Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just curious - does anyone here use specific tax software that handles booth rental situations well? I'm currently using TurboSelf-Employed but it keeps asking me questions that don't really apply to my situation as a booth renter in a barber shop.
I switched to TaxSlayer last year and found it handled my booth rental situation much better. It has specific categories for salon professionals and understands the booth rental model. Way better than the generic "independent contractor" classification other software uses.
As someone who's dealt with similar confusion about booth rental arrangements, I want to emphasize that what you're describing is absolutely legitimate. The key distinction is that you're operating as an independent business owner who simply rents physical space - you're not an employee of the salon. The IRS uses the "ABC test" in many cases: (A) you're free from control and direction, (B) your work is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business, and (C) you're customarily engaged in an independently established trade. Your situation clearly meets all three criteria. Those people commenting on the ad are likely thinking of situations where salons misclassify actual employees as contractors to avoid paying payroll taxes and benefits. That's completely different from legitimate booth rental where you maintain full business autonomy. The fact that the previous owner passed an audit is strong evidence that this arrangement is properly structured. Keep documenting your independent business operations and don't let uninformed opinions create unnecessary anxiety about a perfectly legal business model.
This is such a helpful breakdown! I'm new to the booth rental world and was honestly getting scared reading some of the horror stories online about IRS audits. It's reassuring to hear that legitimate booth rental arrangements like what's described here actually hold up under scrutiny. One thing I'm still unclear about - when you mention the "ABC test," is that something specific I should reference if I ever need to defend my independent contractor status? I want to make sure I understand all the official criteria in case questions come up down the road.
Join the conversation
I just want to add from personal experience that the IRS doesn't mess around with missing gift tax returns, even when no tax is due. My parents made some large gifts to me and my siblings several years ago and didn't file 709s because no tax was due. When my dad passed away last year and his estate was being settled, the IRS noticed the discrepancy because the assets didn't match what would have been expected based on his income/assets. They didn't assess monetary penalties but it delayed the estate settlement by months while everything was straightened out. The executor had to go back and file all the missing 709s to document the lifetime exemption usage properly. Huge headache during an already difficult time.
Do you know if there's any way to check how much of your lifetime exemption you've already used? I've made several gifts over the years and can't remember if I filed for all of them.
You can request a transcript of your gift tax filings from the IRS to see what you've previously reported. You can get these online through the IRS website, by calling them, or by mailing Form 4506-T. The transcript will show all your filed Forms 709 and how much lifetime exemption you've used. If you've made gifts that exceeded the annual exclusion but never filed the forms, you should consider filing them now even if they're late. As Eduardo mentioned, it can create complications later during estate settlement if the IRS can't verify your lifetime exemption usage. Better to get everything documented properly now rather than leave it for your executor to deal with later.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I made a gift to my nephew for his graduate school expenses. Like Yara, I was confused about whether I'd face penalties if no tax is due. Reading through everyone's experiences, it's clear that even though there's no monetary penalty when no gift tax is owed, filing Form 709 is still crucial for documenting lifetime exemption usage. Eduardo's story about the estate settlement complications really drives this point home - nobody wants to leave that mess for their family to sort out later. I think I'll go ahead and file the 709 to be safe. Better to have the documentation on record with the IRS than risk questions down the road. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and insights!
Absolutely agree with your decision to file! I'm new to this community but dealing with a very similar situation myself. My grandmother recently passed and left me some money that I want to gift to my sister for her medical expenses, and I've been researching the same Form 709 requirements. What I've learned from this thread is that even though the penalty calculation might be zero when no tax is due, the documentation aspect is huge. The peace of mind knowing that your lifetime exemption usage is properly recorded with the IRS seems worth the effort of filing, especially after reading about Eduardo's family's experience with the estate complications. Has anyone used a tax professional specifically for gift tax returns, or is it straightforward enough to handle yourself? I'm wondering if the complexity justifies getting professional help or if the form is manageable for someone with basic tax knowledge.
Join the conversation
Has anyone had a similar issue but in reverse? I filed my state taxes first with a local company but need to do federal separately now...
That's actually much more unusual because most tax software requires you to enter federal info before state. But you can definitely file just a federal return through most major tax platforms. You'll still need to make sure all the information matches what was on your state return though.
I did this a couple years ago when I moved mid-year and had to file in two states. It's totally doable but a bit annoying. Most software wants you to do federal first, so you might need to enter all your info but then only submit the federal part.
Just went through something very similar last month! Here's what worked for me: You're absolutely right that you can't withdraw the Cash App federal filing once it's been accepted by the IRS. The good news is this is totally fixable. Go back to FreeTaxUSA and look for their "state only" filing option. You'll need to manually enter all the same federal information from your Cash App return (AGI, withholdings, deductions, etc.) so the state return matches perfectly. FreeTaxUSA should detect that your federal was already filed elsewhere and only submit the state portion. Make sure to have your Cash App federal return pulled up while you're doing this - you want those numbers to match exactly. The whole process took me maybe 30 minutes once I had all my Cash App info ready. No amendments needed, just file the state separately and you're all set!
Join the conversation
This is a complex transaction that requires careful documentation and planning. In addition to the excellent points already raised about appraisals, AGI limitations, and private inurement, I'd strongly recommend your client consider getting a formal legal opinion on the conversion structure. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the potential impact on any existing S Corp elections or tax attributes. If the S Corp had NOL carryforwards, suspended losses, or other tax attributes, these would typically be lost in the conversion process. Also, make sure the conversion was done properly under state law - some states have specific procedures for converting profit entities to non-profits that must be followed exactly. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing these types of conversions, especially when substantial value is involved and the former owner maintains control. I'd also suggest reviewing Revenue Ruling 2004-51 and the regulations under Section 501(c)(3) regarding private benefit restrictions. Given the complexity and audit risk, this might be worth bringing in a specialist in exempt organization law for a second opinion.
