How to properly track partnership and S-corp basis - best practices for tax professionals?
So I've been working at this boutique tax firm for about 8 months now, but I spent nearly 4 years at one of the Big Four before that. Something I've noticed at both places is that nobody seems to consistently track basis for clients who have investments in partnerships and S-corps. It's like everyone thinks it's some optional exercise or too much hassle compared to other billable work. I'm pretty adamant about keeping detailed basis schedules though - not just for the immediate tax year implications but especially for calculating gain/loss when there's eventually a sale. I'm dealing with this headache right now actually. Trying to create a basis schedule for a client who's been invested in this partnership since the late 90s, but we only have K-1s going back to 2011. Now I'm stuck making a bunch of assumptions about the pre-2011 activity which is super time-consuming and probably not entirely accurate. If someone had just maintained a simple Excel spreadsheet all along, I wouldn't be pulling my hair out right now. What's been your experience with this? Do other tax pros actually keep up with basis tracking for their clients' partnership and S-corp investments? Am I being overly diligent or is this actually important? Curious what others think about whether the time investment is worth it.
24 comments


Evelyn Kim
You're absolutely right to be concerned about this. Tracking basis in partnerships and S-corps isn't just good practice—it's essential for proper tax compliance. I've seen far too many practitioners skip this step until they absolutely need it (usually when a disposition occurs), and then they're scrambling to recreate years of history. The three types of basis you need to track for partnerships are: outside basis for tax purposes, capital account basis, and at-risk basis. For S-corps, you need stock basis and debt basis. Without these numbers, you can't properly determine the tax treatment of distributions, losses, or ultimate disposition. I recommend creating standardized templates that make the year-to-year tracking more efficient. Yes, it takes some upfront time investment, but it saves enormous headaches later. The best approach is to build it into your standard process for these entity types so it just becomes part of the annual work rather than an "extra" task.
0 coins
Diego Fisher
•Do you have any specific templates or resources you'd recommend for tracking these different types of basis? I've been trying to create my own system but wondering if there's something more standardized out there. Also, how do you handle the initial basis calculation when you take on a new client with historical investments?
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
•I personally use a rolling Excel workbook with separate tabs for each basis type. For the initial calculation with new clients, I request all prior year K-1s and tax returns if available. If they don't have complete records, I start with their initial capital contribution (usually found on the oldest available K-1) and work forward from there. For resources, the AICPA has some decent templates in their Tax Practice Guides and Checklists. There are also some good continuing education courses specifically on basis tracking that include template examples. I'd suggest checking out the courses offered by CPE Link or the AICPA.
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
I had the exact same problem you're describing and found an absolute game-changer with https://taxr.ai - it literally saved me 20+ hours of work last tax season. I was dealing with a client who had partnership interests going back to 2005 with spotty documentation, and the AI tool extracted all the relevant K-1 data from the PDFs I had and helped build out a comprehensive basis schedule. What impressed me most was how it identified discrepancies between years that I would have missed manually. It flagged a $47,000 distribution from 2014 that wasn't properly accounted for in the following year's beginning basis. The tool basically reconstructed the historical basis timeline and even helped me identify where I needed to make reasonable assumptions for missing years.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
•How does it handle the different types of basis though? Like does it track outside basis, capital account and at-risk separately? I've found that's where things get really complicated especially with partnerships.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical about AI tools for something this nuanced. How accurate is it really? And can it handle complex situations like suspended losses, stepped-up basis from deceased partners, or recourse vs nonrecourse debt distinctions?
