IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Financial advisor mishandled my inherited Roth IRA transfer โ€” now I owe $30K in taxes & penalties. Help!

I inherited a Roth IRA from a work colleague who passed away at 46 (non-spouse) back in 2018. When I first inherited it, I received: * A Roth IRA-BDA (Beneficiary Designated Account) * A separate individual brokerage account Both accounts stayed with Vanguard, along with my personal Roth IRA that I had established on my own, until recently. Last January, a financial advisor from Lincoln Financial was referred to me by a friend. Since I had some extra savings sitting around, I wanted advice on investments and trusted this person to handle everything properly. (I've since discovered Lincoln advisors mainly push insurance products for commissions - which I declined). The advisor suggested I consolidate my inherited Roth IRA and personal Roth IRA into one combined Roth IRA in my name at Lincoln Financial, and move my cash into a new brokerage account there too, so everything would be under one roof. I thought this made senseโ€”until my tax preparer emailed me this week with alarming news. This sent me down a research rabbit hole, and I quickly realized the transfer was done completely wrong. According to the IRS website: * An inherited Roth IRA must be transferred directly into an inherited Roth IRA (titled with the deceased's name for the beneficiary's benefit). THIS DIDN'T HAPPEN - THEY LIQUIDATED IT TO MY CHECKING ACCOUNT THEN DEPOSITED INTO A NEW ROTH IRA IN MY NAME ONLY. * If an inherited Roth IRA is moved into a personal Roth IRA, it gets treated as a distribution, which becomes taxable. * Improper rollovers can also trigger excess IRA contribution penalties. Because my inherited Roth IRA was incorrectly transferred into my personal Roth IRA, I'm now facing almost $30K in taxes and penaltiesโ€”instead of just $260 if it had been done correctly. How this disaster unfolded: 1. Vanguard issued a 1099-R with Code T (early Roth distribution, exception unknown). 2. My financial advisor told me to move the inherited Roth IRA into my personal Roth IRA at Lincoln. I now know this isn't allowedโ€”it should have gone into a properly designated inherited Roth IRA. 3. Since this wasn't a direct transfer (the money was liquidated and deposited into my checking account first), the IRS sees it as a full distributionโ€”even though I never intended to cash it out. 4. After my tax preparer flagged this, I called Vanguard. Two different reps confirmed the 1099-R can't be changed to Code Q (qualified distribution). Is there anything I can do to fix this mess? Can I go after the financial advisor for giving me terrible advice that's costing me $30K?

Nolan Carter

โ€ข

This is an incredibly frustrating situation, and I feel terrible that you're dealing with such a massive financial hit due to someone else's professional negligence. As someone who has navigated IRS issues before, I wanted to add a few thoughts to the excellent advice already shared. First, when you contact Lincoln Financial's compliance department, be very specific about the financial damages and timeline. Don't just say "the advisor made a mistake" - clearly state that their advisor's incorrect guidance has resulted in $30K in unexpected taxes and penalties that you would not have incurred if the transfer had been done properly as an inherited IRA rollover. Also, consider requesting a meeting with a supervisor or compliance officer rather than just submitting a written complaint. Sometimes having a live conversation where you can explain the full impact helps them understand the severity of the situation. They may be more motivated to find a resolution when they realize the scope of their advisor's error. One additional point about documentation - if you have any marketing materials, business cards, or website information where the advisor or Lincoln Financial promoted expertise in retirement planning or inherited accounts, save all of that. It strengthens your case that you reasonably relied on their claimed expertise. The fact that multiple people here have had success with various relief procedures gives me hope for your situation. This is clearly a case where professional advice led to an incorrect action, which is exactly what many of these relief provisions are designed to address. Don't give up - you have legitimate grounds for relief through multiple channels, and $30K is absolutely worth fighting for.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful advice about being specific with Lincoln Financial's compliance department. You're absolutely right that I need to clearly articulate the $30K financial impact rather than just describing it as a "mistake." I'm definitely going to request a meeting with a compliance supervisor as you suggest. Having a live conversation where I can walk through exactly how their advisor's guidance led to this massive tax bill might be more impactful than just submitting paperwork. Your point about saving any marketing materials is spot on. I actually do have some brochures and their website information where they specifically tout their retirement planning expertise. If they were marketing themselves as qualified to handle inherited IRA situations, that should definitely strengthen my case that I reasonably relied on their professional knowledge. Reading through all the responses in this thread has been eye-opening. I went from feeling completely helpless about this $30K mistake to realizing I have multiple legitimate avenues for relief. The combination of IRS procedures, regulatory complaints, and potential insurance claims gives me real hope that I can recover most of this money. Thank you for the encouragement to keep fighting this. Sometimes you need to hear from others that your situation is worth pursuing rather than just accepting a devastating financial loss.

