IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Filing Tax Returns for Irrevocable Trusts: Do Grantors Need 1040s for 1041 Filing?

Hey all, I'm in a bit of a tax puzzle here. I recently became the trustee for an irrevocable trust, and I'm trying to figure out the filing requirements. The thing is, the grantors have pretty minimal income - definitely below the threshold where they'd normally need to file their own returns. My question is: do I still need to have the grantors complete their 1040 tax returns even though they don't earn enough to normally file? I'm wondering if this is necessary for me to accurately complete the 1041 form for the irrevocable trust return. This is my first time handling trust tax matters, so any guidance would be super appreciated. I want to make sure I'm doing everything by the book!

Question - if a trust has zero income for the year, do you still need to file a 1041? Our family trust just holds some property but didn't generate any income last year.

0 coins

Generally no. If the trust has no income and no taxable activity for the year, you typically don't need to file a 1041. However, it's sometimes good practice to file a "zero return" just to keep the filing history current and avoid questions later about "missing" years.

0 coins

Great question! I went through this exact situation last year. As others have mentioned, you don't need the grantors to file personal 1040s just for your trust filing purposes. However, I'd recommend getting a clear understanding of whether your trust is actually a "grantor trust" or not - this makes a huge difference. If it's a standard irrevocable trust (not a grantor trust), then the trust files its own 1041 and issues K-1s to beneficiaries for any distributions. The grantors' personal income levels are irrelevant to the trust's filing requirements. One thing to watch out for: even if the grantors don't normally need to file because of low income, if they receive distributions from the trust that push them above the filing threshold, they'll need to file to report the K-1 income. But that's their responsibility, not yours as trustee. Make sure you have the trust's EIN and keep good records of all trust income and distributions. The 1041 filing requirements are based on the trust having $600+ in gross income OR any taxable income, regardless of the grantors' situation.

0 coins

Great questions! For record-keeping, you'll want to maintain: bank statements for all trust accounts, records of all income received (interest, dividends, rental income, etc.), documentation of all distributions made to beneficiaries, receipts for any trust expenses or fees paid, and copies of any investment statements. Also keep the original trust document and any amendments handy. Regarding the EIN - yes, the trust should have gotten its own EIN when it was established, separate from any grantor's SSN. If it doesn't have one yet, you'll need to apply for one immediately using Form SS-4. The IRS requires trusts to have their own tax ID number for filing purposes. This is actually pretty common - many people don't realize the EIN step when setting up trusts. You can apply online at the IRS website and usually get the EIN right away.

0 coins

Great questions! For record-keeping as trustee, you'll want to maintain: 1. All trust income statements (interest, dividends, rental income, etc.) 2. Records of all distributions made to beneficiaries with dates and amounts 3. Trust expense receipts (trustee fees, legal fees, accounting costs, etc.) 4. Bank statements and investment account statements 5. Any correspondence related to trust administration Regarding the EIN - yes, the trust should have gotten its own EIN when it was established, separate from the grantor's SSN. If it doesn't have one yet, you'll need to apply for one using Form SS-4 before filing the 1041. The IRS requires trusts to have their own tax ID number once they become operational and start generating income or making distributions. Don't worry about the learning curve - trust taxation can be complex, but you're asking all the right questions! Just make sure to keep detailed records from day one, as the IRS can be pretty strict about trust documentation.

0 coins

All positive transcript codes then 971 appeared - how long until refund?

Filed my 2024 taxes on March 12 and got accepted right away. Everything was looking good with all the positive codes showing up on my transcript (150, 806, etc). Was expecting my refund of around $3,200 based on the WMR tool saying it would be deposited by April 3. Then suddenly noticed a 971 code appeared on my transcript dated for April 15. No explanation, no letter yet. Has anyone dealt with this? I'm wondering if this is gonna significantly delay my refund or if it's just a minor hiccup. Really counting on this money for some car repairs I've been putting off.

Hey Miguel, I went through almost the exact same thing earlier this year! Filed in March, everything looked good, then boom - 971 code appeared. I was freaking out because I needed that refund for some medical bills. Turned out to be income verification - they just needed to confirm my 1099 income matched what was reported. Got the letter about 10 days after the 971 code date, sent back the requested docs, and had my refund 3 weeks later. The 570 code (which you mentioned having) does put a hold on processing, but once they get what they need and verify everything, it moves pretty quickly. The waiting is the worst part honestly. Try not to stress too much about it - in most cases it's something simple that just needs clarification. And definitely keep checking your mail daily for that notice so you can respond ASAP when it arrives. Hope you get it sorted out soon! ๐Ÿคž

0 coins

I feel your pain Miguel! I just went through this exact scenario a few weeks ago. Had all the good codes, was expecting my refund around the same timeframe as you, then the dreaded 971 showed up. Mine ended up being an identity verification issue - they needed me to confirm my identity online through ID.me. The whole process took about 2 weeks from when I got the letter to when my refund was released. The key is responding to whatever they ask for as quickly as possible. One thing that helped me was setting up text alerts through the IRS2Go app so I'd know immediately when my transcript updated. Also, if you haven't already, sign up for USPS Informed Delivery so you can see what mail is coming each day - that notice is probably already on its way to you. Try to stay positive - I know it's stressful when you're counting on that money, but the vast majority of 971 codes get resolved without major issues. Just be ready to act fast when that letter arrives! Hang in there ๐Ÿ’ช

