IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been following this discussion with great interest, and it's reassuring to see I'm not the only one who takes basis tracking seriously! As someone who's been in public accounting for over a decade, I've seen the consequences of poor basis tracking far too many times. What really frustrates me is when clients come to us from other firms and we discover years of neglected basis calculations. Just last month, I had a client who sold their partnership interest and the selling firm tried to calculate gain using completely incorrect basis assumptions. We had to go back five years to reconstruct everything properly, which delayed the filing and cost the client thousands in additional fees. I'm definitely intrigued by the AI tools mentioned here like TaxR.ai. The time savings alone would be worth it, but more importantly, having consistent automated calculations could help reduce errors. I'm also curious about ClaimYR for getting historical IRS data - that could be a lifesaver for those reconstruction situations. One thing I'd add is that basis tracking becomes even more critical with the current economic environment. We're seeing more partnership distributions and S-corp redemptions as businesses navigate cash flow challenges, which means basis calculations are happening more frequently than in stable times. The "wait until we need it" approach just isn't sustainable anymore.

0 coins

You've really hit the nail on the head about the current economic environment making basis tracking more critical. I'm seeing the same thing - clients are being forced into distributions and dispositions they wouldn't have considered in better times, and suddenly everyone needs their basis calculations yesterday. The reconstruction work is such a time sink and honestly feels like it could be completely avoided with proper ongoing tracking. I'm definitely going to look into TaxR.ai and ClaimYR based on all the positive feedback here. If these tools can handle the heavy lifting on data extraction and calculations, it might finally make comprehensive basis tracking feasible for all clients rather than just the high-fee ones. What's your experience been with getting clients to understand the value of proactive basis tracking versus explaining to them after the fact why their "simple" distribution just became a taxable event?

0 coins

Julia Hall

•

This thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I'm a relatively new CPA (just got licensed last year) and honestly, basis tracking wasn't emphasized nearly enough in my education or even during my time at a regional firm. Reading through everyone's experiences, I'm realizing I've probably been too casual about this for my clients with partnership and S-corp investments. The point about building it into engagement letters really resonates with me. I've been treating basis tracking as this optional "nice to have" service, but it sounds like it should be standard practice. I'm particularly interested in the automation tools mentioned - TaxR.ai sounds like it could help someone like me who's still building efficiency in these calculations. One question for the more experienced folks here: how do you typically price the ongoing basis tracking service? Do you build it into your annual tax prep fee or charge it as a separate line item? I'm trying to figure out how to position this with existing clients who haven't had this service before without it feeling like I'm suddenly adding unexpected costs. Also, for those using the AI tools, are there any specific limitations or situations where you still prefer manual calculations? I want to make sure I understand both the capabilities and the boundaries of these automated solutions before implementing them in my practice.

0 coins

Great questions, Julia! As someone who's been through the same learning curve, I'd say pricing basis tracking as a separate line item initially helps clients understand its value, then you can roll it into comprehensive fees later. For automation tools like TaxR.ai, they're excellent for standard situations but I still do manual reviews for complex allocations, debt restructures, or when there are related party transactions that might not follow typical patterns. The key is using the tools to handle the heavy lifting while applying professional judgment to the nuanced situations.

0 coins

Caleb Bell

•

I think we're overlooking an important area of growth in tax controversy - cryptocurrency compliance. The IRS is absolutely ramping up enforcement in this area. In the last 6 months, I've taken on 12 new clients with crypto-related tax issues. Many taxpayers either didn't report crypto transactions or reported them incorrectly. The IRS has been issuing CP2000 notices and initiating examinations specifically targeting these issues. Plus, with the new reporting requirements coming into effect, there's going to be even more compliance work and subsequent controversy representation needed. If you have expertise in this area (or are willing to develop it), it could be a significant growth opportunity within tax controversy practice.

0 coins

Have you found any good resources for getting up to speed on crypto tax issues? I'm seeing more clients mentioning crypto but honestly don't feel confident handling the more complex situations yet.

0 coins

Caleb Bell

•

There are several excellent resources for getting up to speed on crypto taxation. The Taxation of Digital Assets course from the AICPA is comprehensive and regularly updated. I also recommend joining the Digital Asset Tax Policy Coalition which provides excellent technical updates and practical guidance. For case-specific questions, Tax Notes has an extensive library of articles on cryptocurrency taxation that I reference frequently. The blockchain alliance also hosts monthly webinars covering emerging issues. Start with understanding the basics of capital gain/loss treatment, then build knowledge on more complex areas like DeFi, staking, and NFTs where the guidance is still evolving.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

I work for a mid-sized firm and we've actually been EXPANDING our tax controversy department despite the lower audit rates. Why? Because the audits that DO happen are getting more complex and high-stakes. The IRS is increasingly focusing on wealthy individuals, partnerships with complex structures, and international tax issues. These cases often involve multiple tax years, substantial documentation, and complicated legal questions. They're not the simple correspondence audits of yesteryear. Plus, with the new partnership audit regime, centralized partnership audit cases are becoming a specialty unto themselves. Fewer audits, yes, but the ones happening require more specialized expertise and representation.

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

Interesting perspective! What kind of background or training would you recommend for someone wanting to specialize in these high-stakes audits? Are there particular areas of tax law that are most valuable?

0 coins

For high-stakes audits, I'd recommend building expertise in partnership taxation and international compliance first - these seem to be where the IRS is focusing their limited resources. Understanding the centralized partnership audit regime (BBA) is crucial since those cases can involve massive dollar amounts and complex procedural requirements. Also consider getting familiar with transfer pricing issues and controlled foreign corporation rules if you want to work on international cases. The IRS has been very aggressive in this space, especially with multinational corporations and high-net-worth individuals with offshore structures. From a practical standpoint, having experience with large document productions and e-discovery can set you apart. These complex cases often involve thousands of documents that need to be organized and analyzed efficiently.

