IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is extremely concerning and your coworker is absolutely walking into a trap. As someone who has dealt with tax issues professionally, I can tell you that "Revocation of Election" in legitimate tax contexts refers to very specific situations - like revoking an S-Corp election or changing certain accounting methods. It has absolutely nothing to do with becoming exempt from taxes entirely. What your coworker is doing sounds like a classic tax protestor scheme. These schemes prey on people by mixing legitimate tax terminology with completely bogus legal theories. The IRS has a specific publication called "The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" that addresses exactly these types of schemes. The fact that nothing has happened to them yet is actually the most dangerous part. The IRS often takes 3-5 years to catch up with non-filers, especially when they're using these elaborate schemes. But when they do catch up, the penalties are devastating - we're talking about failure-to-file penalties, failure-to-pay penalties, interest compounding daily, plus an additional $5,000 penalty per year just for filing frivolous documents. Your coworker needs to speak with a legitimate tax attorney immediately about voluntary disclosure options. Coming forward voluntarily before being caught can significantly reduce penalties and avoid potential criminal charges. Please don't let them continue down this path - the financial consequences will be life-altering.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

This is such helpful information, thank you for breaking it down so clearly. I'm definitely going to try talking to my coworker about this - maybe I can frame it as being concerned about their financial future rather than telling them they're wrong outright. Do you happen to know if there are any free resources where someone could get legitimate tax advice to help them understand why these schemes don't work? I'm thinking if I can point them toward official sources, they might be more receptive than just hearing it from me.

0 coins

Absolutely! The IRS has several free resources that are perfect for this situation. The most relevant one is Publication 2105 "Why Do I Have to Pay Taxes?" which directly addresses common tax protestor arguments. They also have "The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" available free on their website - this document systematically debunks every major tax protestor scheme with actual court cases and legal citations. For someone who's been misled by these schemes, the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is another great resource. They're an independent organization within the IRS that helps taxpayers resolve problems and understand their rights. They can provide free guidance on legitimate tax issues without being judgmental about past mistakes. Your approach of framing it as concern for their financial future is perfect. Maybe you could say something like "I found these official IRS resources that explain why some of these tax strategies can backfire - would you mind taking a look just to make sure you're protected?" That way you're not attacking their current beliefs but offering additional information for their consideration.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Your coworker is absolutely heading for serious trouble, and your instincts are spot on. What they're describing is a classic tax protestor scheme that has been repeatedly debunked and rejected by courts. A legitimate "Revocation of Election" is a real tax concept, but it applies to very specific situations like changing from S-Corp status or modifying certain accounting elections. It has absolutely nothing to do with becoming exempt from taxes entirely - that's complete nonsense. The scary part is that these schemes often sound sophisticated because they misuse legitimate tax terminology. Your coworker may feel safe because nothing has happened yet, but that's actually the most dangerous part. The IRS often takes 3-5 years to catch up with non-filers, especially those using elaborate schemes. When they do catch up, the penalties are devastating. We're talking about failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties that can reach 47.5% of unpaid taxes, plus a $5,000 penalty per year just for filing frivolous documents, plus interest compounding daily on everything. Someone doing this for three years could easily face $30,000-50,000+ in penalties alone, not counting the actual taxes owed. I'd strongly encourage you to approach your coworker with genuine concern and suggest they consult with a legitimate tax attorney about voluntary disclosure options before the IRS finds them. The IRS is much more lenient with people who come forward voluntarily versus those they catch through enforcement actions.

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

•

This is really eye-opening - I had no idea the penalties could be that severe. The $5,000 per year just for filing frivolous documents is shocking on top of everything else. I'm definitely going to have a serious conversation with my coworker about this. Do you know if there's a statute of limitations on how far back the IRS can go once they start investigating someone who's been using these schemes? I'm wondering if my coworker thinks they're somehow "safe" after a certain number of years, which might explain why they're so confident about this approach.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with my UK-based software development company - no US income but got the dreaded FATCA compliance letter from my bank last week. After reading through everyone's experiences, I'm confident that W-8BEN-E is the right form for my situation too. What really helped me understand was the explanation that this form is actually protective - it establishes that we're foreign entities without US tax obligations, rather than putting us "on the radar." One question for those who have completed this process: did anyone encounter issues with the beneficial ownership section (Part II)? My company has a somewhat complex ownership structure with multiple shareholders, and I want to make sure I'm reporting this correctly. The instructions mention reporting "substantial US owners" but since all our owners are non-US persons, I'm assuming this section might not apply to us? Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - it's made what seemed like an overwhelming compliance requirement much more manageable!

