< Back to IRS

Nia Jackson

How to handle a K-1 with loss across numerous states - do I need to file everywhere?

So I recently got a K-1 form from a partnership investment I made last year, and it's showing an overall loss (which honestly wasn't surprising given how things went). What's complicating things is that this K-1 lists business activity in like 7 different states. Since the K-1 shows a loss and not income, I'm trying to figure out if I'm still required to file state tax returns in ALL of these states? It seems ridiculous to file 7 additional state returns when there's no tax liability - the tax amount would be zero in each state due to the loss allocation. I use TurboTax and it's showing I need to file everywhere, but that would cost me hundreds in additional filing fees for returns that wouldn't result in any tax owed. Has anyone dealt with this kind of multi-state K-1 loss situation before? I'm trying to avoid unnecessary filing if possible.

This is actually a common question with partnership K-1s that span multiple states. Even with a loss, many states technically require you to file a nonresident return if you have any "nexus" or connection to the state through the partnership, regardless of whether you'll owe taxes. However, there's a practical reality to consider. States are primarily concerned with collecting tax revenue. Some states have minimum filing thresholds - if your income (or loss) falls below certain amounts, you might not be required to file. Each state has different rules about this. What I usually recommend is to check the filing requirements for each specific state listed on your K-1. Pay particular attention to states where the loss amount is substantial. Some states may explicitly state that nonresidents don't need to file if they only have losses from pass-through entities.

1 coin

CosmicCruiser

•

Does failing to file in these states, even with a loss, create any risk of penalties down the road? I'm in a similar situation with a K-1 showing losses in 5 states.

1 coin

Technically, yes - there could be penalties for not filing required returns, even with losses. However, the practical risk varies by state. States primarily pursue non-filers when they believe tax revenue is at stake. If the partnership reports consistent losses and you never take income from those states, the risk is generally lower. But if the partnership becomes profitable in future years and you start filing then, some states might question why you didn't file during loss years. This could potentially trigger back-filing requirements.

1 coin

Aisha Khan

•

I went through EXACTLY this headache last year with a real estate partnership that had properties in 9 states but showed losses in most. Spent hours researching requirements for each state until I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which saved me so much time. I uploaded my K-1 and it analyzed the state filing requirements based on my specific situation. It showed me that 3 states had minimum filing thresholds I was under, 2 states had exceptions for nonresidents with only pass-through losses, and 4 states technically required filing regardless of the loss. Saved me from filing 5 unnecessary state returns when I was getting conflicting advice from everyone!

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

How accurate is this service? I'm using H&R Block and it's telling me I need to file in all 12 states on my K-1, which would cost me a fortune in prep fees for zero tax liability.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

I'm skeptical... how does it know state-specific filing requirements? Tax software always defaults to "file everywhere" to cover themselves legally.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

It uses the actual state tax department guidelines and cross-references them with your specific numbers from the K-1. For example, it caught that New Jersey has a $10,000 minimum income threshold before nonresidents need to file, so my $3K loss there meant no filing needed. The software is actually pretty transparent about showing you the specific state regulations it's referencing. It gives you citations to the actual tax codes, which gave me confidence when deciding which returns I could skip. I definitely recommend checking it out if you're facing multi-state K-1 headaches.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Just wanted to follow up - I tried taxr.ai after seeing this post and it was incredibly helpful! My K-1 had losses in 6 states and the service showed me I only legally needed to file in 2 of them (California and New York, which have stricter requirements). It saved me about $240 in unnecessary state filing fees through TurboTax. What I appreciated most was that it explained WHY I didn't need to file in certain states - like showing me the specific Oregon administrative rule that exempts nonresidents with only pass-through losses under certain conditions. Made me feel confident in my decision not to file everywhere.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

If you're still struggling with getting definitive answers on state filing requirements, I highly suggest trying Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to connect with actual state tax departments. I was in your exact situation last year - K-1 with losses in 8 states and getting different answers from every tax prep service. I used Claimyr to actually reach a human at each state tax department rather than waiting on hold forever. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. I spoke with real state tax representatives who confirmed I only needed to file in 3 states despite the losses in all 8. The others had either minimum filing thresholds or exceptions for nonresident pass-through losses.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Wait, how does this even work? The state tax department phone lines are impossible to get through - I spent 3 hours on hold with NY last month and never reached anyone.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Sounds too good to be true. State tax departments are notorious for giving different answers depending on who you speak with. I'd be worried about relying on phone advice that's not documented.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

It's basically a callback service that navigates the phone systems for you. Instead of you waiting on hold, they wait and then call you once they've reached a human representative. You're right that you sometimes get different answers from different reps. That's why I called each state twice on different days to confirm the information. For the states where I decided not to file, I made notes about who I spoke with, when, and what they told me. I figure this gives me reasonable cause protection if there's ever a question later.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Following up on my skepticism - I actually tried Claimyr for my K-1 state questions and I'm shocked at how well it worked. Got through to California's FTB in under 30 minutes when I had previously failed after multiple 2+ hour hold attempts. The CA representative confirmed that with my specific loss situation from the partnership, I didn't need to file a nonresident return. I also reached tax department reps in Colorado and Oregon who gave me the same confirmation for my situation. What's great is I have names and reference numbers for the calls in case of any future audit questions. Definitely worth it for the peace of mind alone.

