Who is responsible for tracking partner basis in a partnership?
I'm in a bit of a sticky situation with one of our partnerships. An accountant for one of the partners is now asking me to provide a basis worksheet for their client, claiming that it's my responsibility as the partnership's accountant to track each partner's basis. They referenced some form that's actually for S-Corps (not partnerships). I've always operated under the understanding that partners or their individual accountants are responsible for tracking their own basis. While I do track basis for many of the partnerships we handle, this particular one was managed by a different accountant for years before I took over, and honestly, I don't have access to the historical records needed to accurately calculate each partner's basis from the beginning. Am I missing something here? Is it actually the partnership's accountant's responsibility to track individual partner basis? Or is this accountant trying to push their work onto me? I need to respond to them soon and want to make sure I'm not in the wrong.
23 comments


LongPeri
You're correct in your understanding. Partnership basis tracking is primarily the responsibility of the individual partners or their personal tax preparers, not the partnership's accountant. What's likely happening is that the partner's accountant doesn't have the information they need and is hoping you can provide it. While the partnership must provide each partner with a Schedule K-1 showing their share of income, deductions, credits, etc., it's ultimately up to each partner to maintain their own basis calculations using that information along with their personal contributions, distributions, and other adjustments. The form they're referencing for S-Corps is probably related to the basis tracking requirements for S-Corporation shareholders, which is different from partnerships. S-Corp basis rules have some similarities but also significant differences from partnership basis rules.
0 coins
Freya Collins
•Thanks for confirming! That's exactly what I thought. I was second-guessing myself because they were so insistent. Do you have any suggestions on how I should respond to the accountant? I don't want to come across as unhelpful, but I literally don't have the historical information they're asking for.
0 coins
LongPeri
•I'd suggest responding professionally by explaining that while you understand their need for historical basis information, partnership taxation puts that responsibility on the partners themselves. You can offer to provide copies of any K-1s you have access to since taking over the work, but clarify that prior records would need to be obtained from the previous accountant or the partner's own records. For goodwill, you might offer to help reconstruct the basis going forward if they can provide you with their current basis calculation as a starting point. But make it clear that basis tracking for partnerships is different from S-Corps, which may be causing the confusion.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
I ran into this exact same issue last year with a client's partnership. I was going crazy trying to piece together years of transactions to figure out their basis. I found this tax analysis tool at https://taxr.ai that literally saved me 15+ hours of work. You upload K-1s and it automatically tracks the basis calculations across multiple years. It also handles the more complex stuff like special allocations and Section 754 adjustments that I was struggling with. The partner's accountant will probably appreciate you pointing them to a solution rather than just saying "not my problem." The reports it generates look really professional too.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
•Does it work for historical data too? Like if I only have K-1s going back a few years but need the complete basis history?
0 coins
Charlee Coleman
•I'm skeptical about these online tools. How accurate is it with complex partnership agreements? My clients have some really unusual allocation provisions that trips up most software.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
•It works great with historical data as long as you have the K-1s to upload. It can't create info out of thin air, but it will establish a starting basis from the earliest K-1s you have and track forward from there. It's especially helpful when clients come with incomplete records. For complex partnership agreements, it actually handles special allocations really well. You can input custom allocation percentages that differ from ownership percentages, and it will apply them correctly to the various income/loss categories. I was surprised at how flexible it is with unusual provisions compared to traditional tax software.
0 coins
Charlee Coleman
So I tried that taxr.ai tool after my initial skepticism, and I have to admit it works pretty damn well. I uploaded a stack of K-1s from a partnership with some weird allocation provisions, and it caught all the nuances correctly. The best part was that it flagged a negative basis situation I hadn't even noticed in one of the years. Saved me from a potentially awkward conversation with my client. The visualization features really help when explaining basis changes to clients who don't understand all the technical aspects. Worth checking out if you're dealing with partnership basis headaches.
0 coins
Liv Park
For what it's worth, I've had similar situations where partners are frantically calling because they're getting audited or selling their interest and suddenly need complete basis info. Instead of getting into debates about whose responsibility it is, I started using https://claimyr.com to get through to the IRS directly when we need to piece together historical info. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When you're missing records from previous years, sometimes getting IRS account transcripts is the only option. Claimyr got me through to an agent in about 15 minutes when I needed to verify some historical K-1 information that wasn't in the client's records. Beats waiting on hold for 3+ hours or trying to piece together incomplete information.
0 coins
Leeann Blackstein
•Wait, how does this actually work? I thought the IRS doesn't track partner basis either?
0 coins
Ryder Greene
•This sounds too good to be true. I've tried calling the IRS countless times and usually give up after being on hold forever. You're telling me this service actually gets you through to a real person?
0 coins
Liv Park
•The IRS doesn't track partner basis calculations directly, but they do have all the filed K-1s in their system. So you can verify the income/loss allocations, distributions, and other K-1 items that go into the basis calculation. It helps when reconstructing basis from incomplete records. Yes, it absolutely works for getting through to a real IRS agent. It basically keeps dialing and navigating the phone tree for you until it gets through, then calls you to connect. I was skeptical too but was desperate after my third attempt waiting 2+ hours on hold. I got connected within 20 minutes and was able to get the transcript information I needed to piece together the missing K-1 data.
