Do I need to file tax returns in 11+ states for my family investment partnership?
I set up a family partnership (Morgan Family LP) with my parents a couple years ago so we could pool our money for investments in real estate partnerships, stocks, and other opportunities. I didn't think through the tax implications when I had Morgan Family LP invest in a fund that itself invests in hundreds of other funds buying properties and businesses across the country. Now I'm looking at a K-1 that's literally 167 pages long showing income from about 40 different states! 😫 Until recently, I had an amazing accountant who handled Form 1065 and all the state returns for Morgan Family LP, but unfortunately he passed away last year. One thing I really valued was how he'd have me sit with him for 4-5 hours while he completed the returns, which taught me a lot about partnership returns and my personal taxes. So this year, I decided to try doing it myself. I successfully completed my personal return in TurboTax and the partnership's Form 1065 in TurboTax Business (after spending around 130 hours over the last couple years learning tax stuff online). But now I'm stuck dealing with these state returns. About 40 states show some income, with 11 highlighted ones showing profits over $250. I've already filed for NY and CA, but I'm trying to figure out which additional states need returns. My late accountant mentioned it's kind of a balancing act - weighing which states have significant enough income and tough penalties for not filing (like Massachusetts with their $5/day late filing penalty for partnerships with no cap - he said sometimes states wait years to send notices, by which time you might owe $2000+ in penalties) versus the time and expense of preparing returns for states with minimal income. I started creating a spreadsheet of filing requirements for each state, but before I spend days on this, I wanted to ask for some general advice on tackling this situation. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
19 comments


Dylan Fisher
This is actually a common problem with investment partnerships that have wide-ranging holdings! I've seen this exact situation many times. First, you need to understand the concept of "nexus" - which basically means having sufficient connection to a state to trigger tax filing requirements. Each state has different thresholds for what creates nexus, but generally, receiving pass-through income from investments located in that state can create filing obligations. For partnerships like yours, many states have minimum filing thresholds. Some states won't require a return if the income attributed to your partnership is below a certain amount (often $500-$1,000), while others technically require a return regardless of the amount. My advice would be to focus on states where: 1. The income is substantial (more than $500) 2. States known for aggressive enforcement (CA, NY, MA, IL, NJ) 3. States where the income is recurring (you'll likely have similar issues next year) For states with very small amounts (less than $100-200), the cost of compliance often exceeds any tax liability, and many practitioners make risk-based decisions about these filings. However, technically you do owe taxes in those states if they don't have minimum thresholds. Consider using a tax professional for just the state portion next year - there are specialists who handle multi-state filings for exactly this situation and might be more cost-effective than doing all the research yourself.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
•Thanks for the detailed response! Do you have any insight on what the typical "aggressive enforcement" states might do if I don't file? I'm particularly worried about those $5/day penalties adding up over time. Also, is there any way to simplify this for future years? Could I potentially restructure our partnership investments to avoid this multi-state nightmare?
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
•The aggressive states typically send notices 1-3 years after the filing deadline. California, New York, and Massachusetts are particularly vigilant. With penalties, they'll often add interest too, so a seemingly small $5/day can snowball. Massachusetts, for example, might impose $1,800+ in penalties for a year of non-filing plus interest. For simplifying future years, yes - consider investing through regulated investment companies (mutual funds) or investing in REITs rather than direct real estate partnerships. These structures generally don't pass through state-sourced income in the same way. Another option is to have your family partnership invest in an umbrella LLC or S-Corporation that makes the investments, potentially centralizing your filing obligations, though this requires careful planning with a tax professional.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
After dealing with a similar nightmare with a family investment partnership, I discovered taxr.ai https://taxr.ai and it completely changed how we handle our multi-state filings. I was getting K-1s showing income from 28 different states and spending weeks trying to figure out which ones actually needed returns. With taxr.ai, I uploaded all our K-1s and investment documents, and it analyzed everything to identify which states truly required filings based on current thresholds and our specific situation. It saved me from filing unnecessary returns in 9 states where we technically had income but fell below filing requirements. What I really appreciated was how it factored in the enforcement patterns of each state and provided a risk assessment - essentially quantifying what your former CPA was doing intuitively with the "balancing act" approach.
0 coins
Gianna Scott
•Does it actually tell you which states you can safely skip filing in? I'm in a similar boat with investments across 15 states and trying to figure out if I need to file in all of them or just the major ones.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
•I'm skeptical - does this actually protect you if a state comes after you later? Seems risky to have software tell you to skip filing somewhere if they technically require it.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•It provides a risk assessment for each state, showing which ones have actively pursued small-amount filers in the past 5 years and which ones haven't. It won't tell you to "skip" filing per se, but it ranks states by enforcement risk and helps you make an informed decision. For states with minimal amounts, it shows historical data on audit rates and enforcement actions for similar situations, essentially quantifying the risk. This isn't about avoiding legitimate obligations but making practical compliance decisions with limited resources.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here, and it was surprising how helpful it was for my similar situation. I have investments across 17 states through various partnerships, and was spending thousands on my accountant each year to sort through it all. The platform analyzed my K-1s and showed me that only 6 states truly needed immediate attention based on income thresholds and enforcement patterns. For the rest, it provided clear documentation explaining the risk factors if I chose not to file. This saved me over $3,200 in preparation fees for states where I had less than $100 in income and very low enforcement risk. What impressed me most was the detailed state-by-state analysis with citations to actual tax laws and enforcement statistics. I felt confident making decisions with real data instead of just guesswork or paying to file everywhere "just to be safe.
