IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Make sure that if you do agree to let her boyfriend claim the child (which it sounds like you shouldn't), you DO NOT also claim the same child on your return. If two people claim the same dependent, it triggers automatic flags in the IRS system. When my brother and his ex both claimed their son one year (miscommunication), they both got audited, both returns were held up for 8+ months, and they had to provide extensive documentation. Both ended up getting hit with penalties even though it was unintentional. Also remember that if the boyfriend improperly claims your child and gets caught, he could be banned from claiming certain tax credits for up to 10 years. Might be worth mentioning that when you explain why he can't claim your kid.

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

Whoa, I had no idea the penalties could be that serious! Can the IRS really ban someone from tax credits for a whole decade??

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Yes, the penalties can be extremely serious! Under IRC Section 6695(g), if someone "recklessly or intentionally disregards" the rules for claiming tax credits like the Child Tax Credit or Earned Income Tax Credit, they can be banned from claiming those credits for 2 years for reckless disregard, or 10 years for fraudulent claims. The IRS considers improperly claiming someone else's child when you clearly don't meet the eligibility requirements as potentially fraudulent, especially if there's evidence the person knew or should have known they weren't eligible. In this case, the boyfriend definitely doesn't meet the residency test since the child only lived with him 4 months out of the year. It's worth mentioning this to your ex and her boyfriend - they could be risking serious long-term consequences for what amounts to tax fraud. The Child Tax Credit is up to $2,000 per child, but losing eligibility for credits for up to a decade could cost them way more in the long run.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

This is a really important situation to handle correctly, and you're absolutely right to question this arrangement. Based on what you've described, the boyfriend has zero legal right to claim your child for the Child Tax Credit. The IRS has very strict rules about who can claim a child as a dependent. For someone who isn't a parent to claim a child, they must pass several tests including: 1. **Relationship Test** - The child must be a qualifying relative, which typically means they're related by blood, marriage, or adoption. A boyfriend doesn't qualify. 2. **Residency Test** - The child must live with the person claiming them for MORE than half the year (over 183 days). Your son only lived with the boyfriend for about 4 months. 3. **Support Test** - The person must provide more than half of the child's financial support. Since your son lived with you for over 6 months, YOU are considered the custodial parent for tax purposes. Even if you have an alternating year agreement with your ex-wife, that agreement only works between the two legal parents - it doesn't give either of you the right to transfer the claim to a third party like the boyfriend. The only way a custodial parent can release their claim is through IRS Form 8332, and that can ONLY transfer the right to the other legal parent, not to someone's new partner. I'd strongly recommend filing your taxes as soon as possible and claiming your child as you're legally entitled to do. Document everything about your custody arrangement in case you need to prove it later.

0 coins

This is excellent advice! I'm dealing with a similar custody situation and wasn't sure about the Form 8332 rules. Just to clarify - even if the ex-wife wanted to give up her right to claim the child in her "alternating year," she could only transfer that right to the other biological parent (the OP), not to her boyfriend, correct? And the boyfriend would need to meet ALL those tests independently, not just piggyback off the mother's relationship to the child?

0 coins

This is exactly the info I needed to see! I'm also on the weekly cycle and was getting worried when my transcript updated today without a DDD. It's really helpful to understand that the IRS has separate systems for transcript updates vs actual refund processing - I had no idea they operated independently. Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like there's a real chance of getting the deposit before next week's transcript update. I'm definitely going to start checking my bank account daily now instead of just obsessing over the transcript. Thanks to everyone who shared their timelines - it makes the waiting so much less stressful when you know what to expect!

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

This thread has been so eye-opening! I'm new to filing taxes as a gig worker and had no clue about these different IRS systems. I was getting really anxious seeing my transcript update without a DDD today, but reading everyone's experiences here makes me feel so much better. It's amazing how many people got their deposits on random weekdays before their transcripts updated again. I'm definitely going to follow the advice here and check my bank account every morning instead of just staring at my transcript all day. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories - this community is incredible for navigating tax season stress!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year! I was also a gig worker on the weekly cycle and my transcript updated on a Thursday with no DDD. I was so worried I'd have to wait another full week, but my refund actually hit my account that Tuesday - three days before my next transcript update. The IRS agent I eventually spoke to explained that their refund processing system runs daily while transcripts only update weekly for most people. My advice: definitely check your bank account every morning, not just your transcript. Also, try the "Where's My Refund" tool on IRS.gov since it updates more frequently than transcripts. The waiting is stressful when you're depending on that money for cash flow, but there's a good chance you'll see it before Friday!