0 coins

This is super helpful advice! I didn't even know about the IRS2Go app text alerts - definitely going to set that up right now. And yeah, I should probably get the USPS thing too since I'm terrible at checking my mail regularly. It's good to know that most of these 971 codes aren't as scary as they seem at first. Really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience - makes me feel a lot less anxious about the whole situation! ๐Ÿ™‚

0 coins

How to determine basis in inherited real estate property for capital gains tax?

I've got a client situation I could use some help with. She inherited a property about 10 years ago and recently sold it. The problem is, she says the executor never gave her the fair market value at the time of inheritance, and she didn't get an appraisal done back then. Now she's sold the property and is facing capital gains tax on the entire sale amount (minus selling expenses) if we can't establish a reasonable basis. I'm wondering if anyone has successfully used the tax assessed value of the property at the time of inheritance as a basis? I've been searching through IRS publications but haven't found clear guidance on whether this approach is allowed or disallowed. Any experiences or insights would be really helpful since I don't want her paying more tax than legally required. Time is getting tight for filing!

Just be careful with using assessed values! I'm in California and our assessed values are based on Prop 13 which limits increases to 2% per year regardless of actual market appreciation. My client tried using the assessed value for inherited property and it was WAY below market value at the time of death. Would have resulted in a huge overtaxation when they sold!

0 coins

This is a great point. I'm in Florida and our property assessed values can also be wildly off from actual market value. If your client is in a state with similar property tax limitations, what approach did you end up using instead?

0 coins

Great question! I've dealt with this exact scenario multiple times. The key is establishing a "reasonable" basis using whatever documentation you can gather. Here are the methods I've successfully used: 1. **County assessment records** - While not perfect, they're acceptable when properly adjusted. Look at the assessment-to-sale price ratios in that area during the inheritance year. 2. **Zillow/online estimates** - Print out historical estimates from the inheritance date. While not ideal, I've seen these accepted when combined with other evidence. 3. **Real estate agent CMAs** - Many agents can pull historical comparable sales data going back 10+ years. This creates a solid foundation for your basis calculation. 4. **Estate tax returns** - Check if the estate filed Form 706. Even if not required, sometimes executors file anyway and include property valuations. The IRS understands that perfect documentation isn't always available for inherited property. Document your methodology clearly, show good faith effort to determine fair market value, and keep detailed records of your approach. I've never had an issue when the method was reasonable and well-documented. Time-wise, you might consider filing an extension if you need more time to gather supporting documentation properly.

0 coins

Great questions! For Zillow estimates, you want to look for their actual historical data if available. Zillow does maintain some historical estimates, but the further back you go, the less reliable they become. I typically use their "Price History" section which sometimes shows their estimates from previous years. However, you're right to be cautious - current estimates trying to backdate aren't as strong as contemporaneous records. For extensions, you'd file Form 4868 for individual returns (or 7004 for business) just like any other extension. You don't need to specify the reason on the form itself, but I always document in my files why additional time was needed. The key is that you still need to pay any estimated tax owed by the original due date to avoid penalties. One additional tip: if you're in a state with disclosure requirements for real estate sales, the state real estate commission sometimes maintains databases of historical sales that can be invaluable for establishing comparable values from the inheritance date.

0 coins

Great questions! Regarding Zillow estimates - you want to use their actual historical data when possible. Zillow's "Price History" section often shows their estimates from specific past dates, not retrospective guesses. Look for the graph view that shows their Zestimate timeline. However, you're right to be cautious - if you can only find current estimates that claim to show historical values, document that limitation. For extensions, you'd file Form 4868 for automatic extension (or Form 7004 if dealing with business/trust returns). You don't need to specify the reason on the extension form itself, but I always document in my files why additional time was needed for basis research. The key is showing good faith effort to determine the correct tax liability. One more tip: if you find multiple valuation methods give you different results, using the average or a conservative middle-ground approach often works well. The IRS appreciates reasonable judgment when perfect data isn't available.

0 coins

Can I claim head of household after my divorce? Should I?

Hi everyone, I'm trying to figure out my filing status after going through a divorce last year. I've been reading through the head of household rules for people who are divorced but I'm still confused about whether I qualify or not. My ex and I finalized everything in August, and we have joint custody of our two kids (9 and 12). They live with me most weekdays since I'm closer to their school, but they spend weekends and holidays with my ex. We didn't specify who claims them on taxes in our agreement, which I'm now realizing was a mistake. I paid about $8,900 for housing this year (mortgage, utilities, etc.) and probably covered about 65% of the kids' expenses overall. My ex thinks we should alternate years claiming the kids, but I'm wondering if I should file as head of household since they live with me most of the time? The tax difference seems significant, but I don't want to mess this up and trigger problems with the IRS or my ex. Anyone been through this? What should I do for the 2025 tax year?

