IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just to add another option - you can avoid this mailing headache completely by e-filing your return! I used to mail my returns but switched to e-filing a few years ago and it's so much easier. No worrying about addresses or if it got lost in the mail. Most tax software is pretty affordable (or even free if you qualify) and you get confirmation when the IRS receives your return.

0 coins

Kelsey Chin

•

Thanks for the suggestion. I actually prepared my return on paper because I qualify for free filing but the software kept trying to make me pay for state filing. Is it too late to switch to e-filing now that I've already filled out the paper forms? Would I have to start over?

0 coins

Unfortunately, you would need to input all your information again into tax software if you want to e-file. If you've already completed your paper forms and are comfortable sending by mail, that's still a perfectly valid option. For next year though, check out the IRS Free File program directly through the IRS website. They have partnerships with tax software companies that provide truly free filing for both federal AND state returns if you meet the income requirements. The key is to start through the IRS website rather than going directly to the tax software sites.

0 coins

Nathan Dell

•

One important thing no one mentioned - if you're sending a Form 1040 WITH a payment, the address is different! For California residents sending Form 1040 with a check, you need to use: Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 802501 Cincinnati, OH 45280-2501 I learned this the hard way when my payment check and return got separated last year 😫

0 coins

Maya Jackson

•

Omg this tax system is so needlessly complicated! Why do they need different addresses for different situations all going to the same agency?? No wonder everyone hates tax season.

0 coins

I totally agree @Maya Jackson! The IRS has different processing centers for different types of returns - ones with payments go to Cincinnati because they have specialized equipment for processing checks, while regular returns without payments go to Ogden. It's supposedly more efficient for them but definitely confusing for us taxpayers. At least now we know there are tools like taxr.ai that can help figure out which address to use for your specific situation!

0 coins

Form 1065 Partnership Representative Requirements for Foreign LLC Owners - BBA Opt-Out Options

Hey everyone, I'm hoping someone can shed some light on our situation. My business partner and I are both EU citizens living in Europe, and we own a multi-member LLC together that's treated as a Partnership for US tax purposes. For our 2023 tax filing, things were pretty straightforward - we only had one income source from outside the US and minimal expenses. Nothing complicated. The issue we're running into is with Form 1065. It's asking for a Partnership Representative (PR) who needs to be a US resident with a TIN, US address, and US phone number. Obviously, neither of us meets those requirements. We noticed there's an option to opt out of the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) partnership audit procedures, which would eliminate the need for a PR. But we're not sure about the implications: 1. What happens if we opt out of BBA when we're foreigners not filing US personal taxes? (Our country has a tax treaty with the US, and we pay taxes in our home country) 2. Is there a safe way to complete Form 1065 without designating a PR? 3. If we opt out of these audit procedures, does that make us personally liable for any LLC tax issues? 4. Would opting out require us to file any additional forms at the individual level in the US? 5. Is it realistic for us to complete Form 1065 correctly considering our simple finances? (No real estate, investment earnings, crypto, etc.) We're trying to do everything properly - report all income/expenses and show the correct split between partners - but this PR requirement is making it difficult to file ourselves. Thanks for any guidance!

Lilly Curtis

•

Has anyone run into issues with banking or business operations by not having a Partnership Representative? We're trying to decide if we should just pay a US person to serve as our PR instead of opting out of BBA.

0 coins

Leo Simmons

•

I haven't experienced any banking or business issues related to the PR status. Banks and business partners generally don't care about your tax filing elections - they're more concerned with your entity structure, EIN, and operational credentials. The PR is strictly an IRS requirement for handling audits. If you qualify for the BBA opt-out, there's really no advantage to paying someone to be your PR. The only time it might make sense is if you don't qualify for the opt-out (like if you have more than 100 partners or ineligible partner types) or if you specifically want centralized audit procedures.

