IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Libby Hassan

•

One aspect that hasn't been fully explored yet is how your state's tax laws might interact with your filing status decision. While everyone's covered the federal implications really well, some states have their own quirks that can make filing separately either more or less advantageous. For example, some states don't allow married filing separately at all, meaning you'd have to file jointly at the state level regardless of your federal choice. Others have different standard deductions or tax brackets for MFS that could significantly impact your overall tax burden. Since you mentioned being in a "financial pickle," it's worth checking if your state offers any specific tax credits or deductions that are only available to joint filers - things like first-time homebuyer credits, education credits, or even COVID-related relief programs that some states extended. Also, if you do end up filing separately, make sure you understand how your state handles business losses. Some states have different rules than federal for carrying forward or limiting business loss deductions, which could affect the timing of when your wife's current losses provide tax benefits. The good news is that most tax software will calculate both your federal and state taxes under both scenarios, so you can see the complete picture before deciding. But definitely don't overlook the state tax piece - I've seen couples save money federally but lose even more at the state level, making the separate filing decision a net loss.

0 coins

@Libby Hassan raises such an important point about state tax implications! As someone just joining this conversation, I hadn t'even considered how state-specific rules could completely change the math on filing status decisions. The example about some states not allowing married filing separately at all is particularly eye-opening - imagine thinking you ve'optimized your federal taxes by filing separately only to discover you re'forced to file jointly at the state level anyway! That could create some really messy tax planning scenarios. I m'also curious about how this interacts with the community property state rules that were mentioned earlier in the thread. If you re'in a state like California that has both community property requirements AND specific rules about married filing separately, it seems like the complexity could multiply quickly. This really reinforces what everyone has been saying about running the actual numbers with tax software rather than trying to guess. There are just so many moving pieces - federal brackets, state tax rules, business loss limitations, student loan implications, retirement contribution limits - that it s'impossible to optimize without seeing the complete picture. Thanks for bringing up the state tax angle! It s'exactly these kinds of details that could make or break a filing status decision.

0 coins

This has been an incredibly thorough discussion! As someone new to this community, I'm impressed by how much practical expertise everyone has shared here. What really stands out to me is how this seemingly straightforward question about switching filing statuses has revealed so many interconnected considerations - from student loan repayment plans to retirement contributions to state tax implications. It's a perfect example of how tax planning isn't just about the immediate return, but about understanding all the ripple effects. Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like @Chloe Boulanger has a few clear action items: first, having her wife contact the loan servicer about switching to the SAVE plan (which could solve the student loan payment concern while keeping joint filing benefits), and second, running actual tax calculations both ways using software or one of those comparison tools mentioned. The strategic point about using business losses to offset unemployment income this year (when filing jointly) is particularly compelling, especially since those losses might not be available next year if the business becomes profitable. Sometimes the best financial decision isn't obvious until you see the real numbers! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread is a great resource for anyone navigating similar filing status decisions.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

3 Don't forget that you can include required textbooks and supplies as qualified education expenses for AOTC, even though they don't appear on your 1098-T! This helped me claim more expenses beyond just tuition.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

21 Really? I've been filing my taxes for years and never knew this. Does this include a laptop if it was required for classes?

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

Unfortunately, computers and laptops generally don't qualify for the AOTC unless they're specifically required by the school for enrollment or attendance in a particular course. The IRS is pretty strict about this - it has to be required by the institution, not just helpful or recommended. However, textbooks, lab fees, and course-specific supplies that are required definitely count! Make sure you keep receipts and documentation showing these were required expenses.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

This is a great strategy that many students with scholarships miss! I successfully amended my returns for this exact situation two years ago. One additional tip - when you file Form 1040X for the amendments, include a clear written explanation of what you're doing. I attached a statement that said something like "Electing to include $4,000 of tax-free scholarship in gross income per IRC Section 117(c) to optimize American Opportunity Tax Credit eligibility." Also, don't forget that the AOTC has income limits - it phases out between $80,000-$90,000 for single filers. Make sure your modified AGI (including the additional scholarship income you're reporting) doesn't push you over the threshold. The good news is that even if you're in the phase-out range, you might still get a partial credit that makes the strategy worthwhile. Definitely worth running the numbers for all eligible years - you have until 3 years from the original filing deadline to amend!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was looking for! The income limit point is crucial - I hadn't considered that adding the scholarship income could potentially push me over the AOTC phase-out threshold. Do you know if there's a way to calculate the optimal amount of scholarship to report as taxable income? Like, if reporting $4,000 pushes me into the phase-out, would it be better to report $3,000 instead and still get most of the credit? Also, that sample statement you included is super helpful. I was worried about how to explain this strategy to the IRS in a way that wouldn't raise red flags. Did you face any additional scrutiny on your amended returns because of this election?

