I'm dealing with this exact issue too! My deposit date was 3/5 and I'm still waiting as well. What's helped me stay sane is understanding that the NETSEND/DEEPBLUE system has several handoff points between the IRS, Treasury, and your bank - each one can add 12-24 hours. I've been tracking patterns in this community and it seems like 3/5 deposits are particularly delayed this year, probably due to increased volume during peak refund season. The good news is that I haven't seen anyone report their deposit being lost or cancelled, just delayed. If you have the 846 code on your transcript with the 3/5 date, the money is definitely coming. Try checking your account early morning (around 6-7 AM) as that's when most ACH deposits typically post. Hang in there!

I'm new here but going through this exact same situation! My deposit was also scheduled for 3/5 and still nothing in my account. Reading through everyone's experiences has been really eye-opening - I had no idea the NETSEND/DEEPBLUE system had so many processing stages between the IRS and our banks. It's frustrating when you're planning around that date for important payments, but it sounds like these 1-2 day delays are pretty normal during peak refund season. I checked my transcript and confirmed I have the 846 code with 3/5, so at least I know the IRS did their part. Thanks to everyone who shared their timelines - it really helps to know this is a common experience and that the money does eventually show up! I'll try to be patient for another day or two before panicking.

I went through this exact same situation last year with my Cash App 1099-B! The key thing to understand is that the form shows your gross proceeds (what you received when you sold), but you're only taxed on the actual gain or loss. For your $3,500 in transactions, you'll need to gather records of what you originally paid for each Bitcoin purchase. Cash App's transaction history in the app should have most of this info. When you file, you'll report each sale on Form 8949, showing both the sale price (from the 1099-B) and your cost basis (what you paid). The difference is your actual taxable gain or loss. Don't panic about the disclaimer - it just means Cash App doesn't have complete cost basis info for some transactions, which is totally normal. The IRS expects you to provide the missing pieces. Keep good records and you'll be fine!

I just went through this exact same situation! Got my first 1099-B from Cash App last month and was totally confused by all the disclaimers and missing cost basis info. Here's what I learned after doing a ton of research and talking to a tax professional: The 1099-B is just Cash App reporting your sales proceeds to the IRS - it doesn't mean you owe taxes on the full amount. You only pay taxes on your actual gains (or can deduct losses). Since you did $3,500 in transactions with mostly small buys and a couple sells, you'll likely have some gains and some losses that will offset each other. The key is gathering your purchase records. Cash App keeps pretty good transaction history in the app - go to your Activity tab and look for a "Download" or "Export" option to get a CSV file with all your trades. This will show you exactly what you paid for each Bitcoin purchase, which becomes your cost basis. When you file your taxes, you'll use Form 8949 to list each sale individually, showing both the sale amount (from the 1099-B) and what you originally paid for those specific coins. The difference goes on Schedule D as your capital gain or loss. Don't stress too much about the disclaimer - it's standard because Cash App can't always track coins you might have transferred in from other platforms. As long as you have records of your actual purchase prices, you're good to go!

One important thing no one has mentioned yet - make sure you understand your state's requirements too. While federally a single-member LLC is disregarded, some states require separate filings or have annual LLC fees regardless of federal tax treatment. Here in California, we have to pay an $800 annual LLC tax even for a disregarded entity single-member LLC. Caught me by surprise my first year!

Great thread with lots of helpful info! I'm in a similar boat - just formed my single-member LLC in Texas for rental properties. After reading through everyone's experiences, I'm definitely going to get an EIN even though it won't change my tax treatment. The point about 1099s for contractors is huge - I'll be doing major renovations and didn't realize I'd need to issue those. One question for those who've been doing this longer - when you're calculating depreciation on rental properties, does it matter whether you have an EIN or not? I know the properties still get reported on Schedule E either way, but wasn't sure if there were any depreciation advantages to having the EIN versus just using my SSN. Also really appreciate the heads up about checking state requirements separately. Texas doesn't have income tax but I should definitely verify if there are any annual LLC fees or filings I need to be aware of.

