< Back to IRS

Laila Prince

Is it tax fraud if small business asks customers to designate Venmo payments as "friends & family"?

So there's this small local bakery near me that makes amazing custom cakes and specialty bread. I've ordered from them several times before, but I just noticed something concerning on their website. When you place an order online, they specifically ask customers to pay through Venmo and to mark the payment as "friends & family" instead of "goods and services." I'm not a tax expert, but isn't this basically asking customers to help them hide income from the IRS? From what I understand, payments marked as goods and services get reported to the IRS (through 1099-K forms or something?), while friends & family payments don't. The owner mentioned something about "avoiding unnecessary fees" when I asked about it casually, but it feels sketchy. The bakery does about $3,000-$4,000 in business each month from what I can tell (small operation run from their home kitchen), and they've been operating this way for at least 2 years. I like supporting local businesses, but I don't want to participate in tax fraud. Am I overthinking this or is this actually problematic from a tax perspective?

This is definitely a red flag from a tax perspective. What you're describing is a common way some small businesses try to evade proper income reporting. When a business asks customers to mark Venmo payments as "friends & family," they're essentially trying to avoid two things: First, they're avoiding the Venmo transaction fee (about 1.9% + $0.10) that comes with goods and services payments. Second, and more importantly, they're trying to prevent these transactions from being reported to the IRS. Under current tax rules, payment apps like Venmo are required to issue 1099-K forms to businesses that receive more than $600 in goods and services payments per year. By requesting "friends & family" designations, the bakery is basically asking you to help them hide their income from tax authorities. This is tax evasion, plain and simple. The business is still legally required to report ALL income regardless of how it's received, but they're making it harder for the IRS to track.

0 coins

But wait, doesn't it depend on whether they're reporting the income themselves anyway? Like maybe they just don't want to pay the Venmo fees but still report everything on their taxes? I'm curious because I have a friend with a small Etsy shop who does something similar.

0 coins

Technically yes, if they're faithfully reporting all their income on their tax returns regardless of how it was received, then the main issue would be avoiding the Venmo fees. But there are two problems with this scenario. The purpose of the 1099-K reporting requirement is specifically so the IRS can verify income reporting compliance. When businesses actively take steps to circumvent this verification mechanism, it strongly suggests their intent is to hide income. Additionally, even if they're just trying to avoid Venmo's fees, they're violating Venmo's terms of service, which explicitly prohibit using friends & family payments for commercial transactions.

0 coins

Hey folks, I went through this exact situation last year with my small woodworking business. After months of frustration trying to figure out all the tax implications of different payment methods, I found an amazing resource called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that completely solved this problem for me. I was able to upload screenshots of my payment processor terms and my business documentation, and it analyzed everything to tell me exactly what I needed to do to stay compliant. It explained the whole 1099-K reporting threshold and gave me guidance specific to my situation. The site even helped me understand how to properly categorize different types of transactions and what records I needed to keep. Honestly saved me from potentially making some really bad decisions that could have triggered an audit.

0 coins

How exactly does this work? Do they connect with your bank accounts or payment processors directly? I'm always hesitant to give access to my financial accounts.

0 coins

Sounds like an ad. Does it actually help small business owners avoid fees while staying legal? Because that's the real struggle - these payment processors charge so much that it eats into already small margins.

0 coins

No connection to your bank accounts is needed - you just upload documents or screenshots of your tax situations and it analyzes the text. It's completely secure since you're only sharing specific documents you choose, not giving access to accounts. It definitely addresses the fee vs. legality issue directly. It showed me options for reducing processing fees legitimately while maintaining proper tax compliance. There are actually several legal ways to minimize fees without resorting to the friends & family workaround that could get you in trouble with both the IRS and payment platforms.

0 coins

I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and wow - it was exactly what I needed for my small photography business! I was doing the same thing with Venmo (asking for friends & family payments) and had no idea I was setting myself up for potential tax trouble. The analysis broke down exactly why this approach was problematic and showed me legitimate alternatives that actually saved me more money in the long run. It explained how the new 1099-K reporting thresholds work (the $600 rule that started in 2022) and how payment processors report to the IRS. Most valuable was the explanation of business deductions I could take to offset the slight increase in fees from proper payment processing. I'm actually paying LESS in taxes now while being fully compliant. Definitely worth checking out if you're a small business owner trying to navigate all this payment processing/tax stuff.