0 coins

Great question about the beneficial ownership section! I had a similar concern with my multi-shareholder setup. Since you mentioned all your owners are non-US persons, you're correct that Part II likely won't require detailed reporting. The "substantial US owners" section is specifically looking for US persons who own 10% or more of your company. If all your shareholders are non-US persons, you would typically just need to check the box indicating that there are no substantial US owners to report. However, with complex ownership structures, it's worth double-checking the specific definitions in the form instructions. Sometimes what seems straightforward can have nuances depending on how ownership is structured (direct vs indirect ownership, trusts, etc.). One thing that helped me was sketching out our ownership structure on paper first, then mapping it against the reporting requirements. Made it much clearer what needed to be disclosed versus what could be left blank. Your software development income would definitely qualify you as Active NFFE too, assuming it's more than 50% of your gross income. That classification is much more straightforward for active business operations like software development.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

I've been following this discussion as someone who recently went through a similar process with my Irish consulting firm. Just wanted to add a few practical points that might help others: 1) **Bank communication is key** - Don't hesitate to ask your bank's compliance team specific questions about their requirements. They deal with these forms regularly and can often clarify which sections are most important for their processes. 2) **Digital vs physical submission** - Some banks prefer digital submission through their secure portals, while others still want physical copies. Check their preferred method before completing the form to avoid having to redo it in a different format. 3) **Documentation backup** - Beyond keeping a copy of the completed W-8BEN-E, I'd recommend also saving any email correspondence with your bank about the requirement. This creates a clear paper trail showing you responded to their compliance request appropriately. For those still nervous about completing this form: remember that millions of foreign businesses complete W-8BEN-E forms annually as part of routine FATCA compliance. It's become a standard part of international banking, not an exceptional circumstance. The guidance in this thread about Active vs Passive NFFE classification and the three-year validity period is spot-on. Once you complete it correctly the first time, renewals are much easier since you'll have a template of what worked.

0 coins

Caleb Stone

•

Really appreciate these practical tips, especially about checking bank preferences for digital vs physical submission! I hadn't thought about that aspect but it makes total sense - the last thing you want is to complete everything perfectly only to find out they needed it in a different format. Your point about this being routine for millions of businesses is really reassuring too. Sometimes when you're dealing with IRS forms for the first time, it feels like you're in uncharted territory, but you're right that this has become standard practice in international banking. The documentation backup advice is excellent - I'll definitely be saving all the email correspondence. Having that paper trail showing you responded appropriately to compliance requests could be really valuable if any questions come up later. Thanks for sharing these real-world insights from your experience with the Irish firm. It's helpful to see the practical side of the process beyond just understanding which form to use!

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

Don't forget about the SUV loophole if you've got a vehicle between 6,000-14,000 pounds! My Ford Expedition qualified and I was able to write off the entire business portion in year 1 using bonus depreciation with no luxury auto limits.

0 coins

That's not really a "loophole" - it's an intentional policy to help businesses. But you're right that heavier vehicles like SUVs, vans and trucks over 6,000 GVWR aren't subject to the same limits. Just make sure you actually need that type of vehicle for business though. I've seen people buy massive SUVs just for the tax benefit when a smaller vehicle would have worked fine.

0 coins

You're right to be confused - this is one of the most counterintuitive parts of vehicle depreciation! The key thing to understand is that for passenger vehicles under 6,000 pounds, you're subject to "luxury auto limits" regardless of which depreciation method you choose. Here's the reality: taking bonus depreciation doesn't actually increase your TOTAL depreciation over the vehicle's life - it just shifts more of it to year one. With your $42,500 car at 85% business use ($36,125 business basis), you'll eventually depreciate that full amount either way. The trade-off is timing vs. administrative burden. Bonus depreciation gets you about $8,000 more in year one ($19,200 vs $11,200 with regular MACRS), which means more cash flow now. However, you'll be stuck claiming small amounts ($6,460 annually) for potentially 8-10 years to fully depreciate the vehicle. With regular MACRS, you get less upfront but finish depreciating in about 6 years. The "right" choice depends on your cash flow needs, tax bracket stability, and whether you want to deal with tracking depreciation for a decade. Many business owners prefer the simplicity of finishing depreciation sooner, even if it means less immediate tax benefit.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I needed! So if I'm understanding correctly, the main decision is really about cash flow timing versus administrative simplicity. Given that I'm in my first year of business and could really use the extra cash flow now, it sounds like bonus depreciation might make sense for my situation - even if it means tracking smaller amounts for more years. The $8,000 difference in year one deduction could be significant for getting my real estate business off the ground. One follow-up question though - you mentioned tax bracket stability. If I expect my income (and tax bracket) to be higher in future years, would that change the calculation at all? Would it be better to save some of those deductions for when I'm in a higher bracket?