0 coins

I'm going through almost the exact same situation right now! I exceeded the Roth IRA limit by about $3k and panicked when I realized it, so I just transferred the money back to my checking account without understanding the proper process. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly enlightening - I had no idea there was a specific "return of excess contribution" procedure that's different from a regular withdrawal. I'm definitely going to call my brokerage (Schwab in my case) and specifically ask their IRA department to recharacterize my withdrawal as a return of excess contribution. The advice about getting a reference number and having them put notes on the account seems really smart too. One thing I'm still confused about - if I do this recharacterization now, will I still need to wait until next year to get the 1099-R form? Or can they issue it sooner since we're still in the same tax year? I'm hoping to avoid having to file an amended return if possible, but it sounds like that might be inevitable once you've already filed and been accepted. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread has probably saved me from making even more mistakes with the IRS!

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

•

Great question about the timing of the 1099-R! Unfortunately, even if you get the recharacterization done now, most brokerages will still issue the 1099-R in January of the following year (2025 for your 2024 transactions). This is their standard process regardless of when the correction happens during the tax year. Since you've already filed and been accepted, you'll most likely need to file an amended return once you receive that corrected 1099-R. I know it seems like extra work, but it's really the only way to properly document the correction for the IRS. The silver lining is that Schwab is generally pretty good about handling these recharacterizations - I've heard they're usually more knowledgeable about the process than some other brokerages. When you call, definitely emphasize that you need a "return of excess contribution" not just a withdrawal reversal. Good luck getting it sorted out!

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

This is such a stressful situation, but you're definitely not alone in making this mistake! I went through something very similar a couple years ago and the anxiety was overwhelming at first. The key thing to understand is that what you did (withdrawing directly to your checking account) is treated differently by the IRS than a proper "return of excess contribution." When you request a return of excess contribution, your brokerage calculates any earnings attributable to that excess amount and withdraws both the contribution and the earnings together. The earnings portion becomes taxable income, but you avoid the 6% excise tax on excess contributions. Here's what I'd recommend: 1. Call Fidelity again, but ask specifically for their IRA department or retirement services team - don't just talk to general customer service 2. Explain that you need to "recharacterize" your recent withdrawal as a "return of excess contribution for 2024" 3. They should be able to process this since you're still in the same tax year 4. Get a reference number and ask them to document the request in your account notes The good news is that since you only had the excess contribution in your account for a couple days, any earnings would be minimal. Fidelity will calculate the exact amount, but it's probably very small. You'll likely need to file an amended return (Form 1040-X) once you get the corrected paperwork from Fidelity, but this is a common situation and the IRS processes these corrections regularly. Don't panic - this is absolutely fixable!

0 coins

Emma Olsen

•

This is such a helpful discussion! I'm in a similar situation with full Pell Grant coverage plus some merit scholarships. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like the scholarship allocation strategy is legit but definitely requires careful documentation. A few questions for those who've successfully done this: 1. When you allocate part of your scholarship to "living expenses" to make it taxable, do you need to actually spend that money on rent/food, or is it just a paper allocation for tax purposes? 2. How do you calculate the optimal amount to reallocate to minimize your overall tax burden while maximizing the AOTC? 3. For the audit situation that Selena mentioned - besides receipts and syllabi, what other documentation should we be keeping? I'm planning to try this for my 2024 taxes since I had about $3,000 in textbooks and lab fees that I paid out of pocket, plus my scholarships were more than my tuition. Want to make sure I do everything correctly from the start!

0 coins

Great questions! I successfully used this strategy last year, so I can share what I learned: 1. The scholarship allocation is purely for tax purposes - you don't need to physically spend that reallocated money on specific living expenses. You're just choosing how to categorize the scholarship funds on your tax return. The IRS allows you this flexibility in allocation. 2. For optimization, generally you want to reallocate just enough scholarship to create $4,000 in "paid" qualified expenses (to get the full $2,500 AOTC). Any more than that and you're paying extra tax without getting additional credit. I used a simple spreadsheet to model different scenarios. 3. For documentation beyond receipts and syllabi, I kept: my complete financial aid award letter, enrollment verification showing I was at least half-time, Form 1098-T from my school, and a simple written log of how I allocated my scholarships between qualified and non-qualified expenses. During my friend's audit (similar situation), the IRS mainly wanted to verify the scholarship amounts and that the expenses were truly required for courses. Since you paid $3,000 out-of-pocket already, you might not even need to reallocate much scholarship money - that could be most of your AOTC qualification right there!

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a tax preparer and want to add some professional perspective on the scholarship allocation strategy everyone's discussing. You're absolutely right that this is a legitimate tax strategy. IRS Publication 970 specifically allows students to treat tax-free scholarships as taxable income to optimize education credits. The key is proper reporting and documentation. A few important points to remember: - You must be enrolled at least half-time in a degree program to qualify for AOTC - The maximum credit is $2,500 (100% of first $2,000 in expenses, 25% of next $2,000) - Your modified adjusted gross income affects the credit amount (phases out between $80K-$90K single, $160K-$180K married filing jointly) - Qualified expenses for AOTC include tuition, required fees, and required course materials For those worried about audits - while they can happen, proper documentation makes the process straightforward. The IRS just wants to verify that your claimed expenses were legitimate and required for your education. One tip: consider working with a tax professional if your situation is complex or if you're uncomfortable doing the allocation calculations yourself. The potential savings often justify the preparation cost.