0 coins

For anyone dealing with tax questions related to small business payments, I highly recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to speak directly with an IRS agent about your specific situation. I was confused about the whole Venmo friends & family issue for my craft business, and after weeks of trying to get through to the IRS on my own, I was ready to give up. Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS representative in under 45 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. The agent clearly explained the potential consequences of misclassifying business transactions as personal ones (penalties up to 20% of unreported income plus interest!). You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - it's basically a service that navigates the IRS phone system for you and calls you back when an agent is available. Saved me hours of frustration and hold music.

0 coins

Does this really work? The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. Do they just keep calling until they get through or what?

0 coins

I'm skeptical. The IRS is so backlogged that even professionals struggle to get through. And even if you do talk to someone, they often give inconsistent advice depending on who you reach. How is this service any different from just calling repeatedly yourself?

0 coins

It absolutely works! They use a sophisticated system that knows exactly when and how to call to maximize your chances of getting through. They essentially do the waiting for you by using technology to navigate the phone tree and hold times. They don't just give you general advice like you might find online. The whole point is that they connect you directly with an actual IRS agent who can address your specific tax situation - in my case, about Venmo payment classifications for my business. The agent I spoke with gave me official guidance I could rely on, which was worth its weight in gold for peace of mind.

0 coins

I was totally skeptical about Claimyr but decided to give it a try after struggling with this exact Venmo classification issue for my home bakery. I couldn't believe it actually worked! Got connected to an IRS agent in about 35 minutes when I had spent literally hours over multiple days trying to get through myself. The agent explained that asking customers to mark business transactions as personal payments could be considered tax evasion if done to deliberately avoid reporting income. They confirmed the new $600 reporting threshold for payment apps and explained exactly what records I needed to keep to stay compliant. What surprised me most was learning about legitimate tax deductions I could take as a home-based food business that more than offset the transaction fees I was trying to avoid. The agent even emailed me specific IRS publications about home-based businesses that have saved me WAY more in taxes than I was saving in Venmo fees. Completely changed how I run my business finances.

0 coins

Small business owner here - there's a lot of confusion around this topic. The reason many small businesses ask for friends & family is twofold: 1) Venmo charges a fee of nearly 2% for goods & services transactions, which really adds up for businesses operating on tight margins 2) The payment processor holds back the funds for longer with goods & services payments That said, businesses ARE required to report ALL income regardless of how it's received. The $600 reporting threshold for 1099-K forms doesn't change your obligation to report income - it just changes whether Venmo reports it directly to the IRS.

0 coins

Is there any legit way for small businesses to avoid the fees without breaking tax laws? I'm just starting a small side hustle selling homemade candles and every dollar counts right now.

0 coins

Yes, there are legitimate ways to minimize payment processing costs without breaking tax laws! Consider using ACH transfers for larger orders - they typically have much lower fees than credit card processing. Look into dedicated small business payment processors like Square or PayPal Business which often have competitive rates for small merchants, especially if you do in-person sales. Also, you can build the processing fees into your pricing strategy rather than treating them as extra costs. Many successful small businesses slightly increase their product prices to cover these overhead expenses rather than trying to avoid them through potentially problematic methods.

0 coins

As a customer, I'd be uncomfortable with a business asking me to lie about the nature of a payment. It's not just about the business potentially evading taxes - you're essentially being asked to file false information with a financial service.

0 coins

Exactly! Plus Venmo's terms of service explicitly prohibit using friends & family for business transactions. If something goes wrong with your order, you lose all buyer protection by marking it as personal rather than a purchase. The business is basically asking customers to give up their consumer rights to save on fees.

0 coins

I think the biggest issue here is the $600 reporting threshold that went into effect. Before 2022, payment apps only had to report to the IRS if a business received more than $20,000 AND had more than 200 transactions. Now it's just $600 total for the year, which captures almost every small side hustle. While businesses should always report all income regardless of the threshold, this dramatic change is why you're seeing more small operations trying to work around the system. The compliance burden on tiny businesses is pretty significant.

0 coins

The threshold change was definitely dramatic! But remember, the reporting requirement doesn't create any new taxes - it just helps the IRS verify income that should have been reported anyway. If a business was properly reporting all their income before, this change shouldn't actually affect their tax situation at all.