0 coins

One tool that's been incredibly helpful for my practice is SmartVault for document management and client portals. The security is top-notch with bank-level encryption, and clients love being able to upload documents directly through their secure portal. The integration with QuickBooks and most tax software is seamless. For research and staying current, I rely heavily on the BNA Tax & Accounting portfolio. Their explanations and examples are much clearer than wading through raw IRS publications, especially for complex situations. A free gem that many overlook is the IRS Practitioner Priority Service (PPS) line. Once you're enrolled, you get a dedicated phone line that's much faster than the general taxpayer assistance line. It's saved me countless hours when I need quick clarification on tax law questions or account issues. For time tracking and billing, I switched to TSheets (now QuickBooks Time) last year and it's helped me realize how much unbilled time I was losing track of during client calls and research.

0 coins

Thanks for mentioning the IRS Practitioner Priority Service! I had no idea this existed. How long does the enrollment process typically take, and are there any specific requirements beyond having a PTIN? I'm always looking for ways to cut down on those frustrating IRS hold times.

0 coins

Ezra Bates

•

The IRS Practitioner Priority Service enrollment is pretty straightforward! You need a PTIN and to be in good standing with the IRS. The process typically takes 2-3 weeks once you submit the application online through your PTIN account. You'll need to provide your CAF number if you have one, and they verify your credentials before approval. Once enrolled, you get access to a dedicated phone line that's significantly faster than the general lines - I usually get through in 15-30 minutes versus hours on the regular lines. Definitely worth applying for if you're dealing with IRS issues regularly during tax season!

0 coins

Great thread! I've been using a combination of tools that have really streamlined my workflow. For document management, I swear by FileCenter - it's less expensive than some of the big names but has excellent OCR capabilities and integrates well with most tax software. The search functionality is fantastic when you need to find specific documents quickly. For client questionnaires and data gathering, I started using JotForm this year. I create custom forms for different client types (individual, business, etc.) and clients can fill them out online before our meetings. It automatically organizes the responses and flags incomplete sections, which has cut my prep time significantly. One underrated tool I've discovered is the Chrome extension "Save to PDF" for quickly archiving web-based research and IRS guidance. During tax season when I'm researching complex issues, being able to quickly save and organize my research with client files has been incredibly helpful. For those dealing with estimated tax calculations, the QuickBooks Self-Employed estimated tax calculator is surprisingly robust and free - even if your clients don't use QB, it's great for quick projections during client meetings.

0 coins

Sarah Ali

•

This is such a helpful thread! I've been dealing with a similar situation and had no idea about the pro-rata rule until reading through these comments. I've been making non-deductible contributions to my tIRA for the past 5 years while also having older deductible contributions, and I honestly thought I could just withdraw the non-deductible portions first without any tax consequences. The Form 8606 requirement is news to me too - I've definitely been filing my taxes wrong. It sounds like I need to go back and file amended returns for the years I made non-deductible contributions. One question I have: if I have multiple traditional IRAs at different brokerages, do they all get lumped together for the pro-rata calculation? Or is it calculated separately for each account?

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

Yes, all your traditional IRAs get lumped together for the pro-rata calculation - it doesn't matter if they're at different brokerages. The IRS treats all your traditional IRAs as one big pot when calculating the taxable vs. non-taxable portions of any withdrawal. So if you have $50,000 in deductible contributions/earnings across all your IRAs and $10,000 in non-deductible contributions, then 83.3% of any withdrawal will be taxable regardless of which specific account you withdraw from. This is actually one of the reasons why some people consider the "backdoor Roth" strategy if they're making non-deductible contributions - it can be simpler than dealing with the pro-rata calculations later. But definitely get those missing Form 8606s filed first so you have proper documentation of your basis!

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

Great discussion everyone! As someone who just went through a similar situation, I want to emphasize how important it is to keep meticulous records of all your IRA contributions, especially the non-deductible ones. I had a mix of deductible and non-deductible contributions spanning 15 years across three different brokerages. When I finally needed to start taking distributions, I realized I had never filed Form 8606 for about half of my non-deductible contribution years. The paperwork reconstruction was a nightmare! What saved me was creating a simple spreadsheet tracking every contribution by year, amount, and type (deductible vs non-deductible). I also scanned and saved all my 1099-R forms and brokerage statements. This made filing the missing 8606 forms much easier. For anyone in Brianna's situation - start organizing your records now before you need them. Future you will thank you when it's time to take distributions and you're not scrambling to prove which contributions were already taxed!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is such valuable advice! I wish I had started keeping better records earlier. I'm in a similar boat with contributions scattered across different years and accounts. One thing I'm wondering - when you created your spreadsheet, did you have to go back through old tax returns to figure out which contributions were deductible vs non-deductible? I'm trying to reconstruct my history and some of my older returns don't clearly show which type of contribution I made each year. Also, did you find any particular format or template that worked well for tracking everything? I want to make sure I'm capturing all the details I'll need for future Form 8606 filings.

0 coins

Prev1...1617181920...5643Next