


Ask the community...
I'm going through almost the exact same situation with Gig Worker Solutions/Anchor Financial! Filed my SETC amendment in January, got all the same promises about advances and transcript verification, and now they're giving me the runaround about "third parties" not funding anyone who filed before April 1st. What's really frustrating is that they kept moving the goalposts - first it was transcripts, then it was formatting issues with the transcripts, then it was review time, and now suddenly there are funding restrictions they never mentioned before. It feels like they're just stalling. I've already revoked my POA with the IRS and filed complaints with the BBB and CFPB. The CFPB complaint at least got them to respond, though it was mostly generic corporate language about "reviewing policies." One thing I discovered - when I called the IRS directly (took forever to get through), they confirmed that my amendment is progressing normally and there are no issues on their end. The agent even mentioned they've been getting a lot of calls about these advance companies lately, which makes me think this is a widespread problem. At this point I'm just waiting for the IRS to process everything directly. It's slower but at least I know I'll actually get my money without someone taking a 20% cut. Hang in there - sounds like we're all in the same boat with these companies!
I'm so glad to see I'm not the only one dealing with this! The exact same pattern of excuses - it's like they have a playbook. The "third party funding restrictions" excuse really got to me because they absolutely never mentioned that limitation when I first signed up. I'm curious - did your IRS agent give you any timeline estimate when you called? When I finally got through (after literally 15+ attempts), the agent said my amendment was in "normal processing" but couldn't give me a specific timeframe beyond "several more months." At least knowing it's progressing normally gives me some peace of mind. The 20% fee they wanted was already painful, but now I'm actually relieved I'll be getting the full amount directly from the IRS. It's just hard being financially strapped while waiting. Thanks for sharing your experience - it helps to know others are going through the same thing and that complaints to CFPB seem to at least get their attention, even if it doesn't solve everything immediately.
I went through something very similar with Anchor Financial earlier this year. Filed my SETC amendment in March and got caught up in the same cycle of excuses - first they needed transcripts, then the transcripts were formatted wrong, then they needed review time, and finally the "third party funding restrictions" excuse. What really opened my eyes was when I started tracking all their promises in writing. I had emails saying I'd get my advance "within 2 business days" from April, then May, then June. When I compiled all of this and sent it to them asking for an explanation of the contradictions, they suddenly stopped responding to my calls altogether. The turning point for me was revoking the POA and working directly with the IRS. Yes, it takes longer, but at least you know exactly where you stand. When I finally got through to an IRS agent, they confirmed my amendment was processing normally and said these advance companies have been a major source of confusion for taxpayers this year. My advice: document everything, revoke that POA immediately, and file complaints with both CFPB and your state's attorney general office. The attorney general complaint actually got more traction for me than the BBB. Most importantly, check your IRS transcript weekly to make sure they haven't tried to redirect your refund to their accounts - I've heard of that happening even after POA revocation. You'll get your money eventually, just directly from the IRS without giving these companies their cut. Hang in there!
Another option that hasn't been mentioned - if you can't get your W2 through any of the other methods, you can actually file your return using Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2). This lets you report your wages and withholdings based on your final paystub or other records you have. You'll need to include as much information as possible about your wages, federal income tax withheld, Social Security and Medicare taxes, etc. The IRS will match it against what your employer reported, and if there are discrepancies, they'll contact you. This should really be a last resort since it can delay processing and potentially trigger additional correspondence with the IRS. But if you're truly unable to get your W2 or wage transcripts before the filing deadline, it's better than not filing at all. Just make sure to keep detailed records of how you calculated the amounts you're reporting. Given that you have the automatic extension until June 15 as an expat, you probably have enough time to try the other methods first (contacting HR, getting IRS transcripts, etc.) before having to go this route.
This is great backup information to have! I'm hoping I won't need to use Form 4852, but it's reassuring to know there's still an option even if everything else fails. Do you know if using the substitute form typically causes any delays in getting tax refunds processed? I'm expecting to get a refund since I had taxes withheld all year but will probably qualify for some expat tax benefits.
Yes, using Form 4852 can definitely delay refund processing, sometimes by several weeks or even months. The IRS has to manually review substitute forms and match them against employer records, which takes much longer than their automated processing for regular returns. Since you mentioned expecting a refund, I'd strongly recommend exhausting the other options first - especially the IRS transcript method or contacting your former employer's HR department. Most companies are pretty responsive to W-2 requests from former employees, even for international mailing. If you do end up needing to use Form 4852, make sure you're as accurate as possible with the numbers from your final paystub. Any discrepancies between what you report and what your employer filed will trigger additional correspondence and further delays. But like Anna said, it's definitely better than not filing at all!
Just wanted to add another resource that might help - the IRS has a specific publication (Pub 54) called "Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad" that covers a lot of these expat tax situations in detail. It's available as a free PDF download from IRS.gov. One thing I learned from experience is that if you're going to be living abroad long-term, it's worth setting up mail forwarding with the postal service before you leave (if you haven't already). I know that doesn't help your current situation, but for future years it can save a lot of headaches with tax documents and other important mail. Also, since you mentioned using TurboTax in the past, be aware that their international tax features are somewhat limited. You might want to consider tax software specifically designed for expats like FreeTaxUSA or even consulting with a tax professional who specializes in expat returns, especially if you end up qualifying for FEIE or need to deal with foreign tax credits in future years. The expat tax situation gets more complex each year you're abroad, so it's good to get familiar with all these options now!