0 coins

You're absolutely right - no new taxes were created. But the psychological impact and perceived burden increased dramatically for many micro-businesses. Many people running side hustles weren't fully reporting cash/digital payments before, and suddenly they feel exposed with the new lower threshold. I think what's happening is many small operators are panicking rather than simply adjusting to proper compliance. The smart approach is just to embrace proper reporting, track expenses diligently, and take advantage of all legitimate deductions - which often results in a very similar tax outcome anyway.

0 coins

This is a really important discussion that touches on both tax compliance and business ethics. From a purely tax perspective, what the bakery is doing is problematic because they're actively circumventing income reporting mechanisms. Even if they claim to report all income anyway, the deliberate effort to avoid 1099-K reporting creates a paper trail that suggests intent to evade taxes. However, I think it's worth acknowledging the real challenge small businesses face. The combination of payment processing fees (nearly 2% for most services) plus the administrative burden of tracking and reporting can be genuinely difficult for micro-businesses operating on razor-thin margins. That said, there are legitimate solutions. Many small businesses successfully build processing fees into their pricing, offer cash discounts, or use lower-cost payment methods like ACH transfers for regular customers. The key is finding compliant ways to manage costs rather than asking customers to participate in potentially fraudulent activity. As a customer, I'd recommend finding a different bakery or suggesting they explore legitimate alternatives. You don't want to be complicit in tax evasion, and you also lose buyer protections when payments are misclassified as personal rather than business transactions.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with similar situations, I'd recommend being direct with the bakery owner about your concerns. You could say something like "I love supporting your business, but I'm not comfortable marking business payments as personal transactions. Could we use a different payment method?" Many small business owners genuinely don't realize the legal implications of what they're asking. They might just be focused on avoiding fees without understanding they're potentially exposing themselves (and their customers) to serious problems. If they're resistant to change, consider that this might indicate a broader pattern of cutting corners that could affect other aspects of their business. A legitimate business should be willing to operate transparently and follow tax laws, even if it means slightly higher costs. You might also suggest they speak with a tax professional about legitimate ways to minimize processing costs - there are often deductions and strategies they're not aware of that could offset the fees they're trying to avoid.

0 coins

That's really good advice about having a direct conversation. I think many small business owners are just trying to survive and don't fully understand the implications. When I've encountered similar situations, I've found that most people are actually grateful when someone points out potential issues in a friendly way. Another approach might be offering to pay a slightly higher price to cover their processing fees - many customers are willing to do this for businesses they really want to support. It shows you value their work while helping them stay compliant. The bakery might also not realize that proper business payment processing actually gives them better record-keeping and potential tax deductions they're missing out on by going the friends & family route.

0 coins

This is a great discussion that highlights a really common dilemma for both small businesses and their customers. I've been following this thread and wanted to add a perspective as someone who works in tax compliance. The bakery's request is definitely problematic from multiple angles. Beyond the tax evasion concerns others have mentioned, there's also the issue of consumer protection. When you mark a payment as "friends & family," you're essentially waiving your right to dispute charges or get refunds through Venmo's buyer protection program. So if the bakery fails to deliver your custom cake or there's a quality issue, you have very limited recourse. I really appreciate the suggestions about having a direct conversation with the business owner. Many small business owners are genuinely unaware of the legal and ethical issues with this practice. They're often just trying to keep their heads above water financially and don't realize they're potentially exposing themselves to significant penalties. For anyone in a similar situation, I'd suggest offering alternatives like: "I'd be happy to pay an additional 3% to cover processing fees" or "Do you accept cash or check instead?" Most legitimate businesses will appreciate customers who want to help them stay compliant while still supporting their work. If a business refuses to find a compliant payment method, that's unfortunately a red flag about their overall approach to operating legally.

0 coins

This is such a helpful perspective from someone in tax compliance! The consumer protection angle is something I hadn't fully considered before. You're absolutely right that marking payments as "friends & family" strips away buyer protections, which is especially risky for custom orders like cakes where there's more potential for disputes. I'm curious - from your experience in tax compliance, how common is this type of issue with small businesses? Are there particular industries where you see this pattern more frequently? It seems like food service businesses, crafters, and other cash-heavy operations might be more tempted by these workarounds. The suggestion about offering to cover processing fees is brilliant. It puts the customer in control of staying compliant while still supporting the business they care about. If a business owner refuses that kind of reasonable accommodation, it really does signal that their priorities might not be aligned with legal operation.