This is such valuable insight, especially about the state law requirements for conversion procedures. I'm new to this area of practice and wondering - when you mention Revenue Ruling 2004-51, does that specifically address S Corp to non-profit conversions, or is it more broadly about charitable contributions of business interests? Also, are there any red flags or common mistakes you've seen in these conversions that practitioners should be particularly careful to avoid? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything critical for future clients who might consider similar transactions.
Revenue Ruling 2004-51 deals more broadly with charitable contributions of business interests, but the principles apply directly to S Corp conversions. It addresses when a business owner can claim a charitable deduction for transferring business interests to a charity while maintaining some level of involvement. Common red flags I've seen: 1) Failing to establish true independence of the non-profit board (having family members or business associates as directors), 2) Setting executive compensation before getting comparable data, 3) Not properly terminating the S Corp election with the IRS, 4) Inadequate documentation of the charitable purpose for the conversion, and 5) The big one - retaining too much control or economic benefit after conversion. Also watch out for timing issues with the appraisal and make sure all state conversion requirements are met before claiming any deductions. Some states require specific notice periods or approval processes that can't be skipped.
Great discussion here! I'd like to add one more critical consideration that could significantly impact the charitable deduction calculation - the timing of when the S Corporation election was terminated versus when the actual conversion to non-profit status occurred. The IRS requires that the charitable contribution be valued at the time the donor relinquishes dominion and control over the donated property. If there was any gap between terminating the S Corp status and completing the non-profit conversion, this could affect both the valuation date and the character of what's being donated. Also, don't forget about potential state-level implications. Some states don't automatically recognize federal charitable deductions or have their own limitations that could reduce the overall tax benefit. And if the business operates in multiple states, each jurisdiction may have different requirements for the conversion process itself. Given all the complexities mentioned in this thread - from appraisal requirements to private inurement concerns to state law compliance - I'd strongly recommend engaging both a tax specialist experienced in exempt organizations AND legal counsel familiar with entity conversions in your state. The potential audit exposure and penalties for getting this wrong far outweigh the cost of professional guidance upfront.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive analysis that makes me grateful for communities like this! The timing issue you raised about S Corp election termination versus conversion completion is something I hadn't considered but could be crucial for my client's situation. Quick question - when you mention engaging legal counsel familiar with entity conversions, are there specific credentials or specializations I should look for? I want to make sure I'm referring my client to someone who truly understands both the tax and legal complexities of these transactions, not just general corporate law. Also, has anyone dealt with situations where the IRS challenges the valuation after the fact? I'm wondering what kind of documentation trail we should be building now to defend the appraisal and conversion structure if it gets scrutinized years later.
Brianna Schmidt
This thread has been incredibly eye-opening! As someone who's always tried to be meticulous about tax compliance, I never realized how complex this particular area of tax law could be. What strikes me most is how this creates a situation where the most law-abiding response (reporting all income) could potentially create the most legal jeopardy. It's like the tax code is forcing people into a game of legal chess where every move has potential consequences. I'm wondering about the practical side of this - if someone were to report income using those vague categories like "consulting" or "other income" that people have mentioned, does the IRS ever follow up asking for more specific documentation? Like, do they ever request invoices or contracts for that "consulting" work? It seems like there would be a natural tension between satisfying the reporting requirement and avoiding self-incrimination. The Fifth Amendment protection is interesting in theory, but I imagine in practice it gets pretty murky when you're trying to file accurate tax returns without providing details that could be used against you later. This whole discussion really highlights how much more complicated tax compliance can be than most people realize. Thanks to everyone who shared examples and insights - this has definitely given me a lot to think about regarding how tax policy intersects with criminal law.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
•You've hit on something really important about the documentation aspect! From what I understand, the IRS generally doesn't automatically request detailed documentation for every line item during normal processing, but if you get audited, that's when things can get tricky. For "consulting" income or other vague categories, they might ask for contracts, invoices, or client information during an audit. This is where the Fifth Amendment protection becomes crucial - you can invoke it to avoid providing documentation that would incriminate you, but that obviously raises red flags. The practical reality seems to be that most people in these situations are walking a tightrope. They need to report enough to satisfy the tax obligation, but not so much detail that they're essentially confessing to crimes. It's probably why having both a tax attorney AND a criminal defense attorney becomes important if you're dealing with this kind of situation. What's really wild is that this puts the IRS in the position of essentially being a law enforcement agency by proxy. They're not directly investigating crimes, but the information they collect through tax compliance can certainly be used by other agencies. It makes you wonder how many people get caught up in this web without even realizing the implications of what they're reporting.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
This is honestly one of the most educational threads I've read on here! As someone who does freelance work and sometimes gets paid in cash, I never realized how complex the reporting requirements could get for "non-traditional" income sources. What really fascinates me is how this whole system seems to create a weird parallel between tax compliance and criminal justice. Like, the IRS essentially becomes this backup enforcement mechanism when traditional law enforcement can't make other charges stick. It's brilliant from a law enforcement perspective, but creates such a moral and legal maze for individuals. Reading through all these examples and scenarios, it seems like the key takeaway is that the tax code doesn't really care about the legality of your income source - it just wants its cut. But then you're left navigating this impossible balance between legal compliance and potential self-incrimination. I'm curious - for people who are in legitimately gray areas (like some cryptocurrency transactions or cash-based businesses that operate in legal but poorly defined spaces), do the same principles apply? It seems like this could affect way more people than just those involved in clearly illegal activities. The tools and services people have mentioned in this thread (like the AI tax advisor and the IRS callback service) seem really useful for navigating these complex situations without having to have awkward conversations with traditional tax preparers about hypothetical scenarios!
0 coins