This is a great question and you're definitely not alone in being confused by this! When your qualified dividends and ordinary dividends are exactly the same amount ($110.42 in your case), it means that 100% of your dividend income qualified for the preferential tax treatment. You absolutely should put $110.42 in both line 3a and line 3b on your 1040 - you're not double-reporting or paying tax twice. Line 3a captures all your dividend income, while line 3b tells the IRS how much of that qualifies for the lower capital gains tax rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) instead of being taxed at your ordinary income rates. Since all your dividends were qualified, you get the tax benefit on the entire amount. This is actually a good position to be in!
This explanation really helped clear things up for me too! I've been investing for a few years but never really understood the difference between these two lines on the tax form. It's nice to know that when they match, it's actually a good thing - means I'm getting the better tax treatment. I was always nervous about filling out those dividend lines because I thought I might be doing something wrong. Now I feel more confident about my tax filing!
I had this exact same confusion when I first started getting dividend income! It's totally normal to be puzzled by this. What everyone else has explained is spot on - when your qualified dividends ($110.42) equal your ordinary dividends ($110.42), it means ALL of your dividends met the IRS requirements for qualified dividend status. This is actually fantastic news for your tax situation! You'll report $110.42 on both line 3a and 3b of your 1040, and the entire amount will be taxed at the much lower capital gains rates instead of your regular income tax rates. You're not reporting the same income twice - think of line 3a as "total dividends received" and line 3b as "how much of that total gets the special tax treatment." In your case, 100% gets the special treatment!
This thread has been so helpful! I'm new to investing and just got my first 1099 with dividends. I was panicking thinking I'd have to figure out some complicated math to split up qualified vs ordinary dividends, but it sounds like the brokerage already did all that work for me. It's reassuring to know that when the numbers match, it's actually the best case scenario tax-wise. Thanks everyone for breaking this down in terms that actually make sense!
Is the 1095-A the only healthcare form I need to worry about? I got something called a 1095-B from my state program and I'm confused if that's the same thing or if I need to wait for an A form too?
They're different forms. The 1095-A is specifically for plans purchased through the Marketplace with potential premium tax credits. The 1095-B typically shows coverage from other sources like certain government programs (Medicaid, CHIP) or some employer plans. If you only had coverage through a state Medicaid program and received a 1095-B, you likely won't receive a 1095-A. The 1095-B essentially just proves you had qualifying coverage to satisfy the health insurance requirement. Unlike the 1095-A, you don't need to attach or directly use information from the 1095-B on your tax return.
I'm in the exact same boat as you! Still waiting on my 1095-A and getting more frustrated by the day. I called the Healthcare Marketplace last week and they told me there's been unusual delays this year due to "system updates" - whatever that means. The rep said they're prioritizing cases where people had mid-year coverage changes or income updates, which explains why some people are getting theirs while others aren't. She couldn't give me a specific timeline but said most should be available by the end of this month. One thing that helped me was setting up notifications in my marketplace account - you can get an email alert as soon as your 1095-A is posted online instead of constantly checking. At least that way I'm not refreshing the page ten times a day! Hang in there - we'll get through this tax season eventually. The wait is definitely more painful when you can see that refund just sitting there waiting for one stupid form.
Dmitry Ivanov
Quick tip - save all your subscription receipts and take screenshots of the research they provide that you actually use for trades. I got audited last year and having this documentation saved me. The IRS questioned my trading subscription deductions specifically. Being able to show the direct connection between the research I paid for and actual trades I made based on that info was crucial. They wanted to see that the expense was "ordinary and necessary" for my trading activity.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
β’This is great advice. Do you literally screenshot every research report you use? That seems like a ton of documentation to maintain. Is there a more efficient system you use?
0 coins
Jamal Harris
Be very careful about the trading group deduction if you're dealing with crypto. The IRS has been extra scrutinous about crypto-related deductions lately, especially for subscription services that provide trading signals or research. I'd strongly recommend keeping detailed records of: 1. Every trade you made based on the group's research (with timestamps) 2. Screenshots or downloads of the specific research that influenced each trade 3. A trading journal documenting hours spent analyzing the group's research 4. Evidence that you're truly operating as a trader (regular income from trading, substantial time commitment, etc.) The $400/month subscription is substantial enough that it could trigger additional IRS attention if audited. Make sure you can demonstrate that this expense directly contributed to your trading profits and wasn't just general investment advice. Also consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in trader tax status before filing. The rules around crypto trading classification are still evolving and you want to make sure you're positioning everything correctly from the start.
0 coins
Amaya Watson
β’This is excellent advice about the documentation requirements for crypto trading deductions. I've been hesitant to claim my trading group subscriptions specifically because of the crypto component. One question - when you mention keeping records of trades based on the group's research, how granular do you need to get? For example, if the group provides general market analysis that influences my overall strategy rather than specific "buy XYZ coin now" signals, is that harder to document as a direct connection? I'm also curious about the trading journal aspect. Are there any specific formats or requirements the IRS expects for documenting time spent on research activities, or is a simple spreadsheet with dates/hours sufficient?
0 coins