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
•The tool does track all three types of basis separately, which was actually what sold me on it. It has specific fields for outside tax basis, capital account basis per the K-1, and at-risk basis calculations. It even flags when there might be basis limitations affecting loss deductibility. I was definitely skeptical at first too. What surprised me was how well it handles the complex situations. For suspended losses, it creates a running tally and applies them when basis is restored. For debt, it distinguishes between recourse and nonrecourse and tracks basis restoration when debt is repaid. It's not perfect with some edge cases, but it's way more accurate than most manual tracking I've seen at firms.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
I tried https://taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and I have to eat my words about being skeptical. This thing is seriously impressive for basis tracking. I uploaded 7 years of K-1s for an S-corp client and it built out a complete stock basis and debt basis schedule in minutes. The real value was in the consistency checking - it flagged two instances where prior year ending basis didn't match current year beginning basis on the K-1s. Turns out the client had taken loans from the S-corp that weren't properly documented. The tool showed exactly where the discrepancies were and even suggested adjustments to reconcile the differences. I'm now going through our client list and setting up basis schedules for all partnership and S-corp investments. What used to be a "when we absolutely have to" task is now just part of our standard process.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
After struggling with similar basis tracking issues, I discovered https://claimyr.com which has been invaluable when I've needed to get historical K-1 information from the IRS. When you're missing years of data, sometimes you just need to get transcripts or copies of old returns from the IRS - but we all know how impossible it is to get someone on the phone there. I was initially just trying to get wage and income transcripts for a client, but when I mentioned to the IRS agent that I was specifically looking for K-1 information to reconstruct basis, they were able to provide transcript data going back much further than I expected. Check out their demo video at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c to see how it works. The service basically holds your place in the IRS phone queue and calls you once an agent is available.
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Wait, how exactly does this work? Does it just call the IRS for you? I'm confused why I would need a service for this when I could just call myself and wait on hold.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•That sounds too good to be true. I've spent HOURS on hold with the IRS and half the time I get disconnected before reaching anyone. Are you saying this service somehow gets priority in the queue or something? I'm pretty doubtful this actually works better than just calling yourself.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•It doesn't call the IRS for you - it essentially holds your place in the queue. You give them your phone number, and their system waits on hold instead of you. When their system detects a live IRS agent, it calls your phone and connects you directly to the agent. So you don't waste hours listening to that terrible hold music or getting disconnected. No, they don't get priority in the queue - they wait exactly like you would. The difference is you're not personally tied to your phone for hours. I usually start the service in the morning, go about my day doing productive work, and then get a call back when an agent is available. It's not about getting through faster, it's about not wasting your billable hours sitting on hold.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After reading about it here, I tried it yesterday when I needed to get transcript information for a partnership client. I've always spent at least 1-2 hours on hold with the IRS, but with this service, I just entered my info and went back to work. About 90 minutes later, my phone rang and I was instantly connected to an IRS agent. I was able to get wage and income transcripts that included K-1 information from 2010-2014 that we were missing. This filled the gap in our basis calculations perfectly. The IRS agent was actually really helpful once I explained what I needed for basis tracking. She even suggested requesting a specific transcript type that shows all K-1 income reported for my client across multiple entities, which I wasn't aware existed. Definitely using this service again!
0 coins
Noah Lee
I'm going to disagree with most people here. In my 25 years of practice, I've found that detailed basis tracking is often unnecessary work until there's a disposition or significant loss/distribution event. Most partnerships run smoothly for years with their own internal capital account tracking, and at smaller firms, the time spent on maintaining these complex schedules just isn't justified by the billable hours. For S-corps it's a bit more important since basis limitations come into play more frequently, but even then I typically just do a high-level calculation when needed rather than a year-by-year detailed schedule.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•But what about when a client has a partial disposition or receives a large distribution? Without having tracked basis all along, aren't you stuck doing a bunch of retroactive work that could have been avoided? Plus, how do you handle suspended losses without proper tracking?
0 coins
Noah Lee
•When those events occur, yes, you need to do the work. But in my experience, they're relatively infrequent compared to the ongoing annual effort of maintaining detailed schedules for every client. I find it more efficient to do the deep dive only when needed rather than as a matter of course. For suspended losses, I do keep a separate simple tracker just for those affected clients. It's basically just a running total that gets updated each year rather than a comprehensive basis schedule. If a client consistently experiences loss limitations, then I'll build out a more detailed tracking system for them specifically. It's all about focusing your time where it matters most.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
Has anyone used tax software for this? I'm using UltraTax CS and it has a capital account analysis that supposedly tracks basis, but when I've tried to use it, the numbers never seem to tie out properly year to year. I end up going back to Excel because I trust my own calculations more.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•I use ProSeries and have the same issue! The built-in basis tracking is terrible - it doesn't properly handle special allocations or distinguish between the different types of basis. Excel is definitely more reliable, especially for complicated partnerships.
