IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Anyone else confused about what counts as "taxable" across state lines? I bought a laptop online last year and can't remember if I paid tax on it or not. Would that definitely count for use tax?

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

You should be able to check your email receipt to see if sales tax was charged. If not, then yes, a laptop would definitely be subject to use tax in your home state. Electronics are fully taxable in pretty much every state.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

Just adding to what the other person said - online retailers like Amazon now collect sales tax for most states automatically. So check your receipt. If they didn't collect it, you'd owe use tax. However, if they collected sales tax for a different state than where you live, it gets complicated.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of situation that trips up so many people! Living on state lines makes tax filing way more complicated than it should be. For your grocery shopping, the good news is that many states exempt basic groceries from sales tax entirely, so you might not owe anything on those cross-border trips. But prepared foods, household items, and definitely online purchases are a different story. The key thing to remember is that use tax is really about making sure your home state gets its fair share when you buy things elsewhere. If you paid sales tax in the other state that's equal to or higher than your home state rate, you're usually good. It's only when you paid less (or nothing) that you owe the difference. Most states have made this easier by offering those lookup tables based on income that others mentioned. For someone spending $300-400/month on cross-border shopping, using the table is probably your best bet unless you made some really big purchases that would push your actual use tax way above the table amount. Don't stress too much about perfect record keeping for routine shopping - the states know this is impractical for most people, which is why they created these simplified methods.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with use tax and have been stressing about it. One follow-up question - when you mention that states have lookup tables based on income, where exactly do I find that on my state's tax return? Is it usually clearly labeled as "use tax table" or something similar? I want to make sure I'm using the right method and not missing something obvious.

0 coins

Great thread with lots of practical advice! As someone who works in tax compliance, I wanted to add a few technical points that might help: 1. **Nexus determination**: Physical presence isn't the only factor anymore. If you're actively managing your LLC from Florida (making business decisions, conducting operations, etc.), you almost certainly have nexus there regardless of where it's registered. 2. **Florida's "doing business" rules**: Florida requires foreign LLCs to register if they're "transacting business" in the state. This includes maintaining an office, owning/leasing property, or regularly conducting business activities - which sounds like your situation. 3. **Annual compliance costs**: Don't forget that maintaining good standing in multiple states means tracking different filing deadlines, registered agent requirements, and annual fees. Missing a filing in your formation state can cause your LLC to be dissolved, even if you're compliant in your operating state. 4. **Professional liability**: If you're in a profession that requires licensing (real estate, accounting, legal, etc.), some states have additional requirements for out-of-state business entities that can complicate things further. The privacy benefits are real, but for most small business owners, the administrative complexity and additional costs often aren't worth it unless you have specific asset protection concerns or are planning multi-state operations from the start. Florida's LLC laws are actually quite business-friendly, and you'd avoid the foreign registration requirements entirely.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping to find! The nexus determination point is particularly helpful - I hadn't fully understood that physical presence isn't the only factor. It sounds like since I'd be managing everything from Florida, I'd definitely have nexus here regardless. The point about tracking multiple state compliance requirements is a real eye-opener. I'm already feeling overwhelmed just thinking about keeping track of different deadlines and filing requirements across multiple states. As someone just starting out, that administrative burden alone might outweigh any benefits. I'm not in a licensed profession, so that's one less complication to worry about. And you're right about Florida's LLC laws being business-friendly - I hadn't really researched how Florida compares to other states in that regard. Thanks for the professional perspective! It's really helping me lean toward the simpler Florida LLC route, at least to start with.

0 coins

As someone who went through this exact decision process last year, I wanted to share what ultimately helped me decide. I was also attracted to Wyoming's privacy benefits but got caught up in the complexity everyone's mentioned here. What really sealed it for me was talking to a local Florida attorney who specializes in small business formation. They pointed out something I hadn't considered: Florida has pretty strong privacy protections for LLCs too, especially compared to many other states. While Wyoming and Nevada are often touted as the gold standard, Florida doesn't require you to disclose member information in your Articles of Organization, and you can use a registered agent for additional privacy if needed. The attorney also mentioned that Florida's "series LLC" option might be worth looking into if asset protection is a concern - it allows you to create separate "series" within one LLC that can have different members, assets, and liabilities. Not as well-known as the Wyoming/Nevada route but potentially useful for certain situations. Between the reduced complexity, lower ongoing costs, and still getting reasonable privacy protection, I ended up going with a Florida LLC and haven't regretted it. I'm spending my time growing my business instead of managing multi-state compliance issues, which feels like the right trade-off for where I am right now. Sometimes the "optimal" solution isn't worth the additional complexity when you're just starting out.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

