
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I recently started working at a company that's backed by private equity and as part of my compensation package, I received equity in the business. I also invested some of my own money into the company. Last year I got my first K-1 and included everything on my tax return. The thing is, the company didn't do great last year and my equity is basically underwater. My K-1 showed a pretty substantial loss from ordinary business income, which flowed through to my 1040. While I was happy to see this reduce my taxable income, something doesn't feel right about it. I haven't actually sold anything or realized these losses - they're just on paper. I'm confused about whether these K-1 losses should actually be reducing my taxable income when they're unrealized. Is this correct or am I missing something about how partnership taxation works? Will I have to "pay back" this benefit somehow if the company becomes profitable in the future?
Title: Why do I need to multiply self-employment income by 0.9235 then 0.153 for taxes instead of just applying 15.3%? 1 I'm working on my quarterly estimated taxes and I'm really confused about calculating self-employment tax. Every guide and tax software has me multiply my self-employment income by 0.9235 first, and then apply the 15.3% tax rate to that amount. Why the extra step? Why can't I just multiply my total self-employment income by 15.3% and be done with it? I'm trying to make sure I understand what I'm actually paying for and why. This is my first year being completely self-employed after leaving my office job last year, and I'm trying to make sure I get all these calculations right before I send in my first payment. Is there some logical reason for this weird two-step process instead of just a single calculation?
3 I learned about this the hard way last year. My accountant explained that the 0.9235 factor exists because as a self-employed person, you get to deduct half of your self-employment tax from your income. The formula actually works out to be exactly the mathematical equivalent of allowing that deduction. If SE_income is your self-employment income: - SE_tax = SE_income ร 0.9235 ร 0.153 - This equals: SE_income ร 0.141, which is less than just applying 15.3% It's basically the government's way of making sure self-employed people don't pay more than employees + employers would pay combined.
16 So does this mean I'm actually paying LESS than 15.3% on my total self-employment income? I thought self-employment taxes were higher than regular employment, not lower!
3 You're paying the full 15.3% rate, but on a slightly reduced income amount (92.35% of your earnings). This results in an effective tax rate of about 14.13% on your total self-employment income, rather than 15.3%. The self-employment tax can still feel higher than regular employment because when you have a traditional job, you only see half of the FICA taxes (7.65%) coming out of your paycheck. Your employer pays the other 7.65% behind the scenes, and you never see that money. When you're self-employed, you're responsible for the full amount, which makes it feel like a bigger tax burden even though the math works out fairly.
11 When I first started my business, I made the mistake of just applying 15.3% directly to all my earnings and ended up overpaying by quite a bit! The 0.9235 factor is actually a benefit for us self-employed folks. Quick tip: Don't forget that after calculating your SE tax, you also get to deduct HALF of that amount from your income for calculating your income tax. That's another benefit most people miss! It's on Schedule 1 of your 1040.
14 Wait, so I can deduct half of my SE tax from my income? Is that automatic in tax software or do I need to calculate that separately and enter it somewhere specific? I've been self-employed for 3 years and never knew this!
Yes, you can deduct half of your SE tax! Most tax software does this automatically when you enter your self-employment income, but you should double-check. On Form 1040, it shows up on Schedule 1 (Additional Income and Adjustments to Income) as "Deductible part of self-employment tax." If you've been missing this deduction for 3 years, you might want to consider filing amended returns (Form 1040X) to claim those missed deductions - you could be looking at significant refunds! The statute of limitations is usually 3 years from when you filed, so you might still be able to recover those overpayments.
My husband and I are planning to sell our home in Arizona and relocate to Colorado where we have extended family support. We're expecting our second child in a few months, and the cost of living here has become too much for us, especially with another little one on the way. Here's our situation: We won't hit the 2-year ownership mark in our current home until September 15, 2025. Our house is valued around $1.45M-$1.55M, and we still owe about $1.2M on the mortgage. We file our taxes jointly. I know there's usually a capital gains tax exemption if you've lived in your primary residence for at least 2 years, but we need to move sooner rather than later. Are there any exceptions to this capital gains tax rule that might apply to our circumstances? Any way we could avoid paying capital gains tax without having to wait until September? The timing is really tight with the baby coming.
Don't forget to document EVERYTHING if you're claiming a partial exemption. We sold our house 4 months short of the 2-year mark due to a family health emergency, and the IRS initially questioned our exemption. What saved us was having thorough documentation: doctor's letters explaining the necessity of the move, correspondence showing when we made the decision, and a clear timeline of events. We also kept all receipts for home improvements to increase our cost basis. Also, TurboTax has a specific section for calculating partial exemptions that was actually pretty helpful for us. We ended up paying some capital gains tax but much less than we would have without the partial exemption.
Another option to explore is the "safe harbor" test for unforeseen circumstances. The IRS specifically lists certain situations that automatically qualify, including: - Death of a family member - Divorce or legal separation - Multiple births from the same pregnancy - Becoming eligible for unemployment compensation - Change in employment that leaves you unable to pay housing costs The "multiple births" provision might be relevant if you're having twins! Also, if the cost of living increase has genuinely made your current housing unaffordable (especially with childcare costs), you might qualify under the unemployment/inability to pay provision. I'd strongly recommend getting a consultation with a tax professional who specializes in real estate transactions before making your final decision. The potential tax savings from finding the right exemption could easily pay for professional advice, and they can help you document your case properly if you do qualify for a partial exemption. Given your timeline and the amounts involved, this is definitely worth professional guidance rather than trying to navigate it alone.
