


Ask the community...
Hold on - nobody's talked about franchise taxes yet!! In my state (CA) we pay $800 minimum franchise tax for S-corps REGARDLESS of profit. Then there's a 1.5% tax on net income at the entity level PLUS you pay personal income tax on all passed-through profits. Don't assume your state only has the 2.5% rate you mentioned - there might be hidden fees, franchise taxes, or local business taxes you're not accounting for.
Yep, CA resident here too and that $800 minimum franchise tax is killer for small S-corps. I actually created an LLC for my side business instead of an S-corp because the math worked out better for me with the LLC fee schedule vs the flat $800 for an S-corp. The state-level stuff is where all these "get an S-corp to save on taxes!" advice falls apart.
Great question! As others have mentioned, S-Corp taxation can be tricky at the state level. Here's what you need to know for your situation: Your $160k salary will definitely be subject to the 4.5% individual income tax rate since it's W-2 income. The $40k in business profits will also likely flow through to your personal return and be taxed at 4.5% as well - this is the main benefit of S-Corp pass-through taxation. However, don't assume that 2.5% corporate rate doesn't apply to you at all. Many states have: - Minimum franchise taxes or filing fees for S-Corps - Entity-level taxes on certain types of income - Local business taxes or licensing fees I'd strongly recommend checking with your state's tax department directly or consulting a local CPA who specializes in your state's tax code. Each state handles S-Corps differently, and some have unique rules that could impact your total tax liability. The federal pass-through treatment doesn't always translate perfectly to state level taxation. Also don't forget about the payroll tax savings on that $40k profit - that's one of the main reasons people choose S-Corp structure in the first place!
This is really helpful, Omar! I'm actually in a similar situation but in a different state. Quick question - when you mention "entity-level taxes on certain types of income," what kinds of income are you referring to? I'm wondering if rental income from property owned by my S-Corp would fall into this category, or if it's more about investment income like capital gains? Also, regarding the payroll tax savings on the $40k profit - is there a minimum salary requirement I should be aware of? I've heard the IRS expects S-Corp owners to pay themselves a "reasonable salary" but I'm not sure how that's determined or if states have their own requirements on top of federal rules. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly!
This thread has been super informative! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I received my final paycheck of 2023 on December 31st via direct deposit, but my pay stub shows January 1st, 2024 as the "pay period end date." My employer's HR department is insisting this makes it 2024 income, but based on everything I'm reading here about constructive receipt, it sounds like they're incorrect since I had the money in my account on December 31st, 2023. Has anyone successfully convinced their employer to correct this kind of mistake? I'm worried about getting into a back-and-forth argument with payroll when tax season is already here. Should I just accept their decision and file Form 4852 like someone mentioned, or is it worth fighting this?
You're absolutely right to push back on this! The pay period end date is irrelevant - what matters is when you actually received the money, which was December 31st, 2023. Your employer's HR department is confusing pay period dates with constructive receipt rules. I'd definitely recommend fighting this before accepting it and filing Form 4852. Start by providing your HR/payroll department with documentation about constructive receipt doctrine - you can find the official IRS guidance in Publication 15 (Employer's Tax Guide). If they still refuse, escalate to a supervisor or the finance department. Many payroll people simply aren't familiar with these rules and assume the pay period date is what matters. The reason I'd push for correction rather than just filing Form 4852 is that having an incorrect W-2 can create complications down the road, especially if the IRS questions the discrepancy. It's much cleaner to get your employer to issue a corrected W-2 now than to deal with potential issues later. Plus, you're probably not the only employee affected by this mistake, so fixing it helps everyone.
I'm a tax preparer and see this confusion every year. The key thing to remember is that the IRS follows the "constructive receipt" rule - you're taxed on income when you have the right to receive it, not when it's officially "earned" or when the pay period ends. Since your money was deposited December 30, 2023, that's when you constructively received it, so it belongs on your 2023 W2. Your employer should include this in your 2023 W2, giving you 13 paychecks for that year. This is completely normal and happens whenever year-end pay dates fall this way. Don't let them tell you otherwise - the deposit date is what matters for tax purposes, not the pay stub date or pay period. If your employer insists on putting it on your 2024 W2, they're making an error that you'll need to address before filing your taxes.
