IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Unexpected stock buyout causing large capital gain - do I need to pay estimated taxes or am I covered by safe harbor rules?

I'm about to have a stock position in a company that's being acquired later this year (2025). When the acquisition completes, my shares will automatically be cashed out at the predetermined price. This is going to result in a pretty substantial capital gain for me (mixture of both short and long term holdings). I've been trying to make sense of IRS Publication 505 which states: 1. You expect to owe at least $1,000 in tax for 2025 after subtracting your withholding and tax credits. 2. You expect your withholding and tax credits to be less than the smaller of: a. 90% of the tax to be shown on your 2025 tax return, or b. 100% of the tax shown on your 2024 tax return. Your 2024 tax return must cover all 12 months. Since this capital gain will be for tax year 2025 (which won't be due until April 2026), does this mean I can avoid paying estimated taxes as long as I ensure my withholding for 2025 equals at least 100% of the taxes I owed in 2024? For example, if I complete my 2024 return (due this April), and my total tax comes out to about $10,500, would I be safe if my employer withholds at least $10,500 in taxes from my salary throughout 2025? I'd really appreciate if someone could confirm my understanding. Also, if I do need to make estimated tax payments for this large capital gain, am I required to pay the entire capital gains tax in the quarter when the transaction happens? Or can I spread the payments across the four quarters?

Kylo Ren

•

Great question about the safe harbor rules! I went through something similar when my startup got acquired in 2022. A few additional points that might help: 1. **Timing flexibility with safe harbor**: The beauty of the safe harbor rule is that it doesn't matter WHEN during the year you pay the taxes, just that your total payments meet the threshold. So if your acquisition happens in Q3 but you don't increase withholding until Q4, you're still protected as long as you hit that 110% mark by year-end. 2. **Consider state taxes too**: Don't forget that most states also have their own estimated tax requirements. If you're in a state with capital gains taxes, you'll want to factor that into your planning as well. 3. **Document everything**: Keep detailed records of when you increased your withholding and why. If there are ever questions about penalties, having documentation that you were following safe harbor rules will be helpful. 4. **Alternative minimum tax (AMT)**: With a large capital gain, you might want to check if you'll be subject to AMT. This can sometimes affect your safe harbor calculations, especially if your prior year included AMT. The approach you outlined sounds correct - just make sure you're using the right percentage (110% if your 2024 AGI exceeds $150K) and consider whether paying throughout the year vs. one large payment in April 2026 works better for your cash flow situation.

0 coins

Really appreciate the comprehensive breakdown! The AMT consideration is something I hadn't thought about at all. Do you know if there's an easy way to estimate whether a large capital gain would trigger AMT, or is that something that typically requires professional help to calculate? Also, regarding state taxes - I'm in California, so I know they'll want their share too. Did you find that most states follow similar safe harbor rules to the federal system, or do they each have their own requirements that need to be calculated separately? The documentation point is smart too. I've been pretty casual about record-keeping, but with this large gain coming up, I should probably get more organized about tracking when and why I make withholding changes.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

@edb4720500e7 Great point about AMT! For a rough AMT estimate with capital gains, you can use the IRS AMT worksheet in Form 6251 instructions, but honestly it gets complex quickly with large gains. Many tax software programs will flag potential AMT issues when you input your projected numbers. For California specifically, they do have their own estimated tax safe harbor rules that are similar but not identical to federal. CA generally requires 90% of current year tax or 100% of prior year (110% if prior year AGI exceeded $150K). The good news is that CA accepts increased payroll withholding just like the feds do, so the same strategy of bumping up your W-4 withholding should work for both. One thing that caught me off guard was that California doesn't give preferential treatment to long-term capital gains like the federal system does - they tax all capital gains as ordinary income. So depending on your tax bracket, the CA tax hit might be more substantial than you're expecting. Definitely second the documentation advice. I created a simple spreadsheet tracking my withholding changes, the reasons, and running totals vs. my safe harbor targets. Made tax time much smoother.

0 coins

This is a really comprehensive discussion! One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned yet is the potential impact of Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT). If your modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200K (single) or $250K (married filing jointly), you'll owe an additional 3.8% tax on investment income, including capital gains. This means your effective capital gains tax rate could be higher than the standard long-term rates (0%, 15%, or 20%), which might affect how much additional withholding or estimated payments you need to make. The NIIT applies to the lesser of your net investment income or the amount by which your MAGI exceeds the threshold. Since you mentioned this will be a substantial gain, it's worth factoring this into your safe harbor calculations. The 3.8% can add up quickly on large capital gains, and it's something that might not be immediately obvious when you're doing back-of-the-envelope calculations based on standard capital gains rates. Most tax software will calculate this automatically, but if you're doing manual estimates, don't forget to include it in your projections!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detail I was missing! I knew about the standard capital gains rates but had no idea about the Net Investment Income Tax. With the size of gain I'm expecting from this acquisition, I'll definitely be over those MAGI thresholds, so that extra 3.8% is going to be significant. Do you know if the NIIT gets factored into the safe harbor calculations automatically, or do I need to manually add that 3.8% when I'm estimating my total tax liability for 2025? I want to make sure I'm not caught off guard by an additional tax I didn't account for in my withholding adjustments. Also, does the NIIT apply to both short-term and long-term capital gains, or just certain types of investment income? Since my gain will be a mix of both, I want to make sure I'm calculating this correctly. Thanks for bringing this up - it's exactly these kinds of "gotcha" taxes that I was worried about missing!