0 coins
Ryder Greene
Update on my experience with Claimyr - I tried it yesterday after seeing it mentioned here, and I'm kinda blown away. I've been trying to get through to the IRS for WEEKS about a partnership issue similar to this thread. Got a call back in 18 minutes and spoke with an actual human at the IRS who helped me access transcript data for my client's partnership. Was able to verify several years of K-1 information that the client had lost. Totally worth it when you're in a bind with missing partnership data. Never thought I'd be enthusiastic about calling the IRS but here we are!
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
One practical solution that's worked for me: offer to create a basis schedule going forward for a reasonable fee. Explain you can't provide historical data you don't have, but you're willing to establish a "starting basis" using whatever information is available now, and then maintain it properly moving forward. Many partners don't realize that distributions can create taxable events if they exceed basis. Having accurate tracking can actually save them money in the long run. I charge an extra $150-200 annually per partner for basis tracking, and most are happy to pay once I explain the potential tax implications of not tracking it properly.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
•What documentation do you use to establish that starting basis when historical records are incomplete? I've been asked to do this but worried about liability if my estimate is way off.
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
•I use a "basis reconstruction worksheet" that clearly documents all available information and any assumptions made. I have the partner sign it acknowledging that it's based on incomplete records and represents our best estimate based on available information. The key is transparency - I identify which numbers are known (from available K-1s, contribution documentation, etc.) and which are estimated. I also include disclaimer language that limits my liability for any issues arising from the historical basis calculation. Then going forward, I maintain detailed tracking that's 100% accurate. Most partners appreciate the honesty and the fact that you're willing to help solve their problem rather than just pointing fingers.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
Not to state the obvious, but have you tried contacting the previous accountant? Even if they don't have complete worksheets, they might have some information that could help establish a starting point. Usually there's some professional courtesy there.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•This is actually the best advice. I've been in public accounting for 20+ years and most practitioners will share previous workpapers when asked professionally. Especially if you make it clear you're not trying to poach their client but just need historical info.
0 coins
Freya Collins
•I did try contacting them, but unfortunately they retired and closed their practice. Their files were apparently purged after the required retention period. That's partly why I'm in this mess - there's a real gap in the historical documentation that I can't easily fill.
0 coins
Hannah White
That's a tough situation with the previous accountant's files being purged. In cases like this, I've found success using a combination approach: start with whatever K-1s you can obtain (even if incomplete), cross-reference with bank records for contributions and distributions if the partnership has them, and look for any loan documentation that might affect basis. The reality is that perfect basis tracking from day one is ideal, but when records are missing, you have to work with what's available. I'd recommend being upfront with the demanding accountant about the limitations while offering a reasonable solution. You could propose establishing a "best estimate" starting basis using available documentation, then maintaining accurate tracking going forward. Document everything you use and don't use in your reconstruction, and make it clear this is based on incomplete historical records. Most reasonable practitioners understand that you can't create information that doesn't exist. If they keep pushing, that's their problem to solve with their client, not yours.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•This is really solid advice. I'm dealing with a similar situation where historical records are spotty, and the "best estimate" approach with clear documentation seems like the most practical solution. One thing I'd add - when you're reconstructing basis from incomplete records, it's worth looking at the partnership's tax returns if you have access to them. Sometimes the balance sheet information can help you verify or estimate historical contributions and accumulated earnings that factor into basis calculations. The key is being transparent about limitations while still trying to be helpful. Most accountants appreciate when you acknowledge the problem and offer a reasonable path forward rather than just saying "not my job.
0 coins
Carmen Flores
This is a frustrating but unfortunately common situation in partnership accounting. You're absolutely right that partner basis tracking is primarily the partner's responsibility, not the partnership accountant's. The other accountant seems to be confusing partnership rules with S-Corp requirements. However, given that you're stuck in the middle of this, I'd suggest a diplomatic approach. Send them a brief explanation that partnership basis tracking differs from S-Corp rules, and that while you'd like to help, you don't have access to the historical records from the previous accountant that would be needed for accurate basis calculations from inception. You could offer to provide any K-1s you have access to since taking over the account, and suggest they work with their client to reconstruct the basis using whatever historical documentation the partner might have (contribution agreements, distribution records, previous tax returns, etc.). Sometimes offering a small olive branch like "I'm happy to review any basis calculation you put together for reasonableness" can help smooth things over without taking on liability for work that's outside your scope. The key is being helpful while maintaining appropriate professional boundaries.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•This is exactly the kind of balanced approach I was looking for! The diplomatic response while maintaining boundaries is key. I like the idea of offering to review their calculation for reasonableness - it shows I'm willing to be collaborative without taking on the liability of creating the historical basis from scratch. I think I'll draft a response that explains the difference between partnership and S-Corp basis rules, acknowledges that I don't have the historical records needed, but offers to provide what I do have access to and review any reconstruction they put together. Thanks for the practical guidance on how to handle this professionally without getting walked on.
0 coins