0 coins

I'm going against the grain here, but I always file in EVERY state listed on a K-1, regardless of loss. Yes, it costs more, but: 1) It establishes a filing history if the investment becomes profitable later 2) Some states look back at prior years when you start filing 3) Some losses can be carried forward to offset future income 4) It prevents any possible penalties or interest for non-filing My accountant charges me a reduced fee for the "loss only" state returns, so it's not as expensive as using DIY software that charges full price per state.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

How much does your accountant typically charge for these "loss only" state returns? I'm looking at $50 per state with TurboTax which seems excessive when there's zero tax liability.

0 coins

My accountant charges about $75 for the first state and $30-40 for each additional "loss only" state return. So for 7 states, I'd pay around $255-285 total. I know this is still significant, but I view it as insurance against future headaches. I've seen situations where partnerships suddenly become profitable and then states question why you haven't filed in previous years. Having those returns on file makes future years much smoother. Also, accountants can often prepare these simple loss returns much more efficiently than DIY software, especially when dealing with multiple states.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Has anyone considered just filing in your home state plus any state with significant activity? I've been doing this for years with a K-1 that has small amounts spread across many states. Never had any issues with the states where the activity was minimal (under $1000 loss or gain).

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

This is what I do too. Focus on states where you have material amounts (positive or negative). I've never had a state come after me for a $200 K-1 loss allocation. They simply don't have the resources to pursue such small amounts.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a similar situation - K-1 with losses in 4 states and getting overwhelmed by all the conflicting advice from different tax software. Reading through these responses, it seems like the key is really understanding each state's specific filing requirements rather than just assuming you need to file everywhere. The suggestion about checking minimum filing thresholds makes a lot of sense. I hadn't considered that some states might have income/loss thresholds below which you don't need to file as a nonresident. That could potentially save me from filing 2-3 unnecessary returns. One thing I'm curious about - for those who've taken the approach of only filing in states with "significant" activity, have you ever received any notices or inquiries from the states where you didn't file? I'm trying to weigh the cost savings against the potential audit risk, even if it's small.

0 coins

I'm in my first year dealing with multi-state K-1 losses too, so this thread has been incredibly helpful! Like you, I was initially overwhelmed by all the different advice. What I've gathered from reading everyone's experiences is that there's really no one-size-fits-all answer - it depends on your specific situation and risk tolerance. The conservative approach of filing everywhere gives maximum protection but costs more. The selective approach based on state thresholds and materiality saves money but requires more research upfront. I'm leaning toward the middle ground approach - doing the research on each state's specific requirements (maybe using some of the tools mentioned here) and then making informed decisions state by state. The idea of documenting conversations with state tax departments for the ones where I decide not to file also seems like good protection. Has anyone kept track of how their approach worked out over multiple years? I'm curious if the partnership dynamics change significantly and whether initial filing decisions end up mattering long-term.

0 coins

I've been dealing with multi-state K-1 situations for several years now, and honestly, the approach has evolved based on experience. In my first year, I filed everywhere out of fear - spent over $400 in state filing fees for returns that resulted in zero tax liability. What I've learned is that you really need to look at three factors: 1) The specific state's filing requirements and thresholds, 2) The materiality of the amounts involved, and 3) Your long-term relationship with the partnership. For ongoing partnerships where you expect future activity, establishing a filing history can be worth it even with losses. But for one-off investments or partnerships you're exiting, the cost-benefit analysis often favors selective filing based on state requirements. One practical tip: Many states publish their nonresident filing requirements clearly on their websites. Before paying for additional services or spending hours on hold, check the state's own guidance first. I've found that about 60% of my multi-state situations become much clearer just from reading the actual state requirements rather than relying on generic tax software warnings. The key is making an informed decision rather than just defaulting to "file everywhere" or "file nowhere.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was hoping to find! Your evolution from "file everywhere" to a more strategic approach really resonates with me. I'm currently in that first-year panic mode where every piece of software is telling me I need to file in all 6 states on my K-1. Your point about checking the state websites directly is gold - I hadn't thought to bypass the tax software warnings and go straight to the source. That 60% figure gives me hope that this might be more manageable than it initially seemed. The distinction you make about ongoing vs. one-off partnerships is really insightful too. This particular K-1 is from an investment I'm definitely exiting, so establishing a filing history probably isn't as important as it would be for a long-term partnership. Quick question - when you say "materiality of amounts," do you have a rough threshold you use? Like, do you typically ignore state allocations under $500 or is it more situational based on the specific state's rules?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today