0 coins

Javier Gomez

•

Not sure if you're aware, but this is actually a classic dark pattern that TurboTax has been doing for YEARS. They've even been sued over it. They intentionally advertise free filing but design the system to force almost everyone into paid upgrades. Simple things like student loan interest (which is super common) trigger their "you need to upgrade" messages.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

There was actually a big ProPublica investigation about this! TurboTax (Intuit) and H&R Block actively lobbied against the IRS creating its own free filing system, then made their "free" versions intentionally hard to find and limited. Super shady business practice.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

This is exactly why I switched to doing my own taxes with the IRS Free File Fillable Forms a couple years ago. Yes, it's more work and you need to be comfortable reading tax instructions, but at least there are no surprise upgrade fees or dark patterns. For your situation with just a W-2, student loan interest, and basic savings interest, you'd probably only need Form 1040 and maybe Form 8917 for the student loan interest deduction. The IRS provides all the forms and instructions for free, and you can e-file directly through their system. I get that it's intimidating at first, but honestly once you do it once, simple tax situations like yours are pretty straightforward. Plus you learn way more about your taxes than you would clicking through TurboTax's guided questions. Just another option to consider if you want to avoid the upgrade trap entirely!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I've always been intimidated by the idea of filing directly through the IRS, but you're right that for simple situations it might actually be easier than dealing with all these upgrade traps. Do you know if there are any good resources or tutorials for first-timers using the Free File Fillable Forms? I'm pretty comfortable with reading instructions, but I'd love to have some guidance the first time through to make sure I don't miss anything important.

0 coins

Im confused about how to handle the divorce payment. If the client doesn't receive that money, why does it affect their taxes? Doesn't the ex get their own tax form?

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

The OPM is weird about this. Ex-spouse gets a 1099-R but the original retiree's form still shows the full amount before the divorce payment. It's like they're paying tax on money they never received! But its actually more complicated - the Simplified Method calculation is still based on the full original benefit. The ex-spouse has to report their portion and pay taxes on it separately.

0 coins

I've handled several OPM annuity situations like this, and the key is understanding that the Simplified Method calculation was locked in when your client first retired. The $74,356 in Box 9b represents their lifetime contributions, but you can't just compare it to this year's distribution to determine taxability. When they first started receiving payments, a monthly exclusion amount was calculated based on their age and life expectancy at retirement. This same dollar amount is excluded from taxes each month until they've recovered their full $74,356 in contributions. After that, everything becomes taxable. Regarding the divorce payment - this is tricky. Your client's form shows the gross amount before the $14,530.80 payment to the ex-spouse, but for the Simplified Method calculation, you still use the full gross amount. The ex-spouse should receive their own 1099-R for the portion they received and will report that income separately. To get the correct calculation, you really need to find either the original Simplified Method worksheet from when payments began, or get the client's retirement date and age to recalculate it. The fact that the previous CPA showed most of the distribution as taxable suggests they were correctly applying an established exclusion amount that's much smaller than what you might expect.

0 coins

Javier Gomez

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with federal retirement benefits and was getting overwhelmed by all the different rules. Your explanation about the monthly exclusion being "locked in" makes perfect sense now - I was thinking about it more like a traditional IRA where you just subtract contributions from distributions. One follow-up question: if I can't locate the original Simplified Method worksheet and the client doesn't remember their exact retirement date, would OPM have this information available? Or is there another way to reconstruct the calculation without having to guess at the timeline?

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

•

Has anyone else successfully charged between their own business entities like OP is considering? I'm in a somewhat similar situation with a consulting business and a rental property, and I sometimes do consulting work that benefits the rental. Never thought about actually charging between them.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

I've been doing this for years with my photography business and vacation rental. I take professional photos of my rental for listings and I charge the rental business for this service. The key is documenting it properly and charging market rates. I've been through an audit once and they had no issues with this arrangement because I had proper documentation showing that I charge similar rates to other clients.