Thank you for the professional perspective! As someone new to dealing with year-end payroll issues, this is really reassuring. I was getting stressed about potentially having to argue with my employer's payroll department, but now I feel more confident about the rules. Quick question - if my employer does refuse to correct my W2 and I have to file Form 4852, will that trigger an audit or cause problems with the IRS? I want to make sure I understand all my options before I decide whether to push back or just accept their mistake and work around it.
As someone who works in payroll and deals with nonresident alien withholding regularly, I want to emphasize a few important points that haven't been fully covered here: First, don't panic about your previous exempt claim - this is honestly one of the most common mistakes we see with international workers. Your employer's payroll system may have actually overridden your exempt election if they properly coded you as a nonresident alien in their system. Second, when you submit your corrected W-4, make absolutely sure your employer updates your tax status in their payroll system. Sometimes the W-4 gets processed but the underlying tax codes don't get changed, especially if you're in a large organization with automated systems. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - if you have any scholarship income, fellowship payments, or other education-related income as a nonresident, these often have different withholding rules entirely. Make sure to ask your school's international office about this if applicable, as it can significantly affect your overall tax situation. The good news is that this kind of honest mistake rarely results in penalties beyond owing the taxes plus minimal interest. The IRS recognizes that nonresident tax rules are complex and confusing even for tax professionals!
This is such valuable insight from someone who actually processes these forms! I'm curious about something you mentioned - how can we tell if our employer's payroll system properly overrode the exempt status? Should I be looking at my pay stub for specific codes or withholding amounts that would indicate they're treating me as a nonresident alien correctly? Also, your point about scholarship income is really important. I'm on a research assistantship that pays through the university payroll system, but I also receive a separate fellowship stipend. Should these be handled differently on my W-4, or do the same nonresident alien rules apply to both? I want to make sure I'm not creating more withholding problems by having inconsistent forms across different income sources.
Great questions! To check if your payroll system is handling your nonresident status correctly, look at your pay stub for federal tax withholding amounts. If you see zero or very minimal federal tax being withheld despite claiming exempt, that's a red flag that the system might not be applying nonresident alien withholding rules properly. For your research assistantship vs fellowship situation - this is where it gets tricky. Your research assistantship income (if you're providing services) should follow normal W-4 withholding rules for nonresident aliens. But fellowship/scholarship income that's not for services rendered often has flat-rate withholding (typically 14% for most countries, but this can vary based on tax treaties). My recommendation: submit separate, correctly completed W-4 forms to each paying entity, and specifically ask your university's payroll department to confirm they're applying the right withholding rates for each type of income. Don't assume they'll automatically coordinate between different payment systems - I've seen cases where students had correct withholding on assistantship income but zero withholding on fellowship income because they were processed by different departments. Also, double-check if your fellowship qualifies for any tax treaty benefits, as this could reduce or eliminate withholding requirements entirely depending on your home country's treaty with the US.
I just went through this exact situation last month! As a nonresident alien on an L-1 visa, I made the same mistake of claiming exempt status on my W-4 because I thought I qualified based on my previous year's tax liability. Here's what I learned: you're absolutely right that nonresident aliens cannot claim exempt status regardless of whether they meet the standard exemption criteria. The IRS has specific withholding requirements that override the normal W-4 rules for us. When I discovered my error, I immediately submitted a corrected W-4 to HR with "Single" filing status and "Nonresident Alien" written clearly at the top. My employer's payroll department was actually helpful once I explained the situation - they said they see this mistake fairly often with international employees. The financial impact wasn't as scary as I expected. Yes, I did owe additional tax when I filed, but since it was an honest mistake and I corrected it promptly, there were no penalties - just some minimal interest on the underpayment. The key is acting quickly once you realize the error and making sure your employer processes the corrected form properly. Don't beat yourself up about this - the nonresident alien tax rules are genuinely confusing and even some HR departments aren't fully familiar with them!