0 coins

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this nightmare situation. As someone who works in tax resolution, I've seen this exact scenario too many times - financial advisors who don't understand the specific rules for inherited retirement accounts causing massive tax consequences for their clients. The good news is that you have several strong avenues for relief, and based on the details you've provided, you have a compelling case for both IRS relief and potential recovery from the advisor/firm. Here's what I'd prioritize: **Immediate IRS Action:** File for late rollover relief under Revenue Procedure 2020-46 as soon as possible. Your situation - relying on professional advice that turned out to be incorrect - is exactly what this provision was designed to address. Include a detailed timeline showing how you explicitly sought professional guidance to avoid mistakes. **Documentation Strategy:** Create a comprehensive file with every communication from the advisor. If they recommended consolidating your accounts via email or recorded calls, that's golden evidence. Also document their marketing materials claiming retirement planning expertise. **Multiple Regulatory Complaints:** File with both FINRA and your state insurance commissioner simultaneously. This creates pressure from multiple regulatory angles and shows the severity of the professional error. **Compliance Department Leverage:** Contact Lincoln Financial's compliance department directly and request a meeting. Be very clear about the $30K financial damage and that you're prepared to pursue all available regulatory and legal remedies. The fact that this was a clear violation of inherited IRA rules (not some gray area) works strongly in your favor. Keep fighting - I've seen similar cases result in significant relief when clients pursue all available avenues aggressively.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

โ€ข

This is incredibly comprehensive advice - thank you for laying out such a clear action plan. As someone new to dealing with IRS issues, having a prioritized list like this makes the whole situation feel much more manageable. Your point about Revenue Procedure 2020-46 being designed exactly for situations like mine is really encouraging. I've been feeling like this was somehow my fault for trusting the advisor, but you're right that seeking professional guidance to avoid mistakes should actually work in my favor, not against me. I'm definitely going to follow your suggestion about creating that comprehensive documentation file. I've been collecting emails and materials somewhat haphazardly, but organizing everything chronologically with a clear narrative should make my case much stronger across all the different complaints and relief requests. One question - when you mention filing with FINRA and the state insurance commissioner "simultaneously," do you think there's any risk of the complaints conflicting with each other or causing confusion? I want to make sure I'm coordinating this properly rather than accidentally undermining one avenue by pursuing another. The encouragement from everyone in this thread has been incredible. I went from feeling completely defeated by this $30K mistake to actually feeling hopeful that there are legitimate ways to hold the advisor accountable and potentially recover most of the money. Thank you for sharing your professional experience with these types of cases.

0 coins

Kaylee Cook

โ€ข

One thing nobody has mentioned: KDP (kindle direct publishing) and other platforms will send a 1099-K if your husband makes over $600, and that gets reported to the IRS. they expect to see that income on your return somewhere. If you report as hobby, make sure you list "self-published book" in the description so it matches the 1099. Nothing triggers audits faster than income reported to IRS that doesn't show up on your return!

0 coins

Actually this changed recently - for 2025 tax year the 1099-K threshold is now $5,000, not $600. So smaller sellers might not even get a 1099-K. But you're absolutely right that any 1099 income needs to be reported properly regardless of dollar amount!

0 coins

Paolo Longo

โ€ข

As someone who went through this exact decision last year with my husband's self-published poetry collection, I'd strongly recommend going with Schedule C from the start. Here's what I learned: Even though we had minimal expenses (just some basic editing software and a simple book cover), treating it as a business allowed us to deduct a portion of our home office, internet costs, and even mileage to a local bookstore event. These small deductions added up. The record-keeping really isn't as scary as it seems - I just use a simple Excel spreadsheet with columns for date, description, amount, and category. Takes maybe 10 minutes a month to update. Most importantly, starting with Schedule C gives you flexibility. If your husband's book takes off and he decides to write more, you're already set up properly. If it stays small, no harm done - you're just getting legitimate tax benefits you'd miss with hobby classification. The key is showing profit motive, which it sounds like you have - he completed and published the book with the intent to sell it. That's business activity, not just a hobby. Don't overthink it!

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

โ€ข

This is really helpful! I'm completely new to all of this and feeling overwhelmed by the business vs. hobby decision. Your point about showing profit motive makes sense - my husband did put effort into making the book professionally presentable and we definitely hope it sells. I'm curious about the home office deduction you mentioned. We don't have a dedicated office space, but he does have a corner of our bedroom where he does his writing. Would that still qualify, or does it need to be a completely separate room? And how do you calculate what portion of internet costs are deductible? Also, when you say "no harm done" if it stays small - are there any downsides to filing Schedule C for a very small income? Like does it increase audit risk or anything like that?