0 coins

This is a really nuanced situation that requires careful handling. Based on what you've described, you're actually in a decent position to maintain business classification despite the recent losses. For your first question about the vacation rental paying your advertising business - this is absolutely legitimate as long as you treat it like any other business transaction. Create proper invoices, document the services provided, and charge fair market rates. This can actually help your Schedule C business show some income while providing a legitimate deduction for your rental property. Regarding the hobby classification concern - don't artificially inflate profits by not reporting expenses. Instead, focus on documenting your profit motive. Since you've had profits for most of the 20 years, that's strong evidence in your favor. Make sure you're documenting: - Your business plans and efforts to return to profitability - Marketing activities to drum up new clients - Any changes you've made to improve operations - Your expertise and time invested in the businesses The IRS looks at the totality of circumstances, not just recent losses. Your long history of profitability combined with documented efforts to improve the struggling business should support your business classification. The fact that you're actively trying to get new clients for the low-revenue business is particularly important to document. Consider keeping detailed records of your business development activities, client outreach efforts, and any strategic changes you're implementing. This demonstrates the businesslike manner and profit motive the IRS looks for.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the documentation aspect - when you mention keeping detailed records of business development activities and client outreach, what format works best? Should these be formal business logs, or would something like email records and calendar entries showing client meetings/calls be sufficient? I'm trying to figure out the right level of documentation without going overboard.

0 coins

Felix Grigori

•

Anna, I'm so sorry to hear about your diagnosis - dealing with a critical illness is overwhelming enough without having to worry about tax implications. As someone who's been following this discussion, I want to emphasize what great advice you've received here. The key insight is absolutely correct: whether your benefits are taxable depends entirely on how your premiums were paid. If they came out of your paycheck after taxes were calculated, you're likely in the clear. If they were pre-tax deductions, then yes, the $13,500 would be taxable. One thing that might give you peace of mind while you're waiting to hear back from HR: even if the worst-case scenario happens and you do owe taxes on this amount, you have good options. The safe harbor payment approach several people mentioned is brilliant - paying 100% of last year's tax liability (or 110% if your AGI was over $150,000) protects you from penalties completely, regardless of what you actually end up owing on this insurance payout. The IRS Direct Pay system makes this really straightforward too - you can set up the payment online and get immediate confirmation, which is much better than mailing a check and wondering if it arrived on time. Please try to focus on your recovery first. You're being incredibly responsible by thinking ahead about this, but don't let tax worries add unnecessary stress to an already difficult situation. This community has given you a clear roadmap, and everything will work out once you get that confirmation from HR. Wishing you strength and healing!

0 coins

Felix, this is such a thoughtful and comprehensive response that really ties together all the excellent advice that's been shared throughout this thread. Your emphasis on the safe harbor payment approach as a way to have peace of mind while waiting for HR confirmation is particularly valuable - it gives Anna a concrete action she can take right now if she wants to eliminate penalty worries completely. The reminder about IRS Direct Pay being more reliable than mailing checks is spot-on too. When you're already dealing with health stress, the last thing you need is uncertainty about whether your payment was processed correctly. As someone new to this community, I'm really struck by how supportive and knowledgeable everyone has been in helping Anna navigate this complex situation. She came here with a straightforward question about tax implications, but the responses have covered everything from practical next steps to emotional support during a difficult time. It's clear this community genuinely understands that tax issues can feel overwhelming when you're already dealing with major life challenges. Anna, you have such a clear roadmap now - get that HR confirmation first, then proceed based on what you learn. And Felix is absolutely right about focusing on your recovery first. The tax piece will sort itself out with the right information. Wishing you all the best with your health journey!

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Anna, I'm so sorry to hear about your diagnosis - dealing with a critical illness is incredibly stressful, and the last thing you need is tax uncertainty adding to that burden. After reading through this entire thread, I think you have an excellent roadmap laid out by this community. The consensus is clear: your first step is getting written confirmation from HR about whether your critical illness premiums were deducted pre-tax or after-tax from your paychecks. That single piece of information will determine everything. What I find reassuring for your situation is that voluntary benefits like critical illness insurance are often paid with after-tax dollars, especially when they're offered through employer group plans. If that's the case, your $13,500 would be completely tax-free, even if you receive a 1099 form (which is just a reporting requirement, not proof of taxability). If it turns out the premiums were pre-tax and you do owe taxes, you still have great options. The safe harbor payment approach mentioned by several people here is brilliant - you can make a payment equal to 100% of last year's tax liability through IRS Direct Pay, which completely protects you from penalties while you work out the exact details. One thing I'd add is to document everything - keep records of your HR conversation, your pay stubs showing the deductions, and any written confirmation you receive. This documentation could be valuable both for your tax preparation and for peace of mind. Please focus on your health and recovery first. You're already being incredibly proactive by asking these questions, and this community has given you a clear path forward. The tax situation will resolve itself once you have that key information from HR. Sending you positive thoughts for your healing journey!

0 coins

Prev1...1617181920...5643Next