This is really valuable insight from someone who's actually been through the decision! I hadn't heard about Florida's series LLC option before - that sounds like it could be a good middle ground for asset protection without the multi-state complexity. The point about Florida's privacy protections being better than I initially thought is reassuring too. I think I was getting caught up in the "grass is greener" mentality with Wyoming and Nevada without fully researching what Florida actually offers. Your comment about spending time growing the business instead of managing compliance really resonates with me. As a newcomer to all this, I'm already feeling overwhelmed with just the basics of starting a business, so adding multi-state requirements on top of that seems like it would be a distraction from what really matters. Did you end up using a registered agent in Florida for the additional privacy, or did you find that wasn't necessary? I'm trying to figure out if that's worth the extra cost or if the default privacy protections are sufficient for most situations.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! Just discovered my bookkeeper has been carrying forward some old business credit card accounts that should have been closed years ago. They're showing small balances but I haven't used those cards in forever. Reading through everyone's responses here has been incredibly helpful. It sounds like the consensus is that as long as these balance sheet issues didn't affect my actual Schedule C income and expenses, I don't need to panic about amended returns. That's a huge relief! I'm planning to follow the advice about having my bookkeeper create adjusting entries to zero out the phantom accounts against owner's equity, and properly account for any real money that's sitting in those old accounts. One thing I'm still wondering about - should I wait until after I file this year's taxes to clean this up, or is it better to get it sorted beforehand? My tax deadline is coming up fast and I don't want to delay filing, but I also want to make sure I'm handling this correctly.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Based on what I've learned from dealing with similar bookkeeping cleanup issues, I'd recommend getting those adjusting entries made before you file this year's taxes if possible. It's much cleaner to start the new tax year with accurate books rather than carrying forward known errors. Since you mentioned your deadline is coming up fast, here's what I'd suggest: Have your bookkeeper focus first on identifying whether those old credit card accounts actually affected any of your Schedule C income or expenses for this tax year. If they didn't impact your business income or deductions, then you're probably safe to file on time and clean up the balance sheet afterwards. However, if there's any chance those accounts contained business expenses or income that should be on this year's Schedule C, then it's worth taking the time to sort it out before filing. The last thing you want is to discover later that you missed deductible expenses or unreported income. The good news is that most of these balance sheet cleanup issues are purely cosmetic from a Schedule C perspective - they make your books look messy but don't actually change your tax liability. Just make sure to document everything clearly when you do make the corrections!

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

I've been through this exact scenario with my freelance consulting business. Had old PayPal and bank accounts from a previous venture showing up in my QBO that were making my balance sheet a mess. The relief I felt when my CPA confirmed that Schedule C filers don't submit balance sheets to the IRS was huge! Since you're only providing consulting services, the IRS is really just looking at your income and expenses on the Schedule C itself. Here's what worked for me: I had my bookkeeper create a detailed spreadsheet showing exactly what each old account contained - which ones had real money vs. just old entries. For the accounts with actual funds, we transferred them to my current business account and recorded as owner contributions (since the money was from a previously taxed business). For the phantom entries, we zeroed them out with journal entries against owner's equity. The key is documentation. I kept detailed notes about each adjustment so if questions ever come up, I can explain exactly what happened and why. My CPA said this kind of cleanup is actually pretty common when people switch from one business to another using the same QBO file. You're being appropriately careful about compliance, but it sounds like you can breathe easy about amended returns as long as these old accounts didn't affect your actual business income or deductible expenses this year.

0 coins

This is such a helpful breakdown, thank you! I'm definitely feeling more confident about handling this situation now. Your point about documentation is really important - I hadn't thought about creating a detailed spreadsheet to track what each old account contains, but that makes perfect sense for audit trail purposes. I'm curious about one detail - when you transferred the real funds from old accounts and recorded them as owner contributions, did you have to worry about any specific timing for tax purposes? Like, does it matter if I make these transfers in December vs January for which tax year they affect? Also, did your CPA have any specific advice about how to label these journal entries in QBO so they're crystal clear what they represent? I want to make sure my bookkeeper sets this up in a way that won't confuse future tax preparers.