0 coins

Nathan Dell

•

Thank you so much Sofia for that professional perspective! As someone new to this whole process, it's really reassuring to hear from an actual tax preparer that this strategy is legitimate and well-established in the tax code. I have one follow-up question about the income limits you mentioned - if my parents claim me as a dependent, does their income count toward the MAGI phase-out limits, or is it based on my own income? I work part-time but make less than $15K per year, while my parents are probably in the phase-out range. I want to make sure I understand who can actually claim the AOTC in my situation before I start doing all these scholarship allocation calculations. Also, do you have any recommendations for finding a qualified tax preparer who's familiar with education credits and scholarship strategies? I'd rather pay someone who knows what they're doing than mess this up myself!

0 coins

Just want to add another perspective based on my experience as someone who handles estate planning professionally. One thing that often gets overlooked with 1099-C forms in estate situations is that you need to be very careful about the timing of when debts are actually "canceled" versus when creditors stop collection efforts. Sometimes creditors will issue a 1099-C months or even years after someone passes away, but the actual cancellation date (shown in Box 2 of the form) might be from before death. This can happen when creditors are slow to process their paperwork or when there are multiple creditors involved in an estate. Also, don't forget that if the estate is required to file Form 706 (federal estate tax return), any canceled debt that's excluded from income still needs to be considered when calculating the gross estate value, since the debt reduction effectively increases the net value of assets passing to beneficiaries. I'd strongly recommend keeping detailed records of all your research into when and why each debt was canceled, including any correspondence with creditors. The IRS may ask for supporting documentation if they have questions about the exclusions claimed on Form 982.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is really valuable insight, especially about the timing discrepancy between when debt is actually canceled versus when the 1099-C gets issued. I hadn't thought about that possibility. Since we're dealing with what appears to be an old credit card debt, I'm wondering if there's a chance the creditor might have written it off internally before her death but just got around to issuing the 1099-C afterward. The form does have Code D marked, but now I'm second-guessing whether I should verify the actual cancellation date in Box 2 against her date of death. Do you have any recommendations for the best way to organize this documentation for the IRS? Should I include copies of correspondence with creditors when filing Form 982, or just keep everything on file in case they ask for it later?

0 coins

StarStrider

•

You're absolutely right to double-check that Box 2 date against her death date - that's exactly the kind of detail that can make or break the tax treatment. Even if Code D is marked, if the actual cancellation date in Box 2 is before her death, it might not qualify for the death exclusion. For documentation, I typically recommend keeping everything organized but not submitting it unless specifically requested. Create a file with: 1) copies of all 1099-C forms, 2) any creditor correspondence showing cancellation dates/reasons, 3) death certificate, and 4) a simple timeline document showing the sequence of events. The IRS usually doesn't want supporting docs attached to Form 982 unless they specifically ask for them, but having everything organized makes it much easier if they do request additional information during processing. One more tip - if you find any discrepancies in the dates or codes, it's worth calling the creditor to get written clarification before filing. Better to resolve any confusion upfront than deal with IRS questions later.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my grandfather's estate and was completely overwhelmed by the 1099-C forms we received. Reading through everyone's experiences has really clarified the process for me. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - when I called the creditor to verify the cancellation details, I learned that having the estate's EIN (Employer Identification Number) ready made the conversation much smoother. The customer service rep was able to pull up the account information more easily when I could provide both the deceased's SSN and the estate's EIN. Also, for anyone hesitating about whether to handle this themselves or hire a professional - if the estate is straightforward and the 1099-C clearly shows Code D with a cancellation date after death, it's definitely manageable to do yourself with Form 982. But if there are multiple forms with different codes or questionable timing, it might be worth the peace of mind to have a tax professional review everything before filing. Thanks again to everyone who shared their experiences. It's amazing how much clearer this all becomes when you hear from people who've actually been through it!

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

Great point about having the estate's EIN ready when calling creditors! I'm just starting the executor process for my aunt's estate and hadn't thought about that detail. Did you find that most creditors were willing to work with you once you explained you were handling the estate, or did some give you a hard time about discussing the deceased's account information? I'm also curious - when you say the estate is "straightforward," what factors helped you decide you could handle the 1099-C forms yourself versus hiring a professional? I'm trying to figure out if our situation (two 1099-C forms, both marked Code D but issued about 6 weeks apart) is simple enough to tackle on our own or if we should bring in help.

0 coins

Prev1...1516171819...5645Next