about $7,200 from my IRA to cover closing costs. The IRS doesn't care if it's for down payment or closing costs - any "acquisition costs" for your first home qualify for the penalty exception.

0 coins

@Mateo Martinez - I went through this exact same situation about 6 months ago! Here's what I learned that might help you make the decision: First, definitely confirm you qualify as a "first-time buyer" - the IRS definition is pretty generous (no home ownership in past 2 years). The $10,000 penalty-free limit per person is accurate, so if your wife has an IRA too, you could potentially access $20,000 total. One thing I wish I'd considered more carefully is the timing. You have to use the IRA funds within 120 days of withdrawal for home purchase, so make sure your house hunting timeline aligns with that. Also, even though you avoid the 10% penalty, you'll still owe regular income tax on the withdrawal, which could bump you into a higher tax bracket depending on your income. Given your price range ($340-380k), pulling $20-30k from IRAs for a 10% down payment seems reasonable, but I'd strongly suggest running the numbers on how this affects your 2025 taxes first. The withdrawal gets added to your regular income for that year. Have you looked into any state or local first-time homebuyer programs? Some offer grants or low-interest loans that might reduce how much you need from your IRA. Good luck with the house hunt!

0 coins

has anyone read the book "treasure islands" by nicholas shaxson? it has some great detailed examples of cayman arrangements. there's a whole chapter on how citibank set up structured investment vehicles in the caymans before the 2008 financial crisis. the author also explains how investment banks create "orphan companies" in the caymans that technically aren't owned by anyone but still funnel profits back to the parent company. crazy stuff!

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

That book is fantastic! There's also "The Hidden Wealth of Nations" by Gabriel Zucman that goes deep into the numbers. Estimates that 8% of global financial wealth is in tax havens with the Caymans being one of the biggest.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Great recommendations everyone! I'd also suggest checking out the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations reports - they've published several detailed studies on tax haven abuse that include specific Cayman Islands case studies. One report from 2008 called "Tax Haven Banks and U.S. Tax Compliance" goes into detail about how UBS and other banks helped U.S. clients set up Cayman structures. Another from 2013 examines Apple's use of Irish subsidiaries that were tax residents of nowhere (including Cayman connections). The Congressional Budget Office also publishes data on U.S. companies' foreign profits by jurisdiction. Their 2017 report shows that U.S. multinationals reported about $70 billion in profits from the Cayman Islands despite the tiny economy there - a clear indicator of profit shifting. For a more recent angle, look into how private equity firms use Cayman structures. The Wall Street Journal has done several investigative pieces showing how firms like Blackstone and KKR route investments through Cayman entities to minimize taxes for their wealthy investors.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

The Senate subcommittee reports are freely available on the Senate Homeland Security Committee website under their "Investigations" section. You can also find them through congress.gov by searching for "Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations" plus "tax haven" or "Cayman Islands." For the private equity angle, PE firms often use Cayman structures because their investors (pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, etc.) can be tax-exempt in their home countries but still want to avoid U.S. taxes on investments. The Cayman structure lets them invest in U.S. companies without triggering "unrelated business income tax" that could otherwise apply. It's a different motivation than the profit-shifting we see with tech companies, but equally effective at minimizing tax liability. The WSJ articles I mentioned are behind a paywall, but if you have library access, most university libraries provide free WSJ access. ProPublica has also done some excellent free reporting on PE tax strategies that's worth checking out.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

The Senate subcommittee reports are available for free on the Senate Homeland Security Committee website. Just search for "Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations" and look under their reports section. They're usually published as PDFs with all the detailed exhibits included. For the private equity angle, it's fascinating because PE firms use Cayman structures not just for tax purposes but also to attract international investors. Many pension funds and sovereign wealth funds can't invest directly in U.S. entities due to their own regulations, but they can invest in Cayman-domiciled funds. So you'll see firms like Apollo and Carlyle with master feeder structures where the Cayman entity is the main investment vehicle. The tax benefits come from the fact that investment gains flow through these structures without being subject to corporate tax, and international investors often face lower withholding taxes. It's a win-win for the PE firms and their limited partners, but means less tax revenue for governments where the actual business activities take place.

0 coins

8 Has anyone done this thru TurboTax? Im also changing my name and wondering if theres anything special I need to click or forms to fill out when using tax software.

0 coins

19 I used TurboTax last year after my name change. As long as you're filing with the same name that's on your Social Security card, you don't need to do anything special. Just enter your info as it appears on your W2. There's no special "I changed my name" option because the IRS only cares about what name is officially on your SS card at the time of filing.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

I'm going through a similar situation right now! Just to add another perspective - I called my local Social Security office before filing and they told me something helpful: even after you get your new Social Security card with your updated name, you can still file taxes under your old name for the current tax year if that's what's on your W2. They said it's actually better to keep everything consistent within the same tax year. What I'm planning to do is file this year with my birth name (since that's on all my 2024 documents), then update my Social Security card right after I file. That way next year everything will be clean and consistent with my new name. The Social Security office said this approach avoids any potential processing delays or confusion. Also wanted to mention - keep a copy of your court order with your tax records even if you don't need to submit it. I learned this from my tax preparer - it's good documentation to have in your files showing when the name change was official in case any questions come up later.

0 coins

Prev1...19411942194319441945...5645Next