0 coins

$13,849 Refund Frozen with Code 810 - No Explanation After 2 Months - HoH Filing with $28,832 AGI, Transcript Shows Clear Credits

Filed my 2022 taxes end of January and they were accepted 1/31. I'm filing as Head of Household with an AGI of $28,832.00 and taxable income of $9,432.00. Got hit with a freeze code 810 on 2/7/2023. My transcript shows a credit balance of -$13,849.00 (made up of -$10,849.00 in W-2/1099 withholding and a -$3,000.00 credit to my account), but I can't get my refund. The IRS says I need to wait 180 days for a letter, and they're saying no verification is needed. My processing date shows as March 13, 2023, and there's no accrued interest or penalties showing as of that date. I pulled my Account Transcript today (4/1/2023) from the IRS website, and it's driving me crazy seeing all this information but still not having my refund. The transcript clearly shows: ACCOUNT BALANCE: -$13,849.00 ACCRUED INTEREST: $0.00 AS OF: Mar. 13, 2023 ACCRUED PENALTY: $0.00 AS OF: Mar. 13, 2023 ACCOUNT BALANCE PLUS ACCRUALS (this is not a payoff amount): -$13,849.00 The information from my return shows: FILING STATUS: Head of Household EXEMPTIONS: 03 ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME: $28,832.00 TAXABLE INCOME: $9,432.00 TAX PER RETURN: $0.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME TAXPAYER: $0.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME SPOUSE: $0.00 TOTAL SELF EMPLOYMENT TAX: $0.00 RETURN DUE DATE OR RETURN RECEIVED DATE (WHICHEVER IS LATER): Apr. 15, 2023 PROCESSING DATE: Mar 13, 2023 Looking at my transcript codes: 150 - Tax return filed (cycle 20230805, dated 03-13-2023) $0.00 70221-432-00537-3 806 - W-2 or 1099 withholding (04-15-2023) -$10,849.00 810 - Refund freeze (02-07-2023) $0.00 766 - Credit to your account (04-15-2023) -$3,000.00 Anyone else stuck in this boat? Why does it take half a year just to get a letter when my account transcript clearly shows everything? My return isn't even due until April 15, 2023, but here I am waiting on nearly $14k with no explanation. The transcript literally says "This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data" but apparently not sensitive enough for them to process my refund quickly!

Been in the exact same situation! Filed 1/28, got the 810 freeze 2/3, and I'm sitting here 8 weeks later still waiting. My transcript looks almost identical to yours - $11,200 refund, HoH filing, clean W-2 withholdings, no penalties or interest. The waiting is brutal especially when you can see everything is correct on the transcript. I've called twice and they just repeat the same "wait for the letter" script. At least your processing date of March 13 means they've actually looked at it - mine is still showing as received but not processed. Seeing people say it cleared after 92 days gives me some hope though. Hang in there - we're all in this together! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Ugh this is so frustrating! 8 weeks is already way too long when everything looks clean on the transcript. At least you know you're not alone in this mess. The fact that yours is still showing as received but not processed is actually concerning - have you tried checking if there are any issues with your SSN or address matching? Sometimes that can hold up the initial processing. Really hoping both of ours clear soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same situation! Filed early February, got hit with the 810 freeze about a week later, and now I'm sitting here 7 weeks in with a $9,200 refund just sitting there. My transcript shows everything is clean too - HoH filing, normal W-2 withholdings, $0 penalties and interest. What's really getting to me is that I can see on the transcript that all my information is validated and correct, but they still need this mysterious 180-day "review period." Like, what exactly are they reviewing that takes half a year when everything is right there in black and white? I tried calling last week and the agent basically told me the same thing - just wait for the letter. She couldn't even tell me what specifically triggered the freeze or give me any kind of timeline beyond "up to 180 days." At least seeing that some people are getting theirs released around the 90-day mark gives me hope. This whole process is just so unnecessarily stressful when you're counting on that money. Stay strong everyone! šŸ’™