0 coins

@Sofia Peña This is exactly the kind of comprehensive analysis we need more of! Your point about consumer protection is crucial - I hadn t'really thought about how customers are essentially giving up their rights when they comply with these requests. As someone who s'been on both sides of this I (run a small online business and I m'also a frequent customer of local small businesses ,)I think the key is education rather than judgment. Most small business owners I know are genuinely trying to do the right thing while keeping their businesses viable. Your suggestion about offering to cover processing fees is something I ve'started doing with local businesses I want to support. It s'amazing how receptive most owners are when you frame it as I "want to help you stay compliant while supporting your business. It" transforms what could be an awkward conversation into a collaborative solution. I m'also wondering if there are resources or organizations that help small businesses understand these compliance issues without having to hire expensive accountants? Many micro-businesses operate on such tight margins that professional tax advice feels out of reach, which might contribute to these problematic shortcuts.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a local pottery studio that asks for Venmo friends & family payments. Reading through everyone's perspectives really clarifies why this practice is problematic. What strikes me most is how this puts customers in an uncomfortable position - we want to support small businesses we love, but we don't want to participate in potentially illegal activity or lose our consumer protections. The suggestion about offering to cover processing fees is brilliant and something I'm definitely going to try. I also appreciate the point about this being an education issue rather than malicious intent in most cases. Many small business owners are just trying to survive and may not fully understand the implications. Having a friendly conversation about compliance could actually help them avoid serious problems down the road. For anyone else facing this dilemma, it sounds like the best approach is: 1) Have a direct but supportive conversation with the business owner, 2) Offer alternatives like covering fees or using different payment methods, and 3) If they're unwilling to find compliant solutions, consider whether that reflects their overall approach to business practices. Thanks everyone for such a thorough discussion of both the legal and practical aspects of this issue!

0 coins

@Sean Kelly I m'glad this discussion has been helpful for your pottery studio situation! Your approach sounds perfect - being supportive while still maintaining your own ethical boundaries. One thing I d'add is that when you have that conversation, you might mention that proper business payment processing can actually benefit them in ways they might not realize. Business payments create better records for tax deductions, can help establish business credit history, and provide transaction data that s'useful for business planning and growth. The pottery studio might also not be aware that misclassifying payments could potentially void their business insurance if there s'ever a claim - insurance companies can deny coverage if they find evidence of fraudulent business practices. Your three-step approach is spot-on. Most small business owners genuinely appreciate customers who care enough to help them operate properly. And if they don t...'well, that tells you something important about their values that might affect other aspects of their business too. Good luck with the conversation - I d'love to hear how it goes!

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive discussion that really captures the complexity of this issue! As someone who recently started a small handmade jewelry business, I've been grappling with similar payment processing decisions. What really resonates with me is how this highlights the tension between supporting small businesses and maintaining ethical practices. I initially considered asking customers to use friends & family payments to avoid fees, but after reading through this thread, I realize I would have been putting both myself and my customers in a problematic position. The education aspect that several people mentioned is so important. When I was researching payment options, most of the "small business advice" I found online focused on maximizing profits rather than ensuring compliance. It's easy to see how well-intentioned business owners could stumble into these practices without realizing the implications. I love the practical solutions that have been suggested - building fees into pricing, offering cash discounts, and being transparent with customers about processing costs. I've decided to go with Square for my business payments and simply factor the fees into my pricing structure. Yes, it means slightly higher prices, but it also means I can sleep well knowing I'm operating legally and ethically. For the original poster, I think the advice about having a supportive conversation with the bakery owner is perfect. They might genuinely appreciate learning about the risks they're taking, and you could help them avoid serious problems down the road while continuing to support a business you clearly value.

0 coins

@Diego Ramirez Thank you for sharing your experience as a new business owner! It s'refreshing to hear from someone who chose the compliant path from the start. Your decision to use Square and build fees into pricing is exactly the kind of approach that protects both you and your customers while maintaining business integrity. I think your point about online small "business advice focusing" on profit maximization over compliance is really important. There s'so much information out there that treats tax obligations as obstacles to overcome rather than fundamental responsibilities of operating a business. It s'no wonder so many well-intentioned entrepreneurs end up making problematic choices. Your jewelry business approach sounds solid - transparent pricing that reflects true costs, proper payment processing, and clear records for tax purposes. You re'building a sustainable foundation that will serve you well as you grow. Plus, customers generally respect businesses that operate transparently, even if prices are slightly higher. The bakery situation really is a perfect example of how these conversations can be win-win. The owner gets valuable information about compliance risks, the customer gets to maintain their ethical boundaries, and if handled well, the business relationship can actually become stronger. Thanks for adding your perspective as someone navigating these decisions firsthand!