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

โ€ข

This thread has been absolutely brilliant - so much practical advice from people who've actually been through this process! I've been running woodworking workshops through Eventbrite for about 7 months and made around ยฃ6,200 so far. Like everyone else here, I was completely overwhelmed by the tax implications until reading through all these experiences. The consistent message is crystal clear: register as self-employed with HMRC now, set up a separate business account, track everything, and save 30% for tax. I particularly love the Monzo automatic transfer idea - that would solve my discipline problem completely! A few woodworking workshop-specific questions I wanted to add: **Tool depreciation**: I've invested quite heavily in professional woodworking tools that I use exclusively for workshops (table saw, router, chisels, etc.). Some individual tools cost ยฃ300-800. Can I claim these in full in the first year under the Annual Investment Allowance? **Material waste**: With woodworking, there's always significant material waste - offcuts, damaged pieces, etc. Can I claim the full cost of materials purchased even though not all of it ends up in the final projects participants take home? **Safety equipment**: I provide safety glasses, dust masks, and hearing protection for all participants. These need regular replacement. Are these ongoing safety costs fully deductible? **Workshop insurance**: Beyond public liability, I carry specific tool insurance and workshop accident coverage. The premiums are getting expensive but seem essential given the machinery involved. At ยฃ6,200 in 7 months, I'm clearly way over any threshold for registration. Reading this thread has given me the confidence to stop procrastinating and get properly organized. Thanks to everyone for making this complex topic feel manageable through real-world examples!

0 coins

Natasha Volkova

โ€ข

Excellent questions about woodworking workshop expenses! All of your costs sound completely legitimate for a professional workshop business. **Tool depreciation**: Yes, those ยฃ300-800 tools can be claimed in full in the first year under the Annual Investment Allowance (currently ยฃ1 million limit, so your tools are well within it). Since you use them exclusively for workshops, there's no need to complicate things with depreciation schedules. **Material waste**: Absolutely claim the full cost of all materials purchased for workshops. Material waste is a normal part of any woodworking business - HMRC understands that not every piece of wood becomes a finished product. Keep your supplier receipts and don't worry about calculating waste percentages. **Safety equipment**: Those ongoing replacement costs for safety glasses, masks, and hearing protection are essential business expenses. Given the machinery involved, HMRC would actually expect to see these costs - shows you're running a responsible operation. **Workshop insurance**: All your insurance premiums (public liability, tool insurance, accident coverage) are fully deductible business expenses. Expensive yes, but absolutely necessary for your type of workshop and completely legitimate to claim. At ยฃ6,200 in 7 months, you're looking at potentially ยฃ10k+ annually - definitely time to get registered! The woodworking workshop market seems incredibly popular right now. People love making something tangible with their hands. The Monzo auto-transfer really is the best approach for staying disciplined about tax money. Once it's automated, you won't even think about that 30% as available to spend!

0 coins

Ruby Knight

โ€ข

This thread has been absolutely incredible - so much detailed, practical advice from people who've actually navigated this exact situation! I've been running financial literacy workshops through Eventbrite for about 5 months and made around ยฃ3,400 so far. Like everyone else here, I was completely confused about whether this counted as a "real business" for tax purposes. Reading through all these experiences, the message is crystal clear: stop overthinking it and get registered with HMRC immediately. The consistency of advice here is reassuring - register now, separate business account, track everything religiously, and save 30% for tax. A few financial workshop-specific questions I wanted to add: **Educational materials and subscriptions**: I subscribe to various financial publications and buy educational resources that I reference during workshops and sometimes recommend to participants. Are these fully deductible even though I also use them for my own professional development? **Certification maintenance**: I maintain several financial education certifications that require annual fees and continuing education credits. These benefit both my workshops and my day job - can I still claim the full cost as a business expense? **Technology costs**: I use specialized budgeting software and financial planning tools during workshops, plus pay for video conferencing licenses for online sessions. These monthly subscriptions are adding up but seem essential for delivering quality content. The Monzo automatic tax savings approach sounds absolutely brilliant - I've been terrible about setting money aside and this automated solution would solve that completely. No more relying on willpower! Getting my HMRC registration sorted this week - no more procrastinating! Thanks to everyone for transforming what felt like an impossibly complex topic into a clear set of actionable steps. This thread should be required reading for anyone starting educational workshop businesses in the UK!

0 coins

Grace Johnson

โ€ข

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - your SIC/NAICS code can affect your insurance rates too! My business insurance premiums were way higher than quotes I saw online because the insurance company had classified my e-learning business under a higher-risk category. Once I pointed out the correct NAICS code, my premiums dropped by almost 30%. So definitely take the time to get this right.

0 coins

Caleb Stone

โ€ข

Wow, I had no idea insurance rates could be affected too. Do you know if it's possible to change your code later if you realize you picked the wrong one? Or are you kind of stuck with whatever you initially choose?