I'm dealing with the exact same frustrating situation! Filed early February, got the 570 code on Feb 20th with a date of March 6th. That date came and went with absolutely no movement on my transcript. No 971 code, no 571 code, nothing. WMR still shows the generic "processing" message. What's really getting to me is the inconsistent information everywhere. Some people say the date means when they'll resolve it, others say it's just an internal processing date that means nothing. The IRS website is useless for explaining what these codes actually mean for individual situations. I've been checking my transcript obsessively (probably not helping my stress levels!) and it's maddening to see zero progress. At this point I'm wondering if I should just accept that I won't see my refund until late April or May based on what others are reporting. Has anyone had success calling the IRS about a 570 code, or do they just tell you to keep waiting? I'm hesitant to tie up their phone lines if they can't actually do anything to help.
I'm experiencing the exact same timeline as you! Filed on February 10th, got the 570 code on February 18th with a March 2nd date. That date has long passed and I'm still stuck in limbo with no updates whatsoever. What's really frustrating is how the IRS customer service reps give completely different explanations when you call. One told me the March 2nd date was when they'd finish reviewing my return, another said it was just an internal system date that doesn't mean anything to taxpayers. The inconsistency is maddening! I've been tracking my transcript daily (obsessively, honestly) and seeing absolutely zero movement. No 971 notice code, no 571 release code - just that lonely 570 sitting there mocking me. WMR has been stuck on "still processing" for over a month now. From reading other threads, it seems like 2024 processing is significantly slower than previous years. People are reporting 8-10 week delays even for straightforward returns. I'm trying to be patient but when you're expecting that refund for important expenses, this waiting game is brutal. Has anyone found calling the IRS helpful for 570 codes, or do they just tell you the same "wait longer" message?
GalacticGuardian
This is such a timely discussion for me! I'm a newer agent (2 years in) but had a breakout year and am projected to hit around $400k this year. I've been putting off the S Corp decision but clearly need to stop procrastinating. One question I haven't seen addressed - does the IRS look at this differently for newer agents vs established ones? I'm worried that since I don't have a long track record, they might scrutinize my salary determination more closely. Like, can I justify the same salary percentage as someone who's been in the business for 10+ years? Also, for those who made the switch mid-year, how did you handle the transition? Did you have to do a partial year S Corp election or wait until the following tax year?
0 coins
Aaliyah Jackson
Great question about newer agents! The IRS doesn't explicitly treat newer vs. established agents differently for reasonable compensation, but your track record can definitely influence how you justify your salary determination. For a newer agent hitting $400k, you'd want to emphasize factors like: - Hours worked (newer agents often work longer hours) - Your direct involvement in all aspects of transactions - Market conditions that contributed to your success - Comparable salaries for employed agents with similar production levels The key is documentation. Since you don't have years of historical data, focus on current market comparables and your specific duties. Many newer high-producers actually justify higher salary percentages (50-60%) because they're doing ALL the work themselves. Regarding mid-year transitions: You can make an S Corp election mid-year, but it's complex. You'd need to file Form 2553 and potentially Form 8832. Many CPAs recommend waiting until January 1st to keep things cleaner, but if your projected savings are substantial, the mid-year election might be worth the extra complexity. Definitely run the numbers with a CPA who specializes in real estate to see if the partial-year savings justify the additional complications.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
ā¢This is really helpful advice, especially about emphasizing the hours worked as a newer agent! I'm definitely putting in 60+ hour weeks and handling everything myself right now. One follow-up question - when you mention "comparable salaries for employed agents with similar production levels," how do I find that data? Most job postings I see for real estate positions are either base salary + commission or just commission-only. Are there specific resources that show what high-producing employed agents actually earn in total compensation? I want to make sure I have solid documentation to back up whatever salary I choose. Also, has anyone here actually gone through an IRS audit on their S Corp reasonable compensation? I'd love to hear what that process was like and what documentation they found most valuable.
0 coins