


Ask the community...
14 One important thing to consider - if your employer switches to a non-taxable per diem system, make sure they're not reducing your base pay to compensate! I've seen companies do this, where they say "your total compensation stays the same" but they shift more to non-taxable per diem and reduce the base salary. This can impact your reported income for things like mortgage applications, retirement contributions, disability insurance, etc. Just something to watch out for!
This is such a frustrating situation that so many traveling workers face! I'm dealing with something similar as a field engineer. Your employer is definitely handling this wrong from a tax perspective. One thing that might help speed up the conversation with your company - point out that they're also paying unnecessary employer-side payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare) on those per diem amounts. When they include it in your W-2 wages, they have to pay 7.65% on top of what you're getting taxed. So if they're paying $50/day in per diem to 20 employees for 200 travel days per year, that's $200k in unnecessary taxable wages they're paying an extra $15,300 in payroll taxes on annually. Most finance departments don't realize this hidden cost when they set up these "easier" taxable per diem systems. Sometimes showing them the company cost gets faster results than just explaining the employee burden. Good luck getting this sorted out!
Has anyone tried using a Virtual EFIN service? I've seen some advertised but not sure if they're legitimate or if it's just another term for illegally renting credentials.
Those "virtual EFIN" services are just fancy marketing for the illegal practice of renting EFINs. There's no such thing as a "virtual EFIN" in IRS terminology. It's just credential renting with extra steps. I know someone who got caught up in one of those schemes last year and lost their ability to prepare taxes altogether. The IRS does monitor unusual patterns of EFIN usage and they've been cracking down hard.
I understand the pressure to handle more clients, but as others have mentioned, buying or renting EFINs and PTINs is definitely illegal and could end your tax preparation career permanently. Here's what I'd recommend for expanding capacity legally: 1. **Hire qualified preparers** - They can work under your EFIN with their own PTINs. Even hiring 1-2 seasonal preparers could double your capacity. 2. **Partner with existing firms** - Many established offices offer space-sharing or revenue-sharing arrangements during busy season. 3. **Streamline your current workflow** - The AI tools mentioned above sound promising for reducing time per return. 4. **Apply for your own additional EFIN now** - Even if it takes 45-60 days, you'll have it for next season and beyond. The risk/reward just doesn't make sense with illegal credential sharing. You could lose everything you've built for a short-term solution to what should be a long-term business growth strategy. Better to turn away some clients this year than risk losing your license permanently.
This is excellent advice! I'm actually in a similar situation as Ravi and was considering some questionable options, but you've laid out a really clear path forward. The point about turning away clients this year versus losing everything permanently really hit home. I'm curious about the space-sharing arrangements you mentioned - do you know how those typically work? Is it usually a flat fee or percentage-based? I have good relationships with a couple other preparers in town and this might be a win-win solution for everyone involved. Also planning to get my EFIN application in ASAP for next year. Better late than never!
Also check your state requirements! My state requires an additional form filed with the Secretary of State when switching from sole prop to LLC, plus I had to get a business license. The tax stuff is just one piece of the puzzle.
This is so true. In my state, I also had to publish a notice in the local newspaper when I formed my LLC. Cost me like $90 and I would have completely missed it if my accountant hadn't mentioned it.
Great question! I went through this same transition last year. You'll definitely want to submit a new W-9 form (not 1099 - that's what they send you) with your LLC's EIN and business name. One thing to consider is the timing - if you want all your 2025 income to be reported under your LLC, make sure to get that new W-9 to them ASAP and specify an effective date. Otherwise you might end up with income split between your SSN and EIN on different 1099s, which creates extra paperwork at tax time. Also, don't forget to update your invoices to reflect your new business name and EIN. It helps keep everything consistent and professional. The company's accounting department will appreciate the clear documentation of when the change took effect.
This is really helpful advice, especially about specifying an effective date! I'm curious - when you say "extra paperwork at tax time," what exactly does that involve if you end up with split income? Do you just report both 1099s on your Schedule C, or is there more to it than that? Also, did you run into any issues with your client's accounting system handling the mid-year change? I'm wondering if I should give them a heads up call in addition to submitting the W-9 to make sure nothing gets missed.