0 coins

This is a really thorough discussion that covers all the important angles! As a newcomer to this community, I'm impressed by how thoughtfully everyone has analyzed both the legal and practical aspects of this situation. The consensus seems clear: asking customers to mark business payments as "friends & family" is problematic because it circumvents tax reporting requirements and removes consumer protections. Even if a business owner has good intentions (just trying to save on fees), they're essentially asking customers to participate in misrepresenting the nature of the transaction. What I find most valuable in this thread is the emphasis on education over judgment. Many small business owners probably don't fully understand the compliance risks they're creating. The suggestions about having supportive conversations and offering to cover processing fees show how customers can help businesses they care about while maintaining their own ethical standards. For anyone facing similar situations, the three-step approach mentioned earlier seems solid: have a friendly conversation about compliance concerns, offer practical alternatives like covering fees or using different payment methods, and if the business isn't willing to find compliant solutions, consider what that says about their overall approach to operating legally. It's encouraging to see so many people committed to supporting small businesses while also maintaining proper tax compliance and consumer protections!

0 coins

@Val Rossi Great summary of the discussion! As someone new to both this community and dealing with small business payment issues, I really appreciate how everyone has balanced supporting local businesses with maintaining ethical standards. What strikes me most is how this situation puts customers in such an awkward position - we want to help small businesses succeed, but we also don t'want to participate in potentially problematic practices or lose our consumer protections. The collaborative approach suggested here offering (to cover fees, suggesting compliant alternatives seems) like the perfect middle ground. I m'curious if anyone has experience with how these conversations actually go in practice? I imagine most business owners would be receptive to customers who approach this supportively, but I d'love to hear if anyone has real-world examples of how they ve'handled similar situations. Did the businesses appreciate the heads-up about compliance risks, or did some get defensive about their practices?

0 coins

Noah Lee

This discussion really highlights how common this issue has become with small businesses trying to navigate payment processing costs. As someone who's worked in small business consulting, I've seen this exact scenario play out dozens of times. The key point that everyone's touched on is absolutely correct - what the bakery is asking for is essentially tax evasion, regardless of their intentions. The IRS doesn't care whether you're trying to save on fees or hide income; circumventing reporting mechanisms is problematic either way. What I'd add is that businesses doing this are also exposing themselves to significant penalties beyond just tax issues. Venmo and other payment processors actively monitor for this behavior and can freeze or close accounts when they detect friends & family payments being used for commercial transactions. I've seen small businesses lose access to their payment processing entirely, which can be devastating. The suggestion about offering to cover processing fees is excellent. In my experience, most small business owners are genuinely grateful when customers approach this supportively rather than just walking away. I've helped several businesses transition to compliant payment methods, and they often discover that proper business processing comes with benefits they hadn't considered - better record keeping, business credit building, and eligibility for merchant services they couldn't access before. For the bakery specifically, they might not realize that home-based food businesses have substantial tax deductions available that could more than offset the processing fees they're trying to avoid.

0 coins

@Noah Lee Your perspective from small business consulting is really valuable! The point about payment processors actively monitoring for friends & family misuse is something I hadn t'considered before. Losing access to payment processing entirely would be far more damaging than just paying the transaction fees in the first place. I m'curious about those home-based food business deductions you mentioned - that seems like information that could really help the bakery owner make better financial decisions. Are there specific deductions that home kitchen businesses commonly miss that could offset processing fees? Things like equipment depreciation, utilities for the business portion of their home, ingredient costs? It seems like many small business owners focus so much on the immediate cost of processing fees that they miss the bigger picture of proper business financial management. Having a conversation that reframes this from how "do we avoid fees to" how "do we optimize our overall tax situation while staying compliant could" be a game-changer for businesses like this bakery. Your experience with helping businesses transition to compliant methods sounds like it would make a great resource for other small business owners facing similar decisions.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today