0 coins
NebulaNova
I've been using Drake Tax for about 5 years now and their basis tracking module is actually pretty decent - much better than what I've heard about UltraTax CS and ProSeries. It handles the three types of partnership basis separately and carries forward suspended losses automatically. The key is setting it up correctly in the first year, which admittedly takes some time. That said, I still maintain Excel backups for my more complex clients because no software is perfect. For simpler situations though, Drake's module saves me a lot of time compared to doing everything manually. The real test is when you have distributions, debt changes, or special allocations - that's where most software falls apart, but Drake handles those reasonably well. One thing I've learned is that whatever system you choose - software or Excel - consistency is everything. I've seen too many practitioners switch methods mid-stream and end up with a mess. Pick one approach and stick with it for each client.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•That's really helpful to know about Drake Tax! I'm actually looking to switch from my current software because the basis tracking is so unreliable. How does Drake handle situations where you're taking over a client mid-stream and need to enter historical basis data? Can you import multiple years at once or do you have to enter each year individually? Also, does it generate reports that clearly show the basis calculations for client review?
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
This conversation really hits home for me. I've been dealing with basis tracking nightmares for years, and honestly, the inconsistency across the profession is shocking. What really bothers me is when I take on a new client from another firm and find out they've been completely ignoring basis tracking for their S-corp investments. Then the client gets hit with unexpected tax consequences on distributions because nobody bothered to track their stock basis properly. I've started building basis tracking into my engagement letters as a standard service for any client with partnership or S-corp interests. Yes, it adds to the fee, but I explain to clients that it's like maintaining financial records - you can skip it until you need it, but then it costs way more to reconstruct everything retroactively. The tools mentioned here like TaxR.ai sound promising - I'm definitely going to check those out. Anything that can automate the tedious data entry while maintaining accuracy would be a game changer. Right now I'm spending way too much time on manual Excel work when I could be focusing on higher-level tax planning for my clients.
0 coins
Ellie Perry
•I completely agree about building it into engagement letters! That's exactly what I started doing last year after getting burned on a few retroactive basis reconstructions that took forever. I tell clients upfront that proper basis tracking is essential for accurate tax reporting and ultimately saves them money in the long run. What I've found helpful is showing clients a simple example of how missing basis tracking can cost them - like when they take a distribution from their S-corp and don't realize it's taxable income because their basis was already depleted from prior losses. Once they see the real dollar impact, they're usually happy to pay the additional fee for ongoing tracking. The automation tools definitely seem worth exploring. I'm curious about TaxR.ai too - if it can handle the data extraction and basic calculations, that would free us up to focus on the analysis and planning aspects that clients actually value most.
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
I've been following this discussion with great interest, and it's reassuring to see I'm not the only one who takes basis tracking seriously! As someone who's been in public accounting for over a decade, I've seen the consequences of poor basis tracking far too many times. What really frustrates me is when clients come to us from other firms and we discover years of neglected basis calculations. Just last month, I had a client who sold their partnership interest and the selling firm tried to calculate gain using completely incorrect basis assumptions. We had to go back five years to reconstruct everything properly, which delayed the filing and cost the client thousands in additional fees. I'm definitely intrigued by the AI tools mentioned here like TaxR.ai. The time savings alone would be worth it, but more importantly, having consistent automated calculations could help reduce errors. I'm also curious about ClaimYR for getting historical IRS data - that could be a lifesaver for those reconstruction situations. One thing I'd add is that basis tracking becomes even more critical with the current economic environment. We're seeing more partnership distributions and S-corp redemptions as businesses navigate cash flow challenges, which means basis calculations are happening more frequently than in stable times. The "wait until we need it" approach just isn't sustainable anymore.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•You've really hit the nail on the head about the current economic environment making basis tracking more critical. I'm seeing the same thing - clients are being forced into distributions and dispositions they wouldn't have considered in better times, and suddenly everyone needs their basis calculations yesterday. The reconstruction work is such a time sink and honestly feels like it could be completely avoided with proper ongoing tracking. I'm definitely going to look into TaxR.ai and ClaimYR based on all the positive feedback here. If these tools can handle the heavy lifting on data extraction and calculations, it might finally make comprehensive basis tracking feasible for all clients rather than just the high-fee ones. What's your experience been with getting clients to understand the value of proactive basis tracking versus explaining to them after the fact why their "simple" distribution just became a taxable event?
0 coins