0 coins

I'd strongly recommend getting clarity on your loan agreement with Jackson Hewitt before making any decisions. Like others have mentioned, those Christmas loan agreements often include specific requirements about where you file your taxes. Here's what I'd do in your situation: 1. Call Jackson Hewitt immediately and request a copy of your loan agreement. Don't mention filing elsewhere yet - just say you need to review the terms. 2. Contact the company you filed with and ask if your return has been submitted to the IRS yet. If not, you might have options. 3. Whatever you do, DO NOT file twice. This will create major headaches with the IRS and could delay your refund for months. The refund advance denial is likely because Jackson Hewitt placed a "debt indicator" on your SSN when you took the Christmas loan. This is standard practice to protect their loan investment. If you're really strapped for cash, remember that your regular refund will still come through - it just won't be as fast as an advance. The IRS is processing returns pretty quickly this year, so you might only be waiting an extra 1-2 weeks compared to getting an advance. Don't panic - this situation is fixable, but you need to handle it carefully to avoid bigger problems.

0 coins

Anna Stewart

•

This is really solid advice! I'd also add that when you call Jackson Hewitt about your loan agreement, ask specifically about their "debt indicator" policy. Some offices are more flexible than others about removing these blocks if you can work out an alternative repayment plan for the Christmas loan. I had a friend who got into a similar situation and was able to negotiate keeping her filing with the second company by setting up automatic payments to pay back the holiday loan over a few months instead of having it deducted from her refund. It's worth asking about - the worst they can say is no, but many tax prep companies would rather work with you than deal with collections issues later. Also, definitely ask the second company about their refund timeline. You're right that the IRS is moving faster this year - my refund came in 8 days after acceptance, which is way faster than the advance I got last year that took almost as long anyway!

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

I work in tax preparation and see this situation fairly often, especially during peak season. The key thing to understand is that your Christmas loan from Jackson Hewitt likely came with strings attached - most holiday advance programs require you to file with them to ensure loan repayment. Here's what's probably happening: Jackson Hewitt placed what's called a "debt indicator" or "refund transfer block" on your Social Security Number when you took the loan. This prevents other tax prep companies from offering you advances because it signals there's already an outstanding debt that needs to be satisfied from your refund. My advice would be: 1. Get a copy of your loan agreement from Jackson Hewitt ASAP to understand exactly what you agreed to 2. Check with your current tax preparer about whether your return has been submitted to the IRS yet 3. If it hasn't been submitted, you might be able to cancel and go back to Jackson Hewitt 4. If it has been submitted, focus on working out a repayment plan with Jackson Hewitt for the Christmas loan Whatever you do, don't file twice - that will create major delays and potential penalties. The good news is that even without an advance, regular refunds are processing pretty quickly this year. You might only be waiting an extra week or two compared to getting an advance. This is stressful but definitely fixable if you handle it properly!

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

This explanation is super helpful! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now. Quick question - when you say "debt indicator," is this something that shows up on your credit report or is it just internal to the tax prep industry? I'm worried this might affect my credit score while I'm trying to sort everything out. Also, do you know if there's a time limit on how long these indicators stay active? Like if I can't resolve this with Jackson Hewitt this tax season, will I still be blocked from getting advances next year?

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

I totally understand your confusion about the 1099-R distribution codes - I went through the exact same thing when I rolled over my 401k last year! Getting two separate forms with different codes can definitely be nerve-wracking, especially when you're not sure what they mean for your tax situation. The good news is that if you did direct rollovers (which it sounds like you did), you should be fine regardless of what codes appear on your forms. The distribution code is really just your old plan administrator's way of categorizing the transaction, and sometimes they use generic codes that don't perfectly describe what actually happened. For your Roth rollover form, you're probably seeing code J, which normally indicates an early distribution. But since you did a direct rollover to another qualified plan, this won't be taxable or subject to penalties when you report it correctly on your tax return. The key is making sure you indicate on your tax return that both distributions were rolled over. Most tax software will walk you through this with specific questions for each 1099-R form. When you answer that the distributions were rolled over to qualified accounts, the software handles all the proper coding to show the IRS these weren't taxable events. Keep all your rollover documentation (confirmation letters, transfer forms, etc.) just in case, but you should be all set! The amounts you mentioned aren't huge, but it's definitely worth getting it right to avoid any unnecessary taxes.

0 coins

Payton Black

•

This is exactly the reassurance I needed to hear! I've been losing sleep over these distribution codes since I got my tax documents. You're absolutely right - I did do direct rollovers for both portions, so the money went straight from my old employer's plan to my new one without me ever touching it. It's really helpful to know that code J on the Roth form is probably just a generic code and doesn't necessarily reflect what actually happened. I was so worried I'd somehow triggered the early withdrawal penalty even though I never actually withdrew anything. I'll make sure to be extra careful when I get to the rollover questions in my tax software and clearly mark both distributions as rollovers. Thank you for taking the time to explain this - it's made me feel so much more confident about filing my taxes correctly!

