


Ask the community...
This is such a timely discussion for me! I'm a newer agent (2 years in) but had a breakout year and am projected to hit around $400k this year. I've been putting off the S Corp decision but clearly need to stop procrastinating. One question I haven't seen addressed - does the IRS look at this differently for newer agents vs established ones? I'm worried that since I don't have a long track record, they might scrutinize my salary determination more closely. Like, can I justify the same salary percentage as someone who's been in the business for 10+ years? Also, for those who made the switch mid-year, how did you handle the transition? Did you have to do a partial year S Corp election or wait until the following tax year?
Great question about newer agents! The IRS doesn't explicitly treat newer vs. established agents differently for reasonable compensation, but your track record can definitely influence how you justify your salary determination. For a newer agent hitting $400k, you'd want to emphasize factors like: - Hours worked (newer agents often work longer hours) - Your direct involvement in all aspects of transactions - Market conditions that contributed to your success - Comparable salaries for employed agents with similar production levels The key is documentation. Since you don't have years of historical data, focus on current market comparables and your specific duties. Many newer high-producers actually justify higher salary percentages (50-60%) because they're doing ALL the work themselves. Regarding mid-year transitions: You can make an S Corp election mid-year, but it's complex. You'd need to file Form 2553 and potentially Form 8832. Many CPAs recommend waiting until January 1st to keep things cleaner, but if your projected savings are substantial, the mid-year election might be worth the extra complexity. Definitely run the numbers with a CPA who specializes in real estate to see if the partial-year savings justify the additional complications.
This is really helpful advice, especially about emphasizing the hours worked as a newer agent! I'm definitely putting in 60+ hour weeks and handling everything myself right now. One follow-up question - when you mention "comparable salaries for employed agents with similar production levels," how do I find that data? Most job postings I see for real estate positions are either base salary + commission or just commission-only. Are there specific resources that show what high-producing employed agents actually earn in total compensation? I want to make sure I have solid documentation to back up whatever salary I choose. Also, has anyone here actually gone through an IRS audit on their S Corp reasonable compensation? I'd love to hear what that process was like and what documentation they found most valuable.
Hold on - nobody's talked about franchise taxes yet!! In my state (CA) we pay $800 minimum franchise tax for S-corps REGARDLESS of profit. Then there's a 1.5% tax on net income at the entity level PLUS you pay personal income tax on all passed-through profits. Don't assume your state only has the 2.5% rate you mentioned - there might be hidden fees, franchise taxes, or local business taxes you're not accounting for.
Yep, CA resident here too and that $800 minimum franchise tax is killer for small S-corps. I actually created an LLC for my side business instead of an S-corp because the math worked out better for me with the LLC fee schedule vs the flat $800 for an S-corp. The state-level stuff is where all these "get an S-corp to save on taxes!" advice falls apart.
Great question! As others have mentioned, S-Corp taxation can be tricky at the state level. Here's what you need to know for your situation: Your $160k salary will definitely be subject to the 4.5% individual income tax rate since it's W-2 income. The $40k in business profits will also likely flow through to your personal return and be taxed at 4.5% as well - this is the main benefit of S-Corp pass-through taxation. However, don't assume that 2.5% corporate rate doesn't apply to you at all. Many states have: - Minimum franchise taxes or filing fees for S-Corps - Entity-level taxes on certain types of income - Local business taxes or licensing fees I'd strongly recommend checking with your state's tax department directly or consulting a local CPA who specializes in your state's tax code. Each state handles S-Corps differently, and some have unique rules that could impact your total tax liability. The federal pass-through treatment doesn't always translate perfectly to state level taxation. Also don't forget about the payroll tax savings on that $40k profit - that's one of the main reasons people choose S-Corp structure in the first place!
This is really helpful, Omar! I'm actually in a similar situation but in a different state. Quick question - when you mention "entity-level taxes on certain types of income," what kinds of income are you referring to? I'm wondering if rental income from property owned by my S-Corp would fall into this category, or if it's more about investment income like capital gains? Also, regarding the payroll tax savings on the $40k profit - is there a minimum salary requirement I should be aware of? I've heard the IRS expects S-Corp owners to pay themselves a "reasonable salary" but I'm not sure how that's determined or if states have their own requirements on top of federal rules. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly!
Hi everyone! I'm new to this community but found this thread incredibly helpful as I'm facing the exact same situation. My divorce was finalized last month and I closed my joint bank account, forgetting that my tax refund would still be directed there. Reading through all your experiences has been such a relief - the 4-6 week timeline seems pretty consistent across the board, and knowing about the specific transcript codes (TC841 for rejection, TC846 with "C" for check) gives me a way to actually track progress instead of just wondering what's happening. I'm definitely going to call tomorrow to verify my address since I moved during the divorce proceedings. Based on what everyone has shared, it sounds like that one potentially long hold session is absolutely worth it to avoid the check going to my old address and adding weeks to an already slow process. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their detailed timelines and tips - this community has been more helpful than anything I could find on the official IRS website!
Welcome to the community! I'm also fairly new here, but this thread has been such a lifesaver for understanding what to expect in this frustrating situation. It's unfortunate that so many of us are dealing with post-divorce financial complications, but at least we can help each other navigate the process! The consistency of everyone's 4-6 week timelines is really reassuring, and I agree that having those specific transcript codes to monitor makes such a difference. You're absolutely making the right call about verifying your address tomorrow - from everything I've read here, that seems to be the most critical step to avoid additional delays. Wishing you a smooth process and hoping your check arrives on the faster end of that timeline! This community really is amazing for practical advice that you just can't get anywhere else.