I'm literally going through this exact same situation right now! Filed my 2024 return about 9 days ago and got that "Action Required" message when I checked WMR yesterday. Like practically everyone else in this thread, I also claimed EIC which clearly explains the extra scrutiny. Reading through all these experiences has been such a huge relief - I was starting to think I had somehow screwed up my return! It's amazing how that "Action Required" wording makes it sound so urgent and panic-inducing when it's apparently just their standard verification process for early filers claiming EIC. I'm definitely guilty of the obsessive WMR checking too π I've probably refreshed it like 25 times since yesterday even though I know logically nothing's going to change that fast. But honestly, this whole thread has been like therapy for my tax season anxiety! What's really keeping me calm is that key phrase everyone keeps mentioning: "If we need additional information, we'll mail a notice." Since none of us have received any physical mail yet, that seems like a really positive sign that this is just routine processing and they don't actually need anything from us. The waiting is absolutely brutal when you're depending on that refund for bills and expenses, but seeing how many people went through this identical situation last year and had it resolve automatically within 2-3 weeks gives me so much hope. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories - knowing we're all in this stressful waiting game together makes it so much more bearable! π€
I'm right there with you! Just got that same "Action Required" message this morning and immediately came here looking for answers. Filed about a week ago and also claimed EIC, so it's clear that's what's triggering all these reviews. The obsessive WMR checking is so real π I've probably checked it 15 times already today! But reading everyone's experiences here has been incredibly helpful - it really does seem like we early filers with EIC are all getting caught in the same verification sweep. The fact that none of us have gotten any actual mail yet definitely feels reassuring. Thanks for sharing your experience - it helps so much knowing we're all going through this stressful wait together! π€
I'm going through the exact same thing! Filed my 2024 return about 11 days ago and got that "Action Required" message when I checked WMR this morning. Like so many others here, I also claimed EIC which definitely seems to be the main trigger for these reviews during early filing season. It's honestly such a relief to read through everyone's experiences - I was starting to panic thinking I had made some critical error on my return! The way they phrase it as "Action Required" is so anxiety-inducing when it's apparently just their standard verification process for EIC claims. I'm absolutely guilty of the obsessive WMR checking too π I've probably refreshed it like 20 times since this morning even though I know it's not going to change every few hours. But reading through this entire thread has been like a therapy session for my tax stress! What's really helping me stay calm is that specific wording: "If we need additional information, we'll mail a notice." Since none of us have received any physical mail yet, that seems like a really good indicator that this is just routine processing and not them actually needing documentation from us. The waiting is absolutely torture when you're counting on that refund for bills, but hearing from people who went through this identical situation last year and had it resolve automatically within 2-3 weeks gives me hope. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories - knowing we're all stuck in this stressful limbo together makes it so much more manageable! π€
Diego Fisher
I appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and insights here. As someone who's dealt with similar partnership tax issues, I wanted to add a few practical considerations that might help. The strategy you're describing reminds me of what tax professionals call "basis shifting" - trying to manipulate the timing of income and distributions to minimize taxes. While not inherently illegal, it's definitely in the gray area that attracts IRS scrutiny. One thing I learned the hard way is that partnership taxation is incredibly complex, and seemingly small details can have major consequences. For example, if your LLC has debt, that debt increases your basis (which is good for taking distributions), but only if you're personally liable for it. Non-recourse debt has different rules. Also consider the long-term implications. Even if this strategy works in the short term, you'll eventually need to repay the loan with after-tax dollars. Plus, if your business becomes profitable again, you might face higher taxes later when your basis is depleted from the distributions. My advice? Document everything thoroughly if you decide to proceed, and make sure you have legitimate business reasons for both the loan and the expenses. The IRS is much more forgiving of strategies that serve actual business purposes beyond tax minimization. Have you considered alternatives like adjusting your profit-sharing percentages or exploring guaranteed payments to partners? Sometimes simpler approaches are less risky.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
β’This is really helpful perspective, Diego! I'm curious about the guaranteed payments option you mentioned. How would that work differently from regular distributions in terms of tax treatment? I've been following this thread closely because I'm in a similar situation with my LLC - we're looking at a potentially unprofitable year but still need to get some cash to the partners. The basis shifting concept you mentioned is exactly what I was worried about after reading everyone's responses. Would guaranteed payments avoid some of the basis complications that regular distributions create? And are there any downsides to that approach compared to what the OP was originally considering?
0 coins
Keisha Williams
β’Great question about guaranteed payments! They're treated very differently from distributions tax-wise. Guaranteed payments are considered ordinary income to the receiving partner and a deductible expense to the partnership - so they flow through on your K-1 as guaranteed payment income, not as a share of partnership profits. The key advantage is that guaranteed payments don't depend on your basis in the partnership. You'll owe taxes on them regardless of whether the partnership is profitable, but you also don't need to worry about basis limitations like you do with distributions. The downside is that guaranteed payments are subject to self-employment tax, whereas distributions of partnership profits might not be (depending on your role in the business). Also, they reduce the partnership's overall profit, which affects everyone's K-1s. For your situation, if you need cash in an unprofitable year, guaranteed payments might make more sense than trying to manufacture losses with loan proceeds. Just make sure they're reasonable compensation for services actually performed - the IRS scrutinizes guaranteed payments that look like disguised distributions. Have you talked to your tax advisor about whether your cash needs could be structured as legitimate guaranteed payments for services?
0 coins
Javier Hernandez
I've been reading through this discussion and wanted to share my experience as someone who went through a similar situation. A few years ago, my business partner and I were in almost the exact same position - looking at a loss year but needing cash flow for personal expenses. We initially considered something similar to what you're describing, but our CPA warned us about several issues that others have mentioned here. The main problem is that you're essentially trying to create artificial losses while extracting cash, which is exactly what the IRS looks for in abusive tax strategies. What we ended up doing instead was restructuring some of our compensation as guaranteed payments for actual services we were providing. This gave us the cash flow we needed without the basis complications or potential audit risks. Yes, we paid self-employment tax on those payments, but it was much cleaner from a compliance standpoint. The other thing our CPA pointed out is that even if your strategy worked in year one, you'd be setting yourself up for problems down the road. When the business becomes profitable again, you'd have depleted basis from the distributions, meaning future profits would be more heavily taxed. I'd really recommend getting professional advice before implementing anything like this. The partnership tax rules are incredibly complex, and the penalties for getting it wrong can be severe. Sometimes the "boring" approach is the safest one!
0 coins