0 coins

Consider looking into Captive Insurance Companies (CICs) if you own a business or have significant business income. Under Section 831(b), you can elect to have your captive taxed only on investment income, not insurance premiums, for captives with less than $2.3M in annual premiums. This allows you to deduct legitimate business insurance premiums paid to your own captive, while the captive accumulates wealth in a tax-advantaged structure. Another often-overlooked strategy is investing in Qualified Opportunity Zone funds, which allow you to defer capital gains taxes by investing those gains into designated economically distressed communities. You get a 10% step-up in basis after 5 years, 15% after 7 years, and if held for 10+ years, any appreciation in the QOZ investment itself is tax-free. For immediate tax relief, look into Cost Segregation studies if you own any commercial real estate or rental properties. This allows you to accelerate depreciation on certain components of buildings (like flooring, lighting, landscaping) from 27.5-39 years down to 5-15 years, creating significant upfront deductions. Finally, consider establishing a Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) if you have highly appreciated assets. You get an immediate charitable deduction, avoid capital gains tax on the sale of the appreciated assets within the trust, and can receive income payments for life while ultimately benefiting charity.

0 coins

Aria Park

•

This is incredibly comprehensive - thank you! The Captive Insurance Company strategy is completely new to me. Is there a minimum business income threshold where CICs start to make sense, or specific types of businesses where they work best? I'm curious about the operational complexity too - do you essentially have to run a legitimate insurance operation, or can it be more passive? The Opportunity Zone concept sounds interesting but I'm wondering about liquidity concerns with the 10-year hold requirement. Have you seen good quality investment opportunities in these zones, or are most of them pretty speculative real estate plays? Also, regarding Cost Segregation studies - roughly what's the minimum property value where the study costs justify the tax benefits? I have one rental property worth about $300k but wasn't sure if it would be worth the expense of hiring specialists for the analysis.

0 coins

Aisha Patel

•

Great questions! For CICs, you typically need at least $500k-1M in annual business income to justify the setup and ongoing compliance costs. They work best for businesses with genuine insurable risks - professional services, manufacturing, real estate operations, etc. You do need to run it as a legitimate insurance company with proper reserves, claims handling, and risk distribution, though many use third-party managers to handle operations. For Opportunity Zones, you're right about liquidity concerns - it's definitely a long-term play. The quality varies widely. I've seen some solid multifamily housing developments and mixed-use projects in gentrifying areas, but also plenty of sketchy ground-up construction deals. The key is finding established sponsors with track records in the specific markets. Don't chase the tax benefits if the underlying investment doesn't make sense. On Cost Segregation, $300k is borderline but potentially worthwhile depending on the property type and your tax situation. Residential rental studies typically cost $3k-8k, so if you can accelerate $50k+ in depreciation from 27.5 years to 5-15 years, the first-year tax savings often justify the cost. Get quotes from a few firms - some will do a preliminary analysis to estimate benefits before you commit. All these strategies require good professional guidance. The tax code complexity means small mistakes can be expensive.

0 coins

One strategy that hasn't been mentioned yet is establishing a Solo 401(k) with a profit-sharing component if you have any 1099 income. Even small amounts of consulting or freelance work can open up significant additional retirement contribution space beyond your regular employer 401(k). Also consider tax-efficient withdrawal strategies from existing accounts. At your income level, you might benefit from Roth conversions during lower-income years (if you plan any sabbaticals, career transitions, or early retirement). Converting traditional IRA funds to Roth during a year when your income dips can be incredibly valuable long-term. Don't overlook state tax planning either - depending on where you live, strategies like establishing residency in a no-tax state before retirement or timing certain income recognition around state tax rules can save substantial amounts. Finally, if you're charitably inclined, consider a Donor Advised Fund (DAF). You can make a large contribution in a high-income year to get the deduction, then distribute the funds to charities over multiple years. It's more flexible than direct charitable giving and can help with the "bunching" strategy others mentioned. The key is working with a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in tax planning, not just someone who does basic tax prep. The strategies get much more sophisticated at your income level.

0 coins

This is really helpful perspective on the strategic timing aspects! I hadn't thought about using Roth conversions as a timing strategy during lower income years. That could be huge if I ever take a sabbatical or career break. The Donor Advised Fund suggestion is particularly interesting - I do give to charity but haven't been strategic about the timing for tax purposes. Quick question: is there a minimum amount that makes sense for setting up a DAF, or can you start with smaller contributions and build it up over time? Also, are there any fees or administrative costs I should factor in when comparing it to direct charitable giving? The state tax planning point is something I definitely need to research more. I'm in California now so the state tax burden is pretty significant. Have you seen people successfully establish residency in states like Texas or Florida while still working remotely for California-based companies? I imagine there are some complex rules around that.

0 coins

Prev1...15021503150415051506...5643Next