This has been one of the most comprehensive and insightful discussions I've seen on this topic! As someone currently working in state and local tax (SALT) practice, I wanted to add another perspective that reinforces many of the points already made. The JD/MAcc + CPA combination is particularly powerful in SALT work, where you're constantly dealing with apportionment formulas, nexus determinations, and compliance requirements that require deep understanding of both legal standards and accounting methodologies. Just last week, I was working on a multi-state income tax planning project where understanding the book-tax differences for various state modifications was essential to developing an effective strategy. What I find most compelling about your situation is the convergence of several factors: minimal debt, genuine passion for tax law, access to quality education, and entering the market at exactly the right time. The field is evolving toward valuing practical, interdisciplinary expertise over traditional prestige markers, and you're positioned perfectly for this shift. The SALT area specifically has seen explosive growth in complexity over the past few years, particularly with economic nexus rules post-Wayfair, marketplace facilitator laws, and states' increasing sophistication in audit techniques. Having both legal and accounting expertise makes you incredibly valuable for navigating these evolving requirements. Your financial situation gives you the luxury of being strategic about specialization rather than just chasing immediate income. Whether that's gaining experience in emerging areas like digital taxation, pursuing government service for specialized training, or building expertise in high-growth practice areas like international tax, you'll have options that debt-burdened peers simply won't have. The consensus throughout this discussion has been remarkably consistent - the JD/MAcc + CPA route provides genuine competitive advantages that translate into real client value. Combined with your unique financial position, it seems like the clear strategic choice for building the tax law career you want.

Wow, this has been such an enlightening discussion to follow! As someone currently working as a tax analyst at a mid-size firm while considering law school, I'm amazed by the depth and consistency of insights from practitioners across so many different areas of tax practice. What really stands out to me is how every single practitioner - whether in corporate tax, international compliance, government service, SALT, or Big 4 firms - has emphasized that the JD/MAcc + CPA combination provides genuine, measurable advantages in day-to-day client work. This isn't just about having different credentials; it's about being able to deliver better outcomes because you understand both the legal framework and the business/accounting implications. The examples shared throughout this thread are incredibly compelling: ASC 740 considerations in corporate restructuring, foreign tax credit calculations requiring both legal and accounting analysis, transfer pricing work benefiting from understanding business substance, SALT apportionment requiring accounting methodology expertise, and government policy work needing both perspectives. These aren't theoretical scenarios - they're real client matters where the interdisciplinary knowledge creates tangible value. Your debt situation is genuinely unique and strategic. Reading about how student loans constrained so many people's early career choices really drives home what a rare opportunity you have. Starting with financial freedom means you can prioritize building the right experience and expertise rather than just chasing the highest paycheck to service loans. The market timing seems perfect too. Everything points to tax practice becoming more interdisciplinary, not less - from IRS focus on financial statement integration to emerging areas like digital assets requiring both legal and accounting expertise. You're positioned to enter the field with exactly the skill set the evolving landscape demands. Given the overwhelming practitioner consensus, your unique financial situation, and the clear market trends, the JD/MAcc + CPA route seems like the obvious strategic choice. You'll graduate with minimal debt, maximum career flexibility, and a genuinely differentiated skill set that clients value. That's a powerful foundation for building exactly the tax law career you envision!

This is exactly what happened to me last month! The progression from PATH to processing with those specific codes is a really good sign. I had the 570 and 768 combination too, and like others mentioned, mine resolved in about 18 days without any action needed from me. The fact that you don't see a 971 code means they're not requesting additional documentation, which is great news. Since you mentioned amending paperwork earlier, the 570 is likely just the system doing a final verification check on those changes. I found it helpful to check my transcript every Thursday since that's when most updates seem to post. You're definitely on the right track - just need to be patient while the system works through its process!

Great to see your progress! The PATH to processing transition is definitely a positive sign - it means you've cleared the initial verification hurdle. I had a similar experience with the 570/768 combo last year. The 570 held my refund for about 2 weeks before automatically resolving with a 571 code. Since you mentioned amending paperwork earlier, that's likely why the 570 appeared - they just need to do a final verification of those changes. The good news is no 971 code means they don't need anything from you. I'd recommend checking your transcript once a week (Thursdays seem to be the most common update day) rather than daily to save yourself the stress. You should see movement within the next 1-3 weeks based on what others have shared here. Hang in there!