Hi everyone! I'm brand new to this community and stumbled across this thread while frantically searching for answers about my own situation. Like several others here, I'm dealing with a refund that was sent to a closed account after some major life changes. Reading through all of your detailed experiences has been incredibly reassuring - especially seeing how consistent the 4-6 week timeline is across different situations. The transcript code information (TC841 for rejection, TC846 with "C" for check issuance) is absolute gold - I had no idea I could track the actual processing steps instead of just staring at that useless "still processing" message on Where's My Refund. I'm definitely calling tomorrow to verify my address since I moved recently. Based on everyone's advice here, it sounds like dealing with the hold time now is much better than potentially adding weeks of delays if the check goes to the wrong place. This thread has been more helpful than hours of digging through the IRS website - thank you all for sharing your experiences and timelines so generously! It's amazing to find a community where people actually provide practical, actionable advice for these stressful situations.
This thread has been super informative! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I received my final paycheck of 2023 on December 31st via direct deposit, but my pay stub shows January 1st, 2024 as the "pay period end date." My employer's HR department is insisting this makes it 2024 income, but based on everything I'm reading here about constructive receipt, it sounds like they're incorrect since I had the money in my account on December 31st, 2023. Has anyone successfully convinced their employer to correct this kind of mistake? I'm worried about getting into a back-and-forth argument with payroll when tax season is already here. Should I just accept their decision and file Form 4852 like someone mentioned, or is it worth fighting this?
You're absolutely right to push back on this! The pay period end date is irrelevant - what matters is when you actually received the money, which was December 31st, 2023. Your employer's HR department is confusing pay period dates with constructive receipt rules. I'd definitely recommend fighting this before accepting it and filing Form 4852. Start by providing your HR/payroll department with documentation about constructive receipt doctrine - you can find the official IRS guidance in Publication 15 (Employer's Tax Guide). If they still refuse, escalate to a supervisor or the finance department. Many payroll people simply aren't familiar with these rules and assume the pay period date is what matters. The reason I'd push for correction rather than just filing Form 4852 is that having an incorrect W-2 can create complications down the road, especially if the IRS questions the discrepancy. It's much cleaner to get your employer to issue a corrected W-2 now than to deal with potential issues later. Plus, you're probably not the only employee affected by this mistake, so fixing it helps everyone.
I'm a tax preparer and see this confusion every year. The key thing to remember is that the IRS follows the "constructive receipt" rule - you're taxed on income when you have the right to receive it, not when it's officially "earned" or when the pay period ends. Since your money was deposited December 30, 2023, that's when you constructively received it, so it belongs on your 2023 W2. Your employer should include this in your 2023 W2, giving you 13 paychecks for that year. This is completely normal and happens whenever year-end pay dates fall this way. Don't let them tell you otherwise - the deposit date is what matters for tax purposes, not the pay stub date or pay period. If your employer insists on putting it on your 2024 W2, they're making an error that you'll need to address before filing your taxes.
Thank you for the professional perspective! As someone new to dealing with year-end payroll issues, this is really reassuring. I was getting stressed about potentially having to argue with my employer's payroll department, but now I feel more confident about the rules. Quick question - if my employer does refuse to correct my W2 and I have to file Form 4852, will that trigger an audit or cause problems with the IRS? I want to make sure I understand all my options before I decide whether to push back or just accept their mistake and work around it.
Michael Green
This whole thread has been incredibly valuable! I've been in the same frustrating situation for about 18 months - making decent money from options trading ($38k last year) but completely unable to contribute to retirement accounts due to the earned income requirements. The educational content approach that so many people have shared success with is exactly what I needed to hear. I never considered that my trading knowledge could be turned into legitimate earned income, but it makes perfect sense given that I'm already documenting strategies and analyzing what works. I've been primarily focused on cash-secured puts and protective puts, with some success in covered calls during sideways markets. Reading about people generating $6k-$12k through trading education while actually improving their own discipline is really encouraging. What strikes me most is how this solves multiple problems at once - generates earned income for IRA eligibility, helps other traders learn profitable strategies, and forces you to think more systematically about your own approach. The 8-10 hours per week time commitment mentioned by several people seems very manageable. I'm planning to start with some basic guides on protective put strategies since that's where I've had the most consistent success in managing downside risk. Has anyone found that starting with risk management content tends to attract more serious students than pure profit-focused strategies? Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - this thread has given me a clear path forward after feeling completely stuck on the retirement savings issue!
0 coins
Ashley Simian
I'm dealing with this exact same frustration! Been trading options for about 14 months now, making around $41k annually, but completely shut out of IRA contributions because of the earned income requirement. It's honestly one of the most backward aspects of the tax code - you can be financially successful but still locked out of retirement planning. This thread has been absolutely incredible though. The educational content approach that so many people have successfully implemented is brilliant - I never thought about converting my trading expertise into legitimate earned income, but it solves the problem perfectly. I've developed some solid strategies around iron butterflies and calendar spreads that have kept me profitable through different market conditions. Based on all the success stories shared here, there's clearly strong demand for practical education from consistently profitable traders rather than just theoretical content. The fact that multiple people have generated $6k-$12k in educational income while maintaining their trading performance (and actually becoming more disciplined) is really inspiring. Even creating $7k in earned income would completely solve my IRA contribution issue. I'm thinking about starting with content focused on neutral strategies like iron butterflies, since managing those through different volatility environments requires skills that many newer options traders struggle with. The 8-10 hours per week commitment others mentioned seems very reasonable, especially since I'm already documenting trades and analyzing what works. Has anyone had success with educational content specifically around neutral options strategies? I'm wondering if there's as much demand for that compared to the directional strategies that get more attention. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences - this gives me genuine hope that I can finally start building retirement savings again while helping other traders learn profitable risk management!
0 coins