0 coins

Emma Olsen

•

I've been through this exact situation with my EU-based business partner last year! The BBA opt-out was definitely the right choice for us, and it's much simpler than it initially appears. Just to add to what others have mentioned - when we opted out, we didn't face any complications with our tax treaty benefits. Our accountant confirmed that the opt-out actually made things cleaner since it eliminated the need for ongoing PR correspondence with the IRS. One thing I'd recommend is double-checking that your partnership income is properly classified. Since you mentioned having income from outside the US, make sure you understand whether any of it constitutes "effectively connected income" (ECI). If it's not ECI, you likely won't need to file individual Form 1040-NR returns, which simplifies things considerably. Also, keep good records of your opt-out election. We created a simple file with copies of Schedule B and Schedule B-2 from our 1065 filing, along with notes about why we qualified for the election. It gives us peace of mind for future years. The whole process ended up being much more straightforward than we anticipated. With your simple financial situation, you should be able to handle this without too much difficulty once you understand the opt-out mechanics.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

Don't forget there's also a potential "materials and supplies" option for some of these purchases. Incidental materials and supplies (items that cost less than $200) can be deducted when purchased rather than when used. Non-incidental materials and supplies (items costing more than $200 but less than the $2,500 de minimis threshold) can be deducted when first used or consumed. This is separate from the de minimis safe harbor and might apply to some of the smaller components of your renovation project.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

This is a really helpful discussion! As someone new to rental property ownership, I'm learning so much about these tax rules. I have a follow-up question about the timing aspect - if I decide to capitalize the cabinet replacement as a single improvement project, do I depreciate it over 27.5 years like the rest of the rental property, or is there a different depreciation schedule for kitchen improvements specifically? Also, I'm curious about partial improvements - what if I only replace the upper cabinets this year and plan to do the lower cabinets next year? Would that change how the de minimis rule applies, since they'd be separate projects in different tax years? Or would the IRS still view this as one coordinated kitchen renovation that I'm just spreading out over time?

0 coins

Has anyone considered the implications of not opting out of the audit regime? My partnership decided to just stay in the centralized regime rather than going through the hassle of getting ITINs for our foreign partners. Our accountant said for small partnerships with straightforward returns and good documentation, the audit risk is minimal anyway.

0 coins

We made the same decision. The main difference is that if you're audited, adjustments are made at the partnership level rather than the partner level. So the partnership pays any additional tax directly rather than passing adjustments through to partners. For us, with very straightforward operations, we decided this was actually simpler than requiring our foreign partners to navigate the US tax ID system.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience - that's basically what our accountant said too. We have really straightforward operations and good documentation, so we decided the small risk of audit wasn't worth forcing our partners through the ITIN process. Our accountant also mentioned that staying in the centralized regime might actually be beneficial since we won't have to deal with multiple partners potentially being audited individually. It's been working fine for us for the past two years.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

•

Just wanted to add another perspective on this - we faced the exact same situation last year with our partnership that has two foreign individual partners. After weighing all the options discussed here, we ended up going the ITIN route, and it wasn't as bad as we initially feared. The key was getting started early and using a Certified Acceptance Agent (CAA) as mentioned by Ellie. Our CAA was able to verify the original documents without our partners having to mail their passports to the IRS, which was their biggest concern. The whole process took about 9 weeks from application to receiving the ITINs. What really helped was explaining to our foreign partners that the ITIN would be useful for other potential US tax situations in the future, not just this one partnership filing. Once they understood it was a one-time process that could benefit them long-term, they were more willing to go through with it. Now we can elect out of the centralized audit regime, which gives us more control and flexibility. For anyone still on the fence, I'd recommend starting the ITIN applications as soon as possible - the processing times can vary significantly depending on the time of year you apply.

0 coins

Chloe Zhang

•

Friendly reminder to also consider your NET vs GROSS pay. Your offer letter probably says $36k which is your gross (before deductions). When you budget, make sure you're using your net pay (after deductions). I once messed up and thought I could afford a more expensive apartment because I budgeted based on my gross pay. Big mistake lol.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Great question! As someone who's dealt with this exact situation, here's what you can expect: On $36,000 annually, you'll likely take home around $27,000-$29,000 depending on your state. Federal income tax will be minimal thanks to the standard deduction - you'll probably pay around 6-8% effective rate. Add Social Security (6.2%) and Medicare (1.45%), plus state taxes if applicable, and you're looking at roughly 75-80% of your gross pay. Monthly, expect around $2,250-$2,400 in your bank account. If you're in a no-income-tax state like Texas or Florida, you'll be on the higher end. States like California or New York will put you on the lower end. Pro tip: If your employer offers a 401k match, definitely contribute enough to get the full match - it's free money and reduces your taxable income. Same goes for health insurance premiums if offered through work, as they're typically pre-tax deductions. Good luck with the job offer! It's smart that you're thinking about net pay for budgeting purposes.

0 coins

Prev1...14801481148214831484...5645Next