0 coins

Grace Johnson

โ€ข

You can absolutely change your classification codes later if needed. Businesses evolve over time, and sometimes your primary activities shift. Just be aware that if you're changing them on existing accounts (like with your insurance company or bank), they might ask questions about why you're changing classification. The important thing is to be accurate and consistent. If you realize you've been using the wrong code, it's better to correct it than to continue with an inaccurate classification. Just make sure you update it everywhere - tax filings, loans, insurance, etc. - to avoid discrepancies that might raise red flags.

0 coins

Jayden Reed

โ€ข

Here's my 2 cents as someone who's owned multiple small businesses - don't overthink this too much. Pick the code that most accurately represents what your business actually does. The NAICS website has a search function where you can type in keywords related to your business and find matching codes. Just be honest!

0 coins

Nora Brooks

โ€ข

But doesn't picking certain codes make you more likely to get audited? I heard restaurants and cash-based businesses get flagged more often.

0 coins

Douglas Foster

โ€ข

I've been dealing with IRS notices for years as a small business owner, and this Form 941 signature verification issue is becoming more common. What's happening is that when you e-file through a third-party service, the IRS sometimes can't verify that YOU (the business owner) actually authorized the filing - even though the service submitted it correctly. The LTR 3463C is actually a good thing - it means the IRS received your forms but just wants confirmation they came from you. This is especially common when you have irregular filing patterns (like only filing one quarter per year). Your brother-in-law should definitely sign and return the declarations, but I'd also recommend he contact his tax service to ask about adding electronic signature authorization for future filings. Many services now offer enhanced e-signature verification that prevents these notices from being generated in the first place. The key thing is not to ignore it - even though there's no penalty mentioned, the IRS could flag future filings if they don't get the verification they're requesting.

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

โ€ข

This is really helpful context! I'm actually new to dealing with business tax issues and had no idea that third-party e-filing could cause these signature verification problems. When you mention "enhanced e-signature verification" - is that something all tax services offer now, or do you have to specifically request it? I'm helping my elderly neighbor with her small business taxes and want to make sure we avoid these kinds of notices in the future.

0 coins

Malik Thompson

โ€ข

@Jibriel Kohn Most modern tax services do offer enhanced e-signature verification, but it s'not always enabled by default. You ll'want to specifically ask about electronic "signature authorization or" PIN-based "authentication when" setting up the filing. Some services call it practitioner "PIN or" self-select "PIN. The" key is making sure the tax service captures your neighbor s'explicit authorization digitally rather than just filing on her behalf. This creates a clearer audit trail that the IRS can verify, which should prevent these LTR 3463C notices from being generated. For next year s'filings, I d'recommend asking the tax service to walk through their signature verification process before they submit anything. It s'a small extra step that can save a lot of headaches later!

0 coins

This is such a frustrating situation, but unfortunately it's becoming more common with business tax filings. I've seen this exact issue with several clients - the IRS e-filing system accepts the return, but then their verification system flags it for manual signature confirmation later. The fact that your brother-in-law only files for one quarter per year is likely triggering an automated review. The IRS system expects consistent quarterly filings, so when it sees sporadic activity, it generates these verification requests as a fraud prevention measure. My advice would be to sign and return the declarations immediately, but also have him call the IRS business line to clarify his filing status. If he's truly a seasonal employer who only pays wages one quarter per year, he should formally request seasonal employer designation. This will prevent future signature verification notices and make his filing pattern look normal to the IRS system. The good news is that since there's no penalty mentioned in the LTR 3463C, this is purely administrative and won't negatively impact his business tax account once resolved.

0 coins

Debra Bai

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice about the seasonal employer designation! I had no idea that irregular filing patterns could trigger these automated reviews. As someone who's completely new to business tax issues, I'm wondering - is there a specific form or process for requesting seasonal employer status, or is it something you just discuss when you call the IRS? Also, does this designation affect anything else about how the business is treated for tax purposes, or is it purely for filing schedule purposes?

0 coins

Zara Khan

โ€ข

@Debra Bai Great question! The seasonal employer designation is actually made right on Form 941 itself - there s'a checkbox on line 18 that you mark on your first 941 filing of the year. You don t'need a separate form or special application process. Once you check that box, the IRS knows you only pay wages during certain seasons, so you re'only required to file 941s for the quarters when you actually have payroll activity. This prevents the system from expecting quarterly filings and generating those annoying verification letters. The designation is purely for filing schedule purposes - it doesn t'change your tax rates, deductions, or any other aspects of how your business is treated. It just tells the IRS hey, "I m'not going to file every quarter because I don t'have employees every quarter. If" your brother-in-law has already been filing irregularly without this designation, he can call the IRS to have them update his status retroactively, which should prevent future signature verification issues.

0 coins

Prev1...17431744174517461747...5645Next