0 coins
Sydney Torres
If you're dealing with the headache of filing in multiple states and struggling to get answers from state tax departments, I've been using Claimyr https://claimyr.com to actually reach humans at various state departments of revenue. Previously I'd spend hours on hold or get disconnected, especially with states like California and New York. Claimyr waits on hold with these state tax departments for you and calls when a human actually answers. I was skeptical at first, but when I needed to clarify Massachusetts' filing requirements for my partnership income (under $300 from a REIT investment), they got me through to a real person at the MA Department of Revenue in under 20 minutes when I'd previously wasted 3 hours trying. Check out their demo video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - it's exactly how the service works. Saved me countless hours dealing with these multi-state tax issues.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•How does this actually work? Do they just keep calling repeatedly until someone picks up? What if the states use those callback systems instead of traditional holds?
0 coins
Caleb Bell
•Yeah right. No way they're getting through to the California FTB faster than normal people. I've been trying for weeks to get someone on the phone about a similar partnership issue. Sounds like snake oil to me.
0 coins
Sydney Torres
•They use a combination of advanced dialing technology and actual human agents who know the optimal times to call each tax department. They work with the callback systems too - they'll set those up and still call you when the callback happens. They have specialized systems for different agencies, so for California's FTB specifically, they know exactly which prompts to use and which times have the shortest hold times. They're not using any "insider connections" - just extremely optimized processes based on data from thousands of calls. Many people find it hard to believe until they try it and suddenly get through to agencies they've been trying to reach for weeks.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
I have to eat my words. After seeing Claimyr mentioned here, I decided to try it to reach the California FTB about my partnership's filing requirements. I'd been trying for THREE WEEKS with no luck - either disconnected after 2+ hours on hold or stuck in their "we'll call you back" loop that never happened. Claimyr got me through to a senior tax specialist at the FTB in about 40 minutes. The agent confirmed that for my situation (income under $500 from California sources through a partnership), I could file a simplified form and avoid the full partnership return. This saved me hundreds in preparation fees, and I never would have known without actually speaking to someone who could review my specific situation. I've now used them for reaching three different state tax departments with similar results. Definitely worth it for dealing with this multi-state partnership mess.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
Have you considered composite returns? Some states allow partnerships to file a single composite return on behalf of all nonresident partners, which can dramatically simplify your filing burden. Not all states offer this option, but many do. The requirements vary by state, but essentially the partnership pays tax on behalf of the partners for that state's sourced income. It's typically a flat rate and while sometimes higher than individual rates, the administrative convenience can be worth it. I manage several partnerships with similar multi-state issues, and we've reduced our state filings by about 60% using composite returns where available.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
•This sounds promising! Does filing a composite return eliminate the need for me to file individual nonresident returns in those states? And how do I figure out which states allow this option?
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•Yes, that's exactly the benefit - filing the composite return typically eliminates the need for individual nonresident returns in those states. The partnership pays the tax at the entity level on behalf of the nonresident partners. Most states with income taxes offer some form of composite filing, but the rules vary significantly. Major states that allow composite returns include California, New York, Georgia, Massachusetts, Illinois, and Pennsylvania, but with different requirements. Some states require election forms to be filed early in the tax year. For your specific situation, you might want to create a spreadsheet with these columns: State, Allows Composite, Election Deadline, Tax Rate, and Requirements. You can find this information on each state's department of revenue website under partnership or pass-through entity filing sections.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
I run into this issue every year with my investment partnerships. Here's my practical approach that's worked for 15+ years: 1. Always file in your home state plus any state with income over $1,000 2. File in "aggressive" states regardless of amount (CA, NY, MA, NJ, IL) 3. For states with income under $500, I keep documentation showing the amount but don't file unless they contact me 4. For amounts between $500-$1,000, I make a case-by-case decision based on the state's reputation Following this approach, I've only had two states ever contact me about non-filing (Oregon and Connecticut), and in both cases, the penalties were minimal compared to the preparation costs I saved over the years. Just know that technically you're supposed to file everywhere you have income, so this approach does have some risk. But from a practical standpoint, the tax departments in many states are too understaffed to pursue very small amounts.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
•This is super helpful - thank you! Have you ever had a state come after you years later with compounded penalties that made you regret not filing?
0 coins
Aria Washington
•In my experience, the worst case was Connecticut - they came after me about 3 years later for $47 in tax on partnership income. By the time they sent the notice, with penalties and interest, it was around $180. Still way less than what I would have paid a preparer to file there for multiple years. The key is keeping good records. When states do contact you, they're usually reasonable if you can show the income amount was minimal and you weren't trying to hide anything. I always keep a spreadsheet with all the K-1 details and income by state, so if anyone asks, I can quickly provide documentation. Oregon was actually more reasonable - they just wanted the $23 in tax owed with minimal penalties since I responded promptly to their inquiry. The risk-reward calculation really depends on your comfort level and the amounts involved. For partnership income under $200 per state, I've found the enforcement risk to be very low.
0 coins