I've been using TurboTax's website for my taxes the last few years, but decided to try the TurboTax desktop software this time around (first attempt with their software version). I also tried FreeTaxUSA a while back (probably once or twice). For those of us who have pretty consistent tax situations year-to-year, I'm wondering if it's really worth paying extra for TurboTax? FreeTaxUSA is so much cheaper, though TurboTax software isn't terrible price-wise if you catch an early discount. Which one do most people prefer? I'm guessing TurboTax has a bigger user base since they let you import so many different forms automatically. Just trying to decide if I should switch back to FreeTaxUSA to save some cash or stick with TurboTax for the convenience.
Has anyone had experience with audit support from either company? I'm leaning toward FreeTaxUSA but nervous about audit protection...
FreeTaxUSA's Deluxe version (usually about $7-8) includes what they call "Audit Assist" - they provide guidance if you're audited, but don't represent you. TurboTax sells a more comprehensive audit defense service that includes representation. That said, if your return is relatively straightforward, audit risk is pretty low. I've prepared hundreds of returns over the years with various software and never had one audited. If you're really concerned, you could use the money you save with FreeTaxUSA to purchase third-party audit protection separately.
I made the switch from TurboTax to FreeTaxUSA two years ago and haven't looked back. My situation is pretty standard - W-2 income, mortgage interest, some charitable deductions - and FreeTaxUSA handled everything perfectly. The biggest difference I noticed is that TurboTax holds your hand through every single step with explanations and tips, while FreeTaxUSA assumes you have a basic understanding of tax concepts. If you've been doing your own taxes for a few years, this actually makes FreeTaxUSA faster to use since there's less fluff to click through. The $100+ I save each year by using FreeTaxUSA instead of TurboTax has been totally worth it. Both calculate the same refund amount - I actually ran my numbers through both platforms one year just to double-check. The math is identical, you're just paying extra for the fancier interface and marketing with TurboTax.
I'm a non-resident alien attending university in the US on an F-1 visa, and I'm extremely confused about filing Form 8843. From what I understand, I need to submit this form even though I don't have any US income to report (I'm fully funded by my home country's scholarship). I'm totally lost about when exactly I need to send this in. Is there a filing deadline? My international student advisor mentioned April 15th, but someone else told me it's June 15th for non-residents. Also, do I mail it by itself or does it need to go with other tax forms? I don't have a SSN or ITIN yet - will that be a problem? My roommate says I should've been filing this form every year I've been in the US (this is my third year), but this is the first I'm hearing about it. Am I going to be in trouble for not filing in previous years? I really don't want to mess up my visa status over a tax form I didn't know about. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Does anyone know if we're supposed to include copies of our I-20 or passport with Form 8843? My DSO gave me conflicting info on this.
As someone who went through this exact same confusion a few years ago, I completely understand your stress! Let me add a few practical tips that might help: First, don't panic about the previous years - the IRS is generally understanding about Form 8843 filing delays when there's no tax owed. I filed mine for 3 previous years all at once and never heard anything back from them. For your current situation, since you mentioned you don't have any US income, you'll only need Form 8843 (not Form 1040NR). Make sure to check the "student" box in Part II and fill out the dates you were present in the US during the tax year. One thing that caught me off guard - if you traveled outside the US during the year (even briefly), you need to list those departure and return dates. Keep your passport handy when filling out the form. Also, since you mentioned visa status concerns - filing Form 8843 actually helps protect your status by formally documenting that you're claiming the student exemption from the substantial presence test. It's better to file late than never! The Austin, TX address mentioned earlier is correct for mailing. I'd definitely recommend certified mail with tracking so you have proof it was sent and received.
Mei Liu
Don't forget that your K-1 losses might push you into claiming a Net Operating Loss (NOL) if they're large enough to offset all your other income. The rules for NOLs changed after the TCJA - now you can only carry them forward, not back, and they're limited to 80% of taxable income in future years.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
Are you sure about that? I thought the CARES Act temporarily changed the NOL rules back to allow carrybacks for tax years 2018-2020?
0 coins
Mei Liu
You're partially right. The CARES Act did temporarily modify the NOL rules to allow carrybacks for tax years 2018, 2019, and 2020. However, for current tax years (2021 and beyond), we're back to the TCJA rules: NOLs can only be carried forward, not back, and they're limited to 80% of taxable income in any given year. So for the original poster dealing with 2022 K-1 losses, the TCJA rules would apply. If their partnership losses create an NOL, they can only carry it forward to future tax years, and it will be subject to the 80% limitation when used. It's always good to be precise about these timeframes since tax laws change so frequently.
0 coins
Lara Woods
This is exactly the kind of confusion I had when I first started receiving K-1s! The key thing to understand is that partnership taxation operates on a "conduit" theory - the partnership itself doesn't pay taxes, so all income and losses flow through to the partners whether you receive cash distributions or not. Your K-1 losses are legitimate tax deductions, not some kind of accounting trick. The partnership actually incurred these losses through its business operations, and as a partner, you're allocated your proportionate share. This is fundamentally different from stock investments where you only recognize losses when you sell. To address your concern about "paying it back" - if the company becomes profitable in future years, you'll receive K-1s showing income rather than losses, which will increase your taxable income. But you won't have to "repay" the prior year loss deductions. Think of it like any other business - losses in one year offset income in profitable years. Just make sure you're tracking your basis properly, as others have mentioned, since you can only deduct losses up to your investment plus any retained earnings allocated to you over the years.
0 coins