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year and completely understand your stress! The distribution codes on 1099-R forms can be really misleading, especially when you're dealing with both pre-tax and Roth portions from the same rollover. What you're experiencing is actually pretty common - many plan administrators use code J for Roth 401k distributions even when they're proper direct rollovers. The code doesn't always perfectly match the actual transaction type, which is why it's causing confusion. Since you did direct rollovers (money went straight from old plan to new plan), you should be completely fine tax-wise regardless of the codes. The most important thing is that you properly report both 1099-R forms as rollovers when you file your taxes. When you use tax software, it will ask specific questions about each distribution. Make sure to indicate "yes" when asked if each distribution was rolled over to a qualified retirement account. The software will then properly exclude these amounts from your taxable income, even if the distribution codes look concerning. Keep all your rollover documentation handy - confirmation letters from both plans, transfer forms, account statements showing the funds arrived in your new 401k. This proves the rollovers were legitimate if there are ever any questions down the road. You're being smart to double-check everything before filing. With direct rollovers like yours, this should be a non-taxable event that just requires proper reporting on your return!

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

I'm jumping in as another EA exam candidate who went through the exact same Surgent frustration! Reading through all these responses has been incredibly validating - I was starting to think I was the only one struggling with the practice-question-only approach. What really resonates with me from this discussion is the emphasis on understanding tax principles rather than memorizing answers. I've been caught in that same trap of thinking if I just do enough practice questions, the knowledge will somehow absorb by osmosis. Clearly that's not working! Based on all the consistent recommendations here, I'm planning to invest in Gleim EA Review textbooks and follow the structured approach many of you have outlined: textbook concepts first, then IRS publications as reference, then targeted practice questions to test understanding. For anyone else feeling overwhelmed by this process - this thread has shown me that struggling with Surgent's approach doesn't mean we're not capable of passing the EA exam. It just means we need better study materials that actually teach the material systematically. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and recommendations. It's incredibly helpful to learn from people who've actually been through this journey successfully. The investment in proper textbooks seems daunting after already spending money on Surgent, but it sounds like it's absolutely necessary for building the solid foundation we need. Looking forward to finally understanding the tax code properly instead of just guessing at answers!

0 coins

@28137e76d511 I'm so glad you found this thread helpful! I was in the exact same position a few months ago - frustrated with practice questions that weren't teaching me anything and starting to doubt my ability to pass the EA exam at all. What really helped me was shifting my mindset from "I need to pass this test" to "I need to understand how taxes actually work." Once I made that mental switch, everything became clearer about why the Surgent approach wasn't working. I ended up going with Gleim based on all the recommendations here, and it was honestly night and day. Their textbooks actually explain the logic behind tax rules instead of just stating what they are. For the first time, I felt like I was actually learning to be a tax professional instead of just memorizing random facts. One thing that surprised me was how much faster I progressed once I had that solid foundation. Those early weeks of just reading textbooks felt slow, but when I finally started doing practice questions again, I was getting things right because I actually understood the concepts - not because I had memorized the answers. Hang in there - the fact that you're asking these thoughtful questions and wanting to truly understand the material shows you're going to make an excellent EA. The investment in proper study materials is totally worth it for building real competency, not just exam-passing ability!

0 coins

I'm so glad I found this thread! I'm currently about 6 weeks into my own EA exam prep journey and have been feeling completely lost with the study materials I chose. Reading everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring - it's not just me struggling with the practice-question-only approach. Like many of you, I initially thought that doing tons of practice questions would somehow teach me the material through repetition. But I keep getting questions wrong and the explanations don't help me understand the underlying concepts. I feel like I'm just randomly guessing at answers. Based on all the consistent recommendations throughout this thread, I'm convinced I need to invest in proper textbooks that actually teach the tax principles systematically. The Gleim EA Review seems to be the overwhelming favorite here, and while the cost is concerning after already spending money on inadequate materials, it sounds like it's essential for building real understanding. What I love about this discussion is how everyone emphasizes wanting to actually understand the tax code and become competent tax professionals, not just pass an exam. That's exactly my mindset too, and it's encouraging to see that approach leads to success. Thanks to everyone who shared their detailed study strategies and material recommendations. This thread has given me a clear path forward and the confidence that I can master this material with the right resources and approach. Time to invest in some quality textbooks and start building that proper foundation!

0 coins

Prev1...15951596159715981599...5644Next