0 coins

Welcome to the wonderful world of quarterly tax filings! I went through this exact same confusion when I started my consulting business two years ago. The March 12 date on Line 1 threw me for a complete loop too. What helped me understand it was thinking of Line 1 as a "headcount snapshot" that the IRS takes on specific dates throughout the year, while the rest of the form deals with actual money that changed hands during the full three-month period. So even though your employee wasn't on payroll during the pay period that includes March 12, you still owe taxes on the wages you paid them from March 18-31. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier - make sure you're also staying on top of your deposit schedule! Since you used QuickBooks payroll, they should have handled the deposits automatically, but it's worth double-checking that everything went through correctly. The IRS is much more forgiving about minor form errors than they are about late deposits. You're doing great by asking questions early. Better to get it right the first time than deal with notices later!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of guidance I needed! Thank you for breaking down the "headcount snapshot" vs actual wages concept - that really clarifies things. I'm glad to hear this confusion is so common among new business owners. You're absolutely right about the deposit schedule. QuickBooks did handle the deposits automatically, but I went back and verified everything went through on time after reading your comment. It's a good reminder that even when using payroll software, we still need to stay on top of the details. I really appreciate the encouragement about asking questions early. As someone completely new to payroll taxes, every form feels overwhelming, but this community has been incredibly helpful in making sense of it all. Better to look a little foolish asking questions than to mess up the actual filing!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm also a new business owner dealing with my first Form 941, and I had the exact same confusion about the March 12 date. I kept thinking I was doing something wrong when Line 1 showed zero employees but Line 2 had wage amounts. The explanation that Line 1 is just a statistical census question while the actual tax calculations are based on wages paid throughout the entire quarter makes perfect sense now. It's reassuring to know this is such a common situation for new employers who hire after those mid-month census dates. One question I still have - when filing electronically through the IRS website, does the system flag this as unusual or require any additional explanation when Line 1 shows zero but other lines have data? I want to make sure I don't get held up in the electronic filing process. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - as someone completely new to payroll compliance, having real-world examples from other business owners has been invaluable!

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

No, the electronic filing system won't flag this as unusual at all! I just filed my first Form 941 electronically last month with the exact same situation - zero employees on Line 1 but wages reported on the other lines. The system processed it without any issues or additional prompts. The IRS e-file system is designed to handle this common scenario since so many businesses hire employees after the census dates throughout the year. As long as your math is correct on the wage and tax calculations, it should go through smoothly. One tip: make sure you save a copy of your submission confirmation and keep good records showing when you actually hired your employee. That way if any questions ever come up later, you have documentation that clearly shows why Line 1 is zero for that quarter. Welcome to the business owner club - it gets easier once you get through your first few quarterly filings!

0 coins

Try clearing your cache and cookies before logging in. Sometimes that fixes the 6000 error. Worked for me last year!

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

tried that already but no luck :

0 coins

Error 6000 is super frustrating! I had the same issue last month. If clearing cache doesn't work, try using a different browser or incognito mode. Also make sure you're using the direct IRS.gov link and not going through any third-party sites. Sometimes the verification system gets confused if you've been bouncing between different entry points. The 7-10 day wait for the letter is accurate in my experience - got mine on day 9.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

This is really helpful advice! I've been dealing with the same error and hadn't thought about the third-party sites issue. Quick question - when you say "direct IRS.gov link", do you mean going straight to irs.gov/identity-protection-pin rather than through Google search results? Just want to make sure I'm doing it right when I try again.

0 coins

I actually work for a company that received like 30 unnecessary 1099s last year because we're an S-corp! It doesn't hurt us really, but it does create extra reconciliation work. One thing nobody mentioned is the state reporting requirements. Some states require you to file 1099 information with them separately from the IRS filing. If you're over-filing 1099s, you might create extra work for yourself on the state side too.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

Do you just ignore the incorrect 1099s? Or do you have to do something specific when you get one as an S-corp?

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

Great question about over-filing! I made this exact mistake my first year in business and learned some valuable lessons. While there's no IRS penalty for sending unnecessary 1099s, there are a few practical considerations: 1. **Vendor confusion**: Some businesses will contact you asking why they received a 1099 when they're exempt, which creates extra correspondence. 2. **Your own tracking**: If you over-file this year, make sure to update your vendor classification system so you don't repeat the same mistakes next year. 3. **State implications**: Some states have their own 1099 reporting requirements, so over-filing federally might mean over-filing at the state level too. That said, your "better safe than sorry" approach isn't terrible - just make sure you're collecting proper W-9 forms going forward so you can classify vendors correctly. The most important thing is not missing required 1099s, which can result in actual penalties of $50-$280 per form depending on how late you are. One tip: keep a simple spreadsheet tracking each vendor's tax classification from their W-9 so you don't have to figure this out from scratch every year!

0 coins

This is such helpful advice! I'm curious about the penalty amounts you mentioned - are those $50-$280 penalties per missed 1099, or is there some kind of scaling based on how many you miss total? I have about 15 vendors I need to send 1099s to this year and want to make sure I understand the potential cost if I mess up the timing. Also, do you happen to know if there's a grace period or if the IRS is pretty strict about the January 31st deadline? I'm cutting it close this year and trying to figure out if being a few days late is a big deal or not.

0 coins

Prev1...14981499150015011502...5643Next