Has anyone used TurboTax to figure this out? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if the software helps determine head of household eligibility or if I need to go to an actual tax professional this year.

0 coins

I used TurboTax last year after my divorce. It asks you a series of questions about custody arrangements and living situations to determine if you qualify for HOH. It was pretty thorough, but I still ended up talking to a tax pro to double-check since the penalties for filing incorrectly can be steep.

0 coins

I went through something very similar two years ago! Based on your situation, it sounds like you likely qualify for head of household status. Since your kids live with you most weekdays and you're covering 65% of their expenses plus the housing costs, you're probably meeting both the "more than half the year" residency test and the "more than half the cost of maintaining the home" requirement. The key thing to remember is that head of household status is separate from claiming the kids as dependents. You could file as HOH based on them living with you, while still working out an alternating agreement with your ex about who claims them for the dependency exemption and child tax credit. My advice: Start documenting everything NOW. Keep a calendar showing which nights the kids stay with you, save receipts for their expenses (school supplies, clothes, medical costs), and document your housing expenses. If there's ever a question from the IRS, you'll want solid records showing they lived with you more than half the year and that you supported the household. Also consider getting professional help for this first post-divorce tax year. The rules can be tricky and the tax savings from HOH status are significant enough that it's worth making sure you get it right from the start.

0 coins

Which RSUs Should I Sell to Minimize Capital Gains Taxes?

I recently got some Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) from my company and I'm trying to figure out the smartest way to sell them from a tax perspective. I've got two different batches: 1. Some newer RSUs that are less than a year old with a value pretty close to the current stock price 2. Some older RSUs that I've held for over a year but their value is below the current stock price I'm really confused about which ones would be better to sell if I want to pay less in capital gains taxes. Does the current stock price compared to the value when I received them actually matter for tax purposes? I'm completely new to dealing with RSUs and taxes in general, so any advice would be super helpful. I've tried reading some articles online but they just make me more confused about what's best in my specific situation.

One thing to keep in mind is that most RSUs are taxed at vesting (your company probably withheld shares for taxes when they vested). So your actual cost basis for tax purposes is the FMV on vesting date, not zero. This means your older RSUs that are "lower than current price" might actually represent a loss if the current price is lower than when they vested! In that case, selling them would give you a capital loss you can use to offset other gains. Check your vesting statements carefully!

0 coins

This is such an important point! I actually discovered I had some "underwater" RSUs last year that were showing as a loss because the price had dropped since vesting. Was able to harvest those losses to offset some gains elsewhere in my portfolio.

0 coins

Great advice from everyone here! One additional consideration for @Kristin Frank - if you're in a higher tax bracket this year but expect to be in a lower bracket next year (maybe due to job change, retirement, sabbatical, etc.), it might make sense to delay selling the older RSUs to take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains rate when your overall income is lower. Also, don't forget about the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) - if your modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200K (single) or $250K (married filing jointly), you'll pay an additional 3.8% tax on investment income including capital gains. This could influence the timing of when you sell. The tools others mentioned like taxr.ai sound really helpful for modeling different scenarios, especially when you factor in state taxes and these additional considerations!

0 coins

@Isabel Vega That s'a really smart question! If you re'close to those NIIT thresholds, spreading sales across tax years can definitely be worth it. The 3.8% additional tax on all your investment income above the threshold can add up quickly. Here s'a simple example: If you re'single and would have $220K income with RSU sales this year, you d'pay NIIT on $20K of investment income. But if you could split those sales so you have $190K this year and $190K next year staying (under the $200K threshold both years ,)you d'avoid NIIT entirely. The complexity is usually manageable - most brokerages let you specify which tax lots to sell, so you can easily control the timing. Just make sure you re'not accidentally creating wash sales or missing out on long-term capital gains treatment while trying to manage the income timing. A tool like the taxr.ai mentioned earlier would probably help you model exactly how much you d'save versus the hassle of managing multiple sale dates!

0 coins

@Isabel Vega That s'a really smart question! Spreading RSU sales across tax years to stay under the NIIT threshold can definitely be worth it if you re'right at the edge. The 3.8% savings on potentially tens of thousands in capital gains adds up quickly. The key is to model it out - if you re'at $190K income and have $50K in RSU gains to realize, selling $10K this year and $40K next year keeps you under the $200K threshold both years, saving you about $1,900 in NIIT 3.8% (of $50K .)The complexity isn t'too bad if you re'organized about it. Most brokers let you specify which tax lots to sell first-in-first-out, (last-in-first-out, or specific identification ,)so you can be strategic about which RSUs to sell each year. Just make sure to account for other income changes - bonuses, promotions, spouse s'income changes, etc. The tax modeling tools mentioned earlier would be perfect for running these what "if scenarios" across multiple years.

0 